Copyright Law
By Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala Brain League IP Services
© 2009 Brain League IP Services Pvt. Ltd
Philosophy of Copyright Law
To promote creativity by granting exclusive rights for a limited period of time.
Quid Pro Quo Gives a creative work and takes exclusive rights
Generic Life Cycle
Author Creative Work Copyright (Exclusive Rights) Term Public domain
Nature of Copyright
Idea/Expression Original Originate from author Modicum of Creativity
Registration
R.G. Anand vs. Delux Films and Ors.
Play - Hum Hindustani Movie - New Delhi Hum Hindustani very popular - 1953, 54, 55 and 56 Director came to meet Anand - Anand read out the play Told that he would be informed Subject- Provincialism
R.G. Anand vs. Delux Films and Ors.
Play
Two families - Punjabi and Madrasi family - neighbours Closely associated - Amni and Chander punjabi and madrasi families fall in love - Parents come to know - families relation strained - Girl and Boy decide to commit suicide - They write a letter - Parents on seeing letter realize the mistake - Marry them - Everyone happy.
R.G. Anand vs. Delux Films and Ors.
Movie
Anand young graduate from punjab comes to delhi - Fights with the girl 'Janaki'- Tries to find a place for rent but people refuse to give to any one except south indians - Disguises as a south indian and gets a place to stay - Meets the girl Janaki again – falls in love - Boy's parents come to Delhi - Girl's parents get to know the identity of Anand - Relations strained - Janaki decides to commit suicide leaving a letter - - Parents realize and get youngsters married.
Differences - Provincialism - Marriage - Rent - Casteism - Held no copyright violation
R.G. Anand vs. Delux Films and Ors.
Ideas not protected - Only Expression protected. It is infringement only if the expression of thought is copied. To prove copying it need not be an exact copy, It is enough if the substantial portion has been copied - Substantial similarity in incidents, scenes and treatment. Two works showing the same emotion would not be copies unless the expression has been copied. Colourable imitation amounts to violation.
R.G. Anand vs. Delux Films and Ors.
Test - affect produced on the mind of a person - If the reader, spectator, person feels that a subsequent work is a copy of the original.
There can be no copyright in an idea, subject matter, themes, plots or historical or legendary facts and violation of the copyright in such cases is confined to the form, manner and arrangement and expression of the idea by the author of the copyrighted work.
Copyrightable Subject Matter
Literary Dramatic Artistic Musical Cinematograph Films Sound Recordings
V. Govindan vs. E. M. Gopalakrishna Kone and another
Compilation of a English - English - Tamil Dictionary The Appellants copied the dictionary slavishly Errors, arrangement and words. For a different purpose but retained words not necessary - School Dictionary Dictionary is protectable under copyright - creative Held - liable
N. T. Raghunathan v. All India Reporter Ltd
AIR came up with head notes to case, which included important excerpts from the case.
Raghunathan copied those head notes.
Held that head notes are protectable under copyright law - Copying them is violation of copyright
Literary work
Print or Writing Books
Poems Computer programs Tables Compilations
Dramatic Work
Drama Piece for recitation Choreographic work Entertainment in a dumb show Scenic arrangements or acting form - fixed in writing or otherwise
Musical Work
Music
Graphical notation Does not include - words or action - sung, spoken or performed with music
Artistic Work
Painting Sculpture Drawing Engraving Diagram Map Chart Plan Photograph Architecture
Cinematographic work
Visual recording Any medium Produced through a process Moving image Including Sound recording
Sound Recording
Recording Any medium Produce sounds
Term
Literary, Dramatic, Artistic or Musical works Life plus sixty years Sixty years from publication Government - Sixty years Cinematographic work - 60 years
Ownership
First Owner – Author Sound recording and Cinematograph film – Producer Employment – Employer Contract of service Commissioned work Valuable consideration
Exclusive rights
Bundle of rights
Reproduction Issue copies Distribute Public performance or communication Translation Adaptation Sell or Hire
Moral Rights
Publication Paternity Integrity Section 57
Smt. Mannu Bhandari vs. Kala Vikas Pictures Pvt. Ltd. and another
Director. Kala Vikas has produced motion picture Samay Ki Dhara’ under assignment of filming rights of her novel ‘Aap Ka Bunty’. Author alleges mutilation and distortion of the novel Movie different from Novel Consequences of divorce - impact on children Mother and Father divorce and remarry leaving the child One character who was adivisional manager in the novel has been shown as a builder who gets contracts by supplying woman. The novel shows that the child becomes an orphan but the movie kills him. Held - No violation of moral rights.
Publication
First Publication in India Published outside India Author citizen of India Not Published Citizen or Domiciled in India - Creation
Publication
Issue copies Communication to public
Performer's rights
Actor, Musician, Juggler, Snake charmer, Acrobat, Lecturer, etc Term - 50 years Rights Make sound recording or visual recording Reproduce sound or visual recording of performance Communicate to public Broadcast or otherwise
Fortune v. Devanand
Movie - Darling Darling Contract that copyrights in performance belong to Devanand until the agreed 7 Lakhs is paid completely Fortune does not pay - Court issues injunction in seven territories
Transfer of Copyright
Assignment or License Valid only if it is in writing and signed by assignor or agent Doctrine of first sale Reversion of License - 1 year
Compulsory License
Copyright Board
Conditions Published or Performed in public Author refuse to republish or perform Not reasonable terms Withheld from public
Procedure
Complaint Enquiry Order publication or performance Reasonable compensation
Infringement
Section 51 Any person Without license Owner Registrar Does anything that is exclusive right of copyright owner
Infringement
Existence of copyright Owner of copyright Copying Access Substantial similarity Look and feel test Abstraction-filtration and comparison test
Bradford v. Sahara
Romance novelist Barbara Taylor Bradford - A Woman of Substance Sahara TV - 260 PART Television series inIndia Karishma - Miracles of Destiny - 13 million dollars USD Servant to head of an international organization Street sweeper to head of an international corporation Woman looking back on her life narrates Idea not expression - Held not liable
Educational Book Depot. v. Rabindra Nath Tagore
Dr. Rabindranath Tagore - Author of 'Gitanjali', The 'Gardener', and the 'Crescent Moon' - Published by Macmillan EBT - Intermediate poems for detailed study - 1poem out of first book - 2 out of second book and - 1 out of the third book Held infringed and granted damages of Rupees 400
Cunniah v. Balraj
Subramanyaswamy - Hindu Deity Balasubramanya - Younger version of the deity Appellant made a picture a - Balamurugan Respondent made a similar picture - Mayura priya
Cunniah v. Balraj
Balamurugan Mayura Priya Different colour schemes Large picture and small picture Peacock faces left and right in the other Background - Fort and Temple Court Held colourable imitation of the picture Liable for copyright infringement
Exception to copyright infringement
Private use Teaching and Education Research Criticism or Review News reporting Judicial proceeding Legislative proceedings Archival for library
Civil Remedies
Injunction Interlocutory Permanent Damages Costs
Criminal Remedies
Mens Rea Imprisonment 6 months to 2 years Fine 50,000 - 2 Lakhs
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Nagoti Venkatramanan
Video library - VIDEO CITY 90 CASSETTES Seized Liable for infringement Have to identify the owner to make some one liable Fine - Rs. 10, 000