Cooper Presentation

  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Cooper Presentation as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,192
  • Pages: 42
THE CRISIS of PHYSICIANS SUPPLY and the MYTHS of HEALTH CARE REFORM Richard A. Cooper, M.D. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics University of Pennsylvania

The Crisis of Physician Supply

Physician Supply and Demand 1980-2025

Physicians per 100,000 of population .

400 Trend Model

350

300

250

200

Shortage = 200,000 physicians

Demand

Supply

AMA Masterfile Model

Had residency programs continued to expand after 1996 at ~500/year, the US would not now be facing shortages.

Physicians per 100,000 of population .

400

Continued increase in PGY-1 positions after 1996 at 500 per year

350

300

250

200

Demand

Supply

But even increasing PGY-1 residency positions by 10,000 over 10 years will not close the gap…

Physicians per 100,000 of population .

400

350

300

250

200

Demand

Supply

+1,000 per yr x10 + 500 per yr 2010-25 No change

…and the gap will continue for decades. None of us has ever experienced shortages such as these.

Physicians per 100,000 of population .

400

350

300

250

200

+1,000/yr 2010-2030

+500/yr 2010-2050

Demand

Supply

The Myths of Health Care Reform #1 Unexplained geographic variation in health care is due to the overuse of supply-sensitive specialty services. #2 If spending everywhere could be the same as in the lowest-spending regions, the US could save 30%. #3 States with more specialists have lower quality care. #4 Areas with fewer specialists and more primary care physicians have better health care at lower costs. #5 The US spends more than other developed countries but it has worse outcomes. Therefore, the US doesn’t need more physicians; it

Realities Poverty is the major factor affecting geographic variation in health care. Shortages of specialists is the major factor that will adversely affect health care quality.

A Brief Lesson about Poverty in America --- Poverty is geographic --Regional Poverty Urban Poverty Ghettos

Regional Poverty

20% Lowest 20% Highest Matthew Cooper, 2009

Urban Poverty Ghettos

20% Lowest 20% Highest Matthew Cooper, 2009

Chicago Income = 114% of US Average

Poverty, 2000 0 - 20% 20 - 40% 40 - 60% 60 - 80% 80 - 100%

The Bruton Center The University of Texas at Dallas

Philadelphia Income = 118% of US Average

The Bruton Center The University of Texas at Dallas

Dallas –Ft Worth Income = 107% of US Average

The Bruton Center The University of Texas at Dallas

New York – Newark Income – 137% of US Average

The Bruton Center The University of Texas at Dallas

Poverty and Health Care Utilization Hospital Days and Per Capita Income

Hospital Admissions Ratio Poor vs. Wealthy Regions 8

1 ,0 0 0

6 Days

750

per

6

Days per 1,000

4

1,000

4

500

2

250

0

Per Capita Income Asthma

Milwaukee ZIP Codes

COPD

CHF

2 Diabetes

Myth #1

“Unexplained geographic variation in health care is due to the overuse of supply-sensitive specialty services.” Milwaukee HRR Wisconsin

Dartmouth Atlas, 2003 (from Orszag, 2007)

Milwaukee Income = 108% of US Average

The Bruton Center The University of Texas at Dallas

Wisconsin Hospital Referral Regions (HRRs) 600

”Unexplained variation”

500 Milwaukee Hospital Days per 400 1,000

30% excess

300

200

100

Wisconsin HRRs

Wisconsin Hospital Referral Regions (HRRs) 600

500 Hospital Days per 400 1,000

Variation explained by poverty Poverty Corridor Milwaukee

Milwaukee minus “Poverty Corridor” 

300

200

100

Wisconsin HRRs

Myth #1 (continued)

“Unexplained geographic variation in health care is due to the overuse of supply-sensitive specialty services.”

Los Angeles

Dartmouth Atlas, 2003 (from Orszag, 2007)

Los Angeles Average Income = 108% of US Average

The Bruton Center The University of Texas at Dallas

Los Angeles vs. Minnesota ”Unexplained Variation”

2,500 Medicare Hospital Days per 1,000

LA County

2,000

1,500 From Rosenthal, et al, UCLA

Minnesota

Los Angeles vs. Minnesota Variation Explained by Poverty

2,500 Medicare Hospital Days per 1,000

2,000

1,500 From Rosenthal, et al, UCLA

LA Poverty Core

LA County LA minus Poverty Core Minnesota

Myth #2

“If spending everywhere could be the same as in the lowest-spending quintile, the US could save 30%.”

Dartmouth Atlas, 2003 (from Orszag, 2007)

Myth #2 (continued)

“If spending everywhere could be the same as in the lowest-spending quintile, the US could save 30%.” Lowest Spending

Highest Spending

Dartmouth Atlas, 2003 (from Orszag, 2007)

Medicare Spending and

Low Spending-Low Poverty

High Spending-High Poverty

Myth #3 “States with more specialists have lower quality health care.” (Baicker and Chandra, 2004) QUALITY Best

Worst Least

SPECIALISTS per 10,000

Baicker and Chandra, Health Affairs, 2004

Most

Myth #3 It’s actually states with more SPECIALIST RESIDUALS that have and lower quality health care. QUALITY Best

Worst Least

SPECIALIST RESIDUALS

Most

Specialists and Health Care Quality Reality

22 21 20 Good

19

225

More Specialist “Residuals”  Poorer Quality

Poor

Physicians/100K (Actual)

Specialist "Residuals"

23

Myth

More Real Specialists  Better Quality

215 205 195 Good

185

Poor

Myth #4

“Areas with fewer specialists and more primary care physicians (i.e., family physicians) have better health care at lower costs.”

Family Practice Quartiles

High-FP

Low-FP

Low-FP

High-FP

Myth #5 “The US spends more than other developed countries, but it has worse outcomes.” 150 Mortality

Population

Spain

74

43 M

Italy

74

58 M

Canada

77

32 M

Norway

80

5M

Netherlands

82

16 M

Sweden

82

9M

Greece

84

11 M

Austria

84

8M

Germany

90

82 M

Finland

93

5M

New Zealand

96

4M

Denmark

101

5M

UK

103

60 M

Ireland

103

4M

Portugal

104

10 M

France

125

US

100 75

Preventable Mortality

50 25

OECD Countries

Deaths per 100,000 Commonwealth 2007

Australia

Mortality 65 60 M Population 71 20M

Confederacy vs. The Rest 150 125 100 75

Preventable Mortality

50 25

OECD Countries

Deaths per 100,000 Commonwealth 2007

Six Nations of White America 150 125 100 75

Preventable Mortality

50 25

OECD Countries

Deaths per 100,000 Commonwealth 2007

Six Nations of Black America 250 200 150 100 Preventable Mortality

50

OECD Countries

Deaths per 100,000 Commonwealth 2007

HEALTH CARE REFORM IS TAKING OFF

Dorothy: Come back! Come back! Don't leave without me! Come back! Wizard of Oz: I can't come back! I don't know how it works! Good-bye folks!

Payments Related to “Efficiency” An incentive payment of 5% for providers in the 20% of counties with the lowest Medicare expenditures. Payment reduced by 5% if aggregated physician resource use is above the 90th percentile nationally.

Low-poverty areas will be the winners

Payments Related to Hospital Readmissions Penalties for hospitals with more than benchmark levels of “preventable” readmissions

8 6 R atio of P oores t 4 to W ealth ies t Z on es 2 0

Hospitals that care for the poor will be the losers.

Physician Workforce Initiatives Redistribute unused residency positions. Provide financial incentives for medical graduates to choose primary care. Profound and continuing physician shortages. The sad tale of health care reform.

Conclusions The nation cannot have efficient health care if it does not address the added health care needs of the poorest members of our society. The nation will not have effective health care if it does not assure the training of sufficient numbers of physicians to provide the needed care.

Visit http://buzcooper.com

PHYSICIANS AND HEALTH CARE REFORM Commentaries and Controversies

Thank you

Related Documents

Cooper Presentation
June 2020 5
Cooper General.pdf
May 2020 5
Mini Cooper
November 2019 16
Cooper Plate.docx
October 2019 30
Cooper Letter
August 2019 27
Netos Cooper
May 2020 3