Citizen Vs Natural Born Citizen - 20091116 Issue Of Wash Times National Weekly - Pg 5

5 //

ADVERTISEMENT

“Citizen” vs “Natural Born Citizen” Hawaii

*

* “Citizen” of the U.S. if he was physically born in Hawaii, not born elsewhere and falsely registered as born there after the fact.

FATHER – A “British Subject” born in Kenya while under the jurisdiction of British Empire. The father never attempted to become a naturalized citizen of the U.S. Instead he returned to Kenya and became a Kenyan citizen when Kenya became an independent country.

CHILD – Born a dual “Citizen”. Born a British Subject through his father and which fact was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948. *He is also a citizen of the U.S. if he was physically born in Hawaii, not born elsewhere and falsely registered as born there after the fact. His being a British Subject does not expire. Once a Brit, always a Brit per British nationality law. The child does not meet the definition of a constitutional Article II “natural born citizen” because only one parent was a U.S. citizen when he was born. Our founders intended to exclude dual-citizens from eligibility for the Presidency and Commander-in-Chief of our military as a “strong check” against foreign influences on the person in this office. CONCLUSION: While Obama may be a U.S. “citizen”, Obama is NOT a constitutional standards Article II “natural born citizen” and is NOT eligible to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of our military.

If you would like to help with this lawsuit, please contact Mario Apuzzo, Esq., 185 Gatzmer Avenue, Jamesburg NJ 08831 Email: [email protected] • TEL: 732-521-1900 • FAX: 732-521-3906 • BLOG: http://puzo1.blogspot.com • http://www.protectourliberty.org

Paid for by: American people donating funds at ProtectOurLiberty.org in support of the Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al lawsuit. Graphic concept credit to: ‘Erica’ at http://jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com . Used with permission.

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2009 // THE WASHINGTON TIMES

MOTHER – “Natural born” U.S. citizen because both of her parents were citizens at the time of her birth in the U.S. How her parents acquired their citizenship is irrelevant, as long as they were citizens when she was born. The term “natural born citizen” was defined by Vattel in his legal treatise, “The Law of Nations”, and adopted by our Founders when they wrote the Constitution, specifically and only in the Article II eligibility clause for the President and for Constitutional successors to the office.