Butterflies, Fractals & Psychiatry

My Random Response to:

Butterflies, Fractals & Psychiatry Written by: Steven Reid

I do not consider myself particularly smart nor ordinarily educated. However; I am by nature “my own creation”. This response is a lived extension of experience rather than a supported experience learned by another’s textural synthesis of interpretation. I am where this is because this is who I am fractually; - split by experience/broken by neuro-dynamics, holoquantically aligned although realistically mindfully neurorestructured by the outcome of past previous situations and events; recovered by evolution & transformed; much like the butterfly borne within a new supreme working within a new interface. In all chaos there is a cosmos, in all disorder a secret order' (Jung. 1954) ... I guess my interpretation of this is well ... Cosmos Is and Chaos is broken from the first order Cosmos is as it is and Chaos; well that is a chosen inner "state" which is trans-projected as behaviour. I remember reading some of Jung and I thought - na ... it just doesn't make sense to me and left it be. I recall sometime many years ago when going to some snooty drinks and do; people were discussing this type of thing. I remember saying to them; why do you try and understand the person who wrote his own life instead of lead your own? these people at these "functions" used to confuse themselves and I used to think (to myself) I wonder how many wrinkles they will have down the track! I get so bored because I observe many words and most of which are “borrowed” or referenced from another source which when married with a few others sort of don’t make sense at all! I reckon this would make me confused. But, guessing moreso than not; if at all – something to think about and think about and … think about ... It talks about fractual as broken – then butterfly linked with tornado; turn this about using differing polar perspectives then; torn is a do – butterfly is broken wings. Enough positive energy will create. Just as the momentum of negative energy will destroy.

“In mathematics, chaos theory describes the behavior of certain dynamical systems1 that is, systems whose states evolve with time – that may exhibit dynamics that are highly sensitive to initial conditions2(popularly referred to as the butterfly effect). As a result of this sensitivity, which manifests itself as an exponential growth of perturbations in the initial conditions, the behavior of chaotic systems appears to be random. This happens even though these systems are deterministic, meaning that their future dynamics are fully defined by their initial conditions, with no random elements involved. This behavior is known as deterministic chaos, or simply chaos.” All that above is very interesting and very adaptive to certain observed states. However; what is the first state of observance? Is it what we see – or is it what we see

ourselves when we are evolved enough to understand perspective from a platform that is personally observed by the “self” being the self? A dynamic system. This subjectifies the system as dynamic; however from which stem does the dynamic originate from? Is it organic? Yes it is I think; atomic activity is infact in all of all. Organic activity depends upon social and environment conditions to evolve the atomic energy and manifest as form.

1

2

Understanding “highly sensitive to initial conditions”. Demonstrating this use recognizing the child state within humanity; fast forward and jump to teenage years – add some extra hormones; now where is the “highly sensitive to initial conditions”? … who remembers what the initial conditions were? This in itself is completely random and could perturb many a mind without knowingness! Sharon A Stocker

Referenced Material for Italicized Text http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory