Bratz Mandamus Denial
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Bratz Mandamus Denial as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 183
- Pages: 2
Case: 08-73438
Document: 10
08/12/2008
Page: 1
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MGA ENTERTAINMENT HK, LTD. ISAAC LARIAN.
AUG 12 2008 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
No. 08-73438 D.C. No. 2:04-cv-09049-SGLRNB Central District of California, Los Angeles
MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; et al., Petitioners,
ORDER
v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, MATTEL, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Real Party in Interest.
Before: CANBY, LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. Petitioners’ motion to file portions of the emergency motion and the petition for writ of mandamus under seal is granted. The motion to exceed the page limitation on the petition is granted. The emergency motion for an order suspending trial is denied. LN/MOATT
Case: 08-73438
Document: 10
08/12/2008
Page: 2
Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied.
LN/MOATT
2
08-73438
Document: 10
08/12/2008
Page: 1
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MGA ENTERTAINMENT HK, LTD. ISAAC LARIAN.
AUG 12 2008 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
No. 08-73438 D.C. No. 2:04-cv-09049-SGLRNB Central District of California, Los Angeles
MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; et al., Petitioners,
ORDER
v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, MATTEL, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Real Party in Interest.
Before: CANBY, LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. Petitioners’ motion to file portions of the emergency motion and the petition for writ of mandamus under seal is granted. The motion to exceed the page limitation on the petition is granted. The emergency motion for an order suspending trial is denied. LN/MOATT
Case: 08-73438
Document: 10
08/12/2008
Page: 2
Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied.
LN/MOATT
2
08-73438
Related Documents
Bratz Mandamus Denial
October 2019 7
Michigan Mandamus Denial
May 2020 2
Final Draft Of Response To Mandamus Denial-submit
November 2019 5
Board Denial
May 2020 3
Judge Denial
May 2020 12