Bionetek Technology Comparative Analysis Chart

  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Bionetek Technology Comparative Analysis Chart as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 322
  • Pages: 1
Technology Comparison Analysis

Test Conventional  Angiogram

Occlusive CAD  Diagnostic  Accuracy

Equipment  Cost

Risk

Time

98%

Highest

High

8 hrs

CARDx ECD   (12‐lead CCG)

90~94%

Medium Low

None

10 min

64-Slice CCTA

Sensitivity 91~99% Specificity 64~91%

High

Moderate

60 min

Stress  Thallium  SPECT

S i i i   8 %  Sensitivity 80~90% Specificity 70~75%

High

Stress Echo‐ cardiogram

80% (27% false  positive if  hypertensive)

Medium

Moderate

Echo‐ cardiogram

75%

Medium Low

None

Stress ECG

50~70%

Low

Moderate

ECG

40~50%

Lowest

None

Moderate

4 hrs

Advantages ˆ   Clinical standard for CAD

Limitations ˆ   Invasive, expensive, high risk, and  time consuming

ˆ   The only accurate, fast, and non‐ invasive technology for early detection of  ˆ   Only available for 3D localization of  the approximate ischemic area(s) of  CAD, ischemia, microvascular  involved coronary arteries dysfunction, &  differentiating heart  dsyfunctions ˆ   High calcium score ˆ   A useful way of screening for CAD ˆ   Motion artifact ˆ   Allergic reaction due to IV contrast  ˆ   Safer and faster than conventional  injection angiogram ˆ   Kidney diseases or severe diabetes ˆ   M j i   ffraction i ˆ   Most accurate  ffor ejection

ˆ   Some risk with exercise ˆ   Requires IV radio‐isotope injection ˆ   Expensive

ˆ   Best for ischemia detection ˆ   Evaluates wall motion & heart under  ˆ   Only 80% accurate stress 30~40 min  ˆ   Risk of AMI (technically  ˆ   Non‐invasive demanding) ˆ   Good for measuring valvular ejection  ˆ   Must be ischemic to show  abnormalities fraction and left ventricular function ˆ   Best for valvular, congenital, and wall  ˆ   Only 75% accurate for CAD, good  motion 15 min images cannot be obtained in 5~15% of  ˆ   Non‐invasive patients ˆ No risks ˆ   Detects perfusion deficit ˆ   Not recommended if abnormal EKG 30~40 min ˆ   Only 42% accurate on women; 33%  ˆ   Non‐invasive false positives, 25% false negatives ˆ   Low accuracy, not always specific,  ˆ   Inexpensive insensitive to ischemia ˆ   No risk ˆ   Not always specific 10 min ˆ Fast ˆ Insensitive to ischemia ˆ Non-invasive www.bionetek.com

Related Documents