Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, First Movement Analysis

  • Uploaded by: Fanny Sylvia C.
  • 0
  • 0
  • October 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, First Movement Analysis as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 845
  • Pages: 3
Fanny Chen October 30, 2007 Beethoven’s 9th Symphony Movement 1 Analysis To assign the first movement of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony the sonata form would truly be a subjective judgment. I will first explain how this movement fits the sonata form; then I will discuss how it diverges from this form in rather fascinating ways.

Broadly speaking, the first movement can be divided into three pieces, each beginning with a version of what I have denoted A_0, the introduction to the piece in which motifs float around in a constant void, gaining energy, and morphing into musical themes. If we were to impose the sonata structure onto the piece, we would say that the three pieces are the exposition, development, and recapitulation. The exposition introduces two large thematic blocks separated by a transition that modulates this section from the tonic to the relative major. The first thematic block is much easier to recognize as it is always preceded by A_0, the introductory phrase. Moreover, A_1 is the most easily recognizable theme in the first movement; it emerges out of A_0 and is loudly played by the entire orchestra in unison. Although not all of A is homophonic, the melodic line is always clear throughout this section. In fact, Beethoven clearly wants to impress this theme in our memories. Not only does he make it loud and clear, he also repeats it, with slight modifications the second time. Beethoven then modulates from the tonic to the relative major key. The modulation happens quickly and is extremely subtle, almost hidden by the many series of

ascending sequences written into both the transition in part B of the exposition. Moreover, the transition and part B share many common characteristics, such as texture, tempo, and dynamic. Since the modulation happens so soon, perhaps the transition is meant to be very short and the five (or six) different themes following the modulation are the themes that compose part B. This makes sense time-wise as well, for a short transition will make parts A and B of the exposition approximately the same length, both around a minute and a half. This preserves a sense of balance within the exposition. Part B tends to polyphonic and often has an “echo” feel, where one instrumental voice introduces a theme and is echoed by another instrumental voice. Sometimes, these two voices will overlap, creating a sense of a fugue, where two melodic lines flow at different times along the same stream. Although he breaks up the soft legato sequences with loud, harsh staccato chords for contrast, Beethoven generally preserves a mild dynamic in part B which also helps obscure the switch from the transition to part B. In fact, a loud dynamic actually seems to signal a transition out of part B; in B_2’, the B_2 theme is repeated in sequence, getting louder, faster, and higher pitched until it climaxes. We expect this to become the cadence that will resolve the exposition and allow us to move on to the development. However, it is a false ending; B_5 again resumes a moderate tempo and is played primarily by the woodwinds; the strings enter in little spurts with loud, crisp notes until they join the woodwinds and the entire orchestra plays together to conclude the exposition. It is truly difficult to isolate a dominating theme or melody from part B. In fact, it almost sounds as if Beethoven is wordpainting the act of composing music, of through recycling rhythmic, melodic, and contrapuntal ideas. For example, the rhythm in this

section is composed of sets of patterns of long and short notes. B_1 starts of with ‘- ‘-, where ‘ represents a short note and – a long note. B_2 becomes -‘’ -‘’, and then reverts to ‘’- ‘’-. The continual use of sequences makes each little theme sound like a trial run; he imposes different chords on the same rhythms, superimposes one theme upon another to express how one thought leads to the next. Beethoven seems to be thinking, “What can I do with this rhythm? Now what if I switch it up a bit?” The development starts with A_0, but quickly sounds quite different from A_0 in the exposition. Hints of previous themes come back, but the development also seems to initiate new themes, such as D_2. The recapitulation is perhaps one of the most interesting parts of the first movement if we are trying to impose the sonata form on this piece. Not only does Beethoven return de capo and review the exposition, he also brings in a key theme from the development which plays almost constantly during the latter part of the recapitulation. Its rhythm is ‘’-. We also see other rhythmic sequences harmonizing with and interacting with this main one. The recapitulation, then, not only repeats the themes in the exposition, but also summarizes the way in which Beethoven was able to put together his rather disjointed thoughts from the exposition to meld a polyphonic composition that allows him to finish the task, resolve the sonata, and forcefully conclude with the coda.

Related Documents


More Documents from "Jeff Manookian"

Ec 1723 Pset 1
October 2019 33
Reviewchaps3-4
November 2019 22
Monteverdi's L'orfeo
October 2019 19
Chapter5p2lecture
November 2019 14
Chapter 10
November 2019 23