RB 1: Barriers to Critical Thinking (CT) Chapter 1 WHAT CT IS NOT: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Disagreement To embarrass, humiliate, or dominate Nitpicking Lacking imagination or creativity Applicable only to others’ beliefs
BARRIERS TO CT (think of other barriers to CT not discussed in textbook) df =
definition
Barrier 1: Frame of Reference (necessary, but can be a barrier) Frame of Reference df1 (in textbook) The organized body of accumulated beliefs that we rely on to interpret new experience and guide our behavior. Frame of Reference df2 (not in textbook) A person’s modifiable knowledge-base and set of assumptions, including values, applied for understanding and participating in experiences. THOUGHT EXPERIMENT (in textbook) Imagine doing an inventory of all your beliefs: How would you start? What kind of procedure would you use? How long would it take? “Meta-beliefs”: Beliefs about believing, knowing, truth Assumptions: ‘Sub-terranean’ or under the surface, un-examined beliefs THOUGHT EXPERIMENT (not in textbook) Identify one or more main beliefs in your frame-of reference. What is a central belief that guides your life? What belief (s) do you feel certain (or secure) about? Barrier 2: Ego-Centricity & Resistance to Change We favor our own positions, values, traditions, and groups. Gallileo’s Dialogue of the Two Chief Systems of the World (1632) replaces the geo-centric view of the universe with a helio-centric model. Implications: Consequence: The views and self-concepts of authorities were challenged. Gallileo was threatened with torture, placed under house arrest, and his book was forbidden til 1835.
2 Barrier 3: Wishful Thinking & Self-Deception We are rational beings, but not entirely. Emotions and wishes can over-ride reason. Example: denial, re: e.g., • Corruption in government • Racism • Abuse in a relationship Barrier 4: Ethno-Centricity & Cultural Conditioning In human social life, survival depends largely on: • How well we do within our group(s) • How well our group (s) do. We tend to incorporate into our belief structure the ideas, attitudes, and values of our group. Barrier 5: Hasty Moral Judgments We are quick to denounce persons and acts as immoral, and to approve and admire those we consider ‘good’ and ‘right’. We judge people by their appearance, background, or associations, often over-looking the facts, but based on: • • • • •
Emotion Prejudice Pre-conceptions Intolerance Self-righteousness
Barrier 6: Reliance on Authority Authority df
A source of expert information outside oneself.
1. Individual 2. Group 3. Institution Milgram’s Experiment on Authority Experiments: Book:
1960’s 1974 Obedience to Authority
Subjects were told that the experiment was to determine the effects of punishment on memory. Really, it was to investigate the extent will people obey an authority, even to the point of hurting others. Subjects were asks to administer increasingly strong ‘electrical shocks’ to people they couldn’t see. (There was no actual shock). They were told that the shocks would be painful, but would cause no permanent injury (‘slight shock’: 15 volts to ‘severe shock’: 450 volts).
3 Experimenter’s prediction: No more than 10% would adminster the maxsimum 450 volt ‘shock’. Result: When the ‘authority’ said to apply more voltage, even after confederate ‘victims’ pounded on walls, _____ % of the subjects applied more ‘voltage’ , and _____ % applied the full ‘450 volts’.
Barrier 7: Labels Labels are useful, but potentially distorting. Examples: •
Reductionism:
•
Prejudice:
Blind person considered unqualified for a job
•
False dichotomy:
Us vs. Them Overlooking alternatives Overlooking compromises
Gloria Steinem: ‘feminist”