Barnes Cover Letter K

Kevin Bradley GERMAN 10116 105 Ave Edmonton, Alberta T5H 0K2 February 3, 2007 James Barnes 64 Lambert Drive St. Albert, Ab Re: German vs. German (533 Sqn, RCMP, DND et al) James: As events have unfolded, there have been a lot of “last words” as the case goes ahead. It’s like a chess game in play, but, just when I think they playing field is stable, someone changes their position and with: 1. the CAT Appeal (and QB Action for defamation); and therefore… 2. Statement of Defence for CHA’s legals before TC’s appeal board; 3. the libel suit against the JAG (on the medical and EPO issues); for 4. the “EPO” conditions and “breaches” asserted against the Plaintiff; plus 5. the Professional Misconduct issues against the RCMP and FACS; and 6. the counter-suit allegations of “abuse of process” and “malicious prosecution” all ongoing… and DND/CIC still (IMHO) trying to pretend this isn’t happening and hoping it will go away quietly… And the RCMP stuck in the middle where they feel they have to push ahead on “breaches” as they apparently never drop a charge even if they know it stinks… And the Crown (Kennedy) looking at last point to pick more fly shit out of the pepper to trash my case against FACS and the Barrs, in the name of “justice”… all churning at the same time, there’s ample excuse and time to comb the spaghetti into neat rows once and for all. The colliding worlds are the EPO conditions (i.e. the Goss decision) from May ’06, and the Wacowich decision of March ’06, which fall out of Curtis Woods’ decision of 1 Nov ’02 and Dr. Bland’s decision of March ’04.

-2These wouldn’t have happened but for Ms Edwards’ decision of Oct ’02 and also, Bob Bondarevich’s and Col. McQuillan’s (lack of a) decisive decision of 15 Aug ’02. And this was a result of the Judge’s decision at the trial… based on incomplete forensics, which overlooked Dr. Singh’s decisions of 22 Mar ’02, but are back today to haunt Bennett Jones and Curtis Woods… and also, of course, Ms Barr’s decision of 30 Dec ’01 to toss me to the forces that be for the actions of 25 Dec ’01 which, truth be known, I had no real control over. (Thus the “Bullshit Incident #3,001 e-mail which Ben Barr got as well, and also, the “Gratuitous Sympathy Pose” in the CHAP etc.) I’m trying to force an out-of-court settlement for those “who’s rights have been infringed or denied” and there are, by now, dozens of Charter of Rights abuses but they’re mostly: 1. the right to be presumed “innocent” until proven “guilty” in fair and public hearing for: a. the “assault” charge itself (which was flagged by Dr. Singh but the “criminal assessment” issues fell on MY side of the fence); b. the third, fourth and fifth “breaches” of the Barr’s non-contact provisions which were all unintentional; c. Dr. Bland’s “review” which was hardly a fair assessment; d. Curtis Woods’ “threats” which were stayed but for which I’m asserting “Freedom of the Press and Other Media of Communication” (i.e. the CD with the “Pyromania” FACS photo effectively “burning my shrink in effigy” when I got back from Winnipeg for the CAT Appeal); e. The EPO Conditions (which were based on the Goss decision, itself based on “hearsay” and FACS’ contested notes… then stayed at the trial on 18 Dec ’06); and f. The malpractice trial which is still ahead and that’s the QB Action before Bennett Jones, seeking restitution, anyway. So… might be old news, but: • •

If I thought I was “healthy” and so did they, I’d be flying. If I thought I was “ill” and so did they, I’d be sending FACS Christmas cards and planning a new life as a non-aviator.

But, I was “healthy” and now I’m not… so I’m looking to drag the co-Defendants to court and tear them a whole new asshole for being this bad at their jobs. Bennett Jones knows that now.

-3Again, I’m keeping you in the loop because I can’t rely on what the Barrs are passing around as they’re trashing MY case to stop me and trash my attempts at complying with exactly what they demanded I do -- via that “Consent Order” decree and “House Arrest” – in the first place. This seems a little irrational to me. I now (finally) have number back from DND, haven’t called them back but the last I heard from the MPs was to apply for a Veteran’s Affairs package. That’s DND’s attempt at swapping AISH for a disability pension when I know there’s nothing wrong me. I’d really rather be flying again; ergo you’re all sued for this bullshit now. There’s a lot of overlap, but the damage falls out basically as: Libel: 1) “He was in the throes of a psychotic episode in ‘02” (and has since “encountered a decomposition” for Curtis Woods); 2) “His meds were helping” for Ms Barr; 3) “He beat me up” (very carefully and avoided anywhere where it could be proven) for the Barrs’ EPO Stunt. 4) “He hid in the trees”, “put dirty pictures on the CD”, “was off his meds”, “is stalking Cadet German at the EAHS” yada yada yada for Ben Barr. Malpractice: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6)

“Maybe the Problem is Somewhere Around Here” = “Lily Cares” for FACS; “He consented to the medications” for Ms Barr & Curtis Woods; “He was explained the risks and benefits” for Ms Barr & Curtis Woods; “Alcohol might have been a factor” for Dr. Bland. “He was assessed for a private pilot’s license” for Dr. Bland “The CARS Refs are an accredited medical conclusion” for Dr. Albrecht and Dr. Danforth.

I think you’ll agree that this is such a mess that the “accredited conclusion” that has me “grounded” holds no weight for “Team Blue” at all. I’m back at the second pass at “Discoveries” on 5 March ’07, looking for a cheque to cover the lost years and Claim for Damages suffered under FACS’ “care and attention”.

-4I do have to say, though, that I called the right people prior to Christmas 2001 and also, the right people in ‘02 and gave the League “grounds” on the CARS Refs in ’04 and nobody will get involved as it’s CIC and medical folks. If this is the best that you guys can do you should all be ashamed of yourselves.

Sincerely,

Kevin