Autism Research in Arkansas:
On-going clinical trials and the Arkansas Autism Alliance S. Jill James, PhD
Professor, Department of Pediatrics Director, Autism Metabolic Genomics Laboratory Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock, AR
OVERVIEW Review of metabolic pathways: folate/methionine/glutathione Efficacy of methylB12 and folinic acid treatment on glutathione redox status and core behaviors in autism Parent Metabolic Profiles Specific Aims of our 5 year NIH-funded study Placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over study of broad spectrum nutritional supplementation AAA and ATN in Arkansas
Methionine Transsulfuration to Cysteine and Glutathione Methionine THF 5,10-CH2THF MTHFR
1
MS
B12
5-CH3THF Homocysteine B6
THF: tetrahydrofolate Enzymes
Methionine Transsulfuration to Cysteine and Glutathione Methionine THF 5,10-CH2THF MTHFR
1
SAM MS
B12
5-CH3THF
2
SAH SAHH
B6
Enzymes
(SAM/SAH)
MTase Cell Methylation
Homocysteine
THF: tetrahydrofolate
Methylation Potential
Adenosine
Methionine Transsulfuration to Cysteine and Glutathione Methionine THF 5,10-CH2THF MTHFR
1
Methylation Potential
SAM MS
2
B12
5-CH3THF
(SAM/SAH)
MTase Cell Methylation
SAH SAHH
Adenosine
Homocysteine B6 B6
THF: tetrahydrofolate Enzymes
3
CBS
Cystathionine B6
Cysteine GSH
Antioxidant Redox Potential (GSH/GSSG)
GSSG
Methionine Transsulfuration to Cysteine and Glutathione Methionine THF 5,10-CH2THF MTHFR
1
SAM MS
2
B12
5-CH3THF
1
Folate Cycle
2
Methionine Cycle
3
Methylation Potential
Transsulfuration Pathway
(SAM/SAH)
MTase Cell Methylation
SAH SAHH
Adenosine
Homocysteine B6 B6
3
CBS
Cystathionine B6
Cysteine GSH
Antioxidant Redox Potential (GSH/GSSG)
GSSG
Vital Importance of these Interdependent Metabolic Pathways Methionine THF
1
5,10-CH2THF
SAM
MTase Cellular
2
MS
5-CH3THF
SAHH
Adenosine
Homocysteine B6 Cystathionine
DNA SYNTHESIS
3 PROLIFERATION
Methylation Reactions
SAH
B12
Purines and Thymidylate
METHYLATION
Cysteine GSH
GSSG
REDOX HOMEOSTASIS
AN OPEN LABEL TRIAL OF METHYLCOBALAMIN AND FOLINIC ACID IN AUTISTIC CHILDREN
Can supplementation with methyl-B12 and folinic Acid improve glutathione levels and core behaviors in autistic children? Intervention: (3 months)
MethylB12 (75µg/Kg every 3 days) Folinic Acid (400 µg bid)
Inclusion Criteria:
Autistic Disorder (DSM-IV; CARS) Age 3-7 No previous supplements GSH < 6.0
Endpoints:
Methylation and glutathione metabolites Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales
STUDY DESIGN Each child served as their own control in the open label trial in which both parents and investigators were aware that the child was receiving supplements ofmethyl-B12 and folinic acid for a period of three months. Plasma metabolites in the transmethylation and transsulfuration pathways were measured at baseline and again after the 3 month intervention period. The study nurse administered and scored the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales parent questionnaire before and after the 3 month intervention.
Methyl B12
Methionine
Folinic Acid
THF 5,10-CH2THF
1
SAM MTase Cellular
2
MS
SAH
B12
Purines and Thymidylate
5-CH3THF
Methylation Reactions
SAHH
Adenosine
Homocysteine Folinic Acid
B6 Cystathionine
DNA SYNTHESIS
3
Cysteine GSH
GSSG
METABOLIC DATA Plasma Metabolite Concentration
Control Children (n = 42)
Autism Pre-treatmentb (n = 40)
Autism Post-treatment (n = 40)
Methionine
24 ± 3
21 ± 4
22 ± 3
ns
SAM (nmol/L)
78 ± 22
66 ± 13
69 ± 12
ns
SAH (nmol/L)
14.3 ± 4.3
15.2 ± 5
14.8 ± 4
ns
SAM/SAH (µmol/L)
5.6 ± 2.0
4.7 ± 1.5
5.0 ± 2.0
ns
Homocysteine (µmol/L)
5.0 ± 1.2
4.8 ± 1.8
5.3 ± 1.1
0.04
Cysteine (µmol/L)
210 ± 18
191 ± 24
215 ± 19
0.001
Total Glutathione (µmol/L)
7.5 ± 1.8
5.4 ± 1.3
6.2 ± 1.2
0.001
Free Glutathione (µmol/L)
2.8 ± 0.8
1.5 ± 0.4
1.8 ± 0.4
0.18 ± 0.07
0.28 ± 0.08
0.22 ± 0.06
0.001
tGSH/GSSG
47 ± 18
21 ± 6
30 ± 9
0.001
fGSH/GSSG
17 ± 6.8
6±2
9±3
0.001
GSSG (µmol/L)
a
P value refers to treatment effect
p valuea
0.008
Cysteine 300
µmol/L
250 200 150 100 50 0
Before
After
Total Glutathione 10 9
x
8 µmol/L
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Before
After
GSSG 0.6
µmol/L
0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
Before
After
Total GSH/GSSG 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Before
After
SUMMARY OF METABOLIC RESULTS 1. All baseline metabolites were significantly different from age-matched controls (except for SAH) 2. The treatment did not significantly improve levels of methionine, SAM or SAM/SAH • The treatment did significantly improve cysteine, glutathione, and GSH/GSSG 10. Although significantly improved, glutathione and GSH/GSSG did not reach levels in control children
Behavioral Evaluation The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) provides a numerical score for adaptive functioning in the areas of communication, socialization, daily living skills, motor skills, and an adaptive behavior composite (ABC) score. The data are presented as the mean score for each category before and after intervention.
BEHAVIOR SCORES Vineland Category
Baseline Score (mean ± SD)
Post-Treatment Score (mean ± SD)
Communication
65.3 ± 12.9
72.0 ± 15.5
6.7 (3.5, 10)
<0.001
Daily Living Skills
67.0 ± 76
76.0 ± 17.7
9.0 (4.0, 14)
<0.007
Socialization
68.2 ± 9.3
75.7 ± 14.7
7.5 (3.5, 11)
<0.005
Motor Skills
75.6 ± 9.7
79.0 ± 14.7
3.3 (0, 8)
Composite Score
66.5 ± 9.2
73.9 ± 17.0
6.6 (2.3, 11)
Change in Score (mean; 95% C I)
p value
0.12 <0.003
SUMMARY OF BEHAVIOR RESULTS Although treatment with methylB12 and folinic acid significantly improved core behaviors, they did not reach standard scores for unaffected children (100 ± 15)
CONCLUSIONS Improvement in measures of both metabolic and behavioral endpoints converge to suggest that some children may benefit from targeted nutritional intervention
What about the parents?
Maternal Methionine Cycle Metabolites: Autism Moms (n = 46)
Control Moms (n= 200)
Methionine (µM/L)
24 ± 5
26 ± 6
SAM (nM/L)
80 ± 19
83 ± 13
SAH (nM/L)
33 ± 14*
23 ± 8.4
SAM/SAH Ratio
3.1 ± 1.7*
4.0 ± 1.4
Homocysteine (µM/L)
11 ± 3.9*
7.6 ± 1.6 *statistically significant
It would be a very good idea to ask your physician to check your “total” homocysteine
Maternal Transsulfuration Metabolites Autism Moms
Control Moms
Cysteine (µM/L)
232 ± 40
231 ± 20
Total GSH (µM/L)
5.1 ± 1.7*
7.3 ± 1.5
Free GSH (µM/L)
1.5 ± 0.5*
2.6 ± 0.6
0.30 ± 0.08*
0.24 ± 0.04
GSSG (µM/L) Total GSH/GSSG
17 ± 8
31 ± 10*
*statistically significant
Metabolite imbalance and the risk of being a mother of a child with autism Control Mothers
Case Mothers (N=46)
Odds Ratio (Risk)
SAH >30µMol/L)
14%
54%
6.9
SAM/SAH <2.5
10%
54%
10.7
tGSH/GSSG <20
11%
65%
15.2
SAM/SAH <2.5 and tGSH/GSSG <20
3%
41%
46
Stratified Group
(N=200)
IMPORTANT CAVEAT It is not possible to determine from this data whether the abnormal metabolic profile in parents is genetically determined or whether it simply reflects the stress of living with an autistic child
METABOLIC BIOMARKERS OF AUTISM:
PREDICTIVE POTENTIAL AND GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY A 5 YEAR NIH-FUNDED STUDY (2006-2011)
SPECIFIC AIM 1: METABOLITES AND BEHAVIOR Specific Aim 1: To determine whether the observed metabolite imbalance is associated with quantitative measures of autistic behavior An expanded database of metabolic profiles will allow us to determine whether the severity and specificity of the metabolite imbalance is associated with the severity and specificity of behavioral abnormalities.
SPECIFIC AIM 2: PROSPECTIVE STUDY Specific Aim 2: To investigate whether the abnormal metabolic profile precedes the diagnosis of autism among toddlers 18-30 months of age who are identified in developmental delay clinics to be at increased risk of developing autism.
SPECIFIC AIM 2: PROSPECTIVE STUDY M-CHAT autism screening test and plasma metabolic biomarkers will be measured at Visit 1 and children will be followed for subsequent diagnosis of autism (case) or developmental delay (control). Metabolic data will be analyzed statistically to determine whether metabolic abnormalities precede the behavioral diagnosis of autism and could serve as predictive biomarkers for risk of autism.
AUTISM PROSPECTIVE STUDY DESIGN Visit 1:
FAIL = High Risk
M-CHAT (18-30 months)
PASS = Developmental Delay and Normal CONTROLS
Metabolic Profile
Metabolic Profile
AUTISM PROSPECTIVE STUDY DESIGN Visit 1:
M-CHAT (18-30 months)
FAIL = High Risk
PASS = Developmental Delay and Normal CONTROLS
Metabolic Profile (1-6 months) Visit 2:
M-CHAT Repeat
Metabolic Profile (6 months) M-CHAT Repeat
AUTISM PROSPECTIVE STUDY DESIGN Visit 1:
M-CHAT (18-30 months)
FAIL = High Risk
PASS = Developmental Delay and Normal CONTROLS
Metabolic Profile
Metabolic Profile
(1-6 months) Visit 2:
(6 months)
M-CHAT Repeat
M-CHAT Repeat
FAIL Visit 3: DSM-IV; CARS; ADOS Autism Diagnosis
PASS Not Autism Control
AUTISM PROSPECTIVE STUDY DESIGN Visit 1:
M-CHAT (18-30 months)
FAIL = High Risk
PASS = Developmental Delay and Normal CONTROLS
Metabolic Profile
Metabolic Profile
(1-6 months) Visit 2:
(6 months)
M-CHAT Repeat FAIL
FAIL = High risk Regression
Visit 3: DSM-IV; CARS; ADOS Autism Diagnosis
M-CHAT Repeat PASS
Not Autism Control
AUTISM PROSPECTIVE STUDY DESIGN Visit 1:
M-CHAT (18-30 months)
FAIL = High Risk
PASS = Developmental Delay and Normal CONTROLS
Metabolic Profile
Baseline
(1-6 months) Visit 2:
(6 months)
M-CHAT Repeat FAIL
Autism Diagnosis
M-CHAT Repeat
FAIL = High risk Regression
Visit 3: DSM-IV; CARS; ADOS
Metabolic Profile
PASS
Not Autism Final diagnosis
Control
IMPLICATIONS OF AIM 2 AUTISM PROSPECTIVE STUDY If the metabolic profile is found to precede the behavioral diagnosis, subsequent studies would determine whether early intervention to normalize the metabolic profile can reduce or prevent the development of autism.
SPECIFIC AIM 3: CELLULAR CONSEQUENCES
Specific Aim 3: To establish whether cells from children with autism exhibit evidence of increased oxidative stress and oxidative damage. This mechanistic aim will determine whether lymphocytes from autistic children are inherently more vulnerable to oxidative stress than control cells
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Lymphoblastoid cell lines from autistic children with at least one affected sibling were compared with unaffected control lymphoblastoid cell lines* Pairs of autistic and control cells lines were cultured under identical conditions. Rate of free radical generation, GSH/GSSG were measured at baseline and after exposure to thimerosal as oxidative stress. *Preliminary data supported by SafeMinds
Relative Free Radical Generation (DCF)
Vmax ROS Rate
900 800
Control Autistic
700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0
0.3125
0.625
1.25
2.5
Thimerosal Concentration (uMol/L) Cells from autistic children generate more free radicals than control cells
Glutathione Redox Ratio (GSH/GSSG) 160
Control Autistic
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0
0.16
0.32
0.62
1.25
2.5
Thimerosal Concentration (uMol/L)
Cells from autistic children have lower GSH/GSSG ratio than control cells
MITOCHONDRIAL REDOX IMBALANCE IN LYMPHOBLASTOID CELL LINES 18
4 3.5 3
Autistic
16
Control
14
GSH/GSSG RATIO
12
2.5
10
2
8
1.5
6
1
4
0.5
2
0
0
fGSH
GSSG (X 10)
Control
Autistic
CONCLUSION Since both cell lines were cultured at the same time under identical conditions with identical media, the differences at baseline and after exposure to oxidant stress must reflect inherent genetic or epigenetic differences. These results provide experimental evidence that cells from autistic children may be more sensitive to pro-oxidant environmental exposures.
SPECIFIC AIM 4: METABOLIC GENETICS Specific Aim 4: Using a case-control design, we will determine whether the frequency of relevant genetic polymorphisms is increased among autistic children and whether specific genotypes are associated with the abnormal metabolic phenotype. We have access to 500 trios (child, mother, father) from NIH genetic repository to look at relevant SNP frequencies and transmission
A Targeted Approach to Autism Genetics: Using the Metabolic Endophenotype as a Guide to Candidate Genes Methionine THF SAM B12
5,10-CH2-THF
TC II
DMG
Methyl Acceptor Methyltransferase COMT Methylated Product
MTHFR
5-CH3-THF
SAH
RFC Homocysteine Cystathionine CBS Cysteine GCL Glutathione GST
Adenosine
Treating Oxidative Stress and the Metabolic Pathology of Autism
A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBOCONTROLLED CROSS-OVER STUDY
HYPOTHESIS A significant proportion of autistic children have impaired methylation and antioxidant/detoxification capacity that results in chronic oxidative stress. Targeted nutritional intervention that is designed to correct the metabolic imbalance will significantly improve their metabolic profile and improve measures of autistic behavior.
SPECIFIC AIMS Specific Aim 1. We will screen children with a diagnosis of autism for evidence of impaired methylation (↓SAM/SAH) and impaired antioxidant capacity (↓GSH/GSSG) Specific Aim 2. Children who exhibit evidence of impaired methylation and antioxidant capacity will be randomized into a double blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial of targeted nutritional intervention designed to correct metabolic deficiencies and to improve scores on standardized behavioral evaluation tests.
RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBOCONTROLLED CROSS-OVER DESIGN A is supplement first, placebo second B is placebo first, supplement second A
WASHOUT
B
Thiols, Complete Lab, Behavioral Testing
B A
Thiols, Complete Lab, Behavioral Testing
Thiols, Complete Lab, Behavioral Testing
Children are randomly assigned to either the placebo first or the treatment first for 3 months before 1 month wash out period and cross-over
The supplements have been selected to impact three core cellular functions that are altered with chronic oxidative stress (www.clinicaltrials.gov) 1) Decreased SAM/SAH ratio and cellular methylation capacity 2) Antioxidant and detoxification support (mitochondrial and cytosolic) 3) Cell membrane integrity
OUTCOME MEASURES • Behavioral testing: ADOS; Vineland; PLS-2; SRS Behavioral testing will be videotaped and administered by PhD psychologists 3. Metabolic evaluation: Plasma: Thiol profile; CBC; amino acid profile, P5P, HoloTCII; sulfate; nitrotyrosine; lactate/pyruvate; 25-hydroxy vitamin D; uric acid; Urine: Sulfate, organic acids; creatinine; FIGlu, MMA Cellular: RBC membrane phospholipids; leukocyte GSH/GSSG. • Immunologic evaluation: Flow cytometry for CRP, cytokine mRNA expression and protein levels for TNFα; g-IFN, IL-1; IL-4, IL-6; IL-10; IL-13; T-regs
AUTISM TREATMENT NETWORK (ATN) IN ARKANSAS
The ATN The ATN is a consortium of 15 national sites composed of experts in developmental pediatrics, neurology, genetics, metabolism, sleep, and gastroenterology who are dedicated to improving the standard of care of children with autism. The ATN believes that treatment of medical issues can improve core behaviors and improve quality of life for children and adults with autism and their parents.
Our Dream for Autism in Arkansas
UAMS/ACH/ACHRI
Arkansas Autism Alliance (AAA)
Clinical Evaluation & Treatment Center
UAMS/ACH/ACHRI Arkansas Autism Alliance Resource and Outreach Center
Translational Research Center
FROM EPIDEMIOLOGY TO MECHANISM BEHAVIOR
Necessary but Not Sufficient
GENE EXPRESSION (Genetic/Epigenetic) Multiple, Additive Variable Genes
Necessary but Not Sufficient
ENVIRONMENT
(Vulnerability/Resistance) Multiple, Additive Variable Factors
FROM EPIDEMIOLOGY TO MECHANISM BEHAVIOR
Necessary but Not Sufficient
GENE EXPRESSION (Genetic/Epigenetic) Multiple, Additive Variable Genes
Mechanism
(Redox Imbalance; Methylation)
Necessary but Not Sufficient
Metabolic Endophenotype ENVIRONMENT (GSH/GSSG) (SAM/SAH) (Vulnerability/Resistance)
TREATMENT
Multiple, Additive Variable Factors
Acknowledgements Autism Metabolic Genomics Laboratory Stepan Melnyk, PhD Stefanie Jernigan Alena Savenka Shannon Palmer Sarah Blossom, PhD Lesya Pavliv Study Nurses Nancy Chambers, Dana Schmidt, Amanda Hubanks, Nancy Lowery