Are Foreign-owned Enterprises Disproportionately Harming The Environment In China?

  • Uploaded by: Candace
  • 0
  • 0
  • April 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Are Foreign-owned Enterprises Disproportionately Harming The Environment In China? as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 607
  • Pages: 26
The Impact of Enterprise Ownership on China’s Environment

By Candace Williams

China in the News

Central Goal: Clean-up

I’m not dying of cancer!

Questions

• What are the costs of pollution? • How do privately-owned enterprises (POEs), state-owned enterprises (SOEs), collectivelyowned enterprises (COEs), and foreign firms contribute to pollution? • Are there specific strategies that we can employ that address the strengths and weaknesses of each type of firm?

China’s Growth

GDP per capita from 1975 - 2002

China’s Growth

China’s Growth

How Dangerous is Pollution?

2001: the World Bank reported that 16 out of the world’s 20 most-polluted cities are in China.

China loses 5.4% of its GDP ($160 billion) per year because of environmental degradation.

Air Pollution: Costs

1% of China’s city 560 million citydwellers breath air considered safe by the European Union

Crop yields have decreased by 30%

760,000 PREMATUR E DEATHS

Air Pollution: Causes

Industry: 80% Inefficiency Energyintensive Coal and Oil

Transportation Boom: 14,000 new cars each day

Water Pollution: Costs

More than 75% of water that flows through faucets is deemed unsuitable for drinking or fishing

UNICEF says that 320 million people lack access to clean drinking water

Water Pollution: Causes

One-third of all industrial wastewater and two-thirds of household sewage remain untreated. China’s industries use 10 – 20% more water than similar industries in developed nations

Political Costs

51,000 environment-related protests in 2005

International Issues

Neighbors: 15% of sulfur deposits in South Korea, and 50% of deposits in Japan, are windblown from China.

Los Angeles: 25% particulate pollution in the atmosphere over Los Angeles originates in China

Why does ownership matter?

State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs)

Collectively-Owned Enterprises (COEs)

-Dropped from 80% share to 20% share in 30 years

-Small share of enterprises (decreasing)

-Inefficient

-In a position to internalize local externalities

-Internalize national externalities -Bargaining power

-Slightly more efficient than SOEs -Local bargaining power

Privately-Owned Enterprises (POEs) -Over 70% share today (5.5 million)

-41,485 new contracts in 2006 alone ($70 billion)

-No incentive to internalize externalities

-Wholly-owned foreign enterprises: 75%

-Strive for efficiency

-Rest are joint ventures

-Least bargaining power

-Race to the bottom vs. new

Foreign Firms (FDIs)

Why does ownership matter?

Why does ownership matter?

Wang and Jin (2002) -Determinants: ownership, factor costs, pollution abatement costs, technology, location, policy variables, community variables, type of industry - Best to worst performance: FDIs, COEs, POEs,

Why does ownership matter?

Is “race to the bottom” wrong?

• Pollution is not a large cost for most private firms operating abroad • There are community-level penalties even if formal regulations do not exist • Abatement reduces costs: pollution is an “unamarketed production residual” resulting from inefficiency

Dean, Lovely, and Wang (2005) and Wheeler (2001)

COEs and Public Influence Di and Wang (2002)

COEs and Public Influence

COEs and Public Influence

Reasoning behind GreenWatch: •

Firms may take initiative in regulating themselves if they feel that it will help them market their brand.



The public expectation of ratings could also provide an incentive for regulatory institutions to keep accurately records and disseminate information in a timely matter.



Other actors in the economy may exert pressure over firms.



Provides firms with an evaluation tool and decreases the costs of monitoring. Wang et al (2002)

COEs and Public Influence

11% 4%

Hohhot 1999

Hohhot 2000

Wang et al (2002)

Black Blue Yellow Red

20% 65%

Black Blue Red Yellow

Lesson Learned: Power of the Public

Lesson Learned: Efficiency

Barriers to Efficiency: - Subsidies - Factor Prices - Some enterprises do not have the goal of efficiency

- Phase out subsidies

New Policies

- Change prices - Increase awareness - Provide more outlets for public pressure

Related Documents


More Documents from "KIEN FORCEFIDELE"