Ardmore Parking
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Ardmore Parking as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 1,328
- Pages: 44
Project Goals •
Create a new Ardmore Transit Center with substantial private investment in residential, retail and mixed-used development
•
Revitalize Ardmore Business and Historic District into a transit-oriented, pedestrian-friendly and accessible urban village
•
Provide new parking for visitors, customers, businesses and employees
•
Provide 190 new parking spaces (300 total) for SEPTA and Amtrak commuters
•
Comply with M.U.S.T. ordinance
•
Construct project that enhances and preserves surrounding assets
•
Minimize disruption to businesses, pedestrians and commuters during construction
•
Improve vehicular traffic infrastructure
•
Complete Ardmore Station project in a timely manner
Aerial View
Street Perspective
Train Station Entrance
Main Street
Ardmore Train Platform
Parking Plan Options
Original Plan - Main Street
Updated Ardmore Station
Summary of Parking Options • Option 1:
•
– Smallest Main Street Garage (7 levels) – Keep PSB Addition – Large Bernicker Garage (5 levels)
• Option 2: – Largest Main Street Garage (8 levels) – Demolish/Upgrade PSB Addition – No Bernicker Garage
• Option 2A: – Largest Main Street Garage (8 levels) – Overbuild PSB Addition – requires temporary relocation – No Bernicker Garage
Option 3: – Shorter Main Street Garage (7 levels) – Demolish/Upgrade PSB Addition – Small Bernicker Garage (3 levels)
•
Option 3A: – Shorter Main Street Garage (7 levels – Overbuild PSB Addition – requires temporary relocation – Small Bernicker Garage (3 levels)
Option 1 Components • Smallest Main Street Garage • Keeps Public Safety Building Addition • Large Bernicker Garage
Option 1 – Main Street
Total Spaces: Total Levels:
296 7
Option 1- Main Street
Option 1- Bernicker Lot
Total Spaces: 277 Total Levels: 5
Option 1- Bernicker Lot
Option 1- Pros & Cons Pros •
Additional retail on Lancaster
Avenue •
Lower Merion employee and business parking is separate from commuter parking
•
Minimally disruptive to PSB Addition
Cons • Commuter parking only on Main Street - all other parking on Bernicker • Tall, less efficient garage (7 levels/4 parking rows per level) • Large garage (5 levels) at Bernicker is out of scale • Building two garages is more expensive • Building two garages at once is more disruptive • Doesn’t put most new parking next to the station • 6 fewer new spaces than Option 2
Option 1 – Parking Costs • Gross Parking Spaces:
573
• Net Parking Spaces:
313
• Total Parking Cost:
$18.9 M
• Cost Per Net Space:
$60 K
Option 2 Components • Largest Main Street Garage • Demolish Public Safety Building Addition • No Bernicker Garage
Option 2
Total Spaces: 501 Total Levels: 8
Option 2 – Parking Tiers
Option 2 – Pros & Cons Pros
•
Adds 4th row of parking per garage
Cons •
level resulting in the most efficient and least cost option •
Provides most net new parking
•
Improved access to the PSB
•
Better program, more space for PSB
•
Meets the SEPTA commuter requirement
•
Preserves future opportunity for Bernicker lot
•
Puts the most spots adjacent to the station and local businesses
Tallest option for Main Street garage (8 levels)
•
Programmatic functions in PSB Addition (jail, evidence storage, sally
port) to be temporarily relocated during construction
Option 2 – Parking Costs • Gross Parking Spaces:
501
• Net Parking Spaces:
319
• Total Parking Cost:
$17.6 M
• Cost Per Net Space:
$54.8 K
Option 2A Components • Same size and height as Option 2 • Overbuild Public Safety Building Addition • No Bernicker Garage
Option 2A
Total Spaces: 456 Total Levels: 8
Option 2A – Parking Tiers
Option 2A – Pros & Cons Pros
Cons
•
•
More costly than Option 2
•
Programmatic functions in PSB
Adds 4th row of parking per garage level resulting in the most efficient and least cost option
•
PSB Addition remains
•
Improved access to the PSB
•
Meets the SEPTA commuter parking requirement
•
Preserves future opportunity for Bernicker lot
•
Majority of parking spaces located adjacent to the station and local businesses
Addition (jail, evidence storage, sally port) still has to be temporarily relocated during construction •
44 fewer spaces than Option 2
•
No added space for PSB
Option 2A – Parking Costs • Gross Parking Spaces:
503
• Net Parking Spaces:
275
• Total Parking Cost:
$17.5 M
• Cost Per Net Space:
$64 K
Option 3 Components • Shorter Main Street Garage • Demolish Public Safety Building Addition • Small Bernicker Garage
Option 3 – Main Street
Total Spaces: 416 Total Levels: 7
Option 3 – Main Street
Option 3 – Bernicker Lot
Total Spaces: 145 Total Levels: 3
Option 3 – Pros & Cons Pros •
Height of Main Street garage
decreases by one level •
Creates retail space on the Bernicker lot
Cons • Building two garages increases cost • Building two garages at once will be more disruptive • Programmatic functions in PSB Addition (jail, evidence storage, sally port) to be temporarily relocated during construction • Bernicker land redevelopment potential is lost to relatively small garage and retail space • Takes surface parking from two lots • 18 fewer spaces than Option 2
Option 3 – Parking Costs • Gross Parking Spaces:
561
• Net Parking Spaces:
301
• Total Parking Cost:
$20.3 M
• Cost Per Net Space:
$66.8 K
Option 3A Components • Shorter Main Street Garage • Overbuild Public Safety Building Addition • Small Bernicker Garage
Option 3A – Main Street
Total Spaces: 372 Total Levels: 7
Option 3A – Main Street
Option 3A – Bernicker Lot
Total Spaces: 145 Total Levels: 3
Option 3A – Pros & Cons Pros • Height of Main Street Garage decreases by one level • PSB Addition does not get demolished • Creates retail space on the Bernicker lot
Cons • More costly than Option 3 • Building two garages increases costs • Building two garages at once will be more disruptive • Programmatic functions in PSB Addition (jail, evidence storage, sally port) still has to be temporarily relocated during construction • 44 fewer spaces than Option 3 and 63 fewer spaces than Option 2 • Bernicker land is lost • Takes surface parking from all lots
Option 3A – Parking Costs • Gross Parking Spaces:
517
• Net Parking Spaces:
257
• Total Parking Cost:
$19.9 M
• Cost Per Net Space:
$77.4 K
Summary of Parking Options • Option 1:
•
– Smallest Main Street Garage – Keep PSB Addition – Large Bernicker Garage
• Option 2: – Largest Main Street Garage – Demolish PSB Addition – No Bernicker Garage
• Option 2A: – Largest Main Street Garage – Overbuild PSB Addition – No Bernicker Garage
Option 3: – Shorter Main Street Garage – Demolish PSB Addition – Small Bernicker Garage
•
Option 3A: – Shorter Main Street Garage – Overbuild PSB Addition – Small Bernicker Garage
Summary of Parking Costs • Option 1: – – –
Net Parking Spaces: Total Parking Cost: Cost Per Net Space:
•
– – –
Net Parking Spaces: Total Parking Cost: Cost Per Net Space:
• 319 $17.6 M $54.8 K
• Option 2A: – – –
Net Parking Spaces: Total Parking Cost: Cost Per Net Space:
– – –
313 $18.9 M $60 K
• Option 2:
275 $17.5 M $64 K
Option 3: Net Parking Spaces: Total Parking Cost: Cost Per Net Space:
301 $20.3 M $66.8 K
Option 3A: – – –
Net Parking Spaces: Total Parking Cost: Cost Per Net Space:
257 $19.9 M $77.4 K
Critical Next Steps •
15% Design Completion – July/August 2009. Timely decision needed to secure additional funding and move project forward.
•
Amtrak Agreement – July/August 2009
•
Township/Dranoff Development Agreement – September 2009
•
45% Design, Engineering and Station Architecture – November/December 2009
•
90% Design Review – June 2010
•
Goal to begin construction: Late 2010/Early 2011
Economic Revitalization Committee June 10, 2009 • Seek public input and ideas • Address questions • Determine Option to recommend to Board of Commissioners
Create a new Ardmore Transit Center with substantial private investment in residential, retail and mixed-used development
•
Revitalize Ardmore Business and Historic District into a transit-oriented, pedestrian-friendly and accessible urban village
•
Provide new parking for visitors, customers, businesses and employees
•
Provide 190 new parking spaces (300 total) for SEPTA and Amtrak commuters
•
Comply with M.U.S.T. ordinance
•
Construct project that enhances and preserves surrounding assets
•
Minimize disruption to businesses, pedestrians and commuters during construction
•
Improve vehicular traffic infrastructure
•
Complete Ardmore Station project in a timely manner
Aerial View
Street Perspective
Train Station Entrance
Main Street
Ardmore Train Platform
Parking Plan Options
Original Plan - Main Street
Updated Ardmore Station
Summary of Parking Options • Option 1:
•
– Smallest Main Street Garage (7 levels) – Keep PSB Addition – Large Bernicker Garage (5 levels)
• Option 2: – Largest Main Street Garage (8 levels) – Demolish/Upgrade PSB Addition – No Bernicker Garage
• Option 2A: – Largest Main Street Garage (8 levels) – Overbuild PSB Addition – requires temporary relocation – No Bernicker Garage
Option 3: – Shorter Main Street Garage (7 levels) – Demolish/Upgrade PSB Addition – Small Bernicker Garage (3 levels)
•
Option 3A: – Shorter Main Street Garage (7 levels – Overbuild PSB Addition – requires temporary relocation – Small Bernicker Garage (3 levels)
Option 1 Components • Smallest Main Street Garage • Keeps Public Safety Building Addition • Large Bernicker Garage
Option 1 – Main Street
Total Spaces: Total Levels:
296 7
Option 1- Main Street
Option 1- Bernicker Lot
Total Spaces: 277 Total Levels: 5
Option 1- Bernicker Lot
Option 1- Pros & Cons Pros •
Additional retail on Lancaster
Avenue •
Lower Merion employee and business parking is separate from commuter parking
•
Minimally disruptive to PSB Addition
Cons • Commuter parking only on Main Street - all other parking on Bernicker • Tall, less efficient garage (7 levels/4 parking rows per level) • Large garage (5 levels) at Bernicker is out of scale • Building two garages is more expensive • Building two garages at once is more disruptive • Doesn’t put most new parking next to the station • 6 fewer new spaces than Option 2
Option 1 – Parking Costs • Gross Parking Spaces:
573
• Net Parking Spaces:
313
• Total Parking Cost:
$18.9 M
• Cost Per Net Space:
$60 K
Option 2 Components • Largest Main Street Garage • Demolish Public Safety Building Addition • No Bernicker Garage
Option 2
Total Spaces: 501 Total Levels: 8
Option 2 – Parking Tiers
Option 2 – Pros & Cons Pros
•
Adds 4th row of parking per garage
Cons •
level resulting in the most efficient and least cost option •
Provides most net new parking
•
Improved access to the PSB
•
Better program, more space for PSB
•
Meets the SEPTA commuter requirement
•
Preserves future opportunity for Bernicker lot
•
Puts the most spots adjacent to the station and local businesses
Tallest option for Main Street garage (8 levels)
•
Programmatic functions in PSB Addition (jail, evidence storage, sally
port) to be temporarily relocated during construction
Option 2 – Parking Costs • Gross Parking Spaces:
501
• Net Parking Spaces:
319
• Total Parking Cost:
$17.6 M
• Cost Per Net Space:
$54.8 K
Option 2A Components • Same size and height as Option 2 • Overbuild Public Safety Building Addition • No Bernicker Garage
Option 2A
Total Spaces: 456 Total Levels: 8
Option 2A – Parking Tiers
Option 2A – Pros & Cons Pros
Cons
•
•
More costly than Option 2
•
Programmatic functions in PSB
Adds 4th row of parking per garage level resulting in the most efficient and least cost option
•
PSB Addition remains
•
Improved access to the PSB
•
Meets the SEPTA commuter parking requirement
•
Preserves future opportunity for Bernicker lot
•
Majority of parking spaces located adjacent to the station and local businesses
Addition (jail, evidence storage, sally port) still has to be temporarily relocated during construction •
44 fewer spaces than Option 2
•
No added space for PSB
Option 2A – Parking Costs • Gross Parking Spaces:
503
• Net Parking Spaces:
275
• Total Parking Cost:
$17.5 M
• Cost Per Net Space:
$64 K
Option 3 Components • Shorter Main Street Garage • Demolish Public Safety Building Addition • Small Bernicker Garage
Option 3 – Main Street
Total Spaces: 416 Total Levels: 7
Option 3 – Main Street
Option 3 – Bernicker Lot
Total Spaces: 145 Total Levels: 3
Option 3 – Pros & Cons Pros •
Height of Main Street garage
decreases by one level •
Creates retail space on the Bernicker lot
Cons • Building two garages increases cost • Building two garages at once will be more disruptive • Programmatic functions in PSB Addition (jail, evidence storage, sally port) to be temporarily relocated during construction • Bernicker land redevelopment potential is lost to relatively small garage and retail space • Takes surface parking from two lots • 18 fewer spaces than Option 2
Option 3 – Parking Costs • Gross Parking Spaces:
561
• Net Parking Spaces:
301
• Total Parking Cost:
$20.3 M
• Cost Per Net Space:
$66.8 K
Option 3A Components • Shorter Main Street Garage • Overbuild Public Safety Building Addition • Small Bernicker Garage
Option 3A – Main Street
Total Spaces: 372 Total Levels: 7
Option 3A – Main Street
Option 3A – Bernicker Lot
Total Spaces: 145 Total Levels: 3
Option 3A – Pros & Cons Pros • Height of Main Street Garage decreases by one level • PSB Addition does not get demolished • Creates retail space on the Bernicker lot
Cons • More costly than Option 3 • Building two garages increases costs • Building two garages at once will be more disruptive • Programmatic functions in PSB Addition (jail, evidence storage, sally port) still has to be temporarily relocated during construction • 44 fewer spaces than Option 3 and 63 fewer spaces than Option 2 • Bernicker land is lost • Takes surface parking from all lots
Option 3A – Parking Costs • Gross Parking Spaces:
517
• Net Parking Spaces:
257
• Total Parking Cost:
$19.9 M
• Cost Per Net Space:
$77.4 K
Summary of Parking Options • Option 1:
•
– Smallest Main Street Garage – Keep PSB Addition – Large Bernicker Garage
• Option 2: – Largest Main Street Garage – Demolish PSB Addition – No Bernicker Garage
• Option 2A: – Largest Main Street Garage – Overbuild PSB Addition – No Bernicker Garage
Option 3: – Shorter Main Street Garage – Demolish PSB Addition – Small Bernicker Garage
•
Option 3A: – Shorter Main Street Garage – Overbuild PSB Addition – Small Bernicker Garage
Summary of Parking Costs • Option 1: – – –
Net Parking Spaces: Total Parking Cost: Cost Per Net Space:
•
– – –
Net Parking Spaces: Total Parking Cost: Cost Per Net Space:
• 319 $17.6 M $54.8 K
• Option 2A: – – –
Net Parking Spaces: Total Parking Cost: Cost Per Net Space:
– – –
313 $18.9 M $60 K
• Option 2:
275 $17.5 M $64 K
Option 3: Net Parking Spaces: Total Parking Cost: Cost Per Net Space:
301 $20.3 M $66.8 K
Option 3A: – – –
Net Parking Spaces: Total Parking Cost: Cost Per Net Space:
257 $19.9 M $77.4 K
Critical Next Steps •
15% Design Completion – July/August 2009. Timely decision needed to secure additional funding and move project forward.
•
Amtrak Agreement – July/August 2009
•
Township/Dranoff Development Agreement – September 2009
•
45% Design, Engineering and Station Architecture – November/December 2009
•
90% Design Review – June 2010
•
Goal to begin construction: Late 2010/Early 2011
Economic Revitalization Committee June 10, 2009 • Seek public input and ideas • Address questions • Determine Option to recommend to Board of Commissioners
