Thinking
like
neurologist Is
it
difference? Dr.
Surat
Tanprawate,
MD,
FRCP(T) Northern
Neuroscience
Center Chiangmai
University
Thinking
like
a
Neurologist Where
‘s
the
lesion? What’s
the
lesion?
Series
of
steps
to
collect
data Task
Goal
Chief
complaint Tipping
the
point History
Complaint
explorer Neurological examina4on
List
of
the
problems Rank
of
order
of Likelihood
of
possible
disease
Confirma4on of
localiza4on Review
of Pa4ent‐specific
feature
Differen4al
diagnosis
Complex
brain
processing
Chief
complaint “Tipping
the
point” 5
Component
of
Chief
Complaint Symptom(s)
or
Syndrome + Time
course(progressive,
stable,
fluctua4on) Onset(sudden,
acute,
subacute,
chronic)
Collect
the
right
data
Expand
the
idea
6
The
point
should
be
concerned • • • •
Avoid
over
generaliza4on Avoid
misinterpret
symptoms Avoid
incomplete
chief
complaint Avoid
step
to
the
present
illness
before
having
an
idea
flow
chart
7
Common
misinterpret
symptoms
• Palalysis
VS
• Blur
vision
VS
numbness Diplopia • Dizziness
VS
• Blackout:
loss
of
weakness
VS
Fa4gue
consciousness
VS
loss
VS
ataxia of
vision
VS
simple
confusion • Dysphasia
VS
dysarthria
Expand
the
idea “Symptomatology
approach”
9
Symptoms
approach‐1
In
your
head
• Disorder
of
consciousness – Level
of
consciousness – Content
of
consciousness
• Mental
disorder – – – – –
Memory Intelligence Personality Behavioral
Demen4a
• Higher
corQcal
funcQon
disorder
– Apraxia,
aphasia,
agnosia,
others
• Visual
disorder – Visual
loss – Diplopia
Symptoms
approach‐2 • Language
and
speech
disorder – Dysarthria – Dysphasia
• Lower
cranial
nerve
disorder – – – – –
Deafness/4nnitus Ver4go Balance/staggering Swallowing Voice
change
In
your
head
Symptoms
approach‐3
In
your
head
• Sensory
disorder – Pain
disorder • Headache
and
facial
pain • Others
pain
disorder
– Numbness/4ngling
• Motor
disorder
– Weakness:
each
part – Movement
disorder
• Sphincter
disorder
Symptoms
approach‐4 • Episodic
disorder – Seizure/epilepsy – Syncope – TIA – Abnormal
movement – Migraine
In
your
head
Syndrome
approach‐1 • Parkinsonism – Bradykinesia – Muscle
rigidity – Res4ng
tremor – Postural
instability
• MulQple
cranial
nerve
syndrome “syndrome
of
opthalmoplegia” “syndrome
of
Lower
CN
involvement” • Brain
stem
syndrome “Sudden
onset
plus
brain
stem
s/s” 14
Syndrome
approach‐2 • Spinal
cord
syndrome – Transverse
cord
syndrome(complete,
incomplete) – Hemicord
syndrome – Anterior
cord
syndrome – Posterior
cord
syndrome
• Cerecellar
syndrome ‐ Pancerebellar
syndrome ‐ Hemicerebellar
syndrome ‐ Cerebellar
vermis
syndrome
15
Example 16
PaQent
History 17
Symptomatology Difficult
to
open
his
eye 18
Symptomatology Double
vision “Diplopia” 19
Symptomatology:
Eyelid
disorder • Lid
abnormali4es
presents
as –Ptosis –Lid
retrac4on –Insufficient
eyelid
closure –Excessive
eyelid
closure 20
Ptosis
Excessive
eyelid
closure
Weakness
of
Levator
palpebrae
muscle
Contrac4on
of
obicularis
oculi
muscle
Muller
muscle: Horner’s
syndrome
•Blephalospasm •Hemifacial
spasm 21
Ptosis
approach 22
Ptosis
Non‐neurogenic(mechanical)
ptosis
Neurologic
ptosis Congenital
ptosis
•Uni‐bilateral •Par4al‐complete
Supranuclear
lesion(cerebral
ptosis) •Contralateral
cerebral
hemisphere
•Pupil
involvement •EOM
impairment
LMN •Neuropathic(N,
fascicle,
CN) •NMJ •Myopathic
Horner’s
syndrome
Drug
induced
blephalospasm
and
dyskinesia
24
Superior tarsal muscle (also known as Müller's muscle)
25
26
A
woman
present
with
double
vision
27
Diplopia approach 28
Diplopia
Monocular
diplopia:
Mostly
opthalmologic
condi4on
Binocular
diplopia Non‐misalignment: intermiient,
non‐ organic
Misalignment
Comitant
strabismus Childhood
strabismus
Incomitant
strabismus Mostly
Neuro‐ opthalmologic
disease
• Supranuclear(UMN) • FEF: horizontal conjugate gaze • Diffuse frontal and occipital: vertical conjugate gaze
• Internuclear • Nuclear and pathway • •
PPRF, abducen interneuron, MLF riMLF, INC, PC
• Nuclear(LMN) • Cranial nerve nuclei • Fascicle, Nerve, NMJ and Muscle(LMN) • • • •
Faciculus Cranial nerve NMJ Muscle
Diplopia:
Thinking
Idea • Direc4on
of
involved
muscle – Impair
consistent
with
nerve
innerva4on(Nerve,
nucleus) – if
not • Fluctua4on:
NMJ • Associated
with
proximal
muscle
weakness:
Muscle
disease • Ver4cal
gaze
or
Horizontal
gaze
pathway
involvement:
Internuclear
lesion
31
Eye
examinaQon 32
Bilateral
ponQne
infarcQon
33
A
woman
complains
slow
progressive
diplopia,
gait
difficulty
for
2
weeks 34
Eye
movement 35
• Supranuclear(UMN) • FEF: horizontal conjugate gaze • Diffuse frontal and occipital: vertical conjugate gaze
• Internuclear • Nuclear and pathway • •
PPRF, abducen interneuron, MLF riMLF, INC, PC
• Nuclear(LMN) • Cranial nerve nuclei • Fascicle, Nerve, NMJ and Muscle(LMN) • • • •
Faciculus Cranial nerve NMJ Muscle
38
Gait
abnormality 39
Gait
disturbance
=
Ataxia
40
Tandem
walk 41
Cerebellar
test 42
Approach
to
ataxic
pa4ent Ataxic symptoms? -Nystagmus -Dysarthria -Trunkcal ataxia -Limb and gait -ataxia Ataxic symptoms mimicker? •Mild
weakness •Apraxia •Abnormal
movement
True Ataxia
Ataxia: disease other than cerebellum
Cerebellar’s disease -Where’s the lesion (cerebellum, cerebellar peduncle, cerebellar tract) -What’s the lesion
Where’s
lesion? Associated
sign
Pure cerebellum
Classified Cerebellar syndrome
With Brainstem signs
Classified Brainstem Syndrome?
With mild hemiparesis
Involve frontoPontoCerebellar Pathway “Ataxic hemiparesis”
Classified
cerebellar
syndrome
Cerebellar Unilateral hemispheric intermediate, syndrome lateral zones
Rostral vermis syndrome
Ant, sup vermis
Caudal vermis syndrome
Flucculo nodular, post vermis
All Pan cerebellar regions syndrome
Symmetrical
ataxia
plus
syndrome • Acquired
– Wernicke’s
encephalopathy – Miller
Fisher
syndrome – Normal
pressure
hydrocephalus(frontal
lobe
ataxia)
• Hereditary
– Spinocerebellar
ataxia(SCA)
Back
to
our
case Nuclear
complex
of
oculomotor
nerve Rostral
vermis
syndrome 47
48
Physical
ExaminaQon “Confirm
the
though,
explore
the
next” 49
Neurological
examinaQon • Screening(general)
neurological
examinaQon – Exam
every
path:
the
tests
are
more
sensi4ve
• Specific(focused)
neurological
examinaQon – Exam
the
detail
of
abnormal
neurological
signs
or
symptoms
relevant
to
the
history
and
screening
exam. – the
tests
are
more
specific 50
Record
the
neurological
signs • • • • • •
Presence
VS
Absence Hard
signs
VS
Son
signs Normal
VS
abnormal Lateralizing
sign:
True
VS
false
localizing
sign Normal
varia4on 51
General
neurological
examina4on • Mental
status • Cranial
nerve
– 1‐12
CN
func4on
• Limb
– Voluntary
movement – Muscle:
bulk,
tone,
power
– Coordina4on:
FTN,
HTS,
rapid
alterna4ng
movement – Reflex:
tendon,
plantar
response – Sensa4on:
pinprick,
JPS,
vibra4on
sense
• Gait
and
balance • Romberg
test
The
point
should
be
concerned • • • • •
Avoid
misinterpret
sign Misinterpret
the
normal
varia4on Confirm
the
equivocal
sign
Aware
the
son
sign Aware
the
false
localizing
sign 53
A
man
presented
with
shaking
head
54
An
old
woman
present
with
abnormal
hand
movement
55
Focused
neurological
examinaQon • Which
kind
of
test – Depend
on:
History,
Screening
neurological
examina4on – Complete
the
focused
examina4on:
• More
detail • Complete
the
syndrome
you
thought • Need
extensive
skill
for
specifica4on
56
Concept
of
“son”
neurological
sign • “Hard
sign”:
– neurological
sign
result
from
a
lesion
at
a
known
site
or
that
affect
a
known
pathway
• “Son
sign”:
– Any
structural
or
func4onal
devia4on
found
more
frequently
in
brain
impairment
persons
than
in
normal
persons – Does
not
correlate
with
any
par4cular
type
of
brain
lesion
at
any
par4cular
site,
or
interrup4on
of
any
par4cular
tract
Concept
of
“false”
localizing
sign • True
sign
that
occurs
secondary
to
a
lesion
elsewhere
in
the
CNS.
• The
sign
is
not
false,
but
is
distant
from
the
actual
site
of
primary
lesion • Cause: – Shin
of
brain:
compress
or
displace
structure
(distant)
or
blood
vessel
(ACA,
MCA) – Hydrocephalus:
CN
6
palsy,
Pretectal
(sylvian)
syndrome
59
Problem
list “Review
of
paQent
specific
feature” 60
List
of
problems
Integrate
of
History
and
PE
• First:
anatomical
localiza4on
of
lesion
or
neurology
system – Focal,
Mul4‐focal,
Diffuse – Nuclear,
tract,
system
disorder – CNS,
PNS,
Boths
DifferenQal
diagnosis Discussion
each
problem
list • 1) • 2) • 3) • 4) • 5)
DifferenQal
diagnosis “Rank
of
the
possible
disease” 63
DifferenQal
diagnosis
Integrate
of
History
and
PE • First:
anatomical
localizaQon
• Second:
cause
of
lesion of
lesion
or
neurology
– Congenital,
Gene4c system – Trauma – Focal,
Mul4‐focal,
Diffuse – Nuclear,
tract,
system
disorder – CNS,
PNS,
Boths
– – – – – – –
Tumor Infect/Inflamma4on Vascular Toxic/metabolic/Nutri4onal Degenera4on/Demyelina4on Idiopathic Psychogenic
Series
of
steps
to
collect
data Task
Goal
Chief
complaint Tipping
the
point History
Complaint
explorer Neurological examina4on
List
of
the
problems Rank
of
order
of Likelihood
of
possible
disease
Confirma4on of
localiza4on Review
of Pa4ent‐specific
feature
Differen4al
diagnosis
Combine it together
Thank you for your attention. www.neurologycoffeecup.com