Answer To Cc Complaint

  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Answer To Cc Complaint as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 721
  • Pages: 5
TIMOTHY L. MCCANDLESS, ESQ. SBN 147715 LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY L. MCCANDLESS 820 Main Martinez, California 94553 (925) 957-9797 Telephone (925) 957-9799 Facsimile Attorney for Defendant, DEFENDANT NAME SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF COUNTY NAME NAME BRANCH Case No.: XX-XXX-XXXX PLAINTIFF NAME Plaintiff,

DEFENDANT’S ANSWER COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOTICE OF NON-STIPULATION TO COMMISSIONER

vs. NAME OF DEFENDANT and DOES I through X, Inclusive Defendant(s).

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES HEREIN, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

COMES NOW THE DEFENDANT, DEFENDANT NAME, and in answer to the complaint on file herein, admits, denies, and alleges as follows: GENERAL DENIAL

1

The defendant denies each and every, all and singular, generally and specifically,

2

the allegations contained in the complaint.

3 4 5

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

6

First Affirmative Defense

7 8 9 10

Fails To State Sufficient Facts Each purported cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a basis for relief against these answering Defendants.

11 12

Second Affirmative Defense

13

Waiver

14 15

20. The claims being advanced by Plaintiffs are barred by virtue of the Plaintiff’s acts

16

and/or omissions that amount to a waiver, including but, not limited to attempting to enforce a

17

non-negotiable promissory note by way of an invalid non-judicial foreclosure sale.

18 19

Third Affirmative Defense

20

Estoppel

21 22

21. This answering defendant is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that

23

Plaintiffs have engaged in conduct and activities, and by reason of said activities and conduct are

24 25 26

estopped from asserting any claims for damages or seeking any other relief against this answering Defendant.

27 28

2 of 5 _____________________________________________________________________________ GENERAL DENIAL ANSWER

Fourth Affirmative Defense

1 2

Failure To Mitigate Damages

3

Plaintiffs though under a duty to do so, have failed and neglected to mitigate

4 5 6

their damages and, therefore, cannot recover against these answering Defendants whether as alleged or otherwise. Fifth Affirmative Defense

7

Statute of Frauds

8 9 10

The present action is barred by application of the Statute of Frauds because the agreement is not in writing.

11

Sixth Affirmative Defense

12

Statute of Limitations

13 14

The present action is barred by application of the applicable statute of limitations.

15 16

Seventh Affirmative Defense

17

Unclean Hands

18 19 20

By virtue of Plaintiff’s conduct, Plaintiffs are barred from recovery therein by the doctrine of unclean hands.

21

Eighth Affirmative Defense

22

Standing

23 24

This answering defendant alleges that the Plaintiff does not have standing because

25

Plaintiff’s standing is based solely upon an invalid contract not properly assigned the

26

enforcement of a promissory note that was not negotiable pursuant to California Commercial

27

Code section 3203 et seq.

28

3 of 5 _____________________________________________________________________________ GENERAL DENIAL ANSWER

Ninth Affirmative Defense

1

Reservation of Defendants

2 3 4

Defendant hereby reserves all defenses unknown at the time of filing this response. Dated: TODAYS DATE

5 6 7 8

_____________________________ Timothy L. McCandless, Esq. Attorney for Defendant, DEFENDANT NAME

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

4 of 5 _____________________________________________________________________________ GENERAL DENIAL ANSWER

1 2

PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

3 4 5 6 7

I am over the age of 18 and not a party to this action. My business address is 820 Main, Martinez, California 94553, which is located in the county where the mailing described took place. On October 31, 2009, I served the foregoing document(s) described: DEFENDANT’S ANSWER

8

Which were served upon:

9

Attorney for Plaintiff

10 11 12 13

xx I deposited the foregoing documents in the United States Postal Service. Executed on: Date , in Martinez, California.

14 15 16 17 18 19

(State) XXXX I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. (Federal) ____ I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. _______ BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I caused such envelope to be delivered by hand to the addressee(s) above.

20 21 22

___________________________

23 24 25 26 27 28

5 of 5 _____________________________________________________________________________ GENERAL DENIAL ANSWER

Related Documents