Analysis Risk Final

  • Uploaded by: Klaus Janssen Johanssen
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Analysis Risk Final as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 6,008
  • Pages: 85
Effect of the risk factors on the Structural Conservation Process Delay

Main Risks

Secondary Risks

Project Name

Encroachments & Occupation(EO)

Structural Failure of Monuments(SFM)

Legal,Administrator &Financial Procedures(LAFP)

Structural Solution(SS)

Project Delay Time/ Project No Time

Magra el Eyon

no.1

El sour El shamaly

no.2

Structural Failure of Surrounding Unfeasible Structural Buildings(SFSB) Solutios(USS) Structural Solution(SS)

Structural Solution(SS)

Delay Time/ Project Delay Time/ Project Delay Time/ Project Time Time Time

Natural Risk(NR)

Structural Solution(SS) Delay Time/ Project Time

40/24= 166% (VH) 5/24= 21% (L)

6/24= 25% (L)

Change to Policy of Intervention(CPI)

5/24= 21% (L)

7/24= 29% (L)

22/24= 92%(VH)

14/24= 58% (H)

4/24= 17% (VL)

Gohary group

no.4

6/24= 25% (L)

1/24= 4% (VL)

6/24= 25% (L)

El Moayed Sheekh

no.5

8/24= 33% (L)

2/24= 8.3% (VL)

6/24= 25% (L)

Beshtak Group

no.6

8/24= 33% (L)

6/24= 25% (L)

6/24= 25% (L)

El Selehdar Group

no.7

2/18= 11% (VL)

6/18= 34% (L)

4/18= 22% (L)

El Ashraf Bersbay Gr. no.8

7/24= 29% (L)

4/24= 17% (VL)

Kalawoon Group

no.9

6/24= 25% (L)

Ebn Tolon Masged

no.10

New Technological Solutions(NTS)

4/24= 17% (VL) 4/24=17% (VL)

no.12

2/24= 8% (VL)

Wekala el Khory

no.13

30/18= 167% (VH)

Abo el Dahab Group

no.14

12/24= 50% (M)

4/24= 17% (VL)

El Khory Group

no.15

24/24= 100% (VH)

6/24= 25% (L)

13/18= 72% (H)

3/24= 13% (VL)

3/24= 13% (VL) 9/24= 38% (M) 22/24= 92% (VH)

9/24= 38% (M) 62/24=258%

10/24= 42% (M)

40/24=167%

6/24= 25% (L)

29/24=121%

10/24= 42% (M)

2/24= 8.3% (VL)40/24=167%

38/18=211%

6/24= 25% (L)

20/24=83%

4/24= 17% (VL)

22/24=92%

3/24= 13% (VL)

12/24=50%

10/24= 42% (M)

55/24=229% 30/24=125% 30/18=167%

9/24= 38% (M) 4/24= 17% (VL)

12/24= 50% (M)

37/24=154%

10/24= 42% (M)

4/24= 17% (VL) 6/30= 20% (L)

no.17

9/24= 38% (M)

Kasr el Manyal

no.18

18/24= 75% (H)

Bebars Group

no.19

Shabshery Group

no.20

9/36= 25% (L)

24/24=100%

13/18= 72% (H)

6/24= 25% (L)

El Ameer Taaz House no.16 El Eeny Group

Problems with Utility &Infrastructure Lines(PUIL)

6/24= 25% (L)

4/24= 17% (VL)

3/24= 13% (VL)

9/24= 38% (M)

Sadat House

6/24= 25% (L)

8/24= 34% (L)

9/24= 38% (M)

4/24= 17% (VL)

New Archaeological Finds(NAF)

9/24= 38% (M) 61/24=254%

20/24= 83% (VH

6/24= 25% (L) 23/24= 96% (VH)

Major Decisions to Dismentale or Reconstruction(MDDR)

Archeologica Archeological Architictura Architictur Archeological&Ar l&Architictu Prermissions of the Structural Archeological&Archi &Architictura l& Survey al& Survey Total Delay chitictural ral Relevent Solution(SS) or PRA tictural Studies(AAS) l Documents( Documents Time/ Studies(AAS) Studies(AAS Authorities(PRA) Studies(AAS) ASD) (ASD) Project ) Time Delay Time/ Project Delay Time/ Project Delay Time/ Delay Time/ Project Delay Time/ Project Delay Time/ Project Time Time Time Project Time Time Time

Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra no.3

Mamaay el Seefy Groupno.11

6/24= 25% (L)

Problems Water Lowering Projects(PWLP)

4/24= 17% (VL)

14/24= 58.3% (H)

2/24= 8.3% (VL)

48/24=200% 6/30=20%

5/24= 21% (L)

44/24=183% 18/24=75%

2/36= 5% (VL)

5/36= 14% (VL)

5/36=14%

4/36= 11% (VL)

15/36=42%

Main Risks

Secondary Risks

Project Name

Encroachments & Occupation(EO)

Structural Failure of Monuments(SFM)

Legal,Administrator &Financial Procedures(LAFP)

Structural Solution(SS)

Project Probapility No

Impact

Probapility

Impact

Structural Failure of Surrounding Buildings(SFSB) Structural Solution(SS)

Probapility

Impact

Magra el Eyon

no.1

80% (H) 166% (VH)

El sour El shamaly

no.2

15% (VL) 21% (L)

Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra

no.3

10% (VL) 17% (VL)

Gohary group

no.4

20% (VL) 25% (L)

60% (H) 4% (VL)

El Moayed Sheekh

no.5

20% (VL) 33% (L)

5% (VL) 8.3% (VL)

Beshtak Group

no.6

20% (VL) 33% (L)

El Selehdar Group

no.7

10% (VL) 11% (VL)

El Ashraf Bersbay Gr.

no.8

25% (L) 29% (L)

Kalawoon Group

no.9

10% (VL) 25% (L)

Ebn Tolon Masged

no.10

Mamaay el Seefy Group no.11

40% (M) 96% (VH)

Sadat House

no.12

Wekala el Khory

no.13

65% (H) 167% (VH)

Abo el Dahab Group

no.14

40% (M) 50% (M)

El Khory Group

no.15

50% (M) 100% (VH)

El Ameer Taaz House

no.16

El Eeny Group

no.17

25% (L) 38% (M)

Kasr el Manyal

no.18

50% (M) 75% (H)

Bebars Group

no.19

Shabshery Group

no.20

15% (VL) 25% (L)

10% (VL) 17% (VL) 60% (H) 8% (VL)

40% (M) 25% (L)

85% (VH) 17% (VL)

Risk Probability (%)

VL (0-23 %)

L (18-42 %)

M (39-63 %)

Risk Impact (%)

VL (0-24 %)

L (19-40 %)

M (37-63 %)

Structural Conservation Process Delay Evaluation (SCPDE) %

VL (0-25 %)

L (20-45 %)

M (43-80 %)

Unfeasible Structural Solutios(USS) Structural Solution(SS) Probapility

Impact

Natural Risk(NR)

Structural Solution(SS)

Probapility

Impact

30% (L) 25% (L)

Problems Water Lowering Projects(PWLP)

Change to Policy of Intervention(CPI)

Structural Archeological&Architict Solution(SS) or PRA ural Studies(AAS) Probapility

Impact

Probapility

Impact

90% (VH) 21% (L)

70%( H) 29% (L)

90% (VH) 92%(VH)

70% (H) 58% (H)

40% (M) 83% (VH) 80% (VH) 25% (L) 70% (H) 25% (L)

10% (VL) 17% (VL)

80% (VH) 25% (L)

40% (M) 25% (L)

75% (H) 34% (L)

80% (VH) 22% (L)

40% (M) 17% (VL)

10% (VL) 13% (VL) 90% (VH) 38% (M)

50% (M) 25% (L)

10% (VL) 13% (VL)

70% (H) 38% (M)

40% (M) 38% (M) 90% (VH) 92% (VH)

70% (H) 17% (VL) 40% (M) 25% (L)

25% (L) 13% (VL)

70% (H) 25% (L)

40% (M) 38% (M) 90% (VH) 17% (VL)

60% (H) 42% (M)

80% (VH) 58.3% (H)

90% (VH) 5% (VL)

H (60-84 %)

VH (79-100 %)

H (58-78 %)

VH (76-100 %)

H (75-95 %)

VH > 95%

Major Decisions to Dismentale or Reconstruction(MDDR)

New Technological Solutions(NTS)

New Archaeological Finds(NAF)

Architictural Architictural Archeological& Archeological& & Survey Archeological&Architic & Survey Architictural Architictural Documents( tural Studies(AAS) Documents( Studies(AAS) Studies(AAS) ASD) ASD) Probapility

Impact

Probapility

Impact

Probapility

Impact

Problems with Utility &Infrastructure Lines(PUIL) Prermissions of the Relevent Authorities(PRA) Probapility

Impact

90% (VH) 38% (M) 20% (L) 25% (L)

80% (H) 38% (M)

70% (H) 42% (M) 90% (VH) 17% (VL)

10% (VL) 25% (L)

90% (VH) 34% (L)

30% (L) 25% (L) 85% (VH) 42% (M) 90% (VH) 17% (VL)

10% (VL) 72% (H)

20% (L) 72% (H) 40% (M) 25% (L) 40% (M) 17% (VL) 10% (VL) 13% (VL)

90% (VH) 42% (M)

90% (VH) 50% (M) 10% (VL) 17% (VL) 50% (M) 20% (L) 10% (VL) 8.3% (VL)

10% (VL) 21% (L)

10% (VL) 14% (VL) 4/36= 11% (VL)

5%(VL) 8.3% (VL)

Total Delay Time/ Project Time

61/24=254% VH

77 Magra el Eyon

62/24=258% VH

79 El sour El shamaly

40/24=167% VH

41 Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra

29/24=121% VH

29 Gohary group

40/24=167% VH

40 El Moayed Sheekh

24/24=100% VH

23.5 Beshtak Group

38/18=211% VH

38 El Selehdar Group

20/24=83%

H

23 El Ashraf Bersbay Gr.

22/24=92%

H

23 Kalawoon Group

12/24=50%

M

33 Ebn Tolon Masged

55/24=229% VH

55 Mamaay el Seefy Group

30/24=125% VH

30 Sadat House

30/18=167% VH

32.5 Wekala el Khory

37/24=154% VH

37 Abo el Dahab Group

48/24=200% VH

48 El Khory Group

6/30=20%

VL

6 El Ameer Taaz House

44/24=183% VH

34 El Eeny Group

18/24=75%

M

18 Kasr el Manyal

5/36=14%

VL

5 Bebars Group

15/36=42%

L

15 Shabshery Group

Main Risks

Encroachments & Occupation(EO) Legal,Administrator &Financial Procedures(LAFP)

Secondary Risks

Project Name

Project Probapility No

Natural Risk(NR)

Structural Failure of Surrounding Buildings(SFSB)

Structural Solution(SS)

Structural Solution(SS)

Impact

Probapility

Impact

Probapility

Magra el Eyon

no.1

80

100

1

1

1

El sour El shamaly

no.2

15

21

1

1

1

Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra

no.3

10

17

1

1

1

Gohary group

no.4

20

25

1

1

60

El Moayed Sheekh

no.5

20

33

10

17

5

Beshtak Group

no.6

20

33

1

1

1

El Selehdar Group

no.7

10

11

1

1

1

El Ashraf Bersbay Gr.

no.8

25

29

1

1

1

Kalawoon Group

no.9

10

25

1

1

1

Ebn Tolon Masged

no.10

1

1

1

1

1

40

96

1

1

1

Mamaay el Seefy Group no.11 Sadat House

no.12

1

1

1

1

1

Wekala el Khory

no.13

65

100

1

1

1

Abo el Dahab Group

no.14

40

50

1

1

1

El Khory Group

no.15

50

100

1

1

1

El Ameer Taaz House

no.16

1

1

1

1

1

El Eeny Group

no.17

25

38

1

1

85

Kasr el Manyal

no.18

50

75

1

1

1

Bebars Group

no.19

1

1

1

1

1

Shabshery Group

no.20

40

25

1

1

1

Risk Probability (%)

VL (0-23 %)

VH (79-100 %)

M

Risk Impact (%) Construction Conservation Process Delay Evaluation (CCPDE) %

VL (0-24 %)

VH (76-100 %)

M

VL (0-25 %)

VH > 95%

M

Construction Conservation Process Delay Evaluation (CCPDE) %

80 15 10 20 20 20

VL (0-25 %)

VH > 95%

90 90 15 10

60 5

M

30 40 80 70 80

10

10 25 10

10 90 10

40

10 60

70 40 50 0

90 21 92 25 4 17 8

13 38 13

96

17 8

167 50 100

25

90

85

40

38 75

50 70

90

25 50

10

90

65 40 50

166 21 17 25 33 33 11 29 25

75 40

25 83 25 25 25 34 17 25 38

25

72

42

92

17

17 25 20 8

17

5

Structural Failure of Surrounding Buildings(SFSB) Structural Solution(SS)

Structural Failure of Monuments(SFM)

Problems Water Lowering Projects(PWLP)

Unfeasible Structural Solutios(USS)

Structural Solution(SS)

Structural Solution(SS) or PRA

Structural Solution(SS)

New Technological Solutions(NTS) Archeological&Architic tural Studies(AAS)

Impact

Probapility

Impact

Probapility

Impact

Probapility

Impact

Probapility

Impact

1

1

1

90

21

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

90

92

30

25

1

1

1

15

25

1

1

40

83

1

1

4

1

1

1

1

80

25

10

25

8

1

1

1

1

70

25

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

80

25

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

75

34

10

72

1

1

1

10

13

40

17

1

1

1

1

1

90

38

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

10

13

50

25

1

1

1

10

17

1

1

70

38

90

42

1

60

8

90

92

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

70

17

1

1

1

1

1

90

17

40

25

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

50

20

17

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

8

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

90

5

1

1

1

1

(39-63 %)

L (18-42 %)

H (60-84 %)

(37-63 %)

L (19-40 %)

H (58-78 %)

(43-80 %)

L (20-45 %)

H (75-95 %)

(43-80 %)

L (20-45 %)

70 70 90 90 40

20 70 30 85 90

H (75-95 %)

90 80

5

80

20 40 40 10

25 40 70 40 60

90 10

80

10 10 11

29 58 17 34 25 22 13

25 42 25 42 17 72 25 17 13

38 25 38 42 58

50 17 21 14 11

38 38

8

Change to Policy of Intervention(CPI) Archeological&Architict ural Studies(AAS)

Major Decisions to Dismentale or Reconstruction(MDDR)

New Archaeological Finds(NAF)

Architictural Architictural Archeological& Archeological& & Survey & Survey Architictural Architictural Documents( Documents( Studies(AAS) Studies(AAS) ASD) ASD)

Problems with Utility &Infrastructure Lines(PUIL) Prermissions of the Relevent Authorities(PRA)

Probapility

Impact

Probapility

Impact

Probapility

Impact

Probapility

Impact

70

29

1

1

1

1

90

38

70

58

1

1

20

25

80

38

1

1

1

1

70

42

1

1

1

1

90

17

30

25

1

1

1

1

90

34

85

42

5

8

40

25

1

1

90

17

1

1

80

22

1

1

20

72

1

1

1

1

1

1

40

25

1

1

25

13

1

1

40

17

1

1

1

1

1

1

10

13

1

1

40

38

1

1

1

1

1

1

70

25

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

40

38

90

50

1

1

1

1

60

42

1

1

10

17

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

80

58

1

1

10

21

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

10

14

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

11

1

1

Total Delay Time/ Project Time

61/24=254% VH

77 Magra el Eyon

62/24=258% VH

79 El sour El shamaly

40/24=167% VH

41 Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra

29/24=121% VH

29 Gohary group

40/24=167% VH

40 El Moayed Sheekh

24/24=100% VH

23.5 Beshtak Group

38/18=211% VH

38 El Selehdar Group

20/24=83%

H

23 El Ashraf Bersbay Gr.

22/24=92%

H

23 Kalawoon Group

12/24=50%

M

33 Ebn Tolon Masged

55/24=229% VH

55 Mamaay el Seefy Group

30/24=125% VH

30 Sadat House

30/18=167% VH

32.5 Wekala el Khory

37/24=154% VH

37 Abo el Dahab Group

48/24=200% VH

48 El Khory Group

6/30=20%

VL

6 El Ameer Taaz House

44/24=183% VH

34 El Eeny Group

18/24=75%

M

18 Kasr el Manyal

5/36=14%

VL

5 Bebars Group

15/36=42%

L

15 Shabshery Group

Main Risks

Encroachments & Occupation(EO) Legal,Administrator &Financial Procedures(LAFP)

Secondary Risks

Project Name

Natural Risk(NR)

Structural Solution(SS)

Project Probapilit Probapilit Impact% No y% y%

Structural Failure of Surrounding Buildings(SFSB) Structural Solution(SS)

Impact%

Probapilit y%

Magra el Eyon

no.1

99

99

15

20

85

El sour El shamaly

no.2

95

80

15

40

95

Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra no.3

95

80

25

70

95

Gohary group

no.4

85

75

25

40

60

El Moayed Sheekh

no.5

90

65

25

40

20

Beshtak Group

no.6

90

85

25

40

60

El Selehdar Group

no.7

90

40

25

60

0

El Ashraf Bersbay Gr. no.8

90

70

25

40

20

Kalawoon Group

no.9

90

70

25

40

70

Ebn Tolon Masged

no.10

0

0

25

40

0

Mamaay el Seefy Groupno.11

99

99

25

50

70

Sadat House

no.12

90

40

25

70

0

Wekala el Khory

no.13

99

99

25

40

0

Abo el Dahab Group

no.14

90

85

20

20

20

El Khory Group

no.15

99

99

25

40

50

El Ameer Taaz House no.16

95

35

25

40

80

El Eeny Group

no.17

90

95

25

40

80

Kasr el Manyal

no.18

95

85

25

20

0

Bebars Group

no.19

90

80

25

40

70

Shabshery Group

no.20

99

99

25

40

70

Risk Probability (%) Risk Impact (%)

VL (0-23 %) VL (0-24 %)

L (18-42 %) L (19-40 %)

M M

Structural Conservation Process Delay Evaluation (SCPDE) %

VL (0-22%)

L (20-43 %)

M

80 15

90 90

30

10 20 20 20 10 25 10

15 60 5

10

10 90 10

40

10 60

70 40 50 0

90 21 92 25 4 17 8

13 38 13

96

17 8

167 50 100

25

90

85

40

38 75

10

50 70

90

25 50

10

90

65 40 50

166 21 17 25 33 33 11 29 25

40 80 70 80 75 40

25 83 25 25 25 34 17 25 38

25

72

42

92

17

17 25 20 8

17

5

The senarios of Historic Building Restoration Projects Structural Failure of Surrounding Structural Failure of Buildings(SFSB) Monuments(SFM) Structural Solution(SS) Impact%

Structural Solution(SS)

Problems Water Lowering Projects(PWLP) Structural Solution(SS) or PRA

Probapilit Probapilit Impact% y% y%

Impact%

Unfeasible Structural Solutios(USS) Structural Solution(SS)

New Technological Solutions(NTS) Archeological&Arc hitictural Studies(AAS) or LAFP

Probapility Probapilit Impact% Impact% % y%

25

20

30

90

95

70

40

60

65

25

25

30

90

92

70

50

50

40

95

90

95

80

40

85

75

60

65

25

70

80

0

0

80

90

60

70

20

40

60

0

0

70

90

60

35

25

80

60

0

0

80

90

60

40

0

80

80

0

0

75

80

60

70

30

40

45

95

70

70

70

60

70

65

70

70

95

95

70

60

60

70

0

50

70

70

50

70

80

50

60

45

80

75

0

0

70

85

90

85

0

90

65

95

99

80

90

90

40

0

20

20

0

0

80

80

60

40

20

50

40

0

0

70

85

50

30

40

80

90

90

90

80

85

60

65

45

90

60

0

0

80

70

80

40

45

90

70

0

0

80

87

80

40

0

20

25

0

0

60

60

50

40

40

70

80

0

0

75

70

50

40

50

75

80

90

80

75

80

50

40

(39-63 %) (37-63 %)

H (60-84 %) H (58-78 %)

VH (79-100 %) VH (76-100 %)

(38-59 %)

H (57-81 %)

VH (78-100)%

70 70

20

90 80

70 30 85 90 20 40 40 10

90 90 40 80 25

5

40 70 40 60

90 10

80

10 10 11

29 58 17 34 25 22 13

25 42 25 42 17 72 25 17 13

38 25 38 42 58

50 17 21 14 11

38 38

8

Change to Policy of Intervention(CPI)

Major Decisions to Dismentale or Reconstruction(MDDR)

New Archaeological Finds(NAF)

Problems with Utility &Infrastructure Lines(PUIL)

Archeological Architictura Archeologica Architictur Archeological&Arch Prermissions of the &Architictura l& Survey l&Architictur al& Survey itictural Relevent l Documents( al Documents Studies(AAS) Authorities(PRA) Studies(AAS) ASD) Studies(AAS) (ASD) Probapilit Impact% Probapility% y%

Impact% Probapility% Impact%

Probapilit Impact% y%

70

90

80

85

70

45

70

87

70

90

80

95

70

30

70

83

70

90

90

87

70

90

0

0

80

90

90

50

70

65

0

0

95

99

95

95

85

90

0

0

85

90

80

65

90

90

0

0

80

85

0

0

90

90

0

0

80

80

0

0

60

65

0

0

80

80

90

75

60

70

0

0

70

70

0

0

60

60

20

20

70

80

70

40

70

75

0

0

80

70

0

0

90

60

70

55

70

65

0

0

50

30

0

0

80

75

90

95

70

65

0

0

80

85

90

45

80

95

70

65

95

80

0

0

90

75

0

0

80

99

80

83

80

85

0

0

70

65

0

0

50

30

0

0

70

75

50

40

80

65

0

0

70

80

85

82

70

70

0

0

Total Delay Time of SCP/ Project Time

61/24=254%VH

77 Magra el Eyon

62/24=258%VH

79 El sour El shamaly

40/24=167%VH

41 Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra

29/24=121%VH

29 Gohary group

40/24=167%VH

40 El Moayed Sheekh

24/24=100%VH

23.5 Beshtak Group

38/18=211%VH

38 El Selehdar Group

20/24=83% H

23 El Ashraf Bersbay Gr.

22/24=92% H

23 Kalawoon Group

12/24=50% M

33 Ebn Tolon Masged

55/24=229%VH

55 Mamaay el Seefy Group

30/24=125%VH

30 Sadat House

30/18=167% VH

32.5 Wekala el Khory

37/24=154%VH

37 Abo el Dahab Group

48/24=200%VH

48 El Khory Group

6/30=20% VL

6 El Ameer Taaz House

44/24=183%VH

34 El Eeny Group

18/24=75% M

18 Kasr el Manyal

5/36=14% VL

5 Bebars Group

15/36=42% L

15 Shabshery Group

Magra el Eyon El sour El shamaly Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra Gohary group El Moayed Sheekh Beshtak Group El Selehdar Group El Ashraf Bersbay Gr. Kalawoon Group Ebn Tolon Masged Mamaay el Seefy Group Sadat House Wekala el Khory Abo el Dahab Group El Khory Group El Ameer Taaz House El Eeny Group Kasr el Manyal Bebars Group Shabshery Group

Delay 73.1 63.6 63.8 61.7 63.8 61.4 64.4 63.8 63.8 61.6 64.1 63.8 63.9 69.0 63.9 63.7 61.4 63.6 64.1 64.1

73.1 63.6 63.8 61.7 63.8 61.4 64.4 63.8 63.8 61.6 64.1 63.8 63.9 69.0 63.9 63.7 61.4 63.6 64.1 64.1 Impact =

Impact 62.5 62.3 72.1 61.7 69.2 61.4 67.7 60.3 70.1 66.5 73.8 68.5 68.5 68.3 70.3 62.4 70.6 58.0 69.8 68.8

62.54 62.26 72.11 61.74 69.16 61.4 67.71 60.33 70.13 66.51 73.76 68.53 68.51 68.25 70.34 62.41 70.6 57.96 69.78 68.76

Evalution 82.4 76.6 90.6 62.9 90.6 51.3 90.6 72.2 90.6 76.6 90.6 90.6 90.6 91.6 90.6 76.6 72.3 72.2 90.6 90.6

61.96 59.93 70.88 50.02 68.74 49.88 67.73 60.51 69.59 58.87 71.78 68.74 68.74 61.06 69.59 59.93 58.84 60.85 69.59 68.74

VH H VH H VH M

Evalution =

Main Risks

Encroachments & Occupation(EO) Legal,Administrator &Financial Procedures(LAFP)

Secondary Risks Project Name

Natural Risk(NR)

Structural Solution(SS)

Project Probapilit Probapilit Impact% No y% y%

Structural Failure of Surrounding Buildings(SFSB) Structural Solution(SS)

Impact%

Probapilit y%

Magra el Eyon

no.1

95

99

50

70

95

El sour El shamaly

no.2

95

80

50

70

95

Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra no.3

95

80

50

70

95

Gohary group

no.4

85

85

50

70

60

El Moayed Sheekh

no.5

90

80

50

70

90

Beshtak Group

no.6

90

90

50

70

90

El Selehdar Group

no.7

90

75

50

70

70

El Ashraf Bersbay Gr. no.8

90

70

50

70

70

Kalawoon Group

no.9

90

70

50

70

70

Ebn Tolon Masged

no.10

80

70

50

70

60

Mamaay el Seefy Groupno.11

90

90

50

70

70

Sadat House

no.12

90

80

50

70

70

Wekala el Khory

no.13

99

99

50

70

70

Abo el Dahab Group

no.14

90

85

50

70

80

El Khory Group

no.15

99

99

50

70

80

El Ameer Taaz House no.16

90

70

50

60

80

El Eeny Group

no.17

90

95

50

60

80

Kasr el Manyal

no.18

95

85

50

70

60

no.19

90

80

50

60

70

Shabshery Group no.20 Risk Probability (%) Risk Impact (%)

99

99

50

70

70

Bebars Group

Structural Conservation Process Delay Evaluation (SCPDE) %

VL (0-23 %) VL (0-24 %)

L (18-42 %) L (19-40 %)

M M

VL (0-22%)

L (20-43 %)

M

80 15 10 20 20 20 10 25 10

90 90 60 5

10

10 90 10

40

10 60

70 40 50 0

90 21 92 25 4 17 8

13 38 13

96

17 8

167 50 100

25

90

85

40

38 75

10

50 70

90

25 50

10

90

65 40 50

166 21 17 25 33 33 11 29 25

30 40 80 70 80 75 40

15

25 83 25 25 25 34 17 25 38

25

72

42

92

17

17 25 20 8

17

5

The senarios of Historic Building Restoration Projects Structural Failure of Surrounding Structural Failure of Buildings(SFSB) Monuments(SFM) Structural Solution(SS) Impact%

Structural Solution(SS)

Problems Water Lowering Projects(PWLP)

New Technological Solutions(NTS)

Archeological&Arc hitictural Studies(AAS) or LAFP Probapility Probapilit Impact% Impact% Impact% % y%

Structural Solution(SS) or PRA

Probapilit Probapilit Impact% y% y%

Unfeasible Structural Solutios(USS) Structural Solution(SS)

95

80

95

90

90

70

85

60

70

80

80

95

90

92

70

85

60

70

95

90

95

80

80

95

95

60

70

80

70

80

50

75

80

90

60

70

80

80

80

50

75

70

80

60

70

80

80

80

50

75

80

90

60

70

80

80

80

50

75

75

80

60

70

80

70

80

95

80

70

60

60

70

80

70

90

95

95

70

60

60

70

60

60

70

80

80

70

80

50

60

85

80

90

50

70

70

85

90

85

70

90

90

95

99

80

90

90

90

80

75

80

50

70

80

80

60

70

85

80

90

60

70

70

85

50

70

85

80

90

90

90

80

85

60

70

85

90

80

50

60

80

85

80

70

85

90

95

50

70

80

87

80

70

60

60

70

50

60

60

60

50

60

65

70

80

40

60

75

70

50

60

80

75

80

90

80

75

80

50

70

(39-63 %) (37-63 %)

H (60-84 %) H (58-78 %)

VH (79-100 %) VH (76-100 %)

(38-59 %)

H (57-81 %)

VH (78-100)%

70 70

90 80

20 70 30 85 90 20 40 40 10

90 90 40 80 25

5

40 70 40 60

90 10

80

10 10 11

29 58 17 34 25 22 13

25 42 25 42 17 72 25 17 13

38 25 38 42 58

50 17 21 14 11

38 38

8

Change to Policy of Intervention(CPI)

Major Decisions to Dismentale or Reconstruction(MDDR)

New Archaeological Finds(NAF)

Problems with Utility &Infrastructure Lines(PUIL)

Archeological Architictura Archeologica Architictur Archeological&Arch Prermissions of the &Architictura l& Survey l&Architictur al& Survey itictural Relevent l Documents( al Documents Studies(AAS) Authorities(PRA) Studies(AAS) ASD) Studies(AAS) (ASD) Probapilit Probapilit Impact% Probapility% Impact% Probapility% Impact% Impact% y% y% 70

85

80

85

70

75

90

90

70

90

95

95

70

75

80

90

70

90

90

95

70

80

80

80

80

90

90

90

70

80

80

80

95

99

95

95

85

90

70

80

85

90

90

90

90

90

70

80

80

85

90

90

90

90

70

80

80

80

50

60

60

65

50

70

80

80

90

80

60

70

50

70

70

70

50

50

60

60

50

50

70

80

70

80

70

75

60

75

80

85

80

95

90

95

70

85

70

85

50

65

70

70

60

70

80

85

90

95

70

85

50

60

80

85

90

95

80

95

70

70

95

80

90

75

90

75

70

60

80

99

80

83

80

85

70

65

70

65

50

60

50

55

60

50

70

75

60

60

80

85

60

60

70

80

85

82

70

75

60

60

Total Delay Time/ Project Time

61/24=254%VH

77 Magra el Eyon

62/24=258%VH

79 El sour El shamaly

40/24=167%VH

41 Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra

29/24=121%VH

29 Gohary group

40/24=167%VH

40 El Moayed Sheekh

24/24=100%VH

23.5 Beshtak Group

38/18=211%VH

38 El Selehdar Group

20/24=83% H

23 El Ashraf Bersbay Gr.

22/24=92% H

23 Kalawoon Group

12/24=50% M

33 Ebn Tolon Masged

55/24=229%VH

55 Mamaay el Seefy Group

30/24=125%VH

30 Sadat House

30/18=167% VH

32.5 Wekala el Khory

37/24=154%VH

37 Abo el Dahab Group

48/24=200%VH

48 El Khory Group

6/30=20% VL

6 El Ameer Taaz House

44/24=183%VH

34 El Eeny Group

18/24=75% M

18 Kasr el Manyal

5/36=14% VL 15/36=42% L

5 Bebars Group 15 Shabshery Group

Magra el Eyon El sour El shamaly Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra Gohary group El Moayed Sheekh Beshtak Group El Selehdar Group El Ashraf Bersbay Gr. Kalawoon Group Ebn Tolon Masged Mamaay el Seefy Group Sadat House Wekala el Khory Abo el Dahab Group El Khory Group El Ameer Taaz House El Eeny Group Kasr el Manyal

Bebars Group Shabshery Group

Compare bet.the results of programes & the actua Program Results Project Name

Project No RiskProbapility%

Values

Risk Impact %

Magra el Eyon (finished)

no.1

73.510

H

83.450

El sour El shamaly (finished)

no.2

73.510

H

83.230

Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra (finished)

no.3

73.510

H

83.877

Gohary group (finished)

no.4

71.668

H

83.446

El Moayed Sheekh (finished)

no.5

73.510

H

84.094

Beshtak Group (finished)

no.6

71.524

H

82.335

El Selehdar Group (finished)

no.7

73.764

H

81.720

El Ashraf Bersbay Gr. (finished)

no.8

73.510

H

66.508

Kalawoon Group (finished)

no.9

73.510

H

75.855

Ebn Tolon Masged (finished)

no.10

44.133

M

51.213

Mamaay el Seefy Group (finished)

no.11

71.668

H

81.720

Sadat House (finished)

no.12

73.510

H

84.094

Wekala el Khory (finished)

no.13

73.764

H

84.094

Abo el Dahab Group (finished)

no.14

71.668

H

83.877

El Khory Group (finished)

no.15

73.767

H

84.094

El Ameer Taaz House (finished)

no.16

70.932

H

55.333

El Eeny Group (finished)

no.17

71.524

H

84.094

Kasr el Manyal (Continuous)

no.18

73.510

H

71.232

Bebars Group (Continuous)

no.19

69.008

H

56.573

Shabshery Group (Continuous) Risk Probability (%)

no.20

73.764

H

73.768

VL (0-23 %)

L

Risk Impact (%)

VL (0-24 %)

L

Structural Conservation Process Delay Evaluation (SCPDE) %

VL (0-22%)

L

80 15 10 20 20 20 10 25 10

10

40 65 40 50 25 50 40 166 21 17 25 33 33 11 29 25 96 167 50 100 38 75 25

17

of programes & the actual results Program Results

Actual Results

Values

Structural Conservation Process Delay Evaluation(SCPD)%

Values

VH

90.220

VH

61/24=254%

VH

VH

90.220

VH

62/24=258%

VH

VH

90.450

VH

40/24=167%

VH

VH

89.984

VH

29/24=121%

VH

VH

90.450

VH

40/24=167%

VH

VH

89.984

VH

24/24=100%

VH

VH

89.984

VH

38/18=211%

VH

H

68.742

H

20/24=83%

H

H

68.795

H

22/24=92%

H

M

48.593

M

12/24=50%

M

VH

89.984

VH

55/24=229%

VH

VH

90.450

VH

30/24=125%

VH

VH

90.450

VH

H

90.450

VH

37/24=154%

VH

VH

90.450

VH

48/24=200%

VH

M

48.619

M

6/30=20%

L

VH

90.450

VH

44/24=183%

VH

H

68.742

H

18/24=75%

H

M

48.583

M

5/36=14%

VL

H

68.742

H

15/36=42%

(18-42 %)

M (39-63 %)

Total Delay Time of SCP/ Values Project Time%

30/18=167% VH

M H (60-84 %)

VH

(19-40 %)

M (37-63 %)

H (58-78 %)

VH

(20-43 %)

M (38-59 %)

H (57-81 %)

VH

(79-100 %)

(76-100 %) (78-100)%

Delay =

Impact =

73.51

83.44

73.51

83.23

73.51

83.88

71.67

82.33

73.51

84.09

71.52

82.33

73.76

81.72

73.51

66.51

73.51

75.86

44.13

51.21

71.67

81.72

73.51

84.09

73.76

84.09

71.67

83.88

73.77

84.09

70.93

55.33

71.52

84.09

73.51

71.23

69.01

56.57

73.76

73.77

Evaluation =

90.22 90.22 90.45 89.98 90.45 89.98 89.98 68.74 68.79 48.59 89.98 90.45 90.45 90.45 90.45 48.62 90.45 68.74 48.58

68.74

Main Risks

Natural Risk(NR) Encroachments & Occupation(EO) Legal,Administrator &Financial Procedures(LAFP)

Secondary Risks Project Name

Structural Solution(SS)

Project Probapilit Probapilit Impact% No y% y%

Structural Failure of Surrounding Buildings(SFSB) Structural Solution(SS)

Impact%

Probapilit y%

Magra el Eyon

no.1

95

99

50

70

95

El sour El shamaly

no.2

95

80

50

70

95

Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra no.3

95

80

50

70

95

Gohary group

no.4

85

85

50

70

60

El Moayed Sheekh

no.5

90

80

50

70

90

Beshtak Group

no.6

90

90

50

70

90

El Selehdar Group

no.7

90

75

50

70

0

El Ashraf Bersbay Gr. no.8

90

50

50

40

0

Kalawoon Group

no.9

90

70

50

70

70

Ebn Tolon Masged

no.10

0

0

20

30

0

Mamaay el Seefy Groupno.11

90

90

50

70

70

Sadat House

no.12

90

80

50

70

0

Wekala el Khory

no.13

99

99

50

70

0

Abo el Dahab Group

no.14

90

85

50

70

80

El Khory Group

no.15

99

99

50

70

80

El Ameer Taaz House no.16

90

30

20

20

50

El Eeny Group

90

95

50

80

90

no.17

Kasr el Manyal

no.18

95

85

0

0

0

Bebars Group

no.19

90

60

20

20

70

Shabshery Group no.20 Risk Probability (%) Risk Impact (%)

99

99

50

70

70

Structural Conservation Process Delay Evaluation (SCPDE) %

VL (0-23 %) VL (0-24 %)

L (18-42 %) L (19-40 %)

M M

VL (0-22%)

L (20-43 %)

M

80 15 10 20 20 20 10 25 10

90 90 60 5

10

10 90 10

40

10 60

70 40

85

90 21 92 25 4 17 8

13 38 13

96

17 8

167 50 100

25

90

50 0

40

38 75

10

50 70

90

25 50

10

90

65 40 50

166 21 17 25 33 33 11 29 25

30 40 80 70 80 75 40

15

25 83 25 25 25 34 17 25 38

25

72

42

92

17

17 25 20 8

17

5

The senarios of Historic Building Restoration Projects

Structural Failure of Surrounding Structural Failure of Buildings(SFSB) Monuments(SFM) Structural Solution(SS) Impact%

Structural Solution(SS)

Problems Water Lowering Projects(PWLP)

New Technological Solutions(NTS)

Archeological&Arc hitictural Studies(AAS) or LAFP Probapility Probapilit Impact% Impact% Impact% % y%

Structural Solution(SS) or PRA

Probapilit Probapilit Impact% y% y%

Unfeasible Structural Solutios(USS) Structural Solution(SS)

95

80

95

90

90

70

85

60

70

80

80

95

90

92

70

85

60

70

95

90

95

80

80

95

95

60

70

80

70

80

0

0

80

90

60

70

80

80

80

0

0

70

80

60

70

80

80

80

0

0

80

90

60

70

0

80

80

0

0

75

80

60

70

0

70

40

95

70

70

60

60

60

80

70

90

95

95

70

60

60

70

0

30

40

20

50

50

60

50

50

85

80

90

0

0

70

85

90

85

0

90

90

95

99

80

90

90

90

0

75

80

0

0

80

80

60

70

85

80

90

0

0

70

85

50

70

85

80

90

90

90

80

85

60

70

30

90

80

0

0

80

85

80

50

85

90

95

0

0

85

90

80

70

0

60

70

0

0

60

60

50

60

40

20

20

0

0

50

50

0

0

80

75

80

90

80

75

80

50

70

(39-63 %) (37-63 %)

H (60-84 %) H (58-78 %)

VH (79-100 %) VH (76-100 %)

(38-59 %)

H (57-81 %)

VH (78-100)%

70 70

90 80

20 70 30 85 90 20 40 40 10

90 90 40 80 25

5

40 70 40 60

90 10

80

10 10 11

29 58 17 34 25 22 13

25 42 25 42 17 72 25 17 13

38 25 38 42 58

50 17 21 14 11

38 38

8

Change to Policy of Intervention(CPI)

Major Decisions to Dismentale or Reconstruction(MDDR)

New Archaeological Finds(NAF)

Problems with Utility &Infrastructure Lines(PUIL)

Archeological Architictura Archeologica Architictur Archeological&Arch Prermissions of the &Architictura l& Survey l&Architictur al& Survey itictural Relevent l Documents( al Documents Studies(AAS) Authorities(PRA) Studies(AAS) ASD) Studies(AAS) (ASD) Probapilit Probapilit Impact% Probapility% Impact% Probapility% Impact% Impact% y% y% 70

85

80

85

70

75

90

90

70

90

95

95

70

75

80

90

70

90

90

95

70

80

0

0

80

90

90

90

70

80

0

0

95

99

95

95

85

90

0

0

85

90

90

90

90

90

0

0

80

85

0

0

90

90

0

0

80

80

0

0

60

65

0

0

80

80

90

80

60

70

0

0

70

70

0

0

60

60

0

0

70

80

70

80

70

75

0

0

80

85

0

0

90

95

70

85

70

85

0

0

70

70

0

0

80

85

90

95

70

85

0

0

80

85

90

95

80

95

70

70

95

80

0

0

90

75

0

0

85

99

85

90

90

85

0

0

70

65

0

0

50

55

0

0

50

50

0

0

70

60

0

0

70

80

70

70

50

50

0

0

Total Delay Time/ Project Time

61/24=254%VH

90.220 VH

77 Magra el Eyon

62/24=258%VH

90.220 VH

79 El sour El shamaly

40/24=167%VH

90.450 VH

41 Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra

29/24=121%VH

89.984 VH

29 Gohary group

40/24=167%VH

90.450 VH

40 El Moayed Sheekh

24/24=100%VH

89.984 VH

38/18=211%VH

89.984 VH

38 El Selehdar Group

20/24=83% H

68.742 H

23 El Ashraf Bersbay Gr.

22/24=92% H

68.795 H

23 Kalawoon Group

12/24=50% M

48.593 M

33 Ebn Tolon Masged

55/24=229%VH

89.984 VH

55 Mamaay el Seefy Group

30/24=125%VH

90.450 VH

30 Sadat House

30/18=167% VH

90.450 VH

37/24=154%VH

90.450 VH

37 Abo el Dahab Group

48/24=200%VH

90.450 VH

48 El Khory Group

6/30=20% VL

48.619 M

44/24=183%VH

90.450 VH

23.5 Beshtak Group

32.5 Wekala el Khory

6 El Ameer Taaz House 34 El Eeny Group

18/24=75% H

68.742 H

18 Kasr el Manyal

5/36=14% VL

48.583 M

5 Bebars Group

15/36=42% L

68.742 H

15 Shabshery Group

Magra el Eyon El sour El shamaly Kasr Moh. Aly Shopra Gohary group El Moayed Sheekh Beshtak Group El Selehdar Group El Ashraf Bersbay Gr. Kalawoon Group Ebn Tolon Masged Mamaay el Seefy Group Sadat House Wekala el Khory Abo el Dahab Group El Khory Group El Ameer Taaz House El Eeny Group

Kasr el Manyal Bebars Group Shabshery Group

Delay =

Impact = 73.51 73.51 73.51 71.67 73.51 71.52 73.76 73.51 73.51 44.13 71.67 73.51 73.76 71.67 73.77 70.93 71.52 73.51 69.01 73.76

Modefy third table

Evaluation = 83.44 83.23 83.88 82.33 84.09 82.33 81.72 66.51 75.86 51.21 81.72 84.09 84.09 83.88 84.09 55.33 84.09 71.23 56.57 73.77

90.22 90.22 90.45 89.98 90.45 89.98 89.98 68.74 68.79 48.59 89.98 90.45 90.45 90.45 90.45 48.62 90.45 68.74 48.58 68.74

VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL VL

Related Documents

Analysis Risk Final
June 2020 11
Risk Analysis
May 2020 34
Risk+analysis
July 2020 24
Risk Analysis
November 2019 37
Risk Analysis
June 2020 26
Risk Analysis In It
June 2020 9

More Documents from "api-19916368"

June 2020 1
Analysis Risk Final
June 2020 11
Lobet Den Admin
October 2019 43
Motion.docx
April 2020 1