A Semiotic Study On War Posters

  • October 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View A Semiotic Study On War Posters as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,638
  • Pages: 6
Semiotics: A study of signs

A Semiotic Study on War Posters Acknowledgement This report wouldn’t have seen the light at the end of the tunnel had it not been for Dr. Seema Khanwalkar who encouraged & challenged us & settled for nothing less than our best efforts.

Focus The following study is set during the times of World War II when the bigger national powers ‘sceptre’ed the world colosseum & used war propaganda to score high on the sympathetic quotient of the nation & in turn the world. The focus of this study is to understand & analyze this phenomenon through the U.S. war propaganda & how the super power used it to their advantage to turn tables amongst the global audience.

Hypothesis The hypothesis statement for the entire study is ‘USA used propaganda posters during the war with subliminal texts so that the civilians would get influenced, in turn mobilizing opinion the way the ‘thought leaders’ had anticipated’.

Introduction A historical backdrop The face of human kind got a deep ridden scar in 1945 when the universal mayhem named World War II came to an end with the explosion of an atom bomb in the Japanese territory of Hiroshima & Nagasaki. The world wide turmoil which commenced in the late 1939, divided the world into two powers viz. Allies & Axis till the unfortunate event happened in the Asian quarter of the world. The Allies emerged victorious & as a result United States of America & the Soviet Union grew to be superpowers of the world. Their quest for global dominance left their clothes stained with Submitted by: Karan Chandna (e7019), Komal Lath (e7023), Kshitij Pandey (e7024), Niyati Sharma (e7036), Rajeesh R. (e7041), Shradha Agarwal (e7056), Subhamoy Das (e7058), Varun Attrey (e7062)

Semiotics: A study of signs the blood of innocent civilians across the globe. However, in order to have an upper hand in the political arena as well, these superpowers resorted to use of lens, propaganda & dynamic war journalism in order to mobilize the masses. Propaganda posters were deployed in order ‘to paint the town red’ so as to capture nation’s military triumph over axial powers around the world so as to connect with the patriotic & sympathetic side of people back home. To cut the story short, the United States of America went in with full gusto to propagate a general hatred & an implied support for the nation’s military forces campaign towards world dominance.

Why have we chosen this topic? Semiotics as an application can be extended to the fabric of many…in-fact every sphere. We decided to test waters on our knowledge of semiotics by applying it to some very basic visual texts like posters. It is not unknown that United States of America had been acting the Big daddy of all nations and the World War II just cemented the power structure of that nation. However such global supremacy necessitated mass killing in the other, poorer countries, which needed to be put in a completely different light to fellow citizens to garner political support. As a result of which, the photographs of mass suffering in the Asian lands of Hiroshima & Nagasaki post the ‘Atom Bomb’ incident were suppressed in the US media circles & the triumph of their military coups were projected to a ‘Herculean’ pedestal. The means of propaganda were many…journalism, posters, photographs etc. In our opinion we wanted to analyze how a very basic medium like posters could also be semiotically analyzed to convey rich, deep yet latent meanings. It was an interesting thing to note the play of form, visual imagery and paradigms that cohesively gave way to an altogether new construction of meaning…the way USA wanted so as to justify their brutalities and negate Nazi Germany & other Axial powers.

Methodology The methodology adopted to analyze the posters, (refer appendix) that were issued by the US government to mobilize the masses in their own country, would restrict the universe of our analysis within the quadrangle of signification, paradigms associated, denotations & connotations & finally iconification. The posters would be anaSubmitted by: Karan Chandna (e7019), Komal Lath (e7023), Kshitij Pandey (e7024), Niyati Sharma (e7036), Rajeesh R. (e7041), Shradha Agarwal (e7056), Subhamoy Das (e7058), Varun Attrey (e7062)

Semiotics: A study of signs lyzed under the lights of the signifiers in the posters & in turn what did it signify for the general public, the paradigms associated which are communicated through the generous use of codes & symbols, the denotative & connotative meanings of these posters & finally the negative iconic quotient imparted upon the axial powers to put them in the bad eye of the general public so as to justify mass killing in these parts of the world.

Analysis This analysis concerns a semiotic analysis of posters whose similarity is based on the fact that all concern the posters prepared as propaganda by the USA (In conjunction with the Allied powers) to coerce the Axial powers, and all were found in the within the textual context of war posters. We therefore present a ‘semiotic deconstruction’ of the posters that have been chosen (please refer to the Annexure) in terms of their status as signs, whose associative meanings not only gave a favourable impression of the country, but also the sublime power context in which they were situated and highlighted; thus illustrating Umberto Eco's claim that the medium and message may be 'charged with cultural signification’.

Paradigms The use of Umberto Eco’s theory is very significant in this regard as the ‘paradigm’ in which the war posters have been based, are heavily influenced by the social paradigms (the angst against USA which was rising and therefore to mellow it, Germany was made to look like a devilish country) , economic paradigms (the economic unrest). The medium being posters used for propaganda and the message being ‘exuding power by USA among the nation and the rest of the world through sings, symbols, iconography etc.

Iconography and Codification through symbols…Signified and signifier

Submitted by: Karan Chandna (e7019), Komal Lath (e7023), Kshitij Pandey (e7024), Niyati Sharma (e7036), Rajeesh R. (e7041), Shradha Agarwal (e7056), Subhamoy Das (e7058), Varun Attrey (e7062)

Semiotics: A study of signs Although all of the posters do not physically represent the product, they all provide an important iconic representation of both the propaganda and what the codification, should stand for. Thus, analyses of all the posters strongly focus upon the visual imagery, and the ways in which this imagery generates the appropriate signified concepts (or emotional overtones) which promote the image of the product. Take for instance the colour red that has been very prominently and overtly used to signify the bloodshed caused by Nazis and therefore mobilize opinions against the Germans who belonged to the Axis Powers. The fonts used also have a startling impact on the way the message can be perceived. Poster 3 for instance shows ‘warning, our homes are in danger now’. The very fact that the typography and word constructions (the semantics, syntactic and paradigmatic) meaning emerges strongly that Germany is one that is destroying the world and that to protect your homes, you need to support your country – USA. The visual imagery when ‘decoded’ very bluntly describes the 2 powers – Japan and Germany trying to assert their power( the globe focusing on USA, their expressions of complete power and disgust over the USA and the very fact the placement of the text) Denotations and Connotations The signifier Hitler with his facial expressions, hand gestures and body language signifies contempt for the world and USA in particular. In Poster 2, the shoe kicking the white house bearing a Nazi symbol which lies in the paradigm of the social construction of the aftermath of the Treaty of Versailles. The concept was to show the ‘blitzkrieg’ phenomenon and again the linguistic semiotics – ‘we’re fighting to prevent this’, shows the extent to which USA went to protect its atrocities and justify the horrific deeds. Thus an overview of the analysis as was presented in class covered the way the posters were designed, their historical perspective as to why each poster was made and the backdrop of it being constructed. We then peeled the onion layer bit by bit to unravel the deeper texts hidden within the codes of its construction like visual imagery, fonts, colours, the people who were depicted (Eg. Poster 1 showed surrender by the blue collared workers post the Great Depression), the syntactic, pragmatic and semantic meaning of the visual text, the appeal which it then generated and the overall effect it had on the masses. Applying the theoretical framework: •

Barthes expressed his view that a newspaper photograph, posters are, ‘objects that have been worked on, chosen, composed, constructed, treated according to professional, aesthetic or ideological norms which are so many factors of connotation

Submitted by: Karan Chandna (e7019), Komal Lath (e7023), Kshitij Pandey (e7024), Niyati Sharma (e7036), Rajeesh R. (e7041), Shradha Agarwal (e7056), Subhamoy Das (e7058), Varun Attrey (e7062)

Semiotics: A study of signs •

There are many decisions taken by the poster creator such as; focusing, subject, angle, that produce various representations, and readings, creating different connotations. From the choices made from the paradigm sets of these signifiers, and the syntagmatic relationship between them, it is possible to decode and compare the posters

Bibliography  http://library.georgetown.edu/dept/speccoll/amposter.htm  Writing the image after Roland Barthes – Jean Michael Rabate  http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/semiotics.html

Submitted by: Karan Chandna (e7019), Komal Lath (e7023), Kshitij Pandey (e7024), Niyati Sharma (e7036), Rajeesh R. (e7041), Shradha Agarwal (e7056), Subhamoy Das (e7058), Varun Attrey (e7062)

Semiotics: A study of signs

Annexure 1

Fig 1.1

Fig 1.3

Fig 1.2

Fig 1.4

Fig 1.5 Pandey Submitted by: Karan Chandna (e7019), Komal Lath (e7023), Kshitij (e7024), Niyati Sharma (e7036), Rajeesh R. (e7041), Shradha Agarwal (e7056), Subhamoy Das (e7058), Varun Attrey (e7062)

Related Documents

Semiotic A
June 2020 5
Eco Semiotic A
November 2019 16
Bio Semiotic A
November 2019 9