9th Circuit Court Order For Oral Arguments
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View 9th Circuit Court Order For Oral Arguments as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 377
- Pages: 3
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KRISTIN M. PERRY; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS, Defendant-intervenor Appellant, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; et al., Defendants, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; et al., Defendant-intervenors Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-intervenor.
NOV 25 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
No. 09-17241 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW Northern District of California, San Francisco
ORDER
KRISTIN M. PERRY; et al.,
No. 09-17551
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW Northern District of California, San Francisco
v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER; et al., Defendants, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; et al., Defendant-intervenors Appellants, v. OUR FAMILY COALITION; et al., Plaintiff-intervenors Appellees.
Before: WARDLAW, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Upon review of the record and the moving papers, we have determined that oral argument is necessary to fully consider the range of issues presented by the pending emergency stay motion. Oral argument shall be held on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 at 11:00 a.m. at The Richard H. Chambers Courthouse in Pasadena, California. Each side will have twenty minutes to present its arguments. 2
09-17241, 09-17551
The parties shall be prepared to address the question of jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine, the merits of the First Amendment privilege issue, and whether a temporary stay pending a resolution of the merits should be granted under Nken v. Holder, 129 S. Ct. 1749, 1760-61 (2009). In addition, the parties shall be prepared to address the propriety of the issuance of a writ of mandate. The stay issued on November 20, 2009 remains in effect. Appellants are relieved of the November 30, 2009 deadline for producing discovery. The parties, however, must comply with Magistrate Judge Spero’s remaining orders, including that they meet and confer to determine the terms of an appropriate protective order. On or before Friday, November 27, 2009, appellants shall submit under seal five copies of the twenty-one documents Chief Judge Walker deemed responsive in his November 11, 2009 order. Appellants shall submit the copies as follows: one copy to each Judge’s resident chambers, one copy to Judge Berzon’s visiting chambers in Pasadena, and one copy to the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
09-17241, 09-17551
KRISTIN M. PERRY; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS, Defendant-intervenor Appellant, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; et al., Defendants, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; et al., Defendant-intervenors Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-intervenor.
NOV 25 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
No. 09-17241 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW Northern District of California, San Francisco
ORDER
KRISTIN M. PERRY; et al.,
No. 09-17551
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW Northern District of California, San Francisco
v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER; et al., Defendants, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; et al., Defendant-intervenors Appellants, v. OUR FAMILY COALITION; et al., Plaintiff-intervenors Appellees.
Before: WARDLAW, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Upon review of the record and the moving papers, we have determined that oral argument is necessary to fully consider the range of issues presented by the pending emergency stay motion. Oral argument shall be held on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 at 11:00 a.m. at The Richard H. Chambers Courthouse in Pasadena, California. Each side will have twenty minutes to present its arguments. 2
09-17241, 09-17551
The parties shall be prepared to address the question of jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine, the merits of the First Amendment privilege issue, and whether a temporary stay pending a resolution of the merits should be granted under Nken v. Holder, 129 S. Ct. 1749, 1760-61 (2009). In addition, the parties shall be prepared to address the propriety of the issuance of a writ of mandate. The stay issued on November 20, 2009 remains in effect. Appellants are relieved of the November 30, 2009 deadline for producing discovery. The parties, however, must comply with Magistrate Judge Spero’s remaining orders, including that they meet and confer to determine the terms of an appropriate protective order. On or before Friday, November 27, 2009, appellants shall submit under seal five copies of the twenty-one documents Chief Judge Walker deemed responsive in his November 11, 2009 order. Appellants shall submit the copies as follows: one copy to each Judge’s resident chambers, one copy to Judge Berzon’s visiting chambers in Pasadena, and one copy to the Clerk of Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
09-17241, 09-17551
Related Documents
9th Circuit Court Order For Oral Arguments
June 2020 1
9th Circuit Court Ruling Against Ccf
June 2020 5
9th Circuit Court Stay Of Discovery
June 2020 0
Joshua Richter 9th Circuit Court Opinion
June 2020 5
Bilski Oral Arguments
June 2020 8