88 Supplemental Declaration Re Inability To File Stip

  • Uploaded by: Eugene D. Lee
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 88 Supplemental Declaration Re Inability To File Stip as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 461
  • Pages: 2
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 88

Filed 01/24/2008

Page 1 of 2

Mark A. Wasser CA SB # 60160 LAW OFFICES OF MARK A. WASSER 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 444-6400 Fax: (916) 444-6405 E-mail: mwasser(wmarkwasse1..com

1 2 3 4

Bernard C. Barmann, S1'. KERJ-J COUNTY COUNSEL 6 Mark Nations, Chief Deputy 1115 Truxton Avenue. Fourth Floor 7 Bakersfield, CA 93301 ,Phone: (661) 868-3800 8 Fax: (661) 868-3805 E-mail: mrlatlom;@2o.]kern.ca. 9 5

I'

10 11 12 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15 16

i

II DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O.

17 18

Plaintiff, VS.

19

et

20

Defendants.

) Case No.: l:07-cv-00026-0WW-TAG )

) SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF ) MARK A. WASSER RE: INABILITY TO ) FILE STIPULATION FOLLOWING

) ) )

) Date Action Filed: January 6, 2007 ) Trial Date: December 3, 2008

21

) )

22

~-----------)

23

I, Mark A. Wasser, declare as follows:

24

I.

This continuing discovery dispute is exasperating.

25

2.

Defendants are not trying to "narrow Plaintiffs requests for production beyond

26

what had been agreed." In this regard, Defendants even accepted Plaintiff s proposed change to

27

Paragraph 1 of the draft stipulation to clarify this point. (See, Exhibits C and D to Wasser

28

Declaration of January 23, 2008.) Plaintiff admits, in the Declaration that Eugene Lee filed on I SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARA nON OF MARK A. WASSER RE: INABILITY TO FILE STIPULAnON FOLLOWING DISCOVERY HEARING

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-TAG

Document 88

Filed 01/24/2008

Page 2 of 2

January 23, 2008, that "there does not at the moment appear to be any dispute between the 2

parties regarding actual production ...".

"

continues to resist even the most straightforward agreements.

~

4

3.

Defendants are at a loss to understand why Plaintiff

Defendants have agreed to produce the personnel file of Dr. Royce Johnson.

5

Defendants are produeing it subject to their objections in order to preserve the right to assert the

6

objections later.

7

production of many documents but not the personnel

objections to the

the January 14, 2008 hearing, Defendants withdrew

It is being produced subject

to

. it \'/i11

8 9 10

the

be impossible to resolve subject to

objections. Neither If Plaintiff is

obliectiorlS can be

II

is prejudiced by production of the

to estahlish

Dr. Joblnsc)fi

IS

a COlnparator " as he

~fl!]reSSf"l

,1

4.

13

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

14

Executed

24th day of January, 2008,

Sacramento, California.

IS 16 17

lsi Mark A. Wasser Mark A. Wasser Attorney for Defendants, County of Kern, et al.

18 19

20 21 22

23 24 25

26 27

28 2 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MARK A WASSER RE: INABILITY TO FILE STIPULATION FOLLOWING DISCOVERY HEARING

Related Documents


More Documents from "Eugene D. Lee"