7- Court Of Rulers_nizam2007

  • Uploaded by: Muhammad Nizam Awang
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 7- Court Of Rulers_nizam2007 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 701
  • Pages: 16
ISLAMIC SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF M A L A Y S I A Faculty of Syariah and Law

LBA 1043 Malaysian Legal System II

© Muhammad Nizam Awang @ Ali

Special Court

Court of Rulers

Discussion Points

• • • •

Definition of ‘Ruler’? What is ‘Ruler’s sovereignty’? Who can sue ‘Ruler’? Who are the members of the Court of Ruler? • What is the court jurisdiction? • How the court the conduct the trial? • What is the status of the court decision? • Legislation: Federal Constitution

Who is a ‘Ruler’? Art.160 • Negeri Sembilan – Yang Di-Pertuan Besar acting on behalf of himself and the Rulings Chief is in accordance with the State Constitution c) In any other state - person who according to the State Constitution exercises the function of the Ruler Case: Dato Menteri Othman bin Baginda & Anor v. Dato Ombi Syed Alwi Syed Idrus [1981] MLJ 29 - Ruling Chiefs of Negri Sembilan fall under the definition of ‘Ruler’

What is ‘Ruler’s sovereignty’? Art. 181(1): Sovereignty, prerogatives, powers and jurisdiction of the Rulers and Ruling Chiefs of Negeri Sembilan shall remain affected within their respective territories

Who can Sue Ruler? • Pre-1993 - Absolute immunity – Ruler enjoyed unlimited/absolute immunity – Case:

– Mighell v. Sultan of Johore [1894] QB 147

Who can Sue Ruler? (2) • Post-1993 - Conditional sovereignty – Action can be sought against Ruler in his personal capacity (in Court of Rulers)

Cases in Discussion - DYTM Tengku Idris Shah ibni Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah v DIKIM Holdings Sdn Bhd & Anor [2003] 1 CLJ 801 - Regent exercising the function of the Ruler was not a ‘Ruler’ according to Art 181(2), the 3rd and 5th Schedules. Thus, he could be sued in the ordinary courts - The court adopted purposive approach- by looking back at the purpose of the establishment of the Court of Rulers

Cases in Discussion (2) – Karpal Singh v. Sultan of Selangor [1988] 1 MLJ 64 – Mobil Oil Malaysia Sdn Bhd v. Official Administrator, Malaysia [1988] 1 MLJ 518

Who are the Court Members? Art. 182(1) – Sittings of the Court: b) Chief Justice of the Federal Court (Chairman) c) Chief Judges of the HCs; and d) 2 judges who hold or have held of the Federal Court; or e) 1 judge of the HC appointed by the Conference of Rulers

What is the Court Jurisdiction? •

Art. 182(2) – Proceeding brought only in Ruler’s personal capacity • Art 182(3) – –



Criminal Cases: shall have exclusive jurisdiction to try all offences committed in the Federation by the YDPA or Ruler of the State Civil Cases: By or against the YDPA or Ruler of the State notwithstanding where the cause of action arose

Cases in Discussion - DYTM Tengku Idris Shah ibni Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah v DIKIM Holdings Sdn Bhd & Anor [2003] 1 CLJ 801 • Faridah Begum bte Abdullah v Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah [1996] 1 MLJ 617 - Art 181(2) is ‘of special and exceptional kind’, therefore nonMalaysian citizen cannot sue a Ruler. Unless there is clear principle of reciprocity between Commonwealth nations

How the court conduct the trial? -

Art 182(5) The similar procedure in the inferior courts, HCs and Fed. Court) shall similarly be applicable in the Special court (unless the Parliament make special provision on that)

-

Art. 183- Proceeding shall be instituted with the personal consent of the Attorney General –

Case in discussion: Faridah Begum bte Abdullah v Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah [1996] 1 MLJ 617

How the court conduct the trial? (2) • Art 182(4) – Court of Rulers has similar jurisdiction and power as vested in the inferior courts, HC and the Federal Court (coordinate jurisdiction)

• Case in discussion: Faridah Begum bte Abdullah v Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah [1996] 1 MLJ 617

What is the status of the court decision? Art 182(6) – Decision court • By majority opinion of the court members • Shall be final and conclusive • shall not be challenged in any court n any ground

Next Lesson

Special Courts Court for Children Legislation: Child Act 2001

NEXT LESSON: • Court Martial • Native Courts in Sabah

Related Documents


More Documents from "Circuit Media"