3rd Os Assignment

  • July 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 3rd Os Assignment as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 564
  • Pages: 4
1. Discuss how the following pairs of scheduling criteria conflict in certain settings. a. CPU utilization and response time b. Average turnaround time and maximum waiting time c. I/O device utilization and CPU utilization Answer: CPU utilization and response time: CPU utilization is increased if the overheads associated with context switching are minimized. The context switching overheads could be lowered by performing context switches infrequently. This could however result in increasing the response time for processes. Average turnaround time and maximum waiting time: Average turnaround time is minimized by executing the shortest tasks first. Such a scheduling policy could however starve long-running tasks and thereby increase their waiting time. I/O device utilization and CPU utilization: CPU utilization is maximized by running long-running CPU-bound tasks without performing context switches. I/O device utilization is maximized by scheduling I/O-bound jobs as soon as they become ready to run, thereby incurring the overheads of context switches.

3. Consider the following set of processes, with the length of the CPU-burst time given in milliseconds: Process Burst Time Priority P1 10 3 P2 1 1 P3 2 3 P4 1 4 P5 5

2 The processes are assumed to have arrived in the order P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, all at time 0. a. Draw four Gantt charts illustrating the execution of these processes using FCFS, SJF, a nonpreemptive priority (a smaller priority number implies a higher priority), and RR (quantum = 1) scheduling. b. What is the turnaround time of each process for each of the scheduling algorithms in part a? c. What is the waiting time of each process for each of the scheduling algorithms in part a? d. Which of the schedules in part a results in the minimal average waiting time (over all processes)? Answer: a. The four Gantt charts arePage 3 SJF: RR: b. Turnaround time FCFS RR SJF Priority P1 10 19 19 16 P2 11 2 1 1 P3 13 7 4 18 P4 14 4 2 19 P5 19 14 9 6 c. Waiting time (turnaround time minus burst time) FCFS RR SJF Priority P1 0 9 9 6 P2 10 1 0 0 P3 11 5 2 16 P4 13 3 1 18 P5 14 9 4 1 d. Shortest Job First

Q.5.6Consider a variant of the Round Robin (RR) scheduling algorithm where the entries in the ready queue are pointers to the Process Control Block's (PCB). (a) What would be the effect of putting two pointers to the same process in the ready queue? (b) What would be the major advantages and disadvantages of this scheme? (c)How would you modify the basic RR algorithm to achieve the same effect without the duplicate pointers?

Answer (a) Process appear twice in the ready queue and is scheduled twice as often as other processes. (b) Advantage: implement priorities. Disadvantage: overheads in maintaining pointers; same number of context switches. (c) Adaptive quantums for each process. A higher priority process can use up to 2/3/4/etc. quantums of time over the single quantum for normal processes.

5.11 UsingtheWindows XP schedulingalgorithm,whatisthenumericpri-orityofathreadforthefollowingscenarios? a.AthreadintheREALTIME PRIORITY CLASSwitharelativepri-orityofHIGHEST.b.AthreadintheNORMAL PRIORITY CLASSwitharelativepri-orityofNORMAL.c.AthreadintheHIGH PRIORITY CLASSwitharelativepriorityofABOVE NORMAL.

Answer: a.26 b.8 c.14

.12 ConsidertheschedulingalgorithmintheSolarisoperatingsystemfortimesharingthreads:a.Wh atisthetimequantum(inmilliseconds)forathreadwithpriority10?Withpriority55?

b.Assumeathreadwithpriority35hasuseditsentiretimequantumwithoutblocking.Whatnewpr ioritywilltheschedulerassignthisthread? c.Assumeathreadwithpriority35blocksforI/Obeforeitstimequantumhasexpired.Whatnewpr ioritywilltheschedulerassignthisthread? Answer: a.160and40b.35c.54 5.13 Thetraditional UNIX schedulerenforcesaninverserelationshipbetweenprioritynumbersandpriorities:Thehigherth enumber,thelowerthepriority.Theschedulerrecalculatesprocessprioritiesoncepersecondusi ngthefollowingfunction:Priority=(Recent CPU usage/2)+Basewherebase=60and recent CPU usage referstoavalueindicatinghowoftenaprocesshasusedthe CPU sinceprioritieswerelastrecalculated.Assumethatrecent CPU usageforprocess P 1 is40,process P 2 is18,andprocess P 3 is10.Whatwillbethenewprioritiesforthesethreeprocesseswhenprioritiesarerecalculated? Basedonthisinformation,doesthetraditional UNIX schedulerraiseorlowertherelativepriorityofa CPU -boundprocess? Answer: Theprioritiesassignedtotheprocessesare80,69,and65respectively.Theschedulerlowersthere lativepriorityof CPU -boundprocesses.

Related Documents

3rd Os Assignment
July 2020 13
3rd Assignment
June 2020 29
Assignment (os)
October 2019 14
3rd Assignment Icici
May 2020 12
Os Assignment Proposal
November 2019 7