Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Page 1 of 3
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP KENNETH L. NISSLY (SBN 77589)
[email protected] SUSAN van KEULEN (SBN 136060)
[email protected] SUSAN D. ROEDER (SBN 160897)
[email protected] 2765 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 473-2600; Facsimile: (650) 473-2601 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP KENNETH R. O’ROURKE (SBN 120144)
[email protected] WALLACE A. ALLAN (SBN 102054)
[email protected] 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1060 Los Angeles, California 90071-2899 Telephone: (213) 430-6000; Facsimile (213) 430-6407 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR U.K. LTD., and HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR DEUTSCHLAND GmbH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
19
Filed 01/09/2009
TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP DANIEL J. FURNISS (SBN 73531)
[email protected] THEODORE G. BROWN, III (SBN 114672)
[email protected] JULIE J. HAN (SBN 215279)
[email protected] 379 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: (650) 326-2400; Facsimile: (650) 326-2422
16
18
Document 3040
RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff,
v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A., Defendants
Case No. C 05-00334 RMW HYNIX’S REVISED WITNESS LIST FOR JANUARY 2009 TRIAL Date: January 21, 2009 Ctrm: 6, 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
28
HYNIX’S REVISED WITNESS LIST FOR JANUARY 2009 PATENT TRIAL - CASE NOS. C 05-00334, C 05-02298 and C 06-00244 RMW
1
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Document 3040
RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff,
v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., Defendants RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. and MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants
Filed 01/09/2009
Page 2 of 3
Case No. C 05-02298 RMW
Case No. C 06-00244 RMW
10
Pursuant to the Court’s direction at the January 6, 2009 hearing, Hynix’s revised witness list
11
for the January 2009 Patent Trial is attached hereto. This list does not include witnesses that may be
12
called in rebuttal. Hynix reserves the right to call any witness named on Rambus’s witness list.
13
Hynix also reserves the right to supplement or amend this list depending upon the issues raised by
14
Rambus before or during trial, the witnesses identified by any other Manufacturer on its witness list,
15
and/or the Court’s rulings on the motions in limine or other pretrial matters.
16 17 18 19
Name D.S. Chung Pat Dunton
20 21 22
O.C. Kwon
23 24 25 26 27 28
Jae Park
Subject Matter of Expected Testimony
Intends/May Call
Hynix background; Hynix licensing history and procedures Hynix background; Hynix manufacture of DRAM; Development and commercialization of Hynix DRAM products; Hynix’s continuing commitment to JEDEC and the standardization process; Hynix sales and marketing Hynix background; Hynix manufacture of DRAM; Development and commercialization of Hynix DRAM products; Hynix’s continuing commitment to JEDEC and the standardization process; Hynix sales and marketing Hynix background; Hynix manufacture of DRAM; Development and commercialization of Hynix DRAM products; Hynix’s continuing commitment to JEDEC and the standardization process; Hynix sales and marketing
Presently Intend to Call* May Call*
May Call**
May Call**
HYNIX’S REVISED WITNESS LIST FOR JANUARY 2009 PATENT TRIAL - CASE NOS. C 05-00334, C 05-02298 and C 06-00244 RMW
2
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1 2
Name John Radanovich
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
David Taylor Roy Weinstein
Document 3040
Filed 01/09/2009
Subject Matter of Expected Testimony
Page 3 of 3
Intends/May Call
Hynix background; Hynix manufacture of Presently Intend to Call DRAM; Development and commercialization of Hynix DRAM products; Hynix’s continuing commitment to JEDEC and the standardization process; Hynix sales and marketing Non-infringement; DRAM technology Presently Intend to Call** Semiconductor licensing and royalty rates; Patent exhaustion; Alleged patent damages
Presently Intend to Call*
The witnesses designated with a “*” will be called only in a damages trial. The witnesses designated with a “**” will be called only if infringement is tried in a consolidated trial.
10 11
DATED: January 9, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
12 13
By:
14 15 16
Kenneth L. Nissly Kenneth R. O’Rourke Wallace A. Allan Susan van Keulen Susan D. Roeder O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
17 18 19 20
Attorneys for HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR U.K. LTD., and HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR DEUTSCHLAND GmbH
21 22 23 24
/s/ Daniel J. Furniss Theodore G. Brown, III Julie J. Han TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW LLP
61761802 v1
25 26 27 28
HYNIX’S REVISED WITNESS LIST FOR JANUARY 2009 PATENT TRIAL - CASE NOS. C 05-00334, C 05-02298 and C 06-00244 RMW
3