2210 Order
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View 2210 Order as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 1,025
- Pages: 8
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 1 of 8
1 E-filed:
2 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9/16/2008
6 7 8
RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff,
9
11 For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12 13 14 15 16 17
v.
No. C-05-00334 RMW STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A.,
18
Defendants.
19 20
RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff,
21 22 23 24 25 26
No. C-05-02298 RMW
v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., Defendants.
27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1
For the Northern District of California
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 2 of 8
A bench trial between Rambus and Samsung on various claims and defenses is scheduled to
2
begin on September 22, 2008. At a pretrial conference on September 16, 2008, Rambus and
3
Samsung agreed to drop certain issues from the case with prejudice. Their statements are attached to
4
this order as Exhibits A (Samsung's pleading) and B (Rambus's responsive pleading).
5
United States District Court
Document 2210
The court accepts the parties' stipulation to narrow the issues in this case. The court orders
6
that Samsung's claims and defenses based on Rambus's JEDEC conduct, the conduct of Neil
7
Steinberg, and representations made by Rambus in connection with the 1994 RDRAM technology
8
and patent licensing agreements are dismissed with prejudice. The court orders that Rambus's
9
defenses to Samsung's claims – release, laches, statute of limitations, and Noerr-Pennington – are
10
dismissed as moot to the extent those defenses are based on the issues Samsung has agreed to
11
remove from the case.
12 13 14 15
DATED:
9/16/2008
RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF 2
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1 2
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 3 of 8
Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: counsel in 05-00334 & 05-02298. Counsel for Rambus Inc., all actions
Counsel for Hynix entities, C-00-20905 and C-05-00334
Burton Alexander Gross
[email protected]
Allen Ruby
[email protected]
Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke
[email protected]
Belinda Martinez Vega
[email protected]
5 6
Catherine Rajwani
[email protected]
Daniel J. Furniss
[email protected]
7
Craig N. Tolliver
[email protected]
Geoffrey Hurndall Yost
[email protected]
David C. Yang
[email protected]
Jordan Trent Jones
[email protected]
Douglas A. Cawley
[email protected]
Joseph A. Greco
[email protected]
Erin C. Dougherty
[email protected]
Kenneth Lee Nissly
[email protected]
Gregory P. Stone
[email protected]
Kenneth Ryan O'Rourke
[email protected]
Jennifer Lynn Polse
[email protected]
Patrick Lynch
[email protected]
Keith Rhoderic Dhu Hamilton, II
[email protected]
Susan Gregory VanKeulen
[email protected]
13 14
Kelly Max Klaus
[email protected]
Theodore G. Brown, III
[email protected]
15
Miriam Kim
[email protected]
Tomomi Katherine Harkey
[email protected]
16
Peter A. Detre
[email protected]
Counsel for Micron entities, C-06-00244
17
Pierre J. Hubert
[email protected]
Aaron Bennett Craig
[email protected]
18
Rosemarie Theresa Ring
[email protected]
David J. Ruderman
[email protected]
Scott L Cole
[email protected]
Harold Avrum Barza
[email protected]
20
Scott W. Hejny
[email protected]
Jared Bobrow
[email protected]
21
Sean Eskovitz
[email protected]
John D Beynon
[email protected]
22
Steven McCall Perry
[email protected]
Leeron Kalay
[email protected]
Thomas N Tarnay
[email protected]
Linda Jane Brewer
[email protected]
William Hans Baumgartner, Jr
[email protected]
Rachael Lynn Ballard McCracken
[email protected] om
Robert Jason Becher
[email protected]
Yonaton M Rosenzweig
[email protected] m
3 4
8 9
11 For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
19
23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF 3
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 4 of 8
Counsel for Nanya entities, C-05-00334
Counsel for Samsung entities, C-05-00334 and C-0502298
Chester Wren-Ming Day
[email protected]
Ana Elena Kadala
[email protected]
Craig R. Kaufman
[email protected] m
Claire Elise Goldstein
[email protected]
5
Glenn Michael Levy
[email protected]
David J. Healey
[email protected]
6
Jan Ellen Ellard
[email protected]
Edward Robert Reines
[email protected]
Jason Sheffield Angell
[email protected]
Matthew D. Powers
[email protected]
Kaiwen Tseng
[email protected]
Mark Shean
[email protected]
Robert E. Freitas
[email protected]
Vickie L. Feeman
[email protected]
2 3 4
7 8 9
11 For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Counsel for intervenor, Texas Instruments, Inc., C-05-00334
13
Kelli A. Crouch
14
Counsel for intervenor, United States Department of Justice, C-00-20905
15 16 17
[email protected]
Eugene S. Litvinoff
[email protected]
May Lee Heye
[email protected]
Nathanael M. Cousins
[email protected]
Niall Edmund Lynch
[email protected]
18
Counsel for intervenor, Elpida Memory, Inc., C-00-20905 and C-05-00334
19
Eric R. Lamison
[email protected]
20
John J. Feldhaus
[email protected]
21 22 23 24
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program in each action. Dated:
9/16/2008
TSF Chambers of Judge Whyte
25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF 4
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 5 of 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
EXHIBIT A
11 For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 6 of 8
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 7 of 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
EXHIBIT B
11 For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 8 of 8
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 1 of 8
1 E-filed:
2 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9/16/2008
6 7 8
RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff,
9
11 For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12 13 14 15 16 17
v.
No. C-05-00334 RMW STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A.,
18
Defendants.
19 20
RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff,
21 22 23 24 25 26
No. C-05-02298 RMW
v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., Defendants.
27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1
For the Northern District of California
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 2 of 8
A bench trial between Rambus and Samsung on various claims and defenses is scheduled to
2
begin on September 22, 2008. At a pretrial conference on September 16, 2008, Rambus and
3
Samsung agreed to drop certain issues from the case with prejudice. Their statements are attached to
4
this order as Exhibits A (Samsung's pleading) and B (Rambus's responsive pleading).
5
United States District Court
Document 2210
The court accepts the parties' stipulation to narrow the issues in this case. The court orders
6
that Samsung's claims and defenses based on Rambus's JEDEC conduct, the conduct of Neil
7
Steinberg, and representations made by Rambus in connection with the 1994 RDRAM technology
8
and patent licensing agreements are dismissed with prejudice. The court orders that Rambus's
9
defenses to Samsung's claims – release, laches, statute of limitations, and Noerr-Pennington – are
10
dismissed as moot to the extent those defenses are based on the issues Samsung has agreed to
11
remove from the case.
12 13 14 15
DATED:
9/16/2008
RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF 2
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1 2
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 3 of 8
Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: counsel in 05-00334 & 05-02298. Counsel for Rambus Inc., all actions
Counsel for Hynix entities, C-00-20905 and C-05-00334
Burton Alexander Gross
[email protected]
Allen Ruby
[email protected]
Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke
[email protected]
Belinda Martinez Vega
[email protected]
5 6
Catherine Rajwani
[email protected]
Daniel J. Furniss
[email protected]
7
Craig N. Tolliver
[email protected]
Geoffrey Hurndall Yost
[email protected]
David C. Yang
[email protected]
Jordan Trent Jones
[email protected]
Douglas A. Cawley
[email protected]
Joseph A. Greco
[email protected]
Erin C. Dougherty
[email protected]
Kenneth Lee Nissly
[email protected]
Gregory P. Stone
[email protected]
Kenneth Ryan O'Rourke
[email protected]
Jennifer Lynn Polse
[email protected]
Patrick Lynch
[email protected]
Keith Rhoderic Dhu Hamilton, II
[email protected]
Susan Gregory VanKeulen
[email protected]
13 14
Kelly Max Klaus
[email protected]
Theodore G. Brown, III
[email protected]
15
Miriam Kim
[email protected]
Tomomi Katherine Harkey
[email protected]
16
Peter A. Detre
[email protected]
Counsel for Micron entities, C-06-00244
17
Pierre J. Hubert
[email protected]
Aaron Bennett Craig
[email protected]
18
Rosemarie Theresa Ring
[email protected]
David J. Ruderman
[email protected]
Scott L Cole
[email protected]
Harold Avrum Barza
[email protected]
20
Scott W. Hejny
[email protected]
Jared Bobrow
[email protected]
21
Sean Eskovitz
[email protected]
John D Beynon
[email protected]
22
Steven McCall Perry
[email protected]
Leeron Kalay
[email protected]
Thomas N Tarnay
[email protected]
Linda Jane Brewer
[email protected]
William Hans Baumgartner, Jr
[email protected]
Rachael Lynn Ballard McCracken
[email protected] om
Robert Jason Becher
[email protected]
Yonaton M Rosenzweig
[email protected] m
3 4
8 9
11 For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
19
23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF 3
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
1
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 4 of 8
Counsel for Nanya entities, C-05-00334
Counsel for Samsung entities, C-05-00334 and C-0502298
Chester Wren-Ming Day
[email protected]
Ana Elena Kadala
[email protected]
Craig R. Kaufman
[email protected] m
Claire Elise Goldstein
[email protected]
5
Glenn Michael Levy
[email protected]
David J. Healey
[email protected]
6
Jan Ellen Ellard
[email protected]
Edward Robert Reines
[email protected]
Jason Sheffield Angell
[email protected]
Matthew D. Powers
[email protected]
Kaiwen Tseng
[email protected]
Mark Shean
[email protected]
Robert E. Freitas
[email protected]
Vickie L. Feeman
[email protected]
2 3 4
7 8 9
11 For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Counsel for intervenor, Texas Instruments, Inc., C-05-00334
13
Kelli A. Crouch
14
Counsel for intervenor, United States Department of Justice, C-00-20905
15 16 17
[email protected]
Eugene S. Litvinoff
[email protected]
May Lee Heye
[email protected]
Nathanael M. Cousins
[email protected]
Niall Edmund Lynch
[email protected]
18
Counsel for intervenor, Elpida Memory, Inc., C-00-20905 and C-05-00334
19
Eric R. Lamison
[email protected]
20
John J. Feldhaus
[email protected]
21 22 23 24
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program in each action. Dated:
9/16/2008
TSF Chambers of Judge Whyte
25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF 4
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 5 of 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
EXHIBIT A
11 For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 6 of 8
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 7 of 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
EXHIBIT B
11 For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PORTIONS OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENSES WITH PREJUDICE C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW TSF
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Document 2210
Filed 09/16/2008
Page 8 of 8
Related Documents
2210 Order
October 2019 27
2210-s
June 2020 3
2210-pai
June 2020 5
Enl 2210
June 2020 4
Troubleshooting Bgp (2210)
December 2019 6
