Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Document 2132
Filed 09/04/2008
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 10
RAMBUS, INC.,
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Case No. C 05-00334 RMW
Plaintiff. v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC.,
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR OPPOSITION TO RAMBUS’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR USE OF PRIVILEGED EVIDENCE AT SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 TRIAL
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A.,
20 21
Defendants. RAMBUS, INC., Case No. C 05-02298 RMW
22 23 24 25 26 27
Plaintiff. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., Defendants.
28 Stipulation and Proposed Order To Exceed Page Limit
Case No. C 05 00334 RMW Case No. C 05 02298 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Filed 09/04/2008
Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, Rambus filed a Motion In Limine to Bar Use of Privileged Evidence at
1 2
Document 2132
September 22, 2008 Trial on August 27, 2008; and
3
WHEREAS, Rambus’s eighteen and a half-page motion incorporated by reference
4
portions of two of its previous briefs (its motion in limine from the January 2008 coordinated trial
5
and its motion to strike filed June 2008), thus effectively resulting in a much longer brief; WHEREAS, this is Samsung’s first opportunity to respond to Rambus’s arguments on this
6 7
issue;
8
WHEREAS, Samsung intends to file an Opposition to Rambus’ Motion in Limine; and
9
WHEREAS, Rambus has agreed to Samsung’s request for five additional pages for its
10 11 12
Opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree as follows: Samsung’s opposition brief shall be no longer than 30 pages.
13 14 15
DATED: September 4, 2008
CAROLYN HOECKER LUEDTKE MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
16 17 18
By: /s/ _____________________________ Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke
19
ATTORNEY FOR RAMBUS INC.
20 21
DATED: September 4, 2008
DAVID J. HEALEY WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
22 23 By: /s/______________________________ David J. Healey
24 25
Attorney for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., and SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P.
26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order To Exceed Page Limit
2
Case No. C 05 00334 RMW Case No. C 05 02298 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW
Document 2132
Page 3 of 3
ORDER
1 2
Filed 09/04/2008
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3 4
DATED: ___________________________
5 6 _________________________________ HON. RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order To Exceed Page Limit
3
Case No. C 05 00334 RMW Case No. C 05 02298 RMW