2132

  • Uploaded by: sabatino123
  • 0
  • 0
  • October 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 2132 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 487
  • Pages: 3
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW

Document 2132

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 10

RAMBUS, INC.,

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Case No. C 05-00334 RMW

Plaintiff. v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC.,

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR OPPOSITION TO RAMBUS’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR USE OF PRIVILEGED EVIDENCE AT SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 TRIAL

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION U.S.A.,

20 21

Defendants. RAMBUS, INC., Case No. C 05-02298 RMW

22 23 24 25 26 27

Plaintiff. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., Defendants.

28 Stipulation and Proposed Order To Exceed Page Limit

Case No. C 05 00334 RMW Case No. C 05 02298 RMW

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW

Filed 09/04/2008

Page 2 of 3

WHEREAS, Rambus filed a Motion In Limine to Bar Use of Privileged Evidence at

1 2

Document 2132

September 22, 2008 Trial on August 27, 2008; and

3

WHEREAS, Rambus’s eighteen and a half-page motion incorporated by reference

4

portions of two of its previous briefs (its motion in limine from the January 2008 coordinated trial

5

and its motion to strike filed June 2008), thus effectively resulting in a much longer brief; WHEREAS, this is Samsung’s first opportunity to respond to Rambus’s arguments on this

6 7

issue;

8

WHEREAS, Samsung intends to file an Opposition to Rambus’ Motion in Limine; and

9

WHEREAS, Rambus has agreed to Samsung’s request for five additional pages for its

10 11 12

Opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree as follows: Samsung’s opposition brief shall be no longer than 30 pages.

13 14 15

DATED: September 4, 2008

CAROLYN HOECKER LUEDTKE MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

16 17 18

By: /s/ _____________________________ Carolyn Hoecker Luedtke

19

ATTORNEY FOR RAMBUS INC.

20 21

DATED: September 4, 2008

DAVID J. HEALEY WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

22 23 By: /s/______________________________ David J. Healey

24 25

Attorney for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., and SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P.

26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order To Exceed Page Limit

2

Case No. C 05 00334 RMW Case No. C 05 02298 RMW

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW

Document 2132

Page 3 of 3

ORDER

1 2

Filed 09/04/2008

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3 4

DATED: ___________________________

5 6 _________________________________ HON. RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order To Exceed Page Limit

3

Case No. C 05 00334 RMW Case No. C 05 02298 RMW

Related Documents

2132
May 2020 14
2132
October 2019 17
2132-a
May 2020 14
Bioprocess 1 Sbt 2132
May 2020 16

More Documents from "Sampaio Costa"

2215
October 2019 25
2193
October 2019 20
2408
November 2019 18
2427
November 2019 22
2312[1]
October 2019 21
2344
October 2019 21