A Review of the Top 10 Obstacles to Project Success and their mitigation strategies
PRESENTED BY: Lou Gasco MüTō Performance Corp.
[email protected] 212-842-0508 x3
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
Use of this presentation • • • •
This presentation is intended for use by Project Management, Program Management, or Senior I.T. Leadership to understand the nature of the most common obstacles found by project managers on typical projects. The presentation typically takes from 60 - 90 minutes to complete with Q&A, and depending on audience participation. The content on this presentation is protected by copyright law. Any duplication of any part of this presentation requires the explicit authorization of MüTō Performance Corporation. Upon completion of this presentation the audience will have a clearer understanding that; • •
they are not alone in the project obstacles, or issues that they encounter on their projects. they understand that the resolution to these issues lies in their capability to; • communicate clearly with team members • motivate their teams • hold their team mates accountable to tasks
• •
•
the earlier these skill-sets are improved the lower the impact of these risks. The final slide shows a hint of the required skill sets.
For a copy of this presentation, contact; • • •
Lou Gasco
[email protected] 212-842-0508 xt 3 © 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
data sources • the 2009 MüTō Performance Corp. survey • Rank the Top 10 Obstacles to Project Success.
• answers from over 1,000+ project, program managers, and team leads globally • • • •
various blogs, and forums class surveys client assessments 20+ years of professional program management experience
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
survey review method • we’ll review the “Top Ten” obstacles… • • • • •
from #10 (least frequent) - #1 (most frequent) each obstacle is defined early detection symptoms potential mitigation global results
• we will be “P.C.” about it • we won’t rely on the Dilbert Principle • we WILL focus on reality © 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
The Top 10 Countdown
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
#10. A Skill Set Challenged Team
Stayed at #10 since 2008 Occurs in 34% of projects
Explanation
The team is unable to support the project due to a partial or complete lack of technical skill sets.
Symptoms
Code is completely redone from scratch. Delivery dates are constantly moved as “new information” becomes available. Teammates say, “I don’t know how to do this.”
Potential Mitigation
Open up communications; determine true skill sets at the start. Commit team to roles, and responsibilities Get teammates the resources to learn as necessary.
‘I know we are supposed to be finished tomorrow, but we had a question… Did you say “Three” or “Tree”?’ a supplier to the project manager when construction was stalled due to a requirements question. © 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
#9. A Disappearing Sponsor
Dropped from #3 since 2008 Occurs in 39% of projects
Explanation
The sponsor cannot be reached.
Symptoms
Critical decisions on the project are delayed, because the sponsor can’t be found. Sponsor says, “You go ahead and approve it, I’ll back it when the time comes.”
Potential Mitigation
Establish clear accountability of roles and responsibilities w/ sponsors. If the above mitigation cannot be accomplished, create a plan that includes processes for working within an environment where the sponsor disappears.
“I never actually gave you permission to go ahead with the project.” The sponsor to the project manager, when asked to mediate a situation with another team.
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
#8. Invisible Requirements
Dropped from #2 since 2008 Occurs in 50% of projects
Explanation
The project has a ‘goal’, but no finalized requirements.
Symptoms
“The team should know what is needed.” “Look, we wrote down what we need, what more do you want?”
Potential Mitigation
Establish clear accountability of roles and responsibilities with beneficiaries. If the above mitigation cannot be accomplished, create a plan that includes a process for managing newly found requirements.
“Well, if you are not going to be constructive we’ll just have to replace you.” a sponsor to a project lead, when the lead asked “What are we doing?”
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
#7. The Finance Challenge
Dropped from #4 since 2008 Occurs in 54% of projects
Explanation
Not enough funding to complete the project as desired.
Symptoms
The sponsor says “We all have to do more with less.” No one is following up on the project’s budget/cost analysis.
Potential Mitigation
Establish clear communication of funding requirements, risks created, and their mitigation with the sponsors. If the above mitigation cannot be accomplished, create a plan that includes processes that support acceptance of task level expenditures.
“Don’t worry about the budget, we have no budget, just do the project, we’ll figure it out after.” A Sponsor to the project manager after being told, they had no budget code.
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
#6. Responsibility Unrelated to Authority
Up from #9 since 2008 Occurs in 60% of projects
Explanation
Project manager (or team) lacks the authority to uphold their responsibility.
Symptoms
The PM is taking minutes while someone else manages the project meetings. Teammates constantly require approvals from their management to deliver on their responsibilities.
Potential Mitigation
Open up communications through to management. Commit team (and their management) to Roles, and Responsibilities
“You are only authorized to complete the project, for anything else, you have to get written approval, but I’m not sure from who.” Clear instructions on the modus operandi? from the sponsor to the project manager
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
#5. Tardy Delivery of Project Tasks
Up from #6 since 2008 Occurs in 60% of projects
Explanation
Suppliers are not delivering their tasks on time.
Symptoms
Suppliers are saying “Yes, we’re on time, everything’s fine.” with no validation. A request for new information about the design in the midst of construction.
Potential Mitigation
Commitment to supplier delivery, roles, and responsibilities. Clear communication of delivery dates, times. Correct all supplier issues, before they affect timelines.
“No problem, we can have it for you by when you want it, mostly …I’m sure, give or take a few things, or a week, maybe.” a Supplier, guaranteeing delivery to the Project Manager
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
#4. Minimal or Nonexistent Testing
Up from #7 since 2008 Occurs in 61% of projects
Explanation
The testing (Q&A) process is either nonexistent, or reduced beyond any planned duration.
Symptoms
Testing time is being shortened in order to make room for more development. There are excessive amounts of bugs in production.
Potential Mitigation
Commitment to testing time. Clear communication of necessity of testing. Correct time consuming issues before they affect testing time.
“We just saved 22% of the budget by cutting out QA, entirely. After all, we could test Monday morning in production!” a Project Manager to his Sponsor with a rationale
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
#3. The Resource Challenge
Up from #5 since 2008 Occurs in 74% of projects
Explanation
Not enough resources to complete the project as desired.
Symptoms
The sponsor says “We all have to do more with less.” The plan by design, requires everyone to work overtime, all the time, until completion.
Potential Mitigation
Establish clear communication of funding requirements, risks created, and their mitigation to sponsors. If the above mitigation cannot be accomplished, create a plan that approves task level resource commitments with sponsors.
“If everybody stayed in the office, worked around the clock, took no breaks, and stopped everything else we could finish the job by this Tuesday.” A Project Manager to his sponsor when asked to do more with less. © 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
#2. Challenging Schedule
Up from #8 since 2008 Occurs in 78% of projects
Explanation
The date for delivery of the project’s solution makes it difficult to deliver on time.
Symptoms
Date for delivery is set and the project is funded before any research/analysis work is completed. Team members are saying “We don’t have enough time to deliver.”
Potential Mitigation
Open up communications with sponsors Commit the team to effective analysis. Befriend change management.
“The deadline for this project is Tuesday, January 11th, because we started on November 1st, and that makes it all one’s.” a sponsor to the project team
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
#1. Spontaneous Requirements
#1 since 2008 Occurs in 84% of projects
Explanation
Scope creep.
Symptoms
“We have a change control.” “Say…while we are doing that…why don’t we do this other thing too?”
Potential Mitigation
Establish clear communication of the project’s requirements and goals with the project team. If the above mitigation cannot be accomplished create a plan that incorporates a scope change ‘vetting session’ prior to change management.
“Since we have the patient open, why don’t we also remove the appendix, he’s not using it, is he?” a surgeon who is no longer practicing.
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
Top 10 Obstacles to Project Success Results (Overall) Frequency of projects that experience this obstacle
0%
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 84%
Scope creep
78%
Not enough time
74%
Not enough resources
61%
Not enough testing Team members lack authority
60%
Project tasks are late
60% 54%
Not enough funding
50%
Unseen requirements Sponsor cannot be reached Team lacks the skills necessary
39% 34% © 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
North America and Western Europe Obstacles Ranked for North America, and Western Europe A disappearing sponsor The finance challenge The resource challenge
Obstacle
Tardy delivery of project tasks Minimal or non-existent testing Challenging schedule Delegated responsibility unrelated to authority A skill set challenged team Spontaneous requirements Invisible requirements
0 2009 Western European Ranking 2009 North American Ranking
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Frequency of Obstacle (10 is most frequent)
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
8
9
10
Global Ranking between Customer Outsourcers Between Outsourcers andandCustomers A disappearing sponsor The finance challenge The resource challenge Tardy delivery of project tasks Minimal or non-existent testing Challenging schedule Delegated responsibility unrelated to authority A skill set challenged team Spontaneous requirements Invisible requirements Outsource Ranking 2009 Customer Ranking 2009
0
2
4
6
Frequency of Obstacle (10 is most frequent) © 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
8
10
Mitigation • Process • Have them in place. (Change Management, Life-Cycle Management, Project Methodologies etc.) • Make sure they are understood. • Make sure they are accepted. • Make sure they are followed.
• Systems • Automate the processes. • Make sure they are LESS onerous, and do not add complexity. © 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
People • Develop Communication • Do everything humanly possible to communicate clearly. • Do nothing that blocks or confuses communication.
Who are you attempting to communicate with, and how do they perceive you?
• Develop Motivation Happy, Happy productive team-mate • Keep them happy (ask them how.)
Sad, Sad upset team-mate
• Get them happy (ask them how.)
What’s your team’s temperature?
Apathetic, uncaring team-mate • Get them talking (get to know them.)
• Enforce Accountability • Have a plan “B”, for every agreement. © 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp
Have you enforced accountability?
One final thought…
Success is not by chance.
© 2008 All rights reserved, MüTō Performance Corp