http://www.e-journals.net
ISSN: 0973-4945; CODEN ECJHAO E-Journal of Chemistry Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 510-518, October 2007
Phytochemical Studies of Strychnos potatorum L.f.- A Medicinal Plant P.B.MALLIKHARJUNA*, L.N.RAJANNA, Y.N.SEETHARAM and G.K.SHARANABASAPPA# Biosystematics and Medicinal Plants Laboratory, Department of Botany, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga -585 106, Karnataka, India. # R & D Division, Shashi Phytochemical Industries, 01.Old Industrial Area, Alwar – 301 001, Rajasthan, India. Department of Botany, Govt.College for Women, Kolar – 563 101,Karnataka, India
[email protected] Received 21 February 2007; Accepted 30 March 2007 Abstract: The present paper deals with the phytochemical screening of therapeutic importance from Strychnos potatorum L.f., an important medicinal plant. This study involves the preliminary screening, quantitative determination and the qualitative thin layer chromatographic separation of secondary metabolites from the root, stem bark and seeds (collected and market) of S.potatorum. Further, HPLC alkaloid profile of the seed has been studied. The generated data has provided the basis for its wide use as the therapeutant both in the traditional and folk medicines.
.
Keywords: Phytochemical, Strychnos potatorum, Medicinal plant.
Introduction Plants have an almost limitless ability to synthesize aromatic substances mainly secondary metabolites, of which at least 12,000 have been isolated, a number estimated to be less than 10% of the total. In many cases, these substances serve as the molecules of plant defense against predation by microorganisms, insects, and herbivores. Further, some of which may involve in plant odour ( terpenoids), pigmentation (tannins and quinines), and flavour (capsacin). However, several of these molecules possess medicinal properties1. Strychnos potatorum L.f. is an important medicinal plant, used in Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, and in folk medicine for treating several ailments including microbial infections, diarrhoea and diabetes.
511
P. B. MALLIKHARJUNA et al.
Alkaloids mainly diaboline, and four triterpenes viz., isomotiol,sitosterol,stigmasterol and compesterol were reported from seeds and leaves of S.potatorum, respectively2-3. Further, twenty four alkaloids including diaboline were reported from the root of S.potatorum4. Where as, Adinolfi et al. (1994) have studied galactomannan and galactan (1:1.7), the mixture of the main polysaccharide component of seed5. In the present study, we have concentrated on the preliminary screening, quantitative determination, and the qualitative separation of secondary metabolites from the root, stem bark, and seeds of Strychnos potatorum.
Experimental Collection and identification of plant The plant material viz., root, stem bark, and seeds of Strychnos potatorum L.f., belongs to the family Loganiaceae, were collected from the Karpakpalli forest, Bidar district, Karnataka in December 2002. The plant was identified with the help of The Flora of Presidency of Madras6 and The Flora of Gulbarga district7 and a voucher specimen is deposited in the Herbarium, Department of Botany, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga (HGUG-214). Further, another set of seeds were procured from the M/s Jajee Ayurvedic stores, Gulbarga.
Preliminary screening of Secondary Metabolites The shade dried plant material is powdered using mixer grinder, and subjected to soxhelet extraction with petroleum ether, chloroform, 95% ethanol, and distilled water for 18h in the order of increasing polarity of solvents. The condensed extracts were used for preliminary screening of phytochemicals such as alkaloids (Iodine,Wagner and Dragendorff’s tests), flavonoids (Pew’s, Shinoda and NaOH tests),glycosides (Keller-Kiliani,conc.H2SO4,and Molish tests), Lignins(Labat and Lignin tests),phenols (ellagic acid and phenol tests),saponins (foam and haemolysis tests),sterols (Liberman-Burchard, and Salkowski tests), tannins (gelatin test)were carried out8-9.
Quantitative estimation of secondary metabolites The presence of secondary metabolites from root, stem bark, and seeds of S.potatorum were quantitatively determined by adopting standard protocols. Alkaloids by Ikan’s method10, flavonoids by Swain and Hillis method 11, phenols by Bray and Thorpe method 12 ,tannins by Folin-Denis method13, and saponins by Sanchez method 14.
Separation of secondary metabolites by thin layer chromatography For the thin layer chromatography studies of secondary metabolites, precoated Alugram®Sil G/UV254nm (Machery – Nagel GmbH,Germany) aluminum plates ( 20 X 20cm) were used.
TLC study of alkaloids The powdered root, stem bark, and seeds of S.potatorum were wetted with a half diluted NH4OH and lixiviated with EtOAc for 24h at RT. The organic phase is separated from the acidified filtrate and basified with NH4OH (pH 11-12).It is extracted with chloroform (3X), condensed by evaporation and used for chromatography. The alkaloid spots were separated using the solvent mixture chloroform and methanol (15:1). The colour and hRf values of the separated alkaloids were recorded both under ultraviolet (UV254nm) and visible light after spraying with Dragendorff’s reagent 15.
TLC study of flavoniods One gram powdered root, stem bark and seeds of S.potatorum were extracted with 10ml methanol on water bath (60oC/ 5min). The filtrate was condensed by evaporation, added a
Phytochemical Studies of Medicinal Plant
512
mixture of water and EtOAc (10:1 mL), and mixed thoroughly. The EtOAc phase thus retained is used for chromatography. The flavonoid spots were separated using chloroform and methanol (19:1) solvent mixture. The colour and hRf values of these spots were recorded under ultraviolet (UV254nm) light 15.
TLC study of glycosides The powdered root, stem bark, and seeds of S.potatorum were extracted with 70% EtOH on rotary shaker (180 thaws/min) for 10h. 70% lead acetate is added to the filtrate and centrifuged at 5000rpm/10 min. The supernatant was further centrifuged by adding 6.3% Na2CO3 at 10000 rpm/10min. The retained supernatant is dried, redissolved in chloroform and used for chromatography. The glycosides were separated using EtOAc-MeOH-H2O (80:10:10) solvent mixture. The colour and hRf values of these spots were recorded by observing under ultraviolet (UV254nm) light16.
TLC study of phenols The powdered root, stem bark and seeds of S.potatorum were lixiviated in methanol on rotary shaker (180 thaws/ min) for 24h. The condensed filtrate was used for chromatography. The phenols were separated using chloroform and methanol (27:0.3) solvent mixture. The colour and hRf values of these phenols were recorded under visible light after spraying the plates with Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent heating at 80oC/10min16.
TLC study of saponins Two grams of powdered root stem bark, and seeds of S.potatorum were extracted with 10 ml 70% EtOH by refluxing for 10 min. The filtrate is condensed, enriched with saturated n-BuOH, and thoroughly mixed. The butanol was retained, condensed and used for chromatography. The saponins were separated using chloroform, glacial acetic acid, methanol and water (64:34:12:8) solvent mixture. The colour and hRf values of these spots were recorded by exposing chromatogram to the iodine vapours15.
TLC study of sterols Two grams of powdered root, stem bark, and seeds of S.potatorum were extracted with 10ml methanol in water bath (80 oC/15 min).The condensed filtrate is used for chromatography. The sterols were separated using chloroform, glacial acetic acid, methanol and water (64:34:12:8) solvent mixture. The colour and hRf values of these spots were recorded under visible light after spraying the plates with anaisaldeyde-sulphuric acid reagent and heating (100oC/6 min) 15.
HPLC study of alkaloid profile of S.potatorum seed Extraction and preparation of sample The total alkaloids from the powdered collected seed of S.potatorum were extracted as described by Nuzillard et al. (1996)17. This extract was redissolved in 5mL absolute ethanol (analar grade) and filtered through Whatman filter paper No.1.The filtrate is used for high performance liquid chromatography study.
HPLC instrumentation An isocratic HPLC (Shimadzu HPLC class VP series) with two LC – 10 AT VP pumps (Shimadzu), variable wavelength programmable photodiode array detector SPD MIOA VP (Shimadzu), CTO-IOAS VP column oven (Shimadzu), SCL-10A VP system controller (Shimadzu) and a reverse phase Luna 5 µC18 (2) Phenomenex column (250 mm x 4.6 mm)
513
P. B. MALLIKHARJUNA et al.
was used. The HPLC system was equipped with software class VP series version 6.1 (Shimadzu). The mobile phase components acetonitrile: water (1:3) were filtered through 0.2 µ membrane filter before use and pumped from the solvent reservoir to the column at a flow rate 1 mL/min which yielded a column backpressure of 16-165 Kgf/cm2. The column temperature was maintained at 27oC. 20 µL of sample was injected using Rheodyne syringe (Model 7202, Hamilton).
Results and Discussion The curative properties of medicinal plants are perhaps due to the presence of various secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, phenols, saponins, sterols etc. The successive extracts of root, stem bark, and seeds of Strychnos potatorum have revealed the presence of alkaloids,flavonoids,glycosides,lignins,phenols,saponins,sterols,and tannins (Table 1).Thus the preliminary screening tests may be useful in the detection of the bioactive principles and subsequently may lead to the drug discovery and development. Further, these tests facilitate their quantitative estimation and qualitative separation of pharmacologically active chemical compounds. The lignan-glycosides vanprukoside, strychnoside, and glucopyranoside isolated from Strychnos vanprukii have shown significant antioxidant property 18. Table 1.Preliminary screening of secondary metabolites from S.potatorum Secondary metabolite
Name of the test Iodine test Alkaloids Dragendorff’s test Wagner’s test Pew’s test Flavonoids Shinoda test NaOH test KellarGlycosides Kiliani test Conc. H2SO4 Molisch test Labat test Lignin test Lignin Ellagic acid Phenols test Phenol test Foam test Saponins Haemolysis test LibermannSterols Burchard test Salkowski test Tannins Gelatin test
Root I II III IV + + + + + + + +
Stem bark I II III IV + + + + + + + -
Collected seed I II III IV + + + + + + -
Market seed I II III IV + + + + + + +
+ + +
+
+ + +
+
+ +
+
+
+ + +
+
+
+ + -
+ + + +
+
+ + + -
+ + + +
+
+
+ + -
+ +
-
+
+ -
+ +
+ + -
+
+ + -
+
+ +
-
+
-
+ -
+
+ + + -
+
+ +
+ + + -
+ + -
+
+ +
+ + -
+ + +
+
+ -
+ + -
+ + +
+
+ +
- - + - + + - - +
+ + +
-
-
+ + +
+ + +
-
-
+ + +
+ +
-
-
+ + +
+ +
+ + -
-
+ + -
-
+ -
-
-
+ -
-
-
+ + +
+
+ + +
+
+ +
-
-
+ -
-
-
+ + -
-
+ + -
-
+ +
-
-
+ + -
-
+ +
+ + + -
+ +
‘ + ‘ Present, ‘ – ‘ Absent, I : Petrolum ether , II : Chloroform, III: Ethanol, IV: Aqueous extracts.
Phytochemical Studies of Medicinal Plant
514
The data of quantitative determination of secondary metabolites is tabulated in the Table 2. Among the five groups of phytochemicals determined from the root, stem bark, and seeds of S.potatorum, tannins were found to be the most abundant one followed by saponins and alkaloids. While, phenols and flavonoids were low in concentration. Table 2. Quantitative estimation of phytochemicals of S.potatorum S. No. 1 2 3 4 5
Metabolites Alkaloids Flavonoids Phenols Tannins Saponins
Percent of secondary metabolites / dry weight Root Stem bark Collected seed Market seed, % % % % 1.7 2.2 1.4 1.3 0.140 0.374 0.021 0.021 0.209 0.167 0.039 0.059 12.22 20.00 18.00 18.00 1.535 0.465 5.135 4.741
The data of qualitative separation of alkaloids from root, stem bark, and seeds of S.potatorum by thin layer chromatography is tabulated in the Table 3. Table 3. Qualitative separation of Alkaloids S.potatorum by TLC(UV254nm) S.No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Colour of the spot Light green Blue Green Bluish green Light pink Pink Intense pink Blue Light blue Pink Green Blue Light blue Pinkish green Blue Light green Pale pink Light green Blue Light green
hRf values 5.26 8.42 12.63 14.74 18.95 21.05 24.21 28.42 31.58 34.74 40.00 46.32 52.63 57.89 63.16 68.42 78.95 88.42 92.63 94.74
Root + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Plant parts tested Stem Collected Bark seed + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Market seed + + + + + + -
Authentic sample
Diaboline (31.58)
Twenty quenching and fluorescing alkaloids were reported from the various parts of the plant. However, more number of alkaloids were found in the root and stem bark (17 spots). Further, the collected seed has possessed more alkaloids (13 spots) compared to the market seed (6 spots). This may be perhaps due to the inter conversion of these compounds into other derivatives owing to the prolonged period of storage and method of processing in case of the market seed. Similar observation is made in Strychnos melladora where alkaloids
515
P. B. MALLIKHARJUNA et al.
are transformed into glucoindole alkaloids dolichontaside and palicoside19. The most abundant alkaloid diaboline is found in all samples of S.potatorum with hRf value 34.74 (light blue) and identified by matching with authentic sample. Further, four flavonoid spots were found to be common for all samples with hRf values 5.26, 8.42, 24.21and 31.08. Alkaloids are the lead molecules of therapeutic importance from Strychnos species. These are heterocyclic indole compounds which have proved to be have pharmacological properties such as hypotensive activity20,anticonvulsantactivity21, antiprotozoal, antimicrobial and antimalarial activities22-23. The data of thin layer chromatography of flavonoids of S.potatorum is tabulated in the Table 4. Three flavonoid spots were reported in the root, collected and market seed samples however with different colour and hRf values. While, in the stem bark four alkaloid spots were observed. Flavonoids are the phenolic substances and are the largest group of phenols. These generally occurs as a C6-C3 unit linked to an aromatic ring. Table 4. Qualitative separation of flavonoids of S.potatorum S.No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Colour of the spot Light blue Dark blue Light blue Tapioca Dark blue Touch of lemon Yellow Blue
hRf values
Root
23.33 30.00 36.76 33.67 42.65 51.47 66.67 83.33
+ + + -
Plant parts tested Stem Collected Bark seed + + + + + + + -
Market seed + + + -
The data of glycosides of S.potatorum by thin layer chromatography is tabulated in the Table 5.Three glycosides with similar colour and hRf values 8.06,16.13 and 35.48 were observed both in the root and stem bark. Where as, four glycosides were observed in both seed samples with hRf values 28.69, 46.09, 73.04 and 91.30. Table 5. Qualitative separation of glycosides of S.potatorum S.No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Colour of the spot Intense blue Pink Yellow Light green Pink Pink Yellow
hRf values 8.06 16.13 28.69 35.48 46.09 73.04 91.30
Root + + + -
Plant parts tested Stem Collected Bark seed + + + + + + +
Market seed + + + +
The data of phenols of S.potatorum by thin layer chromatography is tabulated in the Table 6.The highest number of phenols (9 spots) were reported in the market seed. However, five phenolic spots with similar color and hRf values (6.67, 16.67, 44.0, 58.67, and 90.0)
Phytochemical Studies of Medicinal Plant
516
were found both in root and stem bark. Further, it is observed that five spots were found to be common for root, stem bark, and collected seed. Plants have the limitless ability to synthesize phenols or their derivatives. The presence of phenols in all types of tissues is a characteristic feature of plants. Table 6. Qualitative separation of phenols of S.potatorum S.No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Colour of the spot Blue Dark blue Blue Light blue Intense blue Light blue Intense blue Light blue Blue Blue Intense blue
hRf values 6.67 16.67 33.33 38.67 44.00 49.33 58.67 66.67 70.67 80.00 90.00
Root + + + + +
Plant parts tested Stem Collected Bark seed + + + + +
+ + + + + + +
Market seed + + + + + + + + +
The data of saponins of S.potatorum by thin layer chromatography is tabulated in the Table 7. It has revealed the presence of five yellow to intense yellow coloured saponins with hRf values 69.39,71.43,79.59,85.71,and 96.94 in all parts of the plant. Saponins are glycosides of both triterpenes and sterols generally possessing five sugar units and gluconic unit as a component. The occurrence of saponins has been reported in over seventy families of higher plants 24. Table 7. Qualitative separation of saponins of S.potatorum S.No 1 2 3 4 5
Colour of the spot Light yellow Intense yellow Intense yellow Intense yellow Intense yellow
hRf values 69.39 71.43 79.59 85.71 96.94
Root + + + + +
Plant parts tested Stem Collected Bark seed + + + + + + + + + +
Market seed + + + + +
The data of sterols of S.potatorum by thin layer chromatography is tabulated in the Table 8. It has revealed the presence of four sterols in the stem bark and seeds. While three spots of sterols were found in the root. These are of may be isomotiol, sitosterol, stigmasterol and compesterol as ealier reported 3. The qualitative HPLC alkaloids profile of S.potatorum seed were detected at a wavelength of 270 nm due to sharpness of the peaks and proper baseline and recorded its retention time (Rt min), percent area and heights in the Table 9 and Figure 1. The HPLC chromatogram has shown 61 peaks. However, 18 peaks were prominent with significant percent area and height (>0.5%). The most abundant peak with 36.68 percent area and 15.96 percent height is observed at the retention time 31.104 (Rt,min), which is probably diaboline ,the prominent alkaloid of this plant as reported earlier2,4.The other prominent peaks were reported with retention time 2.624,3.893,8.117,9.003 and 12.832 (Rt,min) respectively.
517
P. B. MALLIKHARJUNA et al. Table 8. Qualitative separation of sterols of S.potatorum S.No 1 2 3 4
Colour of the spot Greenish black Greenish black Intense black Pinkish black
hRf values 40.82 56.12 74.49 89.90
Root + + + -
Plant parts tested Stem Collected Bark seed + + + + + + + +
Table 9. HPLC alkaloid profile of S.potatorum seed S.No.of the peak 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Retention time Rt,min
Peak area %
Peak height %
2.624 3.456 3.893 4.256 4.629 5.152 5.781 6.667 7.211 8.117 9.003 10.891 12.832 14.283 18.123 25.035 29.515 31.104
16.96 0.21 3.86 1.44 0.90 2.34 0.42 2.06 1.29 3.55 6.07 6.20 8.49 0.59 1.27 1.78 4.04 36.68
23.22 1.43 5.33 3.26 2.33 2.86 0.88 2.90 2.76 6.38 3.38 2.97 13.70 0.69 0.89 1.45 2.74 15.96
Figure 1.HPLC alkaloid profile of Strychnos potatorum seed
Market seed + + + +
Phytochemical Studies of Medicinal Plant
518
Therefore, the data generated from these experiments have provided the chemical basis for the wide use of this plant as therapeutic agent for treating various ailments. However, there is need to further carry out advanced hyphenated spectroscopic studies in order to elucidate the structure of these compounds. Furthermore, this data may be handy in probing of biochemistry of this plant in the future.
Acknowledgements Authors are thankful to Dr.Michel Frederich, Department of Pharmacy, Universite de Liege, Belgium for generously providing diaboline, an authentic sample. Further, PBM is thankful to the commissioner, Collegiate Education Department, Government of Karnataka for giving permission to carryout this work.
References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24.
Cowan M M, Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 1999, 12,564. Singh H, Kapoor V K, Phillipson JD and Bisset NG, Phytochemistry,1975, 14, 587. Singh H, Kapoor V K, Piozzi F, Passannanti S and Paternostro M, Phytochemistry, 1978,17, 154. Massiot G, Thepenier P, Jacquier MJ, Men Oliver LL and Delaude C, Phytochemistry, 1992, 31, 2873. Adinolfi M, Corsaro M M, Langetta R, Pasilli M, Folkard G,Grant W and Sutherland J, Carbohydrate Res., 1994, 263, 103. Gamble JS, The Flora of Presidency of Madras, Vol II: Botanical Survey of India Calcutta, 1958. Seetharam Y N, Kotresha K and Uploankar S B, Flora of Gulbarga District, Publisher Gulbarga University; Gulbarga, 2000. Dey PM and Harborne J B, Methods in Plant Biochemistry: Academic Press; London, 1987. Evans WC, Pharmacognosy,13th Ed, Balliere – Tindall; London, 1989. Ikan R, Natural Products: A laboratory guide, Academic Press, London, 1981. Swain T and Hillis W E, S.J. Sci.Food Agric., 1959, 10, 63. Bray H G and Thorpe W V, Meth. Biochem. Anal., 1964,1,27. Schanderi SH, Methods in Food Analysis: Academic Press, New York, 1970. Sanchez GL, Acevedo JCM and Solo RR, Analyst, 1972, 97, 973. Wagner R and Bladt S, Plant Drug Analysis, A Thin Layer Chromatography Atlas,2nd Ed: Springer; Berlin,1996. Harborne JB, Phytochemical Methods, 3rd Ed. Chapman and Hall; Madras, 1998. Nuzillard JM, Thepenier P, Jacquier MJ, Men Oliver LL and Delaude C, Phytochemistry, 1996, 43, 897. Thongphasuk P, Suttisri R, Bavovada R and Verpoorte R, Fitoterapia, 2004, 75,623. Brandt V, Tits M, Penelle J, Frederich M and Angenot L, Phytochemistry, 2001, 57, 653. Ali MM and Ghatak BRJ, Ind.J. Exp.Biol., 1975, 13,163. Singh H and Kapoor VK, Planta Med., 1980, 38, 133. Quetin- Lacqlercq J, Favel A, Balansard G, Regli P and Angenot L, Planta Med., 1995, 61, 475. Frederich M, Jacquier MJ, Thepenier P, De Mol P, Tits M, Philippe G, Delaude C, Angenot L and Zaches Hanrot M, J. Nat. Prod.,2002, 65, 1381. Hostettmann K and Marston A, Saponins, Cambridge University Press, UK, 1995.