1
Jason Schultz
2
jason@efforg Corynne McSherry
5
221504)
94110
CA
Street
Francisco,
San
FOUNDAllON
ELECTRONIC 454 Shotwell
4
(SBN
corynne@efforg
FRONllER
3
(SBN 212600)
Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993
x112
6 7
Attorneys for Plaintiff JEFFREYDIEHL
COURT
CALIFORNIA
OF
DISTRICT DISTRICT
NORTHERN
FOR
10
THE
UNITED
9
STATES
8
OAKLAND DIVISION
11 12 13
JEFFREYDIEm.,
No. 06-CY -6800 SBA
) )
STIPULA nON OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
~
14
)
v.
)
15
17
JUDGE: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong
) )
Defendant.
3
Courtroom
DEPT:
MICHAEL CROOK,
16
)
18 19 20
23
Crook
Michael
and
Diehl
Jeffrey
SnPULA
between
HEREBY
and
IS
by
IT
22
TED
21
("Parties") that the above-captioned action, including all claims, counterclaims, and affirmative
25
Each
26
(a)(l)(ii).
41
FRCP
to
pursuant
prejudice
without
dismissed
is
hereby
and
be
defenses,
24 Partywill bearits own costsand attorneys'fees.
The Parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement Order
an
issuing
by
A,
Exhibit
as
hereto
attached
Crook,
Defendant
and
Diehl
Plaintiff
between
27 28
.:
I DISMISSA
OF
TION
TIPULA
1
1
that explicitly retainsjurisdiction to enforcethe settlementagreementand incorporatesthe tenDSof
2
the Settlement
Agreemen~
pursuant
to Kokkonen
v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America, 511 Stipulation.
this
accompanies
Order
Proposed
A
(1994).
381-82
375,
U.S.
3 4 5
7
8 9
r
~
/2.,
/lltlr
Dated:
6
d~~
Electronic Frontier Foundation Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeff Diehl
10
II 12 13 14
Dated:J- 10 -01
f/l cJxt7CL._o -.
-
,
-
Michael Crook
Defendant& Pro Se
15
16 17 18 19 20
21 22
23
24 25 26 27 28
2 STIPULATION Of DISMISSAL
SB4
CO6-O6800
No.
between
and
by
2007,
Fetx'uary,
of
day
9th
made
anindividual residing in Baldwinsville, NewYork. and
('.Crook"),
Crook
Michael
is
nus AGREEMENT
this
AGREEMENT
Cue
CGl Settlement
ND.
Jeffrey Diehl v. MIchaelCrook
contractual
relations;
injunctive
relie(
restitution
and disgorgement
with
interference
intentional
and
Act
Copyright
Millennium
Digital
the
under
claims
Jeffiey Diehl ("Diehl"), an individual resimng in San Francisco, California (collectively, "the Parties"). WHEREAS, on November 1, 2006, Mr. DiehJ commenced a civil action against Mr. Crook seeking injWlCtive relief and damages for misrepresentation of copyri~ht for unfair business
JX'8Ctices; aid declaratoryrelief ("the Action"); and
amicably
damages
them
between
controversy
the
~eking
herein,
contained
promises
mutual
the
of
p-oceedings.
resolve or
to
wish
consideration
in
mspute
Parties further
for
~ed
the
THEREFORE,
NOW,
witIX>Ut
and
the
on January S, 2007, Mr. Crook filed counterclaims for intentiOl8linOictionof emotionaldistress and intimidation; and WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
Notices
image
similar
any
the
of
previously use
he withdrawing
the
which News,
Fox
with
to
entity
or
connection on
appearance
in
person
every
to for 2005
Crook's
request
send
to
to
and/or
similar
cease-
other
and/or
any future copyright
suspension,
for
requests
notices,
DMCA
st,
~
notices,
req
other
on Fox News;
00 ti ce ard' or 3. Crook agrees that he will refrain from submitting and-desist
under 17
notices
any
related
ootices,
and/or any
with
colmection
desist
or
aOO
sus~nsion,
video
cease
for
of
futW"e
~
any
requests
the
iss~
entity
pe~n
agrees relating
notice
Crook
2
image
DMCA
a
to
notices"),
2OOS aPJx:arance
or
video
sent
any
to
~~s
to Crook's
oot
suspension
agrees
("DMCA
in
Crook
§ 512
or
1.
V.S.C.
email
DMCA
the par1ies agree as follows:
IX'OCCsscs in connection with the use of any copyrighted work, for a period of (five) 5 tangible
a
in
or
notices,
of
copyrighted Dismissal
a
of
of
use Order
(a)
for
(URL)
is a fair use and, at the Locator
Resource
in
1he
of
entry
regarding
cease-and-desist
SIX>UX. copyright
his any
threats
the
of
use
the
q~stion
Uniform
Internet
originated
of this Action unlessthe
DismissaJ
photographed, and/or iss~
other date
die
or
does
Crook
authored, years
from
whether t~
include
evaluate
S
suspension,
Crook
to,
personally first
(five)
will
win
of
for
that
~g~d
was extent
formally
notice,
such
Crook
period
requests
To
4.
a
notices, any
of
Action,
for
DMCA work, this top
the
by,
medium
CX'
question
in
material
years from the date of the entry of the Order of
Action maintained by Diehl's counsel, currently located ; and (b) a wcbpage containing a copy of the Joint Stipulation, Penna~nt will be JX"Ovidedto Crook orx:e the Order is entered and the webJDge is created which
for
URL
the
Dismissal,
of
Order
this
aid
regarding
Injurx:tion
the webpage
law: Basic
of
copyright
on mid
Overview
courses
online
following
complete
Copyright
mid
Office Pr«tice arx1A~dSemi
nar 00 of
attcrxlance
of
certificates
with
Diehl
provi~
wiJ!
Crook
Use. 2007,
Fair 30,
2006: April
By
Law
Law
CopyrighllAw
2006: IntrcxilCtioo
cou~.
aOOve
the
6.
Copyright
01
Principles
Copyright
Basic
Understanding
agrees to
the
COD~tEducation
So Crook
of Indi2en~e
~Dresaltation
and
Stipulation
Re2:ardin2:
Dam.~
for
Bream
by for
review
claim
and
any
waives
indigence, Diehl
financial
of
provided,
his
including
Agreement,
this
of
term
any
breaches
he
attorneys' fees.
if
that
agrees
Crook
9.
finaJx:iaJ comJ:eDSation incluang
has
Crook
representation documents
above
the
on
financial
of
Based counsel
Diehl's
8.
7. Crook represents under penalty of perjury that he is indigent and that the financial documents he has provided to Diehl to substantiate this claim are true and accurateto the rest of Crook's knowledge.
owns,
all
to
this order transfer
to
in
of
return,
In
Crook Crook
by
breach.
name the Agreement volunteer
and/or
this
breach
of
domain
any
alleged
time
in
the any enforce breaches
to
of
at
rights notice action said
cure
court
hours
and/or
all
Diehl
to Agreement
48 to
Crook
for
any
least
this
assign
to
at
of
Crook commencing
Crook
execution give opportunity
an
provide
refore
to
agrees
Agreement
Diehl
of
require
to date
right
the
of
as
the
representations of his financial status, Diehl's remedies sball incl\x:le, without limitation,
Statanent
for
Diehl
aJX)logy,
to the
of
wording
aJX)logizing The
Diehl,
to suspension.
for
acceptable
Video"). and
("the
days of the execution of this Agreement, Crook agrees to
notices
statement DMCA
video false
a
to b:tween thepar1ies, isattached hereto asExhi~tA.
agreed
jointly
sending
make
10. Withintwenty-onc
requests
VId~
rights associated with the aoove references Internet oomaim.
he by
bIos.
or provided
be
website shall
any which
for
on
Diehl.
to Video URL
the
Viooo
the
the
show
in Video,
to
rights the
wishes
all to
tink
a
ifhe
assign
to via
that,
agrees
agrees
Crook Crook exclusively
so
do
will
13.
12.
11. Crook agreesnot to revoke or deny any statement made in the Video in any ...wte...forum;
Diehl.
the and
it
that
agrees a~ved
has
Diehl Diehl
until
withheld. and
unless
unreasonably public
the
not to
shall
approval
disseminated
be
be
of the Video, Crook shall submit the Video to Diehl for
completion
which
not
will
Video
aPlX"Oval,
14. Up>n
Jurlsdlcdon
of
Retention
for
below. Re.J~
forth
~t
as
court
the puties have submitted the Joint Stipulation and (Proposed) Order of Dismissal to the
15. Subject to Diehl's approval of the Video, Crook and Diehl will execute aIxI submit to the Court a Motion for Dismissal and Prop>scdOrder dismissing all claims against each other and incorporating the terms of this Agreement. in the form attached heretoas Exhibit. Releaseor Oabns 16. Conditioned upon the parties' compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the parties, and their respective officers, directors, agents, servants,
liabilities.
lo~s,
damages,
demal¥is.
aIKi assigns.
therein.
userted
allegatiOIB
~
ard/or
fees,
~ta1s
Action
the
to
relating
or
of
out
arisil'lg
attorneys, ~essors
but not limited to any claim for attorMYs
rights or causes of action. i~luding
M~ition"
claims,
all
and
any
from
eacb
release
hereby
other
I8lents, subsidiaries, affiliated com~s,
employees,
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerningthe subjectmatter hereof aoo supersedesany agreement or undcrstaJxJing. 17.
modification
the
subject
the
whom
to
respect
against
with
J:8rtiel
made
the
by
was
signed
claim
may
writing
in
~
any
that
instrument
an
written.
by
or
except
altered
oral
whether matter of the Agreement prior to the date of this Agreement. 1ms Agreement may oot be is charged.
18. This Agreement shall be interpeted in accordance with the laws oftbe State of California. Any dispute or controversy between the parties arising under or in ~tion with this Agreement that is not subject to the continuing jurisdiction of the Northern District of California. if any. sball be submitted to a court in the state of California for resolution. Should either rarty b'each this agreement, they will be liable for any associatedattorneysfeesaOOcostsi~urrcd in any legal action to eofo~e the
shall
Agreement
this
of
term
Agreement.
any oftbis
enfo~e
to
term
other
JBfty any
any
or
of tenD
failure
that
of
The waiver
a
effect.
and
fo~
deemed
~
oot
full
agreement. 19. If any provision or 8ub-lXOvision of this Agreement is found invalid or unenforcea~e, the bB.Iancc of the Agreement, and all povisiom thereof, shall remain in
~.
Q7
.
1/r
Date
""~Jr..a
CROOK
MlOIAFL
agreement.
ofwbicb
each ~
~/
Date:
JEFFDIEIu..
same
the
couotefi8rts. and
mo~
~
or
one coostitute
sbaJJ
in
~g~.
ard executed which
be of
all
original.
an
may
s~~rs
respcctive Agreement
their This
and
deemed
be
shall
'21.
J:8rtics
20. This Agreement shall be mooing uJX>nand shall inure to the benefit of the