Work Flow And Work Design

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Work Flow And Work Design as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 3,863
  • Pages: 48
Work Flow and Work Design Workshop by Professor John Sharp COrE Research Group, University of Salford, UK www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Introducing Lean • • • •

Workflow comes from Lean Therefore we need an overview of: Lean principles Lean maintenance tools (covered in yesterday’s workshop) • Processes (process mapping) • Then we can apply them for work flow and work design www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

What is lean ? Lean manufacturing is the reduction in the time from customer order to manufacturing and delivery of products by elimination of non-value added waste in the production stream. Key points: – One-piece flow – Continuous improvement Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

www.ipamc.org

Lean Principles 5. Perfection

1. Specify Value

4. Pull

3. Creating Flow

2. Identify value stream

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Lean maintenance tools • 5S process • Elimination of 7 deadly wastes (7Mudas) • Kaizen (continuous improvement) & Poka Yoke • Jokoda (quality at the source) • JIT (Just In Time) & TPM (Total Productive Maintenance) www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

5S is a systematic common sense approach to good house keeping to have a neat, clean, tidy and safe work place

STRUCTURE DISTINGUISH NEEDED ITEMS FROM NOT THE NEED AND ELIMINATE THE LATER

SYSTEMISE

SELFDISCIPLINE

KEEP NEEDED ITEMS IN THE CORRECT PLACE TO ALLOW FOR EASY & QUICK RETRIEVAL

MAKING A HABIT OF MAINTAINING THE SET CONDITIONS THE CONDITION PEOPLE SUPPORT WHEN MAINTAIN THE FIRST THREE S’s

KEEP THE WORKSHOP SWEPT AND CLEAN

STANDARDISE

SWEEPING

Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

www.ipamc.org

7 Mudas – “Waste” Any activity which consumes resources but does not create value. • • • • • • •

Searching Delays Unnecessary movement of resources and material Defects Over processing Over producing Storing inventory/work in progress

Lean = creation of more value with fewer resources. www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Value and non-value activities Activities add value which addTHAT costGETS TODAY’Swhich CUSTOMERS WILL ONLY Activities PAY FOR THE VALUE Processing it Printing it Assembling it Cutting it Drilling it Packing it Painting it Despatching it Polishing it Welding it Plating it

ADDED INTO A PRODUCT.

Sorting it Inspecting it Finding it Reworking it Handling it Snagging it Moving it Scrapping it Counting it Recalling it Repairing it www.ipamc.org

Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK What adds value in your organisation? “Work Flow and Work Design”

Lean maintenance tools

• Kaizen (continuous improvement, Plan do check act) • Poka Yoke (mistake proofing) • Jokoda (quality at the source) • JIT (Just In Time) • TPM (Total Productive Maintenance) www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Total Productive Maintenance • Achieving overall effectiveness of the production system by involving all workers in the process of actively maintaining equipment. • This process involves cleaning, inspection, restoration, redesign to improve deterioration characteristics, preventative maintenance, condition based maintenance, maintenance prevention. www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

What is a Process ? Any activity or group of activities that takes An ‘input’, adds value to it, and provides an output to an internal or external customer Processes are at the heart of maintenance management. INPUT List - Resources -

That are turned into

OUTPUT

Transformation PROCESS

List - Results

- Activity www.ipamc.org

Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

What is process management?

Inputs

Organisation as a series of activities

Output

Measure against targets, learn & improve www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Functional v. Process Based organisation CEO Funtional Dept. 1

Dept. 2

Hierarchy Dept. 3

Dept. 4

Dept. 5

Input

1 2 3 4

5

Output

6

Who owns the process?

Work processes flow across departments

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

•USA had top male sprinters in 2004 Olympics yet

did not win the gold medal!

•Great Britain won the gold medal. How? www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

We should manage our business (including) maintenance) through processes not departments !! www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Process Mapping • Allows a team to identify the actual flow or sequence of events in a process that any product or service follows • Flowcharts can be applied to anything from the travels of an invoice to the steps in making a purchase or maintaining a piece of equipment (plant). www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Process Mapping Symbols Task

Indicates a task (activity)

Decision No

Meeting

Indicates a meeting may span across several departments

Document

Indicates the preparation of a document or report

Task

Yes

Indicates a "yes/no" decision, where "yes" leads to one subsequent activity, "no" to another Used to indicate where others give support for an activity

End

Indicates the end of the process

A drop shadow on any symbols indicates that the item can be broken down into additional process steps

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Can map a process of many activities No

Create project team & allocate project manager

Create Terms Of Reference

Identify causes and agree, collect additional info if required

Management Team

Project Manager

Project Team

No

Yes Yes Agree?

Identify short & long term solutions

Agree?

Project Team

Test solutions & agree for full implementation

Project Team

Management Team

Management Team

No

No

Yes Closedown project

Has problem been resolved?

Monitor & report on progress

Project Manager

Project Manager Project Manager

No

Do processes / procedures need changing? Yes

Implement

OK? Yes

Project Team

Project Manager

Management Team

Update processes & procedures

System Manager

Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

www.ipamc.org

What would the Flowchart for “Making a cup of tea” look like?

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

• Making a cup of tea Start

Fill kettle with water

Boil Kettle

Put teabag in cup

Sugar? Yes

Yes

Add Milk

Fill cup with boiled water

Milk?

No

Add sugar

No

Tea ready to drink www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

• Making a cup of tea Start

Sugar?

Fill kettle with water

Boil Kettle

Put tea in teapot Yes

Pour tea into cup

Add Milk

Pour water into teapot Yes

Milk?

Is Tea Ready?

No

Add Sugar

Tea ready to drink

No

Each person does it differently therefore we need the “Preferred practice”. www.ipamc.org

Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

A Simple Plant Production Flow Diagram Bin No 4

Bin No 2

Bin No 4

Tank One

Tank Two

V5

V6

To packaging Units

Bin No 1

Fin Fan Cooler

V2

V1

V3

V4

Heat Processing Unit

HPP1 HPP2 Mill No One

MP1 MP= Mill Pump

Mill No Two

MP2 V = Valve

HPP= Heat Processing Pump

Blender Mixer Unit

BMP

BMP= Blender Mixer Pump www.ipamc.org

Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Process flow chart for Scenario Mechanical Fitter Identifies both mechanical and Electrical faults

Start Operator hears noise from the plant

Investigate

Send mechanical Fitter to identify and repair the fault

No

Ops manager arranges safety lock off of area

Yes Observes smoke coming from The equipment

Report the problem

Reported to Maintenance Engineer No Breakdown of Plant

Yes

Reported to Ops Manager

Reports electrical faults to engineer

Mechanical Fitter repairs mechanical faults

Electrical Fitter identifies faults Electrical Fitter repairs faults Lock off safety documents are signed to release Area to ops

Reported to Ops Foreman Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Finish

Outage completed plant back on line

www.ipamc.org

Process map: example Fa cilita te R e vie w a nd s o lve is s u e s

P ro d uce de p artm e ntal plan cove rin g ob je ctives , tim e s ca les , m an p ow e r I.T. re qu irem e n ts , e qu ip m e nt, bu d ge t e tc to d e liver s a le s ta rg et

yes R es e arch In d ep en d en ts a n d ide n tify the ir ne e ds a nd e xp e cta tion s fo r the future.

D e fin e go a ls an d o bjectives to S e nior Man a ge rs .

P ro du ce p la n ning as s um p tion s an d te m plate Fina n ce P la n in clu d in g a n y s a le s nu m b ers .

D efine s a le s s trateg y an d re s ou rces req u ire d to d elive r s a le s ta rg ets .

C o ns o lid ate in to Sa le s p lan an d d is trib u te .

Im plem e n ta tio n Gro up

Fin a ncia l C o ntro lle r

Sa le s D ire ctor

Fin a ncia l C o ntro lle r

H ea d Office D e pa rtm en t Man ag e rs

D o ind ivid ua l Sa le s Plan s fit?

P ro du ce B ra n ch p la n cove rin g ob je ctives , tim es cales , m a n po w er, e qu ip m e nt, b ud g et etc to d e liver th e s a le s ta rg e t.

Ma rketin g no

R e s ea rch In de p en d en ts , Mu ltiples & D is tribu tion o utle ts an d id e ntify th eir n e ed s an d e xp ecta tio n s for th e future.

Fin a ncia l C o ntro lle r

R e vie w / s ig n o ff w ith re le va n t D irecto rs

C o ns o lid a te all p la ns into P &H b u s ine s s pla n .

Ge n eral Man a ge rs

Im ple m e ntation Grou p

D o d ifferen t d ep a rtm e n tall bu s in es s p la n s fit tog ethe r?

Ge ne ra l Ma n ag e rs Fa cilita te a revie w proce s s w ith S ale s D irecto r

Sa le s D ire ctors Fin an cia l C o ntro lle r R e s e a rch m arke t p la ce for p o te ntial o pp o rtu nitie s a nd ide n tify p oten tial im p act o n P& H .

D is cu s s / a gree s ha re d s tra te g y a n d ob je ctive s .

App ro ve p la n

s tra teg ic

D ire ctors

B o ard

R e view req u ire m e nts o f :B a nk , le ga l a n d re gu la to ry in s titution s a nd im p lica tio ns for P &H

R e vie w / eva lua te s trate g y, n ee ds o f th e m a rke t a nd re view dire ction

Fin a ncia l D irecto r

B o ard

Im ple m e ntatio n Gro up

Is d irectio n ta ctica l or s tra te gic ?

ta ctica l

Id e ntify H oldin g s Bo a rd R e qu irem e n ts

Ma na g in g D ire cto r

R e s ea rch an d Id en tify S up p lie r / Man a ufactu re r n ee d s an d exp ecta tio ns fo r the fu tu re .

C o m m e rcia l D irecto r

R e s e a rch an d id en tify s ta ff tra in ing n e ed s an d e xpe ctatio ns fo r th e future.

R evie w an d eva lu ate cu rren t pe rfo rm a n ce .

Ma n ag em en t E xecutive Me e tin g M.E .M. (Gro up )

Im plem e n t ta ctical d ire ctio n fro m the B o ard.

Gen e ra l Ma na g ers S a le s

Im plem e n t ta ctical d ire ctio n a n d id en tify p riority lis t of w ha t n e ed s to b e achieved , w h o,h o w .

Tactica l Actio n Plan

Gen e ra l Ma na g ers Fo ru m

Im plem e n t ta ctical d ire ctio n from the B o ard

N a tio n al S ale s Man a ge r D is tribu tion S e rvice s plus Acco u nt C on trollers

All S en io r Man ag e rs C o m m u nica tio n of b u s ine s s pla n im plem e ntatio n a n d ad vis e ta ctica l ch an g es .

Ope ration s D ire ctor N ote:- The D irecto rs in vo lve m e nt is to ind icate the flow o f the p ro ces s on ly a n d do e s no t e xp la in th e ir fu ll job fun ctio ns .

‘Comments?’ Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

www.ipamc.org

An example change process T im e o r S eq u en ce

R e sp on sib ility

M an ag e m e n t T eam

C reate project team & allocate p roject m an ager

Agree?

Y es

Y es

No

No

P r oje ct M a n ag er

Agree?

OK?

Y es

No Do processes / N o prodedures needchanging?

C reate T erm s of R eferen ce

M on itor

Y es

P r ojec t T e a m

Id en tify cau ses & agree, collect ad d ition al info if req uired

S y ste m M a n ag er

Id en tify short & lon g term solu tion s

T est solu tion s & agree for fu ll im p lem en tation

Hasproblem Y es beenresolved?

C losed ow n p roject

No

Im p lem ent

U pd ate p rocesses

F ig ur e 1 0 : 'S w im lin e s' d ia g ra m

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

The business focused management information system Business objectives + KPI’s

Process objectives + KPI’s

People objectives + KPI’s KPI = Key Performance Indicators Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

www.ipamc.org

Work Flow • Flow is a method of organisation such that the task is worked on continuously, or alternatively as a system whereby the processing of material is continuous and progressive. • Aims to improve (i) work/material flow (ii) standardise skills (iii) added value/complete work faster • When a particular task is completed it must be passed directly to the next stage for processing. For flow to be smooth the times of the tasks should be of equal length. www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

For Flow to Work • • • • • • • • •

Constant demand Task should be standardised Materials must be to specification and delivered on time All operations comprising the task should be defined Work must conform to quality standards Correct equipment must be used Reliable plant Inspection “in line” Balance all stages www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Apply Lean to create Flow • Identify and map the value stream. • Focus on the equipment as the product moves along the value stream. • Breakdown organisational boundaries that hinder flow. • Rethink all activities along the value stream so as to eliminate waste. • kaikaku - radical improvement • Kaizen (PDCA) - continuous incremental improvement www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Work design Work design involves deciding what tasks to allocate to each person, what sequence to perform them, where to locate the job, who else should be involved in it, how people should interact with their workplace and their immediate work environment, what autonomy to give the staff and what skills to develop in the staff. Management Control

Staff Autonomy

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Work design Work design should meet the following objectives: • • • • • • •

Quality Speed Dependability Flexibility Cost Health and Safety (environment) Quality of working life. www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Work design The following elements need to be considered : • • • • • • • •

What Tasks to be allocated (trade split v multiskill)? What sequence (process)? Where is job location? Who else involved? What equipment used in the job? What environmental conditions? How much autonomy? What staff skills?

• Best results when involved all employees involved in the work (tasks and activities within the process)

www.ipamc.org

Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Implementation phases

Education & Change

•Design management system •Identify processes •Develop processes & KPIs •Set up management information system •Review / develop procedures (FOG) •Implement changes •Carry out process audits •Compare with standard (preferred practices) •Improvement (KPI data & audits). www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Implementation phase • Brief managers & staff on process thinking • Set up MI system & collect KPI information • Report KPI information to Sen Mgt, complete projects to demonstrate continual improvement • Assess process management • Base management reviews on high-level KPIs • Revise maintenance manuals/procedures www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Draw a process map for a maintenance process Process map maintenance processes

Who should produce the process map?

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

A Maintenance Process Welder needs rod Finds supervisor Completes request Supr goes to office Requests rod

Discuss diff rods

Supr finds Welder

Alison orders rod

Yes

Use other rod?

No

Supplier processes order

Contact Supr Supplier delivers rod

Contact Alison No

Alison contact rod supplier

Finds Alison

Rod in stock?

Unload van

Welder starts to weld!! Welder collects rod Supr tells welder Contact Supr Tell Alison Locate rod

Yes

Rod in Eng Stores www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK How can we create flow for this process? “Work Flow and Work Design”

Workflow in action! 23staff (mechanics etc) to change 4 tyres and refuel Mr Schumacher!

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Modelling Roll Changes

Creating flow when changing rolls

Modelling roll changes of a 7 stand rolling mill in a steel rolling mill in UK to get the optimum time and number of rolls to change.

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Thomas Bolton Mill

1700 ton extrusion press. 70% of company’s copper products

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Layout

www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Implementation • • • •

Customer focus Maintenance strategies PM, CBM, Lean, flow, work redesign, etc Process redesign, reorganisation/relocation – cell teams, skills mix, training, FOG, data analysis (OR techniques) • CMMS (on line real time) • Spectacular results!! • 1700 ton extruder = downtime 7.5% to 4.6% • 50% increase in output with a 50% Profit Increase (Maintenance budget increased by 9%)

www.ipamc.org

Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Modelling of Extrusion Press Delay time model of Loewy Downtime 1700 Ton extrusion press withmin/day subjective data to determine 40 optimum PM duration and 30 cycle time.

dp=120 dp=30

20 10 0 0 5

10

15

20 25 30

PM Cycle Length (days)

Downtime reduced by 50% Output increased by 50% (15% Maint increase) www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Case study Colleagues investigated the maintenance processes carried out in power stations (power plants) in the USA. They got a breakdown of a mechanic’s day and then compared it a high performing power station. www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Breakdown of a mechanic’s day in a US power station Activity carried out by mechanic Clearance Transportation Getting parts Scaffolding Insulation Special tools Equipment Test procedures Troubleshooting Time on the job

Plant A

High Performing

10% 15% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 10% 25% Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 55% www.ipamc.org

Technology v Logistics Frequently Asked Questions • Should we Concentrate on Improving the Process? • Should we Concentrate on Logistics and Enterprise Integration? • Is the Japanese model, “Create Visual Factory follow Lean Manufacturing Thinking” Sufficient? • Do we need Information Technology based Logistics/Decision Support? www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

CONCLUSIONS Maintenance can be improved using lean principles thereby using work flow and work design to eliminate/reduce wasteful activities from all the maintenance processes. This leads to an improvement of service to customers (both internal and external) and demonstrates that maintenance adds value to the organisation. www.ipamc.org Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

Thank you for your attention.

Questions ? Professor John Sharp, University of Salford, UK

“Work Flow and Work Design”

www.ipamc.org

Related Documents

Work Flow And Work Design
November 2019 22
Work Flow
April 2020 13
Work Flow Analysis
May 2020 5
Work Flow Guide
October 2019 19
Forex Work Flow Document1
November 2019 16