Beyond Factory Drilling: Using Seismic Data for Intelligent Well Placement
Nick Boyd Geophysicist Halliburton Consulting
Halliburton Shale Characterization Objectives Evaluate specific specific behavior that impact the system behavior
sweetspots Identify potential locations of sweetspots Evaluate geochemical and geomechanical geomechanical parameters parameters Determine wellbore wellboregeometries geometries Evaluate completion and stimulation strategies completion and stimulation strategies
wellperformance performance Predict and evaluate well Optimize programs Optimizewellbore wellbore programs
© 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
2
Eagle Ford 3-D Seismic Acquisition– South Texas PATRON GRANDE 3-D FRIO COUNTY
DIMMIT
CATARINA 3D 261 SQ. MILES
EAGLE GRANDE 3D 902 SQ. MILES
REPUBLIC 3D LA 158 SQ. MILES
INTREPID 3D 394 SQ. MILES
McMULLEN COUNTY
Group Interval:
220 ft.
Source Interval:
220 ft. (source line orthogonal to receiver lines)
Receiver Line Spacing:
1,540 ft.
Source Line Spacing:
1,100 ft.
Geophone:
Basic Patch:
SALLE PATRON 3D 928 SQ. MILES
HAWK FIELD3D 276 SQ. MILES
LIVE OAK COUNTY
Sources:
3 per station 2410Hz, lines x 180 receivers Vibroseis, slip sweep technique, 3 vibs per (4,320 channels) fleet, 1 sweep x 36 seconds, 6 second
Maximum Far Offset: Basic Patch: Maximum Far Surface Square Miles Offset Inline: Bin Size:
WEBB COUNTY
(approx):
Maximum Far OffsetFar Crossline: Maximum Offset Inline: Maximum Far Offset:
listen time, minimum slip time 26 seconds
26,929 ft.
24 lines x 180 receivers (4,320 channels) 110 ft. by 110 19,690 ft.ft. 781
18,370 ft.
26,929 ft. 19,690 ft.
Maximum Far Offset Crossline:
Fold:
18,370 ft. 216 all offsets (18 in-line x 12 cross-line)216 70-74 at 0-12,500 all offsetsfold (18 in-line x 12 cross-line) Fold: 70-74 fold at 0-12,500 ft. offset ft. offset 158-165 fold at 0-18,750 158-165 fold at 0-18,750 ft. offset ft. offset 6 seconds Record Length: Sample Rate:
2 ms
3,300 sq miles 3-D Seismic in the Eagle Ford © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
3
Moving Beyond Classic Seismic Interpretations Interface boundaries and layer property analysis Interpretation from reflections
Interpretation Earth Model
Dry holes not because of where reservoir is.
Pre-stack data gives reservoir information
Thin Section Dry because of what reservoir is.
© 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
4
3D Seismic Delivers: PostStack Interpretation Interface Properties: Reflections for structure/stratigraphy
PreStack Interpretation Isotropic Layer Properties: – Prestack Inversion for Lithology, Porosity, Pore Fluid, Young’s Modulus, Poisson’s Ratio Anisotropic Layer Properties: – Long offset acquisition & VTI for Vertical Stress & Pore Pressure – Wide Az – Full Az acquisition indicate Fast & Slow velocity & HTI for fracture mapping/horizontal stress
© 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
5
Sources of Anisotropic Rock Media Properties Formation Anisotropy Classification Stress-Induced
Intrinsic
Intrinsic
V (r, ) Shale, Bedding - VTI V (r, )
© 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
6
Fractures - HTI V ()
Anisotropy Observed at All Length Scales
© 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
7
Sonic Logs Seismic VTI Anisotropy Viewed by Long-Offset DTC DTS Fast DTS Slow
Buller et al (2010) SPE 132990 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
8
HTI Anisotropy– Full Azimuth 3-D Seismic Vs V
V
Vf Vs
No Fractures = Isotropic
Dominant Fractures In One Direction = HTI Anomaly
Full Azimuth
Narrow Azimuth © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Fractures but no Dominant Direction = Velocity Anomaly
9 9
HTI, H , Microseismic Events in the Barnett
Rich & Ammerman (2010) SPE 131779 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
10
Total Reservoir Characterization
© 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
11
Reservoir Trending: Dipole Sonic Data and Cross Plot Case Study: One formation, three wells 1.6
Well 3
Mu Rho
1. 8
16000
Well 1
2.0
Well 2
1400 0 1200 0 Constant S Impedance (ft/s*g/cc
Fluid
)
Lambda Rho © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
12
(ft/s*g/cc )
1.6 1.6 1.6
1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8
Mu-Rho Mu-Rho Mu-Rho (GPa*g/cc) (GPa*g/cc) (GPa*g/cc)
2.0 2.0 2.0 8000 8000 8000 8000
2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
7000 kPa s/m 7000 kPa s/m 7000 kPa s/m
uK uK
6000 6000 6000 6000 5000 kPa s/m 5000 kPa s/m 5000 kPa s/m 5000 kPa s/m
Sh 1 Lambda-Rho (GPa*g/cc) Lambda-Rho (GPa*g/cc) Lambda-Rho (GPa*g/cc) Lambda-Rho (GPa*g/cc) © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
13
upper K Shale 1 Cretaceou s Shale 2
Rock Physics Links Well Bore and Seismic 1.8
2.0 2.2
200000 kg/m2s
400000
150000
150000
300000 kg/m2s
200000
Lambda Rho (GPa*kg/m3) Boyd et al (2010) © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
14
Gamma Ray
Mu Rho (GPa*kg/m3)
1.6
Reservoir Lithology
Vp/Vs 1.8
1.6
M1
M1- 8 ms.
Boyd et al (2010) © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
15
Brittleness
Intelligent Wells: Place the Wellbore in the Optimal Location & Orientation
© 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
16
Brittleness
Intelligent Wells: Stimulating the Right Rocks
© 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
17
Intelligent Wells: Developing and Optimizing Assets
© 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
18
Seismic 3D Landmark
Seismic and Microseismic Landmark and Pinnacle
Seismic Landmark
Shale Core
CONTINUAL VALIDATION OVER ASSET LIFE
ShaleXpert® Halliburton Well Planning Halliburton
© 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Microseismic Pinnacle
19
QuickLook® Halliburton
Thank You. Questions?
© 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
20