Understand Rme Totalmix

Does anyone here understand RME Totalmix? [Archive] - 3dB

1 of 2

http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/archive/index.php/t-6971.html

3dB > The Front Page > The Old Yellow Board > Does anyone here understand RME Totalmix?

View Full Version : Does anyone here understand RME Totalmix? animix

PDA

11-13-2005, 06:47 AM

I've got 2 x HDSP 9652's and a Multiface PCI in one of my DAWs. I've been using it in a pretty straightforward way and not using Totalmix for monitoring.....however, I'm trying to use my Multiface analog I/O for inserting analog gear in a mix and for some reason, it suddenly doesn't work. It was working........now it's not. I go into the Totalmix software matrix to look around and I've never seen such a bunch of counterintuitive wierdness in my life. I know I've got my bussing set up correctly in Cubase SX but now, for a reason I can't quite fathom, what was working before, no longer works..........wait........did I already say that????? Arrrrrrrggggghghhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!! :mad: Wireline

11-13-2005, 11:24 AM

I went thru that a week or two back, Doug (or should I say Peabody?) :D Bill Park was very helpful in learning me up...seems TM can be described as a virtual big board, in which one is to pull up or down sliders on the second row to actually monitor the inserts (in Samp anyway - can't say about Cubase and the coveted auto latency insert feature)... Boiled down to this: have one TM template set up for tracking (thus having the second row act as cue sends, etc)...then have another TM template set up for editing/inserting external goodies.... Anyway, hope it helps. This is the thread (http://www.3daudioinc.com /3db/showthread.php?t=6890) animix

11-13-2005, 05:45 PM

I went thru that a week or two back, Doug (or should I say Peabody?) :D Bill Park was very helpful in learning me up...seems TM can be described as a virtual big board, in which one is to pull up or down sliders on the second row to actually monitor the inserts (in Samp anyway - can't say about Cubase and the coveted auto latency insert feature)... Boiled down to this: have one TM template set up for tracking (thus having the second row act as cue sends, etc)...then have another TM template set up for editing/inserting external goodies.... Anyway, hope it helps. This is the thread (http://www.3daudioinc.com /3db/showthread.php?t=6890) Thanks Sherman :D I will revisit that thread. Chances are though, when I boot my system later today, it will just work and I won't know why......then I'll need to use it and I'll be paranoid about changing anything because ........errrr.......I need to use it........so it will work and I won't know why.........because I need to use it........wait.........did I already say that.......???? Regards, Peabody animix

11-13-2005, 10:07 PM

Thanks Sherman :D I will revisit that thread. Chances are though, when I boot my system later today, it will just work and I won't know why......then I'll need to use it and I'll be paranoid about changing anything because ........errrr.......I need to use it........so it will work and I won't know why.........because I need to use it........wait.........did I already say that.......????

9/25/2008 4:18 PM

Does anyone here understand RME Totalmix? [Archive] - 3dB

2 of 2

http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/archive/index.php/t-6971.html

Regards, Peabody Well.......hmmmm.........I've got it working now. The new manual is quite a bit more informative and I think I understand a few more things now.........at least until I forget them again in the middle of some kind of major crisis/clocking/patching meltdown scenario. If explained my digital/analog routing matrix between the 3 DAWs I'm clocking and timeline syncing simultaneously during mixdown, you would laugh out loud, so all I will say is that I do have the basics of routing analog to analog and digital to digital in Totalmix now. It's just like a mixer.........DOH!!!!......imagine that. ;) Wireline

11-13-2005, 11:19 PM

Glad you got it worked out....it can be intimidating, can't it? animix

11-13-2005, 11:49 PM

Glad you got it worked out....it can be intimidating, can't it? I bought a VSTi a while back called DKFH. It's a drum module, sort of along the lines of BFD. It had the same kind of grid interface as Totalmix. One of the DVD's that came with it was corrupt and this was my ticket to return it. When I started looking around the interface, I just didn't like it at all and since on of the DVD's was defective, Musicians Friend gave me the option for a refund or a swap for BFD. Since I thought I needed something like this at the time, I chose to go with the swap. I never use BFD either because I track all my drums live, but I think it will be handy once Drumagog (which I also thought I would use, but never do) can trigger BFD multilayered samples. Anyway, when I got my first HDSP 9652 and saw this Totalmix routing matrix, I nearly sent it back in exchange for a Lynx product, but they didn't have a combination at the time that quite suited my overall needs ......so anyway....... It never ends, does it? :D vBulletin v3.6.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

9/25/2008 4:18 PM

TotalMix Users... - 3dB

1 of 9

http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=6890

3dB > The Front Page > The Old Yellow Board

TotalMix Users... Register

FAQ

Members

Calendar

Thread Tools

User Name

Remember Me?

Password Store

Today's Posts

Search this Thread

Search

Display Modes #1

11-03-2005, 02:23 PM

Join Date: May 2002 Location: Midland Tx Posts: 4,865

Wireline Titanium Club Member (4000+) TotalMix Users...

I know some of you guys are reported wizards with the RME Totalmix...I, on the other hand, have proven myself to be an idiot with it...I know its a powerful tool, but just can't seem to get the hang of when to mute inputs, setting up multiple cue mixes without latency, etc... Samp 8.2 user here...I tried getting some guidance from the RME site, to no avail, and have RTFM until I'm half blind...still unclear as to the three levels, and how they interact with what it is I am hearing. Bill, et al - any pointers, tips, etc? What works best for you? I HATE it when there is a great tool, and I am a bit too backwards to figure out how to use it properly.... Thanks for any information. __________________ Ken Morgan Wireline Studio Midland, TX

11-03-2005, 07:53 PM

Dennis Jones Gold Club Member (1000+ posts)

#2 Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Spindale N.C. USA Posts: 1,694

Have you tried calling RME?George is one of the best at talking you through

9/25/2008 4:20 PM

TotalMix Users... - 3dB

2 of 9

http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=6890

problems I've ere seen.Not a Samp user here;Nuendo3.1/2.3 and the Total Mix feature is really nice with it. __________________ Dennis Jones Technical Director WNCW-FM www.wncw.org 3D Audio V.I.P.

11-03-2005, 11:16 PM

#3 Join Date: May 2002 Location: Midland Tx Posts: 4,865

Wireline Titanium Club Member (4000+)

How are you Dennis? I'll try calling them and see if they can shed some light... The two biggest issues I'm dealing with are 1) the duplication of mixers (Samp and Totalmix screens....and have found out by repeated trial and error how the 3 levels interact) and 2) as annoying as this is, what plays back through the Totalmix sounds so much clearer, cleaner, deeper, etc...than what's coming through the Samp engine.... Very disturbing. __________________ Ken Morgan Wireline Studio Midland, TX

11-04-2005, 03:13 AM

Dennis Jones Gold Club Member (1000+ posts)

#4 Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Spindale N.C. USA Posts: 1,694

Took a week off from the Studio....worked on a Master job at home Got my new truck pimped and went leaf viewing. Don't know Samp.I saw it once on a guys DAW up in Boone.What RME card set-up are you using?I don't really hear any thing different across my Multi-Face units.George is pretty good at getting right to the problem.He must have seen it all. __________________ Dennis Jones Technical Director WNCW-FM www.wncw.org 3D Audio V.I.P.

9/25/2008 4:20 PM

TotalMix Users... - 3dB

3 of 9

http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=6890

11-04-2005, 03:30 AM

Bill@WelcomeHomeStudios Gold Club Member (1000+ posts)

#5 Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Pittsburgh Posts: 2,590

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wireline How are you Dennis? I'll try calling them and see if they can shed some light... The two biggest issues I'm dealing with are 1) the duplication of mixers (Samp and Totalmix screens....and have found out by repeated trial and error how the 3 levels interact) and 2) as annoying as this is, what plays back through the Totalmix sounds so much clearer, cleaner, deeper, etc...than what's coming through the Samp engine.... Very disturbing.

OKay, let's back up a bit. How are you set up, what are you using, and what are you trying to do that is so confusing? If I can understand how and what, maybe I can help. 3 levels? And there should be no difference in sound. How can there be? In my rig, the playback (to the studio monitors) level is calibrated and set, and pretty much left alone... I use an attenuator for my own listening level, and at a certain point on the scale, it means a certain thing in terms of level. But the TM allows me to quickly set up multiple mixes or routings. Have you looked at the Matrix view yet? sometimes that helps to keep what is going where in your mind. You understand that you can set multiple levels for each output, so that (say...) a single mic input can have 16, 18, 26 or 28 different levels (Multiface, Digiface, Fireface? Different numbers of outputs. But basically it is total number of channels, plus SPDIF; or total number of channels plus SPDIF plus analog monitoring pair... whatever, it is a bunch) On each channel you select the channel, the routing menu drops down, you click on the output pair, and set your pan and level for each output choice. Rinse and repeat for the next output choice, or move on to the next channel. So in my rig, the output to the monitors from TM is constant, and the stereo output level in Samp is constant, so the channel levels might change for a mix, but I always know where I am at. The headphone mixes might change, and these I handle from TM, as described above, for zero latency

9/25/2008 4:20 PM

TotalMix Users... - 3dB

4 of 9

http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=6890

monitoring. I don't really think much about either mixer, mixer being an analog construct for dealing with something which can be handled differently in software.... I'm usually setting levels in the Object View screen. (I use Sequoia) anyway, give me some more info, and maybe I can help. Bill __________________ Bill Park Welcome Home Studios 3D VIP "...they have a coconut phone. What could go wrong?..."

11-04-2005, 12:55 PM

Wireline Titanium Club Member (4000+)

#6 Join Date: May 2002 Location: Midland Tx Posts: 4,865

Morning Bill... Quote:

And there should be no difference in sound. How can there be?

This is what I'm trying to find out...haven't been back to the studio since this occurred...will try null testing, re-doing the origin waves, see what's up...I would hope the difference between the 32bit Samp mixer and the 40 bit Totalmix mixer isn't that noticable...

I went through last night and re -RTFM a few times, drew out some schemes (I seem to work best when I use pencil and paper and draw it out...whatever 'it' is...) and seem to have a slightly better understanding...I'll know more when I get back to the studio. Here's my rig, as best I can describe: FF800: Analog ins 1-4-external pres Analog ins 5-8-returns from external gear Analog 9 empty, analog 10 talkback mic Analog outs - 1/2 to mains; 3/4 to patch cbles which can connect to a pair of OSAs or whatever i want to use for final mix coloration; 5/6 unattached; 7/8 to a tracking room amp; analog 9/10 for cue mixes

9/25/2008 4:20 PM

TotalMix Users... - 3dB

5 of 9

http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=6890

ADAT 1 ins - optical from Focusrite Octopre convertor card (yeah yeah..I know...) ADAT 1 outs - not connected ADAT 2 ins - Tango24 with various sources (external boxes, guitar DIs, etc) ADAT 2 outs-Tango 24 acting as a sending unit to various comps, EQs, reverbs, whatever... The TM is VERY complex - I think I've been using a limited ITB mindset and applying it to the TM, which as you said can essentially give more routing versitility than a 'regular' console....steep unlearning/relearning curve. I just hope I can find a way that the TM will supplant the Samp mixer, work at object level (preferred), and get the two platforms to actually interact and work with each other instead of independantly...(IE - changing the routing or automation from Samp will also change the routing/automations inside TM...) Still have no idea as to why there was such a noticable difference...perhaps I didn't make a TM change when needed....I'll investigate much more when I get to work.... I am REALLY starting to appreciate even more the concept of an integrated system (ala PTHD) ... seems they resolved all these internal/external goodies issues long ago... Or maybe, I'm making it way more difficult than it has to be...but (Yoda voice here) sleep I won't until mystery resolved is... Again, gents, thanks for the guidance... __________________ Ken Morgan Wireline Studio Midland, TX

11-05-2005, 01:20 PM

Bill@WelcomeHomeStudios Gold Club Member (1000+ posts)

#7 Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Pittsburgh Posts: 2,590

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wireline

...I would hope the difference between the 32bit Samp mixer and the 40 bit Totalmix mixer isn't that noticable...

9/25/2008 4:20 PM

TotalMix Users... - 3dB

6 of 9

http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=6890

The TM is VERY complex -....steep unlearning/relearning curve. I just hope I can find a way that the TM will supplant the Samp mixer, .....(IE - changing the routing or automation from Samp will also change the routing/automations inside TM...) Or maybe, I'm making it way more difficult than it has to be... ..

"Or maybe, I'm making it way more difficult than it has to be..." This may be the case. In terms of complexity, the I/O functions are not much different than those of any large format hardware console... a whole buncha gozintas, and a whole buncha comzouttas. Major difference: On a regular console, when you select the output routing, that output recieves the signal from the channel, post fader. With TM, each channel will have a seperate fully adjustable output level at each output selected for it. (Almost like pre-fade auxes, in that respect. And can be used as such.) In my (mostly mastering and/or mixdown/assembly ) room, TotalMix doesn't get touched after it is initally set up for the room. My main (monitoring)feeds are constant. TotalMix does have several user-selectable and modifiable presets. You can build a few 'looks' that are normal to your usage and switch between them at the punch of an on screen 'button'. Handy for templates for headphone mixes, etc. Or you can adjust all of this stuff on the fly, because there really isn't that much to it to use it for these tasks... the manual is a little intimidating, as it is trying to give you a sense of the power, and offer all of the options...you get swamped. The trick is to set it up and use it for a while, and as you grow more comfortable with it, look over the manual again... you'll see some things have become more clear, and some things will jump out at you, ''Ohhhh... I can do THAT...." kinda stuff. I don't see why you can't have already set up and running in TM, the various I/O that you may want to use for those eqs etc that you mention, and when you choose to use them in Samp, there they are, already happening in TM. I see your list of gear, but I still don't get any sense of how you are trying to use the programs, other than you talking about layering the mixers, and there I have no idea what you are talking about. In a normal hardware setup, you'd be looking for unity gain among devices. The same holds true here. As I said before, in my room the TM stuff is preset, and with a given input will provide a known output. In Sequoia I provide that given input... that is what meters are for. I don't work in the Sequoia mixer that much, don't more work on the Object level, or (adjusting levels) on the multitrack Object page, in the left hand track control blocks .... but I have no problems with the mixer. It does what I expect it to do in the way that I expect it to do it. I don't see how you expect to bypass the Samplitude mixer... or why you want to.

9/25/2008 4:20 PM

TotalMix Users... - 3dB

7 of 9

http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=6890

Just a couple of side notes to your setup... I try to get all the coloration on the way into the box, rather than routing out afrerwards, then going back in. This is a fairly destructive route to take, usually causing more harm by the multiple conversions than any gains that might be seen by hitting any 'special' gear. The FF is set up to use 9&10 as the monitor outputs. Have you tried it? Bill __________________ Bill Park Welcome Home Studios 3D VIP "...they have a coconut phone. What could go wrong?..."

11-05-2005, 02:08 PM

Wireline Titanium Club Member (4000+)

#8 Join Date: May 2002 Location: Midland Tx Posts: 4,865

Wow...good timing... Here's what I discovered (and you were right about the "Wow - I didn't know it could do THAT" comment....) The issues I was having were a result of monitoring externally processed stuff AND previously recorded (IE sources) at the same time...I have since learned/figured out/been advised to either raise/lower TM outputs OR just mute the source tracks....I already knew I should have been doing that, but it was a catastrophic brain f*rt... As to inbound signal processing: I prefer doing this, but with just very mild comp/eq, leaving some manipulation elbow room for when I submix (my prefered method is to take similar instruments, play with their pan/levels /whatevers at the track level, and then assign to submixes...then run the subs through the external gear to kind of glue it all together...if that makes sense)... I've also been enlightened as to building/using presets, depending on what I am doing - one for tracking, one for mixing, etc....sort of a single mouse click to reconfigure an entire patch bay. Very cool. One thing I did notice when experimenting with this though is I need to shut down the VIP before switching TM presets...then simply reopen the VIP...tried it without closing the VIP and got a couple of BSODs...maybe my system is just too old (computer system, not the body ) to switch on the fly, but its not big deal - took all of 4 seconds....Although my rig looks complicated, its now under control with the TM preset options...guzintas and goesouttas are easily switched around.

9/25/2008 4:20 PM

TotalMix Users... - 3dB

8 of 9

http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=6890

I spoke with Sebastian at Samp, and he advised me the 32float mixer is superior to the 40bit fixed in TM...preliminary results are confirmng this (IMO)...and yes, now that I'm getting the hang of it, I have been just opening TM, setting the proper preset, then closing it and working strictly from Samp....tres cool. As for the 'big board' comparison: it took a while, but I think I've finally figured out that in one setup, the TM mixer is like a standard mid sized recording mixer with a couple of auxes, etc...in another setup it acts as a live monitor mixer (matrix mode) with each source being able to routed and leveled to specific outputs to meet specific needs. One thing I also discovered: that unless the "live input mode" is selected under Samp/Seq recording option when running external reverbs, etc, things can get really strange...that's what I was encountering....reverb return times were not even close to synching with the source aux feeds, but it appears all is well now. The more I use this TM, the more I am absolutely amazed by its routing powers...I think the manual leaves something to be desired, but that's another discussion. Thanks again for your assistance.... __________________ Ken Morgan Wireline Studio Midland, TX

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Rules You You You You

may may may may

not not not not

post new threads post replies post attachments edit your posts

vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads

9/25/2008 4:20 PM

TotalMix Users... - 3dB

9 of 9

http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=6890

Similar Threads Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

Questions for DAC-1 users

Tim Zurowski

The Old Yellow Board

2

01-12-2005 05:08 AM

Any UAD-1 users? Thoughts?

Philip Perkins

The Old Yellow Board

3

08-11-2004 11:53 PM

Mac X Users: which recording software do you use?

EJ

The Old Yellow Board

15

02-20-2004 03:27 PM

Custom DAW Users: Best Software?

Jansen

The Old Yellow Board

6

11-29-2003 01:28 PM

"TAIL " users - REJOICE or REPENT....

kwit

The Old Yellow Board

2

11-19-2001 06:51 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:17 AM. Contact Us - 3dB - Archive - Top Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. All original contents ©2000-2008 by 3D Audio Inc.

9/25/2008 4:20 PM