Theory Of Metal Cutting-tool Geometry

  • Uploaded by: Izi
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Theory Of Metal Cutting-tool Geometry as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 2,733
  • Pages: 25
LECTURE-07 THEORY OF METAL CUTTING - Tool Geometry

NIKHIL R. DHAR, Ph. D. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL & PRODUCTION ENGINEERING BUET

Introduction Production or manufacturing of any object is a value addition process by which raw material of low utility and value due to its irregular size, shape and finish is converted into a high utility and valued product with definite size, shape and finish imparting some desired function ability. Machining is an essential process of semi-finishing and often finishing by which jobs of desired shape and dimensions are produced by removing extra material from the preformed blanks in the form of chips with the help of cutting tools moved past the work surfaces in machine tools. The chips are separated from the workpiece by means of a cutting tool that possesses a very high hardness compared with that of the workpiece, as well as certain geometrical characteristics that depend upon the conditions of the cutting operation. Among all of the manufacturing methods, metal cutting, commonly called machining; is perhaps the most important. Forgings and castings are subjected to subsequent machining operations to acquire the precise dimensions and surface finish required. Also, products can sometimes be manufactured by machining stock materials like bars, plates, or structural sections. Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/2

Methods of Machining In the metal cutting operation, the tool is wedge-shaped and has a straight cutting edge. Basically, there are two methods of metal cutting, depending upon the arrangement of the cutting edge with respect to the direction of relative work-tool motion:  

Orthogonal cutting or two dimensional cutting Oblique cutting or three dimensioning cutting.

Orthogonal Machining Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Oblique Machining 25/3

Orthogonal Cutting The cutting edge of the tool remains at 900 to the direction of feed (of the tool or the work) The chip flows in a direction normal to the cutting edge of the tool The cutting edge of the tool has zero inclination with the normal to the feed The chip flows in the plane of the tool face. Therefore, it makes no angle with the normal (in the plane of the tool face) to the cutting. The shear force acts on a smaller area, so shear force per unit area is more. The tool life is smaller than obtained in oblique cutting (for same conditions of cutting) There are only two mutually perpendicular components of cutting forces on the tool The cutting edge is bigger than the width of cut. Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/4

Oblique Cutting The cutting edge of the tool remains inclined at an acute angle to the direction of feed (of the work or tool) The direction of the chip flow is not normal to the cutting edge. Rather it is at an angle β to the normal to the cutting edge. The cutting edge is inclined at an angle λ to the normal to the feed. This angle is called inclination angle. The chip flows at an angle β to the normal to the cutting edge. This angle is called chip flow angle. The chip flows at an angle β to the normal to the cutting edge. This angle is called chip flow angle. The shear force acts on a larger area, hence the shear force per area is smaller The tool life is higher than obtained in orthogonal cutting There are only three mutually perpendicular components of cutting forces on the tool The cutting edge is smaller than the width of cut. Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/5

Cutting Tool Geometry Cutting tool is device with which a material could be cut to the desired size, shape or finish. So a cutting tool must have at least a sharp edge. There are two types of cutting tool. The tool having only one cutting edge is called single point cutting tools. For example shaper tools, lathe tools, planer tools, etc. The tool having more than one cutting edge is called multipoint cutting tools. For example drills, milling cutters, broaches, grinding wheel honing tool etc. A single point cutting tool may be either right or left hand cut tool depending on the direction of feed. Primary Cutting Edge

Left hand cutting tool

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Right hand cutting tool

25/6

Tool-in-hand Nomenclature The geometry of a cutting tool consists of the following elements: face or rake surface, flank, cutting edges and the corner. Face or rake is the surface of the cutting tool along which the chips flow out. Flank surfaces are those facing the work piece. There are two flank surfaces, principal and auxiliary flank surfaces. Principal cutting edge performs the major portion of cutting and is formed by the intersecting line of the face with the principal flank surface. Auxiliary cutting edge (often called end cutting edge) is formed by the intersection of the rake surface with the auxiliary flank surface. Corner or cutting point is the meeting point of the principal cutting edge with the auxiliary cutting edge.

Tool axis Shank of tool Auxiliary cutting edge

Rake or Face Principal cutting edge Principal flank surface Corner Auxiliary flank surface

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/7

Single Point Cutting Tool

Side rake angle (γx) End cutting edge angle (φe)

Side clearance angle (αx)

Nose radius (r)

Side cutting edge angle (φs) Back rake angle (γy)

End clearance angle (αy)

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

Note: All the rake and clearance angles are measured in normal direction 25/8

Side Cutting Edge Angle (φs): The side cutting-edge angle (SCEA) is usually referred to as the lead angle. It is the angle enclosed between the side cutting edge and the longitudinal direction of the tool. The value of this angle varies between 0° and 90°, depending upon the machinability, rigidity, and, sometimes, the shape of the workpiece. As this angle increases from 0° to 15°, the power consumption during cutting decreases. However, there is a limit for increasing the SCEA, beyond which excessive vibrations take place because of the large tool-workpiece interface. On the other hand, if the angle were taken as 0°, the full cutting edge would start to cut the workpiece at once, causing an initial shock. Usually, the recommended value for the lead angle should range between 15° and 30°.

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/9

Auxiliary or End Cutting Edge Angle (φe): The end cutting-edge angle (ECEA) serves to eliminate rubbing between the end cutting edge and the machined surface of the workpiece. Although this angle takes values in the range of 5° to 30°, commonly recommended values are 8° to 15°. Side Clearance Angle (αx) and End Clearance Angle (αy): Side and end clearance (relief) angles serve to eliminate rubbing between the workpiece and the side and end flank, respectively. Usually, the value of each of these angles ranges between 5° and 15°.

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/10

Back Rake Angle (γy) and Side Rake Angle (γX): Back and side rake angles determine the direction of flow of the chips onto the face of the tool. Rake angles can be positive, negative, or zero. It is the side rake angle that has the dominant influence on cutting. Its value usually varies between 0° and 15°, whereas the back rake angle is usually taken as 0°. Nose radius (r): Nose radius is favorable to long tool life and good surface finish. A sharp point on the end of a tool is highly stressed, short lived and leaves a groove in the path of cut. There is an improvement in surface finish and permissible cutting speed as nose radius is increased from zero value. Too large a nose radius will induce chatter.

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/11

Designation of Cutting Tools By designation or nomenclature of a cutting tool is meant the designation of the shape of the cutting part of the tool. The following systems to designate the cutting tool shape which are widely used are:  



 

Tool in Hand System Machine Reference System or American Standard Association (ASA) System Tool Reference System Orthogonal Rake System (ORS) Normal Rake System (NRS) Maximum Rake System (MRS) Work Reference System (WRS)

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/12

Tool Reference System The references from which the tool angles are specified are the 

Reference plane (πR)



Machine longitudinal plane (πx)



Machine transverse plane (πy)



Principal cutting plane (πc)



Orthogonal plane (πo) and



Normal plane (πn)

The reference plane (πR) is the plane perpendicular to the cutting velocity (Vc). The machine longitudinal plane (πx) is the plane perpendicular to πR and taken in the direction of feed (longitudinal feed). The machine transverse plane (πy) is the plane perpendicular to both πR and πX or plane perpendicular to πR and taken in the direction of cross feed. The principal cutting plane (πc) is the plane perpendicular to πR and containing the principal cutting edge. The orthogonal plane (πo) is the plane perpendicular to πR and πc. The normal plane (πn) is perpendicular to the principal cutting edge. Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/13

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/14

American Standard Association System Zm Xm

γX Ym

αx

Tool Character

ΠX Section B-B

A

B

B

Xm

φe

φ A

Ym Zm

αy γy ΠY

γy

γx

αy

αx

φe

φs

r

50

100

70

80

200

300

1/32

γy γx αy αx φe φs r

Back rake angle Side rake angle Back or end clearance angle Side clearance angle Auxiliary or End cutting edge angle Side cutting edge angle (90o-φ) Nose radius (inch)

Section A-A

φs

ΠR

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/15

Orthogonal Rake System (ORS) Zo

Yo ΠC

λ

αo

γo

/

Zo

Xo

/

Πc/

αo

Section M-M

N

Xo

Yo M

φe

φ

N

M

ΠO

γo

Section N-N

Tool Character λ

γ0

α0

α0/

φe

φ

r

50

100

70

80

200

300

0.8 mm

λ γ0 α0 α0/ φe φ

φs

r

Inclination angle Orthogonal rake angle Orthogonal clearance angle Auxiliary orthogonal clearance angle Auxiliary or End cutting edge angle Principal cutting edge angle (90-φs) Nose radius (mm)

ΠR

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/16

Interconversion Between ASA and ORS Interrelations can be established between ASA and ORS and vice versa. Various methods are used for developing such interrelationships such as     

Method of projection Method of slopes Method of master line Circle diagram Vector methods, etc.

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/17

Methods of Master Line for Rake Angles Zm Xm γx T ΠX

αx Zm

Xo

Yo Yo

Xo λ G ΠC

D/

Xm

αo

Zo

ΠO

γm

γo

T=Depth of the cutting tool

φs

Ym

C

O

D

Zm

αy

φ M

A/

B/

φγ H

A

γy

C

B

ΠR

Master line

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

M

Xo

/

F

E

OA=T cot λ OB=T cot γy OC=T cot γo OD=T cot γx OM=T cot γm

ΠY

For T=1 OA= cot λ OB= cot γy OC= cot γo OD= cot γx OM= cot γm

φγ Setting angle for grinding rake surface γm Maximum rake angle 25/18

Prove the followings by master line methods for a single point cutting tool.

(i) tan γ o = tan γ x sin φ + tan γ y cos φ (ii) tan λ = − tan γ x cos φ + tan γ y sin φ (iii) tan γ x = tan γ o sin φ - tan λ cos φ (iv) tan γ y = tan γ o cos φ + tan λ sin φ (v) tan γ m = tan 2 γ o + tan 2 λ  tanλ   (vi) φ γ = φ − tan   tanγ o  −1

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

φγ Setting angle for grinding rake surface γm Maximum rake angle

25/19

tan γo = tan γx sin φ + tan γy cos φ From Figure ΔOBD=ΔOBC+ΔOCD ½OB.OD=½OB.CE + ½OD.CF ½OB.OD=½OB.OC sin φ + ½OD.OC. cos φ Dividing on both sides by ½OB.OC.OD

G

1 sinφ cosϕ = + OC OD OB

sinφ cosφ 1 = + OB OD OA

Xm

A

Yo F

φ O E

tan γo = tan γx sin φ + tan γy cos φ tan λ = -tan γx cos φ +tan γy sin φ From Figure ΔOAD = ΔOAB +ΔOBD ½ OD. AG = ½ OB. AH + ½ OB.OD ½ OD. OA. sin φ=½OB.OA COS φ + ½OB.OD Dividing on both sides by ½OA.OB.OD

Ym

Xo

φγ

B H

Master line

M

D

C OA= cot λ OB= cot γy OC= cot γo OD= cot γx OM= cot γm

tan λ = -tan γx cos φ +tan γy sin φ Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/20

Methods of Master Line for Clearance Angles Zm Xm γy T αy

ΠX D/

Xo

Yo

Zm

Yo

Xo Xm

λ ΠC

φ

αo C/

φs

Ym

Zo

αm

ΠO

T=Depth of the cutting tool

γo

Ym

O B

C

D

Zm

αx B/

M

γx ΠY

A/

φα ΠR

A Master line

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

OA=T cot λ OB=T tan αy OC=T tan αo OD=T tan αx OM=T an αm For T=1 OA= cot λ OB= tan αy OC= tan αo OD= tan αx OM= tan αm

φα Setting angle for grinding principal rake surface αm Maximum rake angle 25/21

Prove the followings by master line methods for a single point cutting tool.

(i) cot α o = cot α x sin φ + cot α y cos φ (ii) tan λ = −cot α x cos φ + cot α y sin φ (iii) cot α x = cot α o sin φ - tan λ cos φ (iv) cot α y = cot α o cos φ + tan λ sin φ (v) cot α m = cot 2 α o + tan 2 λ  tan α o  (vi) φ α = φ − tan    cotλ  −1

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

φα Setting angle for grinding principal rake surface αm Maximum rake angle

25/22

cot αo = cot αx sin φ + cot αy cos φ From Figure ΔOBD=ΔOBC+ΔOCD ½OB.OD=½OB.CE + ½OD.CF ½OB.OD=½OB.OC sin φ + ½OD.OC. cos φ Dividing on both sides by ½OB.OC.OD

1 sinφ cosϕ = + OC OD OB

Ym Xm G

sinφ cosφ 1 = + OB OD OA

tan λ = -cot αx cos φ +cot αy sin φ Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

φ

φα A

F

O E B

cot αo = cot αx sin φ + cot αy cos φ tan λ = -cot αx cos φ +cot αy sin φ From Figure ΔOAD = ΔOAB +ΔOBD ½ OD. AG = ½ OB. AH + ½ OB.OD ½ OD. OA. sin φ=½OB.OA COS φ + ½OB.OD Dividing on both sides by ½OA.OB.OD

Yo

Xo

M H

C

D

Master line

For T=1 OA= cot λ OB= tan αy OC= tan αo OD= tan αx OM= tan αm 25/23

Assignment-1 Prove by Master Line Method

(i) cot α o = cot α x sin φ + cot α y cos φ

(i) tan γ o = tan γ x sin φ + tan γ y cos φ

(ii) tan λ = −cot α x cos φ + cot α y sin φ (ii) tan λ = − tan γ x cos φ + tan γ y sin φ (iii) cot α x = cot α o sin φ - tan λ cos φ

(iii) tan γ x = tan γ o sin φ - tan λ cos φ

(iv) cot α y = cot α o cos φ + tan λ sin φ

(iv) tan γ y = tan γ o cos φ + tan λ sin φ

(v) cot α m = cot 2 α o + tan 2 λ

(v) tan γ m = tan 2 γ o + tan 2 λ

 tan α o  (vi) φ α = φ − tan −1    cotλ 

 tanλ   (vi) φ γ = φ − tan   tanγ o 

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

−1

25/24

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Department of Industrial & Production Engineering

25/25

Related Documents


More Documents from "Izi"