Pure Mathematics – Sequences
p.1
King’s College 2007 – 2008 F.6 Pure Mathematics Revision Test 7 Suggested Solution
1.
When n = 1, x1 = 2 > 1 and 1 −
(a) (i)
1 1 1 1 = 1− = = = S1 . x2 − 1 3 − 1 2 x1
∴ The statements are true for n = 1.
Assume that x k > k and S k = 1 −
1 x k +1 − 1
Then,
Then, x k +1 = x k − x k + 1
x k +1 = x k − x k + 1
2
= x k (x k − 1) + 1 > k ( x k − 1) + 1
∴
x k +1
for some k ∈ N .
2
= (x k − 1) + x k 2
(Q x k
> k ≥ 1)
≥ k +1 > k +1
> xk
Since xn is an integer for all n ∴ x k +1 ≥ x k + 1 > k + 1
(ii) Also, S k +1 = S k + = 1− = 1− = 1−
1 x k +1 1
x k +1 − 1
+
1 x k +1
1 x k +1 − x k +1 2
1 xk +2 − 1
∴By mathematical induction, the statements are true for any positive integer n.
(b) By (a)(i), xn > n > 0 => {Sn} is strictly increasing. 1 < 1 => {Sn} is bounded above by 1. Also, by (a)(ii), S n = 1 − x n +1 − 1 Thus, lim S n exists. n→∞
By (a)(i), xn > n => xn Æ ∞ as n Æ ∞ ∴
⎛ 1 ⎞ ⎟⎟ = 1 → 0 as n → ∞ ⇒ lim S n = lim⎜⎜1 − n →∞ n →∞ x n +1 − 1 ⎝ x n +1 − 1 ⎠ 1
lim S n exists (and equals 1) n→∞
Pure Mathematics – Sequences
2.
p.2
(a) Let f(x) = x – ln(x + 1) for all x > -1. Then, we have f ' (x ) = 1 −
1 x +1
x x +1 ⎧< 0 if − 1 < x < 0 ⎪ ⎨= 0 if x = 0 ⎪> 0 if x > 0 ⎩
=
Therefore, f attains its absolute minimum at 0. Thus, we have f ( x ) ≥ f (0 ) for all x > -1 x − ln ( x + 1) ≥ 0 for all x > -1
x ≥ ln ( x + 1) for all x > -1
(b) Let n be a positive integer. Putting x =
1 in (a), n
1 ⎛ n +1⎞ ⎛1 ⎞ ≥ ln⎜ + 1⎟ = ln⎜ ⎟. n ⎝ n ⎠ ⎝n ⎠ For all positive integers k, k n +1 1 ≥ ln ∑ ∑ n n =1 n n =1 k n +1 = ln Π n =1 n k +1 = ln n ∞ k k +1 1 1 = = lim =∞ lim ∑ ∑ k →∞ k →∞ n n =1 n n =1 n k
∞
1
∑n
Thus, the series
is divergent.
n =1
3.
(a) (i)
an+1 – bn+1 2 a n bn a n + bn − a n + bn a n + bn 2
= =
2
(a n − bn )2 a n + bn
≥ 0 for all n = 1,2,3,K. Thus, an ≥ bn for all n = 1, 2, 3, …. − bn (a n − bn ) a n + bn ≤ 0 for all n = 1, 2, 3, …. − an = a n + bn a n + bn 2
(ii) a n +1 + a n =
2
Pure Mathematics – Sequences
p.3
Therefore, bn ≤ bn +1 for all n = 1, 2, 3, …. Thus, {bn} is monotonic increasing. b (a − bn ) 2a n bn bn +1 + bn = − bn = n n ≥ 0 for all n = 1, 2, 3, …. a n + bn a n + bn Therefore, a n ≥ a n +1 for all n = 1, 2, 3, …. Thus, {an} is monotonic decreasing. (iii) By (a)(i) and (a)(ii), a1 ≥ a n ≥ bn ≥ b1 for all n = 1, 2, 3, … {an} is monotonic decreasing and bounded below by b1. {bn} is monotonic increasing and bounded above by a1. l1 + l 2 l1 + l 2 2
(iv) Let lim a n = l1 and lim bn = l2. Then, we have l1 = n →∞
n→∞
2
(or l1 =
(l1 – l2) l2 = 0 But since l 2 = lim bn ≥ b1 > 0 , we have l1 = l2. n →∞
i.e. lim a n = lim bn n→∞
n→∞
(v) Note that a n + bn =
(a n−1 + bn−1 )2 a n −1 + bn −1
= a n −1 + bn −1 = K = a1 + b1 .
Therefore, we have lim(a n + bn ) = a1 + b1 . n →∞
a +b 1 1 1 lim a n + lim bn = lim(a n + bn ) = 1 1 → ∞ → ∞ → ∞ n n n 2 2 2 2 If a1 ≤ b1 < 0 , then − a1 ≥ −b1 > 0 .
By (a)(iv), lim a n = n→∞
(b)
An + Bn An + Bn 2
Define An +1 =
2
and Bn +1 =
2 An Bn for all n = 1, 2, 3, …, An + Bn
where A1 = –a1 and B1= –b1. Note that A1B1 > 0 and A1 ≥ B1 > 0 . Then, by (a), lim An and lim Bn both exist. n→∞
n→∞
Further note that an = –An and bn= –Bn for all n = 1, 2, 3, …. Therefore, we have lim a n = − lim An and lim bn = − lim Bn . n→∞
n →∞
n→∞
n →∞
Thus, the limits of the sequemces {an} and {bn} both exist. You may repeat Part(a)(i), (ii) and (iii) as an alternative method.
2l1l 2 ). l1 + l 2