Efficacy of ranibizumab in eyes with significant hemorrhage from neovascular AMD Tara Golisch, BS Josh Robinson, MD Jonathan L. Prenner, MD
Financial Disclosures •Consultant •Opko •Ophthotech •Neovista •Alcon •J&J •Genentech
Background: •Most AMD trials exclude eyes with >50% blood •No prospective evidence to guide management in these eyes
Background: •Some eyes likely require surgical intervention •Massive hemorrhage •Significant breakthrough bleeding •What should the approach be in eyes with less severe hemorrhages?
Is anti-VEGF therapy effective in eyes like these?
Hypothesis: •Eyes with >50% hemorrhage may do well with anti-VEGF therapy •Examine the efficacy of ranibizumab in these less well studied eyes
Methods: •Retrospective review •29 eyes of 29 patients •Presented with CNV complexes that had >50% blood •Treatment naive •Monotherapy with ranibizumab
Methods: •Fifty five percent were taking anticoagulation
Methods: •All patients had •Three injections of ranibizumab •Fifteen weeks of follow up •Baseline and 15 week FA •Allowed for measurement of lesions and subsequent analysis
Methods: •Endpoints •Anatomic: amount of blood resolution •Functional: change in snellen visual acuity
Baseline:
Week 15:
Baseline:
Week 15:
Results:
Results: blood composition •Baseline •77.6% blood •Range 51-100% •Week 15 •9.5% blood •Range 0-50%
Results: visual acuity •Baseline •20/200 -1 •Range (CF to 20/30) •Week 15 •20/200 +2 •Range (CF to 20/25)
Results: visual acuity •Three line gainers: 34% •Non responders: 7%
No Change Lost > 3 lines Gained <3 lines
Lost <3 lines Gaines >3 lines
Conclusions: •This cohort of eyes typically excluded in clinical trials responded well •Anatomically: most eyes had significant blood resolution •Functionally: visual data mirrored large prospective trials
Conclusions: •Anti-VEGF monotherapy seems reasonable in this cohort of patients •Prognosis seems better than might be expected in these less well studied eyes
Mahalo