Taktik(z) | Leuze Electronic | Safety Training

  • Uploaded by: taktik(z), Inc.
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Taktik(z) | Leuze Electronic | Safety Training as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,890
  • Pages: 38
Safety Training

Mark Smokowicz Leuze electronic Product Management & Safety Products PM

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

What is covered today? • Common safety standards – differences in standards

• • • •

What is Safe Distance? Reach over and under Some definitions Safety Distance calculations – OSHA, EN999, ANSI-RIA

• • • • Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Safe distance example Introduction to Risk Assessment Application example Questions to ask

Common Safety Standards • Occupational Safety and Health Administration – (OSHA) 1910

Machinery and Machine Guarding

• American National Standards Institute – (ANSI) B11.19

Performance Criteria for Safeguarding

• Robotic Industries Association – (RIA) R15.06

Robot Safety Standard

• American Society of Mechanical Engineers – (ASME) B15.1

Safety Standard for Mechanical Power Transmission

• European Standard Acronyms: OSHA ANSI RIA ASME EN CSA Mark Smokowicz / LAS

– (EN954)

Safety of Machinery

• Canadian Standards Association – (CSA) Z434-03

Industrial Robots and Robot Systems General Safety Requirements

What is safe distance? A method of work piece positioning and operator location that eliminates the need for the operator to be in our near the hazardous area during the hazardous portion of the machine cycle CSA Z 432-04 Safeguarding of machinery – ANSI B11-19-2003

All safeguarding devices shall be securely installed and located at a distance such that the hazard cannot be accessed. CSA Z 432-03 Robots – ANSI RIA R15.06-1999

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Safety Distance and Barriers The barrier (and any barrier openings) needs to be sized such that a person cannot reach: » Over » Under » Around » Through and access a Hazard The same for US, Canada and Europe Mark Smokowicz / LAS

“Reach Over” – “Reach Under” CSA Clearance: 20” ANSI RIA Clearance = 18”

Barrier Guards

1.5m (60”) RIA min 1.8m (72”) CSA min

CSA Max: 6” ANSI RIA Max: 12”

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

CSA Z434 clause 10.2 ANSI-RIA R15.06

CSA Z432-04 C2 Reaching over protective structures C2.1 General Distance Guards used as perimeter fences should be at least 1800mm high. The data given in Claus C.2.2 for barriers less than 1800mm high should only be used where the 1800 mm height is not reasonably practicable.

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Safety Distances U.S. Safety Distance Formulas Safety Light Curtains must be mounted at a sufficient distance from the pinch point or point of operation hazard to ensure that the machine stops before a person’s hand(s), arm(s), or body reaches the hazard. This distance, referred to as the safety distance, must be properly calculated prior to determining the safety light curtain protective height and mounting the light curtains on the machine. Failure to properly calculate this safety distance may result in operator injury. Note: Regardless of the calculated safety distance, Safety Light Curtains should never be mounted closer than 6 inches from the point of operation or pinch point hazard. ref. EN999 100mm min (4”) In the United States there are two formulas that are used to properly calculate the safety distance. The first, the OSHA formula, is the minimum requirement for the calculation of the safety distance. The second formula, is the ANSI formula, which incorporates additional factors to be considered when calculating the safety distance. Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Dpf Depth Penetration Factor • Maximum travel towards the hazard within the presence sending safeguarding devices (PSSD) field that may occur before a stop is guaranteed • It is possible that you can reach through the light curtain a SHORT distance

Acronyms: AOPD PSSD OS Mark Smokowicz / LAS

• Depth penetration factors will change depending on the resolution of the device or minimum object sensitivity (OS)

Resolution of AOPD Resolution (d) AKA Object Sensitivity (Os)

Resolution (d) = pitch (p) + lens diameter (Ø) d=p+Ø Channel

Channel

Ø

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

p

Dpf, Depth Penetration Factor based on ANS-RIA

Light Curtain

Light Grid

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Dpf, Depth Penetration Factor (OS) < 2.5”, Vertical Field For ANS-RIA, CSA

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

PSSD Resolution (mm)

Dpf

Dpf

(mm)

(in)

14

24.22

.95

20

44.62

1.75

30

78.62

3.09

40

112.62

4.43

Safe distance calculations OSHA version

Ds = 63 x Ts where:

• Ds = min safe distance between safeguarding device and the hazard (inches)

• 63 = constant, speed of hand/arm when body is stationary, use 63 in/s

• Ts = total stopping time of all the devices in the safety circuit, measured in seconds.

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Safe distance calculations ANSI RIA version

Ds = K x (Ts + Tc + Tr) + Dpf where:

• Ds = min safe distance between safeguarding

device and the hazard (inches) • K = constant, speed of hand/arm when body is stationary, 63 in/s • Ts = stopping time of the machine/equipment (wc)

• Tc = stopping time of the control system (wc) • Tr = response time of the safeguarding device and it’s interface • Dpf = Depth penetration factor Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Safe distance calculations EN99 version

S = (K x T) + C where:

• S = min safe distance between safeguarding

device and the hazard (mm) • K = constant, speed of hand/arm when body is stationary, use 2 m/s • T = t1 + t2 + t3 • t1: response time of the AOPD • t2: response time of the safety interface • t3: response time of the machine

• C = 8 x (d-14) • d = resolution of the AOPD (14 to 40mm)

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Safe distance calculations Ds = 63 x Ts Ds = K x (Ts + Tc + Tr) + Dpf AN S

S = (K x T) + C What to do….so , let’s see the differences?

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

I?

O

EN

A? H S

?

Safe distance calculations Example: A light curtain application has; o o o o

a response time of 15 ms a machine stopping time of 180ms braking response time of 40ms and a 3.2 inch depth of penetration

Assume a 14mm resolution device Let’s divy this up, solve and compare  Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Stopping distance examples Example: A light curtain application has; a response time of 15 ms, a machine stopping time of 180ms, braking response time of 40ms and a 3.2 inch depth of penetration

ANSI version Ds = K x (Ts + Tc + Tr) + Dpf Ds = 18.0”

OSHA version Ds = 63 x Ts Ds = 14.8” Mark Smokowicz / LAS

EN999 version S = (K x T) + C

S = 18.5”

Stopping distance examples

18.5 18 14.8

0 Mark Smokowicz / LAS

5

10

15

20

EN999 ANSI-RIA OSHA

Calculating min Safe Distances

Channel

Stepping behind protection using master and slave units (different resolutions possible).

S

Minimum Safe Distances must be calculated for each segment. Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Safeguarding devices used horizontally Direction of approach parallel to the sensing plane of the AOPD Relationship between height of the sensing plane above ground and resolution of the AOPD:

H = 15 x (dmax - 50) [mm]

d = resolution of the AOPD H = height of the AOPD above ground

dmax = H/15 + 50 [mm]

Minimum safety distance S:

S=K xT+C S

K = 1.6 mm/ms T = tAOPD + tInterface + tMachine in ms

d

(< 850 mm) C = (1200 + 0.4 H) in mm Channel

H* Using EN999 Mark Smokowicz / LAS

H < 1000 mm H < 300 mm is considered not to allow crawling underneath

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Area Scanner Safety Distance EN-954

S = (K x T) + C

= K = T = in C ms = Cmin = SFT = field S

Safety distance in mm 1.6 mm/ms tAOPDDR+tInterface + tMachine 1200 – 0.4 x H in mm 850 mm Depth of protection

Hmin = 15 x (d 50) H = Heights of scanning plain d = Resolution of AOPDDR d Hmin == 70 300mm mm Hmax = 1000 mm

S SFT

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

H

Web based tools

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Calculation wizards

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Introduction to Risk Assessment

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Safety related parts of machine control EN 954-1 General schematic representation of a machine

signalling display warning

actuators control device

data storage

and logic or analogue

data processing

operatormachine interface

sensors, safety devices

power control elements (contactors, valves, etc.) machine actuators (engines, cylinders)

power transmission elements working parts Mark Smokowicz / LAS

hard guarding

Risk reduction remaining risk

risk without any safety measures maximally permissible risk risk without safety related parts of machine control

risk level necessary reduction of risk

real reduction of risk

part of risk reduced by safety related parts of control Mark Smokowicz / LAS

part of risk reduced by design measures

Risk elements

Risk

Severity

referring to the considered danger

the possible damage by the considered danger

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

is a function of

Probability of damage occurrence: and

- frequency and duration of the danger exposure - possibility of avoidance or limit of damage

Risk elements

severity of the injury

• slight • severe

exposure in danger area

• rarely, short • frequent, long

possibility of avoidance

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

• possible • rarely possible

Risk levels EN 954-1

S1

I P1 F1

S2 F2

P2 P1

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

III IV V

Severity of injury S1: slight injury (reversible) S2: severe irreversible injury or one or more persons or death of a person

Frequency, duration of exposure Possibility to withhold

Frequency, duration of exposure

Severity of injury

P2

II

F1: rarely to repeated and/or short duration F2: frequent to permanent and/or long duration

Possibility to withhold from exposure to hazard P1: possible by certain conditions P2: rarely possible

Risk reduction index CSA Z434-03

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Safeguard selection matrix CSA Z434-03

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Example EN 954-1 B 1 2 3 4

S1 F1 S2 F2

Result:

P1 P2 P1 P2

Category: _____

The dangerous event is the uncontrolled movement of the press from standstill or a delayed stopping of the machine. This event can cause severe injuries or at worst, lead to death. In this example, it is assumed that the user stays frequently in the danger zone. Since the pressing is a very fast process, the dangerous situation can hardly be avoided.

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Types of AOPD applications Making a danger point safe

Access guarding

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Safeguarding an area

Perimeter guarding

Questions to ask •

To determine resolution to use – Finger safe – Hand safe – Access/area



What are you interfaced to? – Solenoid/starter – Safety PLC



integrated muting lamp, sensors safety switches

Cables, special mounting considerations? – High vibration – Washdown applications – Ease of wiring

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

relay output pnp safety outputs

Special functions required? – Muting – Interlocks



14/20mm 30/40mm 50/90mm, multibeam, laserscanner

anti-vibration brackets IP68 tubes MIN connectors/cables

What was covered today? • Common safety standards – differences in standards

• • • •

What is Safe Distance? Reach over and under Some definitions Safety Distance calculations – OSHA, EN999, ANSI-RIA

• • • • Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Safe distance example Introduction to Risk Assessment Application example Questions to ask

Thank You for Your Interest in Safety Products of Leuze electronic

Mark Smokowicz / LAS

Related Documents


More Documents from "taktik(z), Inc."