Tabel Untuk Jurnal.docx

  • Uploaded by: AriefO'lMind
  • 0
  • 0
  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Tabel Untuk Jurnal.docx as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 557
  • Pages: 3
Table 14: Result of simulation coverage and capacity Parameter

LTE (Scenario I) LTE-AP (Scenario II) Using with PCI and SFR - 77.71 - 73.51 11,88 17,02 37,079 49,739 98.05% 100 %

Average RSRP (dBm) Avegare SINR (dB) Avegare Throughput (Mbps) User Connected

KPI TELKOMSEL -90 dBm > 90% 90% > 5 dB > 15 dBm 90%

Table 13: Final Simulation Results LTE (Scenario I) Not Using Using using PCI SFR PCi and SFR Using with mimo 4x4

Parameter

Number of user Number of site Number of user/site Average RSRP (dBm) Average SINR (dB) RS Interferensi for SINR > -80 dBm Average Throughput (Mbps) 25 < RS SINR Distribution (dB) <=60 User Connected

1.9 37.43%

94000 156 602 - 77.71 0.17 48.54%

11.88 2.23%

LTE-AP (Scenario II) Not Using Using using PCI SFR PCi and SFR Using with mimo 2x2 and LAA 45000 74 608 - 73.49 6.35 6.89 16.77 42.77% 39.29% 1.53%

15.513

13.793

38.210

30.942

31.144

49.569

0.12%

0.33%

13.72%

13.02%

20.61%

35.27%

97.09%

97.42%

98.00%

100%

Table 12: User Rejected LTE-AP Scenario II LTE-AP LTE-AP +PCI LTE-AP +SFR

Demand

Number of Site

45000 45000 45000

74 74 74

No Access 0 0 0

Rejected No Coverage 0 0 0

Offline 0 0 0

Presentase User Rejected 0% 0% 0%

Presentase User Connected 100 % 100 % 100 %

Tabel 11: User Rejected LTE

Scenario I

Demand

Number of Site

LTE LTE+PCI LTE+SFR

94000 94000 94000

156 156 156

No Access 0 0 0

Rejected No Coverage 0 0 0

Offline 2817 2492 1932

Presentase User Rejected 2.91% 2.58% 2.00%

Presentase User Connected 97.09 % 97.42 % 98.00 %

Tabel 10: Comparison of LTE and LTE-AP Coverage Parameter

DL RSRP (dBm) Signal Level

C/(I+N)

Throughput

Average edge DL Bandwidth RSRP >-65 (dBm) RSSI >-50 (dBm) DL PDSCH Signal Level >-80 (dBm) DL RS SINR (dB) Average edge DL PDSCH SINR >20 (dB) RS Interference Margin >-80 (dBm) DL MAC Peak Average Throughput (Kbps) Edge

Scenario I LTE Using With PCI and SFR -77.71 -93.61 89.44% 62.68% 73.03%

Scenario II LTE-AP Using with PCI and SFR -73.51 -87.53 92.97% 78.81% 78.59%

11.88 -1.52 30.75% 2.23% 37079.66 7879.90

17.02 2.79 45.88% 1.26% 49739.90 11507.95

Table 9: Coverage prediction LTE-AP Parameter

-73.49 -87.35 93.13% 83.89% 78.66%

Scenario II LTE-AP LTE-AP Using With Using With PCI SFR -73.49 -73.49 -87.35 -87.35 93.13% 93.13% 83.89% 83.89% 78.66% 78.66%

6.35 -4.62 14.09% 42.77% 30942.33 2893.981

6.89 -4.05 14.02% 39.29% 31144.54 3057

LTE-AP

DL RSRP (dBm) Signal Level Signal Level

C/(I+N)

Throughput

Average edge DL Bandwidth RSRP >-65 (dBm) RSSI >-50 (dBm) DL PDSCH Signal Level >-80 (dBm) DL RS SINR (dB) Average edge DL PDSCH SINR >20 (dB) RS Interference Margin >-80 (dBm) DL MAC Peak Average Throughput (Kbps) Edge

16.77 2.3 46.06% 1.53% 49569.61 11263.64

Table 8: Coverage prediction LTE Parameter LTE DL RSRP (dBm) Signal Level

C/(I+N)

Throughput

Average Edge DL Bandwidth RSRP >-65 (dBm) RSSI >-50 (dBm) DL PDSCH Signal Level >-80 (dBm) DL RS SINR (dB) Average edge DL PDSCH SINR >20 (dB) RS Interference Margin >-80 (dBm) DL MAC Peak Average Throughput (Kbps) Edge

-77.71 -93.61 89.44% 70.61% 73.31% 1.9 -6.27 1.38% 37.43% 15513.50 3454.18

Skenario I LTE Using With PCI -77.71 -93.61 89.44% 70.61% 73.31% 0.17 -7.95 1.47% 48.54% 13793.02 2645.72

LTE Using With SFR -77.71 -93.61 89.44% 70.61% 73.31% 11.88 -1.52 30.75% 2.23% 38210.30 8691.19

Related Documents

Tabel Untuk Jurnal.docx
December 2019 1
Tabel
May 2020 50
Tabel
October 2019 62
Tabel
May 2020 56
Tabel
August 2019 80