Students Evaluation For The Software Evolution Lecture (w7084 - 2008)

Universität Bern Hochschulstrasse 4 3012 Bern

Sehr geehrter Herr Dr. Tudor Girba (PERSÖNLICH) Institut für Informatik und angewandte Mathematik Neubrückstrasse 10

Auswertungsbericht Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation an die Lehrenden

Sehr geehrter Herr Dr. Girba, Please find attached the results of the automatic analysis belonging to the evaluation of the course 08 W7084 Software Evolution. Type of questionnaire VORLe. Please observe: The results first show under the heading "Globalwerte" the mean value for the following dimensions: - Planning and Presentation - Manners with Students - Interest and Relevance - Complexity and Scope - Overall Assessment of Course - Overall Assessment of Lecturer - Overall Assessment of Teaching Methods The second part shows the results for all the questions individually. 1 equals the lowest grade (unless the question is inverted), 4 or more the highest grade. In the group 'Complexity and Scope' the grade 3 corresponds to "exactly right". We hope that this report is useful for the further plannung of your teaching. Please briefly discuss the results of this evaluation with your students. The collaborators of the Group "Hochschuldidaktik" (contact: [email protected]) are happy to discuss the results with you. Please bring a copy of the reports with you since they are not accessible to anybody else but you. The evaluation process and details for your faculty may be found under: http://www.rektorat. unibe.ch/unibe/rektorat/unistab/content/e362/e1957/e980/LeitfadenLVEvalDezember2008. pdf In case you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

05.03.2009

EvaSys Auswertung

Seite 1

Dr.Tudor Girba 08 W7084 Software Evolution (W7084) Erfasste Fragebögen = 18

Globalwerte 1

Planning and Presentation

-

Manners with Students

-

Interest and Relevance

-

Complexity and Scope

-

Overall Assessment of Course

-

Overall Assessment of Lecturer

-

Overall Assessment of Teaching Methods

-

Legende

2

4

+ 1

2

3

4

+ 1

2

3

4

+ 1

2

3

4

5

+ 1

2

3

4

5

6

+ 1

2

3

4

5

6

+ 1

Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten

Fragetext

3

2

3

4

5

6

+

Std.-Abw. 1

Mittelwert

2

3

Median 4

mw=3.8 s=0.4 mw=3.6 s=0.5 mw=3 s=0.5 mw=5.1 s=0.5 mw=5.7 s=0.5 mw=5.3 s=0.6

Quantil 5

Linker Pol

Rechter Pol

Skala

mw=3.5 s=0.6

n=Anzahl mw=Mittelwert md=Median s=Standardabweichung E.=Enthaltung

Histogramm

Planning and Presentation 1_A)

1_B)

1_C)

1_D)

1_E)

1 The course follows a coherent structure.

2 The wider context of the subject matter is not sufficiently elucidated.

3 The lecturer expresses him-/herself clearly and comprehensibly.

4 The course provides an adequate overview of the subject matter treated.

5 The design of the course contributes to an understanding of the subject matter.

0%

33%

67%

1

2

3

4

0%

6%

22%

72%

true

1

2

3

4

0%

0%

28%

72%

not true

1

2

3

4

0%

0%

39%

61%

not true

1

2

3

4

0%

0%

41%

59%

not true

1

05.03.2009

0%

not true

EvaSys Auswertung

2

3

true

n=18 mw=3.7 md=4 s=0.5

not true

n=18 mw=3.7 md=4 s=0.6

true

n=18 mw=3.7 md=4 s=0.5

true

n=18 mw=3.6 md=4 s=0.5

true

n=17 mw=3.6 md=4 s=0.5

4

Seite 2

1_F)

1_G)

6 There is overall enough material provided to assist the learning process (slides, course material, hand-outds, etc.).

7 The course materials (slides, course manuals, hand-outs, etc.) are overall of sufficient quality.

0%

35%

29%

35%

not true

1

2

3

4

0%

11%

50%

39%

not true

1

2

3

4

0%

0%

17%

83%

true

n=17 mw=3 md=3 s=0.9

true

n=18 mw=3.3 md=3 s=0.7

true

n=18 mw=3.8 md=4 s=0.4

true

n=18 mw=3.8 md=4 s=0.4

true

n=18 mw=3.8 md=4 s=0.4

not true

n=17 mw=3.8 md=4 s=0.4 E.=1

true

n=18 mw=3.8 md=4 s=0.4

true

n=16 mw=3.4 md=3 s=0.5 E.=2

not true

n=17 mw=3.8 md=4 s=0.6 E.=1

true

n=18 mw=3.5 md=3.5 s=0.5

Manners with Students 2_A)

2_B)

2_C)

2_D)

8 The lecturer takes students seriously.

9 The lecturer is friendly and respectful towards students.

10 The lecturer adresses questions and suggestions from students adequately.

11 The lecturer doesn't seem to care about his/her students' progress.

not true

1

2

3

4

0%

0%

22%

78%

not true

1

2

3

4

0%

0%

17%

83%

not true

1

2

3

4

0%

0%

24%

76%

true

1

2

3

4

0%

0%

22%

78%

Interest and Relevance 3_A)

3_B)

3_C)

3_D)

12 The lecturer succeeds in making the course interesting.

13 The course is probably very useful for my future professional life.

14 The applicability and relevance of the subject matter is not sufficiently clarified by the lecturer.

15 The lecturer fosters my interest in the subject.

not true

1

2

3

4

0%

0%

56%

44%

not true

1

2

3

4

0%

6%

12%

82%

true

1

2

3

4

0%

0%

50%

50%

not true

1

05.03.2009

EvaSys Auswertung

2

3

4

Seite 3

Complexity and Scope 4_A)

4_B)

4_C)

4_D)

16 The degree of complexity of the course is:

17 The scope of the course is:

18 The pace of the course is:

19 The amount of knowledge presupposed by the course is:

0%

11%

83%

6%

0%

far too low/narrow

1

2

3

4

5

0%

6%

83%

11%

0%

far too low/narrow

1

2

3

4

5

0%

17%

78%

6%

0%

far too low/narrow

1

2

3

4

5

0%

6%

78%

11%

6%

far too low/narrow

1

2

3

4

far too high/wide

n=18 mw=2.9 md=3 s=0.4

far too high/wide

n=18 mw=3.1 md=3 s=0.4

far too high/wide

n=18 mw=2.9 md=3 s=0.5

far too high/wide

n=18 mw=3.2 md=3 s=0.6

6 (excellent)

n=18 mw=5.1 md=5 s=0.5

6 (excellent)

n=18 mw=5.7 md=6 s=0.5

6 (excellent)

n=18 mw=5.3 md=5 s=0.6

5

Overall Assessment of Course 5_A)

20 How would you grade the course as a whole?

0%

0%

0%

11%

72%

17%

1 (poor)

1

2

3

4

5

6

0%

0%

0%

0%

28%

72%

Overall Assessment of Lecturer 6_A)

21 How would you grade the lecturer with regard to subject expertise?

1 (poor)

1

2

3

4

5

6

0%

0%

0%

6%

56%

39%

Overall Assessment of Teaching Methods 7_A)

22 How would you grade the lecturer with regard to teaching methods?

1 (poor)

1 7_B)

2

3

4

5

6

23 The course has taught me

n=15

very little

0%

little

0%

this or that

13.3%

a lot

86.7%

an awful lot

05.03.2009

EvaSys Auswertung

0%

Seite 4

Sociodemographic Data and Background Variables 8_A)

24 How many hours per week did you invest in preparation and revision for the course (on average)? 0h

5.6%

less than 2h

5.6%

2 to 4h

77.8%

4 to 6h

11.1%

more than 6h

8_B)

8_C)

n=18

not at all

0%

slightly

0%

fairly

38.9%

quite

61.1%

26 How many lectures did you miss?

n=18

none

38.9%

1-2

50%

3-4

11.1% 0%

27 If you missed more than 2 lectures, please give one reason:

n=4

lack of interest

0%

course overlap

25%

illness etc.

50%

course manual/required reading suffices for exam preparation other reasons

8_E)

0%

25 Was the topic of interest to you?

more than 4

8_D)

n=18

0% 25%

28 Allocation of the course in your study programme:?

05.03.2009

n=17

mono subject/Major/Hauptfach

70.6%

Minor/Nebenfach

11.8%

complemetary or specialisation course

17.6%

EvaSys Auswertung

Seite 5

8_F)

29 Your current number of semesters?

n=17

1

5.9%

2

0%

3

0%

4

0%

5

5.9%

6

0%

7

17.6%

8

5.9%

9

47.1%

10 higher than 10

8_G)

0% 17.6%

30 Sex

n=18

female male

5.6% 94.4%

Open Questions

9_A)

What did you like about the course?

05.03.2009

EvaSys Auswertung

Seite 6

05.03.2009

EvaSys Auswertung

Seite 7

9_B)

What did you not like about the course?

05.03.2009

EvaSys Auswertung

Seite 8

9_C)

Suggestions for improvements?

05.03.2009

EvaSys Auswertung

Seite 9

05.03.2009

EvaSys Auswertung

Seite 10

Profillinie Teilbereich: Phil.-nat. Fakultät Name der/des Lehrenden: Dr. Tudor Girba Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: 08 W7084 Software Evolution (Name der Umfrage)

1_A)

1 The course follows a coherent structure.

1_B)

2 The wider context of the subject matter is not sufficiently elucidated.

1_C)

3 The lecturer expresses him-/herself clearly and comprehensibly.

1_D)

true

mw=3.7

not true

mw=3.7

not true

true

mw=3.7

4 The course provides an adequate overview of the subject matter treated.

not true

true

mw=3.6

1_E)

5 The design of the course contributes to an understanding of the subject matter.

not true

true

mw=3.6

1_F)

6 There is overall enough material provided to assist the learning process (slides, course material, hand-outds, etc.).

not true

true

mw=3

1_G)

7 The course materials (slides, course manuals, hand-outs, etc.) are overall of sufficient quality.

not true

true

mw=3.3

2_A)

8 The lecturer takes students seriously.

not true

true

mw=3.8

2_B)

9 The lecturer is friendly and respectful towards students.

not true

true

mw=3.8

2_C)

10 The lecturer adresses questions and suggestions from students adequately.

not true

true

mw=3.8

2_D)

11 The lecturer doesn't seem to care about his/her students' progress.

not true

mw=3.8

3_A)

12 The lecturer succeeds in making the course interesting.

not true

true

mw=3.8

3_B)

13 The course is probably very useful for my future professional life.

not true

true

mw=3.4

3_C)

14 The applicability and relevance of the subject matter is not sufficiently clarified by the lecturer.

not true

mw=3.8

3_D)

15 The lecturer fosters my interest in the subject.

true

mw=3.5

4_A)

16 The degree of complexity of the course is:

far too low/ narrow

far too high/ wide

mw=2.9

4_B)

17 The scope of the course is:

far too low/ narrow

far too high/ wide

mw=3.1

4_C)

18 The pace of the course is:

far too low/ narrow

far too high/ wide

mw=2.9

4_D)

19 The amount of knowledge presupposed by the course is:

far too low/ narrow

far too high/ wide

mw=3.2

5_A)

20 How would you grade the course as a whole?

1 (poor)

6 (excellent)

mw=5.1

6_A)

21 How would you grade the lecturer with regard to subject expertise?

1 (poor)

6 (excellent)

mw=5.7

7_A)

22 How would you grade the lecturer with regard to teaching methods?

1 (poor)

6 (excellent)

mw=5.3

05.03.2009

not true true

true

true not true

EvaSys Auswertung

Seite 11

Präsentationsvorlage Vorlesung 08 W7084 Software Evolution Dr. Tudor Girba Erfasste Fragebögen = 18

Planning and Presentation 1

2

3

4

-

+

mw = 3.5 Manners with Students 1

2

3

4

-

+

mw = 3.8 Interest and Relevance 1

2

3

4

-

+

mw = 3.6 Complexity and Scope

The mark "3" means "exactly right".

1

2

3

4

5

-

+

mw = 3 Overall Assessment of Course 1

-

2

3

4

5

6

+

mw = 5.1

05.03.2009

EvaSys Auswertung

Seite 12

Overall Assessment of Lecturer 1

2

3

4

5

6

-

+

mw = 5.7 Overall Assessment of Teaching Methods 1

-

2

3

4

5

6

+

mw = 5.3

05.03.2009

Seite 13