Spss Data Result-kamala.docx

INTRODUCTION Respondents in this study are blood donors from the National Blood Centre, Kuala Lumpur. Total number of respondents are 40. These blood donors answered a set of questionnaire comprised of attitude towards blood donation, intention to donate blood and demographic variables. CHAP 3: MEAN, MODE AND MEDIAN Item: Blood donation is a good act 1 2 3 4 5

= = = = =

strongly disagree disagree sometimes disagree/agree agree strongly agree

Statistics Item: Good Act N

Valid Missing

Mean Median Mode

40 0 4.7500 5.0000 5.00

Mean: In this data, the descriptive analysis showed that the mean value for the item ‘blood donation is a good act’ is 4.750. In other words, the average point (value) for this item is 4.750, meaning that for these respondents; they agreed that blood donation is a good act. Median: In this data, the median is 5.00. the data showed that the midpoint of the distribution is 5.000. in other words, the value showed that the scores are divided into two equal groups with the midpoint of 5.000. Mode: In this data, the mode is 5.00. Meaning that, the value of 5 which is strongly agree has the greatest frequency. This data indicates that the respondents strongly agree that blood donation is a good act.

1

CHAPTER 4: STANDARD DEVIATION AND VARIANCE Item: Blood donation is a good act 1 = strongly disagree 2 = disagree 3 = sometimes disagree/agree 4 = agree 5 = strongly agree Statistics Item: Good act N

Valid Missing

Std. Deviation Variance

40 0 .43853 .192

Standard deviation: From the item ‘blood donation is a good act’ the standard deviation is .439. Meaning that for this item, the data is not clustered closely around the mean (4.750) as the standard deviation is at .439, which means the data is more diverse.

2

CHAPTER 10: T-TEST FOR TWO INDEPENDENT SAMPLES HO: There is no significant different between working and non-working blood donors towards the attitude in blood donation. Group Statistics D_10StatusOccupation

N

SumScore_Attitud Working e Not working

Mean

Std. Error Mean

Std. Deviation

32

53.4063

5.62173

.99379

8

53.3750

3.70087

1.30845

Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

F SumScore_Attitude Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed

2.410

Sig. .129

t-test for Equality of Means

t

Sig. (2tailed)

df

Mean Difference

Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower

Upper

.015

38

.988

.03125

2.10301

-4.22608

4.28858

.019

16.189

.985

.03125

1.64307

-3.44860

3.51110

Result: Fail to reject HO. There is no significant different between working and non-working blood donors towards attitude in blood donation. From the analysis of the independent sample t-test, it showsb that there is no significant difference in attitude towards blood donation between working (M=53.406) and non-working (M=53.375), t(38)= .015, p=.988.

3

CHAPTER 11: T-TEST FOR TWO RELATED SAMPLES HO: There is no significant different in perceived painful among respondents before and after donation Paired Samples Statistics Mean Pair 1

N

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

A3_Attitude_BeforeDonat ion_Painful

4.1750

40

.71208

.11259

A3_ Attitude _AfterDonation_Painful

2.6250

40

1.39021

.21981

Paired Samples Correlations N Pair 1

A3_ Attitude _BeforeDonation_Painful & A3_ Attitude _AfterDonation_Painful

Correlation

40

.042

Sig.

.797

Paired Samples Test Paired Differences

Mean

Std. Deviation

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Std. Error Mean

Lower

Upper

t

A3_ Attitude _BeforeDonation_Painful 1.55000 1.53506 .24271 1.05906 2.04094 6.386 - A3_ Attitude _AfterDonation_Painful Result: Reject HO. There is significant different in perceived painful among respondents before and after donation.

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Pair 1

4

39

.000

From the analysis of the paired sample t-test, it shows that there is significant difference in attitude towards blood donation before donation (M=4.175) and after donation (M=2.625), t(39)= 6.386, p=.001. This result indicates that before the blood donation, the respondents feel the act would be painful. However, after the blood donation the respondents perception changes as they feel it is less painful.

5

CHAPTER 12: ANOVA Descriptives SumScore_ Attitude 95% Confidence Interval for Mean N Majority Malay Majority Chinese Mixed Total

Mean

Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Minimum Maximum

18

53.4444

5.26053

1.23992

50.8284

56.0604

45.00

60.00

5

47.4000

5.31977

2.37908

40.7946

54.0054

40.00

53.00

17 40

55.1176 53.4000

4.04479 5.25162

.98100 .83035

53.0380 51.7205

57.1973 55.0795

48.00 40.00

60.00 60.00

ANOVA SumScore_ Attitude Sum of Squares Between Groups Within Groups Total

df

Mean Square

230.191

2

115.095

845.409 1075.600

37 39

22.849

F 5.037

Sig. .012

HO : There is no significant difference in neighbourhood composition of race towards attitude in blood donation Result : Reject HO. There is significant difference in neighbourhood composition of race towards attitude in blood donation.

6

Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable: SumScore_Attitude Tukey HSD 95% Confidence Interval

Mean Difference (I) D_6KomposisiKaum

(J) D_6KomposisiKaum

Melayu majoriti

Cina Majoriti

6.04444*

2.41644

.044

.1448

11.9441

Campuran

-1.67320

1.61661

.560

-5.6201

2.2737

Melayu majoriti

-6.04444*

2.41644

.044

-11.9441

-.1448

Campuran

-7.71765*

2.43184

.008

-13.6549

-1.7804

Melayu majoriti

1.67320

1.61661

.560

-2.2737

5.6201

Cina Majoriti

7.71765*

2.43184

.008

1.7804

13.6549

Cina Majoriti

Campuran

(I-J)

Std. Error

Sig.

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

From the one-way analysis of the variance (ANOVA) test, it shows that there is significant difference in attitude towards blood donation between three groups of neighbourhood composition of races among respondents. Subjects were divided into three groups according to their race (Group 1: Malay, Group 2: Chinese and Group 3: Mixed). Result shows that there is a significant difference at the p<.05 level in attitude towards blood donation activity scores for the three groups [F(2, 37)=5.037, p=.012]. Post-hoc comparisons using the Tukey HSD test indicated that the mean score for Group 1 (M=53.444, SD=5.261) was significantly different from Group 2(M=47.400, SD=5.320). As for Group 2 (M=47.400, SD=5.320), the score in attitude was significantly different from Group 1(M=53.444, SD=5.261) and Group 3 (M=55.118, SD=4.045)

7

CHAPTER 14:CORRELATION Descriptive Statistics Mean SumScore_SocialAwar eness SumScore_Intention

Std. Deviation

N

35.1500

3.87993

40

11.5500

2.55152

40

Correlations SumScore_I ntention SumScore_SocialAwar Pearson eness Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N

.440** .005 40

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). HO: There is no significant correlation between social awareness and intention to donate blood. Result: Reject HO. There is significant correlation between social awareness and intention to donate blood. From the Pearson’s Correlation, the result showed that there was a significant correlation between social awareness and intention to donate blood [r=.440, n=40, p<.005]. In other words, the result indicates that high score of attitude towards blood donation is associated with stronger intention to donate blood among the blood donors in this study.

8