Speech Perception 4/4

  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Speech Perception 4/4 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 562
  • Pages: 8
Voice onset time (VOT) • Primary cue for distinguishing voiced and voiceless stop consonants • Delay between release and vocal fold vibration • Much longer in voiceless stops – 0 - 20 ms = voiced – 40 - 100 ms = voiceless

English speakers

Source: Lisker & Abramson, 1964

Thai speakers

Source: Lisker & Abramson, 1964

1

Categorical Perception • Continuum from blue to green

• Continuum from /g/ to /k/ – VOT ranging from 0 ms to 80 ms in steps

Identification/rating task • Label each item as being a member of one category or the other • Sometimes add in “goodness rating” • For example, a 6-item rating going from a good clear blue (1) to a good clear green (6) – – – –

2 = mostly blue 3 = borderline, but more blue than green 4 = borderline, but more green than blue 5 = mostly green

Color identification/rating results Average rating; 6 = blue, 1 = green

6

5

4

B B

B

B B B B

3

B B

2

B B B

1 Series members

B B

2

Speech identification/rating results Average rating; 6 = voiced, 1 = voiceless

6

B

B

B

B

B B

5

4

B

3

B

2

1 Series members

B

B

B

B

B

Discrimination tasks • AX • ABX – 1 step: 1-2-2, 4-3-3, 7-8-7, 6-5-6 – 2 step: 1-3-3, 4-2-2, 6-8-6, 7-5-7

Color discrimination results 100 90

Discrimination accuracy

80

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Series members

3

Speech discrimination results B

100 90 Discrimination accuracy

80 70 60 50

B

B

B

B

B

B B

B

B

B

B

40 30 20 10 0

Pairs of adjacent series members Categorical Perception

• As if people can only perceive category information • Found for many different consonant distinctions • Not found for vowels

Differences among items that fall into different categories are exaggerated, and differences among items that fall into the same category are minimized. Source: cognitrn.psych.indiana.edu/rgoldsto/projects/categorical.html

4

Example stimuli • • • •

Series 1 Series 2 Series 3 Series 4

• Same/different task

Same-Different Answers 1. Different 2. Same 3. Different 4. Same 5. Same 6. Different 7. Different 8. Same 9. Different 10. Same

11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.

Same Different Different Different Different Different Same Different Different Different

Same-Different Answers, cont. • Compare your results across the continuum: – /g/ end of the continuum = numbers 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 13, 16, 20 – /k/ end of the continuum = numbers 3, 4, 11, 12, 14, 18 – Middle of the continuum = numbers 5, 6, 9, 15, 17, 19

5

Consonant results

Vowel results

Interpretations • Is speech special?

6

Animals show categorical perception • Pat Kuhl trained chinchillas to label endpoints of a speech continuum • Tested on other members of series

Chinchilla results • Chinchillas showed the same categories, although slightly less steep

Source: Kuhl, 1975

Chinchilla results, cont.

Source: Kuhl & Miller, 1978

7

Who cares about categorical perception? • Because phonemes are heard categorically, distinctions that do not occur in your language are not heard, even though they may occur in other languages. • This poses a problem for second language learning & accent reduction.

8

Related Documents

Speech Perception 3/4
December 2019 10
Speech Perception 2/4
December 2019 8
Speech Perception 1/4
December 2019 5
Speech Perception 4/4
December 2019 3
Perception
November 2019 51
Perception
October 2019 54