p. 174 8c.
OP = 6i – j + 3k OT lies on line l, so OT = 2i + s (i + 3j + 4k) PT = PO + OT = – (6, -1, 3) + (2+s, 3s, 4s) = ( s – 4, 3s + 1, 4s – 3) Since PT is perpendicular to the line, so PT d = 0 (s – 4, 3s + 1, 4s – 3) (1, 3, 4) = 0 s – 4 + 9s + 3 + 16s – 12 = 0 26s – 13 = 0 s = 1/2 Therefore OT = 2 1/2 i + 1 1/2 j + 2k (ans) 8 iii
iz 2 2 2 z 2 3 0 z
(2 2 ) (2 2 ) 2 4(i )(2 3 ) 2i
2 2 8 8 3i 2 2 2 3 2i 2i 2i 2 2 2 3 2i i 2 2i 2 3i 2 2i i 2 2i 3i 1 z
or 2i 3i 1
Now find the square root of
8 8 3i = 2 3 2i 8 8 3i a ib 8 8 3i a 2 b 2 2abi a 2 b 2 8 (1) 2ab 8 3 (2) a 2 3 b 2 2 3 2i
1. Use numerical method to find all the roots of the cubic equations x3 – 2x2 – 2x + 2 = 0, giving your answers correct to 2 decimal places. Let f(x) = x3 – 2x2 – 2x + 2 F(-2) = -8 – 8 + 4 + 2 = - 10 F(-1)= -1 -2 + 2 + 2 = 1
A sign change, root lies between -2 and -1
F(0) = 0 – 0 – 0 + 2 = 2 F(1) = 1 – 2 – 2 + 2 = -1
A sign change, root lies between 0 and 1
F(2) = 8 – 8 – 4 + 2 = -2 F(3) = 27 – 18 – 6 + 2 = 5
A sign change, root lies between 2 and 3
[normally in paper 3, the iteration formula will be given. Since not given, we need to do trial and error, making your own iteration formula.] Let x3 subject x3 = 2x2 + 2x – 2
x 3 2x 2 2x 2 x n 1 3 2 x n2 2 x n 2 U try substitute x = -1.6, -1.4, 0, 0.5, 0.7, 2.4, 2.6 See whether will converge to a root or not. If not then try this formula: x(x2 - 2x - 2) = – 2 Let x2 subject,
x
x3 2x 2 2
or
x
2 2 x x2
Let x subject or
x
x3 2x 2 2 or 2
Make subject x3 +2 = 2x (x+1)
x
x3 2 2( x 1)
Trial and error. See which one converge to the answer. I haven’t tried this yet because I left my scientific calculator in the school. Tomorrow will let you know which one give the answer.