http://web.hku.hk/~amslee/gsp.pdf
Geometer's Sketchpad prepared by Arthur Lee
[email protected] Jun 2008
please download the Sketchpad file for workshop: http://web.hku.hk/~amslee/jun08.gsp
Locus Exploration
Construct & Explore ● Find B so that BC to AB is 2. ● Make a table to record positions of such points. ● Plot the points stored in the table. http://screencast.com/t/DlZ4cyql
Locus Exploration
Explore the locus with parametric coloring. http://screencast.com/t/7FSrs6WQn
Two parabolic chords, difference of slopes
Construct & Explore ● Mark 3 points on a quadratic graph. ● Measure the slopes of 2 chords. ● Calculate the difference of the slopes. ● What happens if the points are changed?
http://screencast.com/t/Zf7pPcBORM
Construct a quadratic graphs with 3 given points
http://screencast.com/t/Mo9SLI7q
Antiderivative of a quadratic function
http://screencast.com/t/w4MHDevQ
Quadrilateral, Sum of Squares of Opposite Sides
Construct tangents with custom tools
http://screencast.com/t/IdpCDc9AQH
Another construction of tangents
equation of tangent is created from the derivative calculated and coordinates of the given point on the graph http://screencast.com/t/dGuewyDqf
Exponential Function
http://screencast.com/t/W7RHdPxmf
Perimeter and Area of a Regular Polygon
http://screencast.com/t/h1gfQNgvNJg
Line Pattern
http://screencast.com/t/SeD51wyB4
Some readings about use of images and videos with dynamic tools From
http://www.atm.org.uk/mt/micromath.html
Oldknow, A. (2003) Mathematics from still and video images
a free program for video analysis is mentioned in Oldknow (2003)
Micromath (Summer, 2003, pp.30-34)
Vidshell
http://www.atm.org.uk/mt/micromath/mm192oldknowa.pdf Oldknow, A. (2003) Geometric and Algebraic Modelling with Dynamic Geometry Software Micromath (Summer, 2003, pp.16-19)
Oldknow, A. (2005) ICT - bringing maths to life and vice versa Micromath; Summer 2005; 21, 2; Academic Research Library. pg. 16
Sharp, B.D. (2007) Making the Most of Digital Imagery Mathematics Teacher 100-9, May 2007, pp.590-593 free preview at
http://nctm.org/publications/mt.aspx?id=8594
http://cripe03.ugent.be/Vidshell/Vidshell.htm
van Dyke, F. & White, A. (2004) Making Graphs Count. Mathematics Teaching (188) pp. 42-45
Students do not make the Cartesian connection
van Dyke, F. & White, A. (2004) Making Graphs Count. Mathematics Teaching (188) pp. 42-45
Students do not make the Cartesian connection Students simply do not see the connection and so do not take advantage of graphs to solve an equation. Only 35% of the students tested saw that (12,1) provided them with a solution to the equation. Overall, students on average correctly answered only one out of four questions concerning the Cartesian connection. Many students, when interviewed, said that when they saw the word solution they immediately felt they had to do some algebraic process in order to discover some unknown quantity. We need to be aware that students often associate terms in mathematics with set procedures and in general feel that doing mathematics always entails algebraic manipulation.
van Dyke, F. & White, A. (2004) Making Graphs Count. Mathematics Teaching (188) pp. 42-45
Students have difficulty using functional notation with graphs
Knuth, E. (2000). Student Understanding of the Cartesian Connection: An Exploratory Study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 31(4), 500-508.
http://www.jstor.org/view/00218251/ap020152/02a00060/0
Knuth, E. (2000). Understanding connections between equations and graphs. The Mathematics Teacher. 93(1), 48-53.
Only 1/5 of the 35 students responded that finding a solution without the missing coefficient was possible, although the most obvious response was that the coordinates of any point on the graph would yield a solution. ... the majority of students did not perceive that the graph had any relevant information that would directly contribute to finding a solution.
http://math.buffalostate.edu/~mcmillen/Kunth.pdf
Knuth, E. (2000). Understanding connections between equations and graphs. The Mathematics Teacher. 93(1), 48-53.
Students solved part (b) primarily in two ways: (1) rewriting the equation in slope-intercept form and using the slope found from the graph to find the missing coefficient; or (2) substituting an x-value and its corresponding yvalue, both found from the graph, into the equation and solving for the missing coefficient. 75% of the students selected the former method, ... only 3 students used the latter method.
http://math.buffalostate.edu/~mcmillen/Kunth.pdf
Knuth, E. (2000). Understanding connections between equations and graphs. The Mathematics Teacher. 93(1), 48-53.
Ironically, a number of students responded to part (a) by stating that finding a solution was impossible without the missing coefficient; however, these same students responded to part (b) by stating that using the graph would allow them to find the missing coefficient. ... these students did not recognize that the procedures that they used relied on the fact that any point on a line is a solution to the equation of the line.
http://math.buffalostate.edu/~mcmillen/Kunth.pdf