QUALITY MANAGEMENT
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
By: Sid Calayag Date: September 11, 2009
Training Description Root Cause Analysis training is consist of
lectures and practices (application) that provide participants with a practical understanding of how to do an analysis in identifying the root cause of a problem.
This presentation has two modules. The second module is deleted from this presentation. The hands-on training exercises and samples were also excluded in this presentation.
Presentation set-up Module 1 will guide participants in the creation and use of histograms, Pareto chart and Fishbone diagram. Module 2 will guide participants in the process of creating a good 8 – D Report
Application Section is part of both modules, however, it will require knowledge gained in Module 2 to apply advance application such as the 8 – D Report.
Objectives Module 1: Participants will learn how to: • Create and use Pareto chart in the analysis of a problem • Implement steps for carrying out effective RCA • Select and apply tools that support RCA
Objectives Module 2:
Participants will be able to: • Define and explain the 8 – D as a Problem Solving Method • Apply the 8 Disciplines and Concepts
HOME PAGE
• INTRODUCTION • MODULE 1 • MODULE 2
• APPLICATION
INTRODUCTION
To ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Introduction Introduction
MODULE 1
Definition of Terms What it is
Why use it
RCA Process How to use it
MODULE 2
Terms and Definition Cause (causal factor) - a condition or event that results in an effect Direct Cause - cause that directly resulted in the occurrence
Contributing Cause - a cause that contributed to the occurrence, but by itself would not have caused the occurrence Root Cause - cause that, if corrected, would prevent recurrence of a non-conformity and similar occurrences
RCA Definition Root Cause Analysis - a process designed for use in investigating and categorizing the root causes of
events
A process of tracing a Problem to its Origins
Root Cause Analysis Process Step One: Define the Problem
Step Two: Collect Data Step Three: Identify Possible Causal Factors
Step Four: Identify the Root Cause(s)
Step Five: Recommend and Implement Solutions
Module 1 Digging for the Root Causes
Module 1 Table of Contents MODULE 1
MODULE 2
APPLICATION
Histograms and Pareto Chart Cause and Effect Diagram What it is How to use it Examples
Summary
Histograms- What it is
• A chart that graphically display the distribution of a set of data.
Pareto Chart - What it is A Pareto chart allows data to be displayed as a bar chart and enables the main contributors to a problem to be highlighted. It reveals that a small number of NCNs are responsible for the bulk of quality issues, a phenomenon called the „Pareto Principle‟.
Pareto Chart – How to create it 1. Gather facts about the problem 2. Rank the contributions to the problem in order of frequency.
Pareto Chart – How to create it (cont’n)
3. Draw the value as a bar chart. 4. add a line showing the cumulative percentage of errors
5. Review the chart 6. Redefine classifications if necessary.
Pareto Analysis Example • Chart 1 : The chart gives summary information and starts the cumulative % count at the top of the first bar:
600
100
500
80
400
Percent
Count
Pareto of D3 Small Engine Card Faults
300
60 40
200 20
100
Defect
ec . Sp
ir ne pla ar d epa v al t. edat lteecd egdh Bo d R Remo ic t H e E t e y i m t r r t t i t f l t ge oi u F e s u f n y i n d i t 0 o . l e r a c to s d r o nho em F mgp toiM ion E not tMth Mscis tiona rnt ne n Juo t ciS obl angeent o o e o r d o o d s e n C d m T n h u r P nat n n n a s i C i t i e a g S oLe ec a ptst peogs yW rinm kol m t oDmpo optnM m e m tam eurlty k o r r o g pC p C i o f n d C B n o l er s L P i a n h m m e o C L T C CW D J C Lo SoF Oth
Count Percent Cum %
141 139
69
52
22
20
20
17
17
17
16
13
10
10
10
8
6
5
29
23
22
11
8
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
23
45
56
65
68
71
75
77
80
83
85
87
89
91
92
94
95
0
95 100
* This is a sample output from Minitab Statistical Software
Pareto Analysis Example • Example 2 : a series of Pareto charts drill down to more detail: Fault by Main Cause 100
1st level Analysis gives “Design” as main cause of failure
70 80
60
Percent
40 30
60 40
20 20 10
Defect Count Percent Cum %
ign Des
57 75.0 75.0
2nd level Analysis gives breakdown of “Design”
0
ent pon Com
er Oth
d Buil
13 17.1 92.1
4 5.3 97.4
2 2.6 100.0
Design Faults 100 50 80 40
Percent
0
Count
Count
50
30 20
Defect Count Percent Cum %
40 20
10 0
60
dule t Mo nec Con 21 36.8 36.8
rs Moto que Tor 10 17.5 54.4
le odu on rM r ati uc e alib rt Sta r ans d IC C T AS Cold 8 14.0 68.4
8 14.0 82.5
5 8.8 91.2
0 IOP 3 5.3 96.5
n Imo 2 3.5 100.0
* This is a sample output from Minitab Statistical Software
Pareto Analysis Example • Example 3 : if the original Pareto is very flat, be prepared to cut the defects in a different way, here, it is 40:60 Pareto Chart for Child11 100 80
Percent
Count
200
100
60 40 20
0
Defect Count Percent Cum %
788 646 777 780 CC CC CC CC KD KD KD KD
0 47E 6- 1 3 74811 782 64- 72 2 5 4 6 8 9 6 7 7 66 40- 5 CC CC 40- 5 40KD KD
0 er s Oth
18
13
11
11
11
10
9
9
8
138
7.6 7.6
5.5 13.0
4.6 17.6
4.6 22.3
4.6 26.9
4.2 31.1
3.8 34.9
3.8 38.7
3.4 42.0
58.0 100.0
* This is a sample output from Minitab Statistical Software
Pareto Analysis Example How it helps Pareto Analysis is a useful tool to: •
identify and prioritize major problem areas based on frequency of occurrence;
•
separate the „vital few‟ from the „useful many‟ things to do;
•
identify major causes and effects.
The technique is often used in conjunction with Brainstorming and Cause and Effect Analysis. HINT ! The most frequent is not always the most important! Be aware of the impact of other causes on Customers or goals.
Pareto Chart and Analysis A method for showing the distribution of quantitative data and identifying those with the greatest impact.
Summary Pareto Charts provide a visual representation of the variables which contribute to problems or issues. Pareto Charts can be used as a prioritization tool to aid in focusing on the top issues which contribute to specific conditions. Pareto analysis is an approach which ranks the contributing factors and identifies which are the ones which have the most impact on a problem or issue. Often referred to as an approach for “separating the vital few from the trivial many”, sometimes referred to as the “80-20 rule”
Process Steps Pareto
Identify the problem and the potential direct or contributing causes
Collect data about each of the potential direct or contributing causes
Construct the Pareto Chart: Causes on Horizontal Axis Frequency of events on Vertical Axis
Identify the Vital Few (those with the highest number of occurrences)
Develop Corrective Action or Improvement Action Plans for those identified as the Vital Few
Coffee Break 15 Minutes Break Only
CAUSE AND EFFECT
Ishikawa/Fish Bone Diagram Procedures
People
Problem
Equipment
Materials
Cause and Effect • Cause and Effect Analysis is a tool for identifying all the possible causes associated with a particular problem Valuable for: • Focusing on causes not symptoms • Providing a picture of why an effect is happening • Establishing a sound basis for further data gathering and action • Identifying all of the areas that need to be tackled to generate a positive effect
Cause and Effect Sources of Variation Sources of Variation is categorized as follows 1. People 2. Method
3. Machine 4. Material 5. Environment
6. Measuring System
How to do it • 1. Identify the Problem/Issue • 2. Brainstorm 3. Draw fishbone diagram Place the effect at the head of the “fish” Include the 6 recommended categories shown below People
Method
Machine
Problem or Issue
Material
Environment
Measurement System
How to do it (cont’n) • 4. Align Outputs with Cause Categories
• 5. Allocate Causes • 6. Analyze for Root Causes • 7. Test for Reality
Tip ! The 6 categories recommended will address almost all scenarios. However, there is no one perfect set of categories. You may need to adapt to suit the issue being analyzed.
Sources of Variation - People
People •
The activities of the workers.
•
Variations caused by skill, knowledge, competency and attitude
Sources of Variation - Method
Method
• The methods used to produce the products. •
Variations caused by inappropriate methods or processes.
Sources of Variation - Machine
Machine •
The equipment used to produce the products.
•
Variations caused by temperature, tool wear and vibration.
Sources of Variation - Material
Material
• The "ingredients" of a process. •
Variations caused by materials that differ by industry, product and stage of production.
Sources of Variation - Environment
Environment • The methods used to control the environment.
• Variations caused by temperature changes, humidity etc.
Sources of Variation – Measurement System
Measurement System • The methods and instruments used to evaluate products.
• Variations caused by measuring techniques, or calibration and maintenance of the instruments.
Cause and Effect Analysis Example
Cause and Effect Diagram (Ishikawa)
A visual brainstorming tool used to help identify and categorize potential root causes named for Kaoru Ishikawa.
Summary The development of the cause and effect Fishbone diagram is credited to Kaoru Ishikawa, who pioneered quality management processes in the Kawasaki shipyards. The cause and effect diagram is used to explore potential causes (or inputs) that result in a single undesirable effect (UDE, or output). Causes are categorized under six headings, namely Machinery, Methods, Measurement, Manpower, Materials, and Environment. Potential causes can be arranged according to their level of importance or detail, resulting in a depiction of relationships and hierarchy of events. It is the hierarchy that creates a map that looks somewhat like fish bones, hence the name. The Ishikawa Fishbone Diagram is intended help you brainstorm and search for potential root causes or identify areas where there may be problems by questioning the existence of causes under each of the six categories.
Ishikawa Fishbone Template
Measurement Measurement
Methods Methods
Machinery Machinery
UDE
Causes, inputs, or sources of variation
Manpower Manpower
Materials Materials
Environment Environment
A UDE is an UnDesireable Effect
Module 2
APPLICATION
Application Table of Contents MODULE 1
MODULE 2
APPLICATION
ISO 9001:2000 CA/PA & IQA Report Eight Discipline What it is How to use it Examples Summary
Different Action to Improve Performance Corrective
- the action taken to eliminate the cause of a detected non-conformity (and prevent its recurrence.)
Preventive
– the action taken to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity and to prevent its occurrence. After
Before
Action 2 Action 1
Time
Different Action to Improve Performance Continual Improvement
Breakthrough P e r f o r m a n c e
Continual
Continuous
TIME
Corrective Action Steps to Complete Document plan for implementing C/A
Implement Containment Action
Implement the Corrective Actions
Remove the Containment Actions
Verify the Corrective Actions Overtime
V- Verify Corrective Actions
Your Guide in verification 1. Are SOLUTIONS and not PATCHES 2. Are Doable and Time-bounded
3. Will not introduce a new problem or effect
Verify Effectiveness
3 Steps in Verifying Effectiveness 1. The “after” condition eliminates the problem. 2. There is a difference between the “before” and “after” condition. 3. The “after” condition does not create another effect
PROBLEM SOLVING FAILURE
•
Jumping to conclusion
•
Failure to define problem
•
Failure to find the root cause
•
Weak problem solving
•
No execution of corrective action
PROBLEM SOLVING SUCCESS -
Problem is clearly defined. Problem is accepted As an opportunity/challenge to improve - True root cause is found - Implemented an effective and irreversible corrective and preventive action - - Problem did not re-occur
PROBLEM SOLVING SUCCESS Action Reflection -
Which principle or technique will I apply $$$when I get right away back to work?
Your Guide to Conformance • Say what you do – Document the system
• Do what you say – Implement the system
• Prove it – Demonstrate implementation
Use our Standard Form
PREVENTIVE ACTION
PA INITIATIVES The PA initiative may be derived from sources such as: •
Lessons learned USING BENCHMARKING
•
Lessons learned from any other performance issues.
•
Review of preventive/predictive maintenance data records.
•
Analysis of defect trends and outlier fallouts.
•
Lessons learned from actual field failures and customer COMPLAINTS
Preventive Action Process Flow 1. Identify an Opportunity/Initiative based on gathered information, -define the success criteria Control Chart
Day3
Day5
Day1
Day2
Bent Lead
3
0
2
2
9
Damaged Leads
2
0
4
2
5
1
Joggled Leads
0
0
9
0
2
7
Defects
Day4
Day6 4
Wrong symbol
4
3
15
0
1
2
Mixed device
5
5
5
8
7
0
Chipped package
0
5
0
9
1
1
Illegible symbol
2
0
3
2
0
1
15
Scrap
Rework 10
Check Sheets
5
0 21 1
3
5
7
9 11 13 15
17 19
23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45
Histogram
Pareto Diagram
Scatter Diagrams
Preventive Action Process Flow 2. Identify an Opportunity based on gathered information - Root cause Analysis considers the potential problem and its future risk - Use error-proofing actions whenever possible - Consider resource needs and costs
3. Identify and Implement Preventive Actions - Verify effectiveness of PA - Document actions into specs, Engineering designs etc. - Confirm that the success criteria was met - did the performance metric improve? - plan to fan-out- create the implementation timeline/roadmap chart
SUMMARY Symptom
Problem (Is & Is Not)
X
What ? Where ? When ? How Big ?
Preventive Actions What about ...
Corrective Actions Occur Cause
Containment
Root Cause
Escape Cause Occur Cause
Escape Cause
Created by: Sid Calayag – Lead Auditor for Taikisha Phils., Inc Quality Management System
Presented by: Sid Calayag “Sorry I don’t accept donation” “I only did it for the love of my company” But CASH is still acceptable if you will not tell anybody about it …”
By: Anonymous
End of Presentation