Review 7

  • Uploaded by: gbland
  • 0
  • 0
  • October 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Review 7 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 208
  • Pages: 7
Review 7 Gongjun Yan

Homework • Homework: uniqueness quantifier • ! P(x) = “there exists a unique x such that P(x) is true” • P59 10.h • x !y f(x,y) • Page 37 • P59 12.L • x y (x!=y^ c(x,y) ^c(y,x)) • P49 46 • P73 10.c

P73 10.e

Variants of Quantified Conditional Statements • Statement: x  D, P(x)  Q(x) • Contrapositive: x  D, ~Q(x)  ~P(x) • Converse: x  D, Q(x)  P(x) • Inverse: x  D, ~P(x)  ~Q(x) • Same logical variants apply to existentially quantified conditional statements

18 September 2008

Introduction & Propositional Logic

4

Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements Universal Modus Ponens

Universal Modus Tollens

x  D, P(x) Q(x) P(a) aD  Q(a) Universal Instantiation

x  D, P(x) aD  P(a) 18 September 2008

x  D, P(x) Q(x) ~Q(a) aD  ~P(a) Existential Generalization

P(c) cD  x  D, P(x) Predicate Calculus

5

Errors in Decution • Existential Modus Ponens - Doesn't exist • Existential Modus Tollens - Doesn't exist

Inverse Error

xD, P(x)  Q(x) ~P(a)  ~Q(a) • Converse Error: xD, P(x)  Q(x) Q(a) P(a)

Concept • Variants of Quantified Conditional Statements • Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements

Related Documents

Review 7
October 2019 25
Unit 7 Test Review
November 2019 17
Quiz Review Week 7
October 2019 21
Review Units 7 - 9
November 2019 14

More Documents from ""

Review%201
October 2019 25
Taylor's Philosophy Excerpts
November 2019 21
Generation We
November 2019 21
Rachels Philosophy Overview
November 2019 20