Research Ethics Assignment Mamta.docx

Research Ethics and Nuances of Plagiarism Plagiarism is claiming someone else’s ideas as yours own. It is an act or instance of using or closely imitating the language and thoughts of another author without authorization and the representation of that author’s work as one’s own, as by not crediting the original author. The following ways of taking information from others would be considered plagiarism: 1. Not providing reference when we have used other’s idea in our work. 2. No use of quotation mark seven if we provide the reference. 3. Taking a few sentences or paragraph from other’s work without referencing. Plagiarism comes in several forms and types: there is intentional and unintentional plagiarism, self-plagiarism and collusion. Ultimately, they are all wrong and considered unlawful and will lead to severe consequences irrespective of whether or not you planned to plagiarize. Every institution will have a policy and guidelines on how plagiarism is dealt with, and often the actual consequences depend on individual cases. In order to maintain academic honesty, the author to avoid plagiarism in his/her writing. The writer needs to consult various sources which needs to be properly citied and referenced. Proper citing would avoid plagiarism, and it would show respect to the ideas and content of others.

When one writes a research paper one must follow research ethics incorporating it with ethics of plagiarism to form a strong and relevant paper. Research of any sort is done to guide actions. Ethics are needed to ensure that research results are true and are used properly. Research ethics are the set of ethical considerations a research team has to consider while conducting research. They are in place to protect the participants of a study from physical, psychological or

social harm through participation in the study. There are three main pillars of ethical research with a lot more minutiae in between.

The first is to maintain confidentiality which means that all the identifying information must be kept confidential and private and that individual should feel confident that no one else will know of their participation in the study. The second is to limit harm which refers to that first and foremost you must do no harm to that individual. And the last one is concerned with the transparency which refers to the fact that you can’t outwardly lie to participants about what the study is about.

There are two types of authors who have plagiarism in their manuscripts. The first type is the direct plagiarizing that the author would plagiarize by duplicating another author’s text exactly and pretending as his/her own work. It is commonly known as copy-pasting in word processing applications. The second type is about authors who plagiarize unconsciously. There are many factors which may cause these problems. Some of these factors are as follows: 1) Uncited Ideas & Concepts: Scholars are used to read many articles to improve other methodologies in order to deliver a contribution in science. Using other researcher’s idea is considered as plagiarism unless his/her research article would be cited properly in the manuscript. 2) Accidental Similarity: The next factor is when the text of the author has been closely similar to another author’s by chance. When an idea or a sentence is as usual as everybody uses in their own text, it might be possible that a sentence or a concept would be recognized as plagiarism in plagiarism detection systems.

3) Fixed Definitions: At almost all sciences, there are fixed definitions which authors write and cite them, and modification would make them a change or twist the meaning. 4) Cross-Text Plagiarism (Text Recycling): A piece of writing consists of several parts such as Introduction,Body and Conclusion. These parts are dependent on the manuscript goals, applications and styles. However, they might have more sections including Abstract, Evaluation, etc. Sometimes, authors need to repeat some concepts in various parts of the text. 5) Self-Plagiarism (Similarity): Researchers might publish more than one article from their own research. Even though they are different, they have many similarities in different sections of the articles.

Drawing upon previously established ideas and values and adding pertinent information in paper are necessary steps, but these need to be done with caution without failing into the trap of plagiarism. It is thus imperative for researchers to increase their understanding about plagiarism. In some cultures, academic traditions and nuances may not insist on authentication by citing the source of words and ideas. However, this form of validation is a prerequisite in the global academic code of conduct. The digital age too affects plagiarism. Researchers have easy access to material and data on the internet which makes it easy to copy and paste information. collaboration.

It may be laborious for teenagers who have grown up in a web “copy, paste” culture to envision plagiarism as a moral issue. Somewhat amazingly, it’s not only struggling students who plagiarize3: indeed, it may be students who are under pressure to achieve who are more likely to

engage in the subtler forms of plagiarism. Researchers have found 3 things where this can be most likely: once students are struggling (such as one’s work should be finished in a decent point of time, or a work is particularly vital for his or her grades); once students are not fascinated by the work; and once students feel that the assignment is unfair to the purpose where they need no hope of success while not cheating.

References 1. Educational Technology in Teaching and Learning: Prospects and Challenges, Publisher: Patna Women's College, Editors: Doris D'Souza, Upasana Singh, Durga Sharma, Prabhas Ranjan, pp.30-37 2. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm 3. Academy/how-to-avoid-plagiarism-in-research-papers. 4. Daniels

Fund

Ethics

Initiative,

University

of

5.www.ccsenet.org/ies International Education Studies Vol. 7, No. 7; 2014

New

Mexico