Reliability Analysis Of Shear Strength Of A Rcc

  • Uploaded by: truenotesrakesh
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Reliability Analysis Of Shear Strength Of A Rcc as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 355
  • Pages: 9
Reliability analysis of Shear Strength of a RCC beam by Hasofer Lind Method by

Rakesh Kumar S 3rd semester M.E(Structures)

Under the guidance of

Dr V Devaraj Professor UVCE Bangalore University Bangalore

introduction 

The evaluation of safety of a structure is a task of much importance.



The performance of any structure is assessed by its safety, serviceability and economy.



Input variables are never certain, precise and complete.



Shear Strength of the beam is one of the phenomenon which may be at risk.



Evaluation of this risk is done by Reliability Analysis.

Procedure  

FIRST STEP Collection of available data of the problem;



In this case,

     

       

breadth, B =150mm depth, D =450 mm length, L=6000mm live load, Q=4KN shear strength, =95N/sq mm

Limit state function 

Limit state of shear

   

as defined in I.S 456.



Load and resistance models 

Resistance =

  

Load =

g(x) =

Reliability analysis Hasofer Lind method is selected for reliability analysis.  1) = 115.15 N/ sq mm  = 242.1 mm  = 473.7 mm  = 3637 N 2)The basic variables are normalized.  Z= 3) Write the limit state function in terms of normalized co-ordinate system.  g(z1,z2,……,Zn)=0 for computational purpose 4)Select a value for and values for 



=1.

Start the iteration. Calculate the new value of  using the equation =  Calculate  k= 



Determine the values of

 

With these new values, start the new iteration.  Iterations are continued until the last two results of iterations matches within unacceptable errors. 

Results and discussions Results are compared with the Standard values.  For strength above 3 is safe.  For serviceability above 2.2 is safe.  For the problem, the result obtained after 8 iterations is 5.71, and it is safe. 

conclusions 

THE RELIABILITY INDEX OBTAINED IS 5.71 , WHICH IS SAFE.





DESIGNS MADE UNDER THE CODE AND OTHER STANDARD PROVISIONS ARE UNECONOMICAL RATHER MORE SAFE.

Related Documents


More Documents from ""