Rdbms

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Rdbms as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 4,930
  • Pages: 142
2

Introduction to Database Management Systems (DBMS)

Database Management System (DBMS) Definitions: 



Data: Known facts that can be recorded and that have implicit meaning Database: Collection of related data 



Ex. the names, telephone numbers and addresses of all the people you know

Database Management System:

4

DBMS (Contd.) 



Goals of a Database Management System: 

To provide an efficient as well as convenient environment for accessing data in a database



Enforce information security: database security, concurrence control, crash recovery

It is a general purpose facility 5

Benefits of database approach       

Redundancy can be reduced Inconsistency can be avoided Data can be shared Standards can be enforced Security restrictions can be applied Integrity can be maintained Data independence can be provided

6

DBMS Functions      

Data Definition Data Manipulation Data Security and Integrity Data Recovery and Concurrency Data Dictionary Performance

7

Database System Users

DATABASE

Application Programs/Queries

SYSTEM DBMS Software

Software to process queries/programs Software to access stored data

Stored Data Defn. (META-DATA).

Stored Database

8

Database System Application program query Q2

Compiled query Q2

user query Q1

Database scheme

Query processor

DDL compiler

Database manager

Database description

File manager

Physical database

9

Data Model 



A set of concepts used to describe the structure of a database By structure, we mean the data types, relationships, and constraints that should holds for theofdata Categories Data Models

Conceptua l

Physical

Representation al 10

Database Architecture External level (individual user views) Conceptual level (community user view)

Internal level (storage view) Database

11

An example of the three levels SNo FName LName

Age

Salary

Conceptual View SNo FName LName

Age

External View1

SNo LName BranchNo External View2

Salary

BranchNo struct STAFF { Internal int staffNo; View int branchNo; char fName[15]; char lName[15]; struct date dateOfBirth; float salary; struct STAFF *next; /* pointer to next Staff record */ }; index staffNo; index branchNo; /* define indexes for staff */

12

Schema 



Schema: Description of data in terms of a data model Three-level DB Architecture defines following schemas: 

External Schema (or sub-schema) 



Conceptual Schema (or schema) 



Written using external DDL Written using conceptual DDL

Internal Schema 

Written using internal DDL or storage structure definition

13

Data Independence 

Change the schema at one level of a database system without a need to change the schema at the next higher level 

Logical data independence: Refers to the immunity of the external schemas to changes in the conceptual schema e.g., add new record or field



Physical data independence: Refers to the immunity of the conceptual schema

14

TYPES OF DATABASE MODELS HIERARCHICAL

NETWORK

COLUMN

ROW

VALUE

TABLE

RELATIONAL 15

DATABASE DESIGN PHASES DATA ANALYSIS

Entities - Attributes - Relationships - Integrity Rules

LOGICAL DESIGN Tables - Columns - Primary Keys - Foreign Keys

PHYSICAL DESIGN DDL for Tablespaces, Tables, Indexes

16

Introduction to Relational Databases: RDBMS

Definition : RDBMS 

It is a system in which, at a minimum : 

The data is perceived by the user as tables ( and nothing but tables ); and



The operators at the user’s disposal e.g., for data retrieval - are operators that generate new tables from old, and those include at least SELECT, PROJECT,18

Features of an RDBMS 

 



The ability to create multiple relations (tables) and enter data into them An interactive query language Retrieval of information stored in more than one table Provides a Catalog or Dictionary, which itself consists of tables ( called system tables ) 19

Some Important Terms 

Relation : a table



Tuple : a row in a table



Attribute : a Column in a table



Degree : number of attributes



Cardinality : number of tuples



Primary Key : a unique identifier for the table



Domain : a pool of values from which

20

Properties of Relations (Tables) 

There are no duplicate rows (tuples)



Tuples are unordered, top to bottom



Attributes are unordered, left to right



All attribute values are atomic ( or scalar )



Relational databases do not allow repeating groups

21

Keys 

Key



Super Key



Candidate Keys





Primary Key



Alternate Key

Secondary Keys 22

Keys and Referential Integrity Enrolled sid 53666 53688 53650 53666

cid grade carnatic101 C reggae203 B topology112 A history105 B

Foreign key referring to sid of STUDENT relation

Student sid

name

login

age

gpa

53666 Jones

Jones@cs

18

3.4

53688 Smith

Smith@eecs

18

3.2

53650 Smith

Smith@math

19

3.8

Primary key

23

24

Relational Algebra

Relational Query Languages 





Query languages: Allow manipulation and retrieval of data from a database. Relational model supports simple, powerful QLs:  Strong formal foundation based on logic.  Allows for much optimization. Query Languages != programming languages!

26

Example Instances R1

sid

bid

day

22

101

10/10/99

58

103

11/12/99

S1

sid

sname

rating

age

22

Deepa

7

45.0

31

Laxmi

8

55.5

58

Roopa

10

35.0

S2

sid

sname

rating

age

28

Yamuna

9

35.0

31

Laxmi

8

55.5

44

Geeta

5

35.0

58

Roopa

10

35.0 27

Relational Algebra 

Basic operations:     

Selection (σ ) Projection (π) Cross- product ( Χ) Set- difference ( –) Union (∪ )

28

Projection sname

rating

Yamuna

9

Laxmi

8

Geeta

5

Roopa

10

π sname, rating(S2)

age 35.0 55.5

π age(S2) 29

Selection sid

sname

rating

age

28

Yamuna

9

35.0

58

Roopa

10

35.0

sname

rating

Yamuna

9

Roopa

10

σ rating > 8(S2)

π sname, rating(S2) (σ rating > 8(S2))

30

Union, Intersection, Set Difference sid

sname

rating

age

22

Deepa

7

45.0

31

Laxmi

8

55.5

58

Roopa

10

35.0

44

Geeta

5

35.0

28

Yamuna

9

35.0

sid

sname

rating

age

31

Laxmi

8

55.5

58

Roopa

10

35.0

sid

sname

rating

age

22

Deepa

7

45.0

S1 ∪ S2

S1 ∩ S2 S1 − S2 31

Cross- Product (sid)

sname

rating

age

(sid)

bid

day

22

Deepa

7

45.0

22

101

10/10/99

22

Deepa

7

45.0

58

103

11/12/99

31

Laxmi

8

55.5

22

101

10/10/99

31

Laxmi

8

55.5

58

103

11/12/99

58

Roopa

10

35.0

22

101

10/10/99

58

Roopa

10

35.0

58

103

11/12/99

32

Joins Condition Join : (sid)

sname

rating

age

(sid)

bid

day

22

Deepa

7

45.0

22

101

10/10/99

31

Laxmi

8

55.5

58

103

11/12/99

33

Equi-Join

(sid)

sname

rating

age

bid

day

22

Deepa

7

45.0

101

10/10/99

58

Roopa

10

35.0

103

11/12/99

34

Division •Not supported as a primitive operator, but useful for expressing queries like: •Find sailors who have reserved all boats . A

sno s1 s1 s1 s1 s2 s2 s3 s4 s4

pno p1 p2 p3 p4 p1 p2 p2 p2 p4

pno p2 B1 sno s1 s2 s3 s4 A/B1

pno p2 p4

pno

B2

p4

sno

p1 p2

B3

s1

sno

s4

s1

A/B2

A/B3 35

36

Introduction to Query Optimization

Processing A Highlevel Query Query in a high level language SCANING, PARSING AND VALIDATING Intermediate form of query QUERY OPTIMIZER Execution plan QUERY CODE GENERATOR

Typical steps when processing a high level query.

Code to execute the query RUNTIME DATABASE PROCESSOR

Result of query

38

Two Main Techniques for Query Optimization  Heuristic Rules: A heuristic is a rule that works well in most of cases, but not always. General Idea: Many different relational algebra expressions (and thus query trees) are equivalent.  Transform the initial query tree of a query into an equivalent final query tree that is efficient to execute. 



Cost based query optimization 39

Motivating Example select * from R1, R2, R3 where R1.r2no=R2.r2no and R2.r3no=R3.r3no and R1.a=5000

SS(R2)

NLJ

NLJ

SS(R1, “a=5000”)

SS(R3)

40

Alternative Plans 1(No Indexes) select * from R1, R2, R3 where R1.r2no=R2.r2no and R2.r3no=R3.r3no and R1.a=5000

SS(R1, “a=5000”)

NLJ

NLJ

SS(R3)

SS(R2)

41

Alternative Plans 2 (With Indexes) select * from R1, R2, R3 where R1.r2no=R2.r2no and R2.r3no=R3.r3no and R1.a=5000

IS(R1, “a=5000”)

NLJ

NLJ

SS(R3)

SS(R2)

42

43

Conceptual Design Using the EntityRelationship Model

Overview of Database Design 

Conceptual design : (ER Model is used at this stage.)



Schema Refinement : (Normalization)



Physical Database Design and Tuning

45

E R Modeling  

Conceptual Schema Design Relational Calculus - Formal Language for Relational D/B. Relational Calculus

Predicate Calculus

Domain Calculus

SQL / Tuple Based

Query By Examples 46

Design Phases… Requirements Collection & Analysis Data Requirements

Functional Requirements User Defined Operations Data Flow Diagrams Sequence Diagrams, Scenarios

Conceptual Design Entity Types, Constraints , Relationships No Implementation Details.

Logical Design

Ensures Requirements Meets the Design

Data Model Mapping – Type of Database is identified Physical Design Internal Storage Structures / Access Path / File Organizations 47

E-R Modeling 

Entity 



Entity Set 



a group of similar entities

Attribute 



is anything that exists and is distinguishable

properties that describe an entity

Relationship 

an association between entities

48

Notations ENTITY TYPE ( REGULAR )

WEAK ENTITY TYPE RELATIONSHIP TYPE

WEAK RELATIONSHIP TYPE

49

Entity Attributes ssn

name

Employee

lot

SSN NAME 123- 22- 3666Attishoo 231- 31- 5368Smiley 131- 24- 3650Smethurst

LOT 48 22 35

Entity Set CREATE TABLE Employees (ssn CHAR (11), name CHAR (20), lot INTEGER, PRIMARY KEY (ssn)) 50

Types of Relationships 1

1:1

student

1:M

students

M

M:M

students

M

Is issued

enrols in

take

1

ID card

1

course

M

tests

51

ER Model ssn

name

Employee supervisor

lot

since

Works_in

did

dname

budget

Department

Subordinate

Reports_To

52

ER Model (Contd.) Works_ In SSN 123-22-3666 123-22-3666 231-31-5368

DID 51 56 51

SINCE 1/1/91 3/3/93 2/2/92

CREATE TABLE Works_ In( ssn CHAR (11), did INTEGER, since DATE, PRIMARY KEY (ssn, did), FOREIGN KEY (ssn) REFERENCES Employees, FOREIGN KEY (did) REFERENCES Departments) 53

Key Constraints

ssn

name

Employee

lot

since

Manages

did

dname

budget

Department

54

Key Constraints for Ternary Relationships

ssn

lot

name

Employee

since

Works_in

did

dname budget Department

Location address

capacity

55

Participation Constraints ssn

name

Employee

lot

since

Manages

did

dname

budget

Department

Works_in since 56

Weak Entities ssn

name

Employee

lot

cost

policy

pname

age

Dependent

57

ISA (‘is a’) Hierarchies ssn

name

lot

Employee Hrly_wages Hrs_worked

Hourly_Emp

IsA

contractid Contract_Emp 58

Aggregation ssn

name

lot

Employee monitors

pid

pbudget

project

Started on

sponsors

until

did

dname budget

department 59

Entity vs. Attribute Works_ In does not allow an employee to work in a department for two or more periods (why?)

ssn

name

Employee

lot

from

to

Works_in

did

dname

budget

Department

60

Entity vs. Attribute (Contd.)

ssn

lot

name

Employee

from

did

Works_in

Duration

dname

budget

Department

to

61

Entity vs. Relationship

ssn

name

lot

Employee

since

DB

manages

did

dname

budget

Department

DB - Dbudget

62

Entity vs. Relationship ssn

name

Employee

lot

did

manages

dname

budget

Department

since Appt num

Mgr_appt DBudget 63

Binary vs. Ternary Relationships

ssn

lot

name

Employee

pname

age

Dependent

covers Policy

policyid

cost 64

Binary vs. Ternary Relationships Better Design ssn

name

lot

pname

Dependent

Employee

Beneficiary

purchaser

policyid

age

Policy

cost 65

Constraints Beyond the ER Model • Some constraints cannot be captured in ER diagrams: • Functional dependencies • Inclusion dependencies • General constraints

66

E-R Diagram DEPARTMENT 1 SUPPLIER DEPT_ EMP M

M M

PROJ_ WORK

M PROJECT

EMPLOYEE 1

M

M

1

PROJ_ MGR

M

DEPENDENT

SUPP_ PART

M

EMP_ DEP M

SUPP_ PART_ PROJ

PART M

M M

PART_ STRUC TURE

67

Example to Start with …. 

An Example Database Application called COMPANY which serves to illustrate the ER Model concepts and their schema design. The following are collection from the Client.

68

Analysis… 

Company : Organized into Departments, Each Department has a name, no and manager who manages the department. The Company keeps track of the date that employee managing the department. A Department may have a Several locations. 69

Analysis… 



Department : A Department controls a number of Projects each of which has a unique name , no and a single Location. Employee : Name, Age, Gender, BirthDate, SSN, Address, Salary. An Employee is assigned to one department, may work on several projects which are not controlled by the department. Track of the number of hours per week is also controlled. 70

Analysis…. 

Keep track of the dependents of each employee for insurance policies : We keep each dependant first name, gender, Date of birth and relationship to the employee.

71

Now to our Company… DEPARTMENT ( Name , Number , { Locations } , Manager, Start Date ) PROJECT ( Name, Number, Location , Controlling Department ) EMPLOYEE (Name (Fname, Lname) , SSN , Gender, Address, Salary Birthdate, Department , Supervisor , (Workson ( Project , Hrs)) DEPENDENT ( Employee, Name, Gender, Birthdate , Relationship )

72

Example … 

Manage:   



Department and Employee Partial Participation Relation Attribute : StartDate.

Works For:  

Department and Employee Total Participation

73

Example… 

Control : Department , Project  Partial Participation from Department  Total Participation from Project  Control Department is a RKA. 



Supervisor : Employee, Employee  Partial and Recursive 

74

Example … 

Works – On : Project , Employee  Total Participation  Hours Worked is a RKA. 



Dependants of: Employee , Dependant  Dependant is a Weaker  Dependant is Total , Employee is Partial. 

75

One Possible mapping of the Problem Statement Name No

Lname Fname

Work s For

Sal Sex

Loc

Department

SSN

Name Employee

Sdate

Address

Control s

manage s

Bdate Hours

Project

Work sOn

Supe rvise s

Name

Loc

No

Depend On Dependent Name

Sex

Bdate

Relationship 76

77

78

79

80

Schema Refinement and Normalization

Normalization and Normal Forms



Normalization:

Decomposing a larger, complex table into several smaller, simpler ones.  Move from a lower normal form to a higher Normal form. 



Normal Forms: First Normal Form (1NF)  Second Normal Form (2NF)  Third Normal Form (3NF)  *Higher Normal Forms (BCNF, 4NF, 5NF ....) 



In practice, 3NF is often good enough. 82

Why Normal Forms 

The first question to ask is whether any refinement is needed!



If a relation is in a certain normal form (BCNF, 3NF etc.), it is known that certain kinds of problems are avoided/ minimized. This can be used to help us decide whether decomposing the relation will help. 83

The Evils of Redundancy 



 

Redundancy is at the root of several problems associated with relational schemas More seriously, data redundancy causes several anomalies: insert, update, delete Wastage of storage. Main refinement technique: decomposition (replacing ABCD with, say, AB and BCD, or ACD and ABD).

84

Refining an ER Diagram Before ssn

name

Employee

lot

since

Works_in

did

dname

budget

Department

85

Refining an ER Diagram After ssn

name

since

did

dname

budget lot

Employee

Works_in

Department

86

First Normal Form 

A table is in 1NF, if every row contains exactly one value for each attribute.



Disallow multivalued attributes, composite attributes and their combinations.



1NF states that : 

domains of attributes must include only atomic (simple, indivisible) values and that value of any attribute in a tuple must be a single value from the domain of that

87

Functional Dependencies (FDs) 

Provide a formal mechanism to express constraints between attributes



Given a relation R, attribute Y of R is functionally dependent on the attribute X of R if & only if each Xvalue in R has associated with it precisely one Y-value in R. 88

Full Dependency 

Concept of full functional dependency 

A FD x → y is a full functional dependency if removal of any attribute A from X means that the dependency does not hold any more.

89

Partial Dependency 

An F.D. x → y is a partial dependency if there is some attribute A ∈ X that can be removed from X and the dependency will still hold.

90

Example: Constraints on Entity Set S N 123- 22- 3666 Attishoo 231- 31- 5368 Smiley 131- 24- 3650 Smethurst 434- 26- 3751 Guldu 612- 67- 4134 Madayan

S N 123- 22- 3666 Attishoo 231- 31- 5368 Smiley 131- 24- 3650 Smethurst 434- 26- 3751 Guldu 612- 67- 4134 Madayan

L 48 22 35 35 35

H 40 30 30 32 40

L 48 22 35 35 35

R 8 8 5 5 8

R 8 8 5 5 8

W 10 10 7 7 10

H 40 30 30 32 40

R W 5 7 8 10

91

Second Normal Form (2NF) 

A relation schema R is in 2NF if: 

it is in 1NF and



every non-prime attribute A in R is fully functionally dependent on the primary key of R.



2NF prohibits partial dependencies.

92

2NF: An Example 





Emp{Eno, Dept, ProjCode, Hours} 

Primary key: {Eno, ProjCode}



{Eno} -> {Dept}, {Eno, ProjCode} -> {Hours}

Test of 2NF 

{Eno} -> {Dept}: partial dependency.



Emp is in 1NF, but not in 2NF.

Decomposition: 

Emp {Eno, Dept}

93

Transitive Dependency 

An FD X → Y in a relation schema R is a transitive dependency if 

there is a set of attributes Z that is not a subset of any key of R, and



both X → Z and Z → Y hold.

94

Third Normal Form 

A relation schema R is in 3NF if 

It is in 2NF and



No nonprime attribute of R is transitively dependent on the primary key.



3NF means that each non-key attribute value in any tuple is truly dependent on the Primary Key and not even partially on other attributes.



3NF prohibits transitive

95

3NF: An Example 

Emp{Eno, Dept, Dept_Head} Primary key: {Eno}  {Eno} -> {Dept}, {Dept} -> {Dept_Head} 



Test of 3NF {Eno} -> {Dept} -> {Dept_Head}: Transitive dependency.  Emp is in 2NF, but not in 3NF. 



Decomposition: Emp {Eno, Dept}  Dept {Dept, Dept_Head} 

96

Boyce –Codd Normal Form 

The intention of BCNF is that- 3NF does not satisfactorily handle the case of a relation processing two or more composite or overlapping candidate keys

97

BCNF ( Boyce Codd Normal Form) 

A Relation is said to be in Boyce Codd Normal Form (BCNF) if and only if every determinant is a candidate key.

98

Decomposition of a Relation Scheme 

Suppose that relation R contains attributes A1 ... An. A decomposition of R consists of replacing R by two or more relations such that: Each new relation scheme contains a subset of the attributes of R (and no attributes that do not appear in R), and  Every attribute of R appears as an attribute of one of the new relations. 

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

Transaction, Concurrency Control and Recovery

Transaction 

A sequence of many actions which are considered to be one atomic unit of work. 



Governed by four ACID properties: 



Read, write, commit, abort Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability

Has a unique starting point, some actions and one end point 108

The ACID Properties  





A tomicity: All actions in the transaction happen, or none happen. C onsistency: If each transaction is consistent, and the DB starts consistent, it ends up consistent. I solation: Execution of one transaction is isolated from that of other transactions. D urability: If a transaction commits, its effects persist. 109

Automicity 

 

All-or-nothing, no partial results. An event either happens and is committed or fails and is rolled back.  e.g. in a money transfer, debit one account, credit the other. Either both debiting and crediting operations succeed, or neither of them do.  Transaction failure is called Abort Commit and abort are irrevocable actions. There is no undo for these actions. An Abort undoes operations that have already been executed  For database operations, restore the data’s previous value from before the transaction (Rollback-it); a Rollback command will undo all actions taken since the last commit for that110

Consistency 





Every transaction should maintain DB consistency  Referential integrity - e.g. each order references an existing customer number and existing part numbers  The books balance (debits = credits, assets = liabilities) Consistency preservation is a property of a transaction, not of the database mechanisms for controlling it (unlike the A, I, and D of ACID) If each transaction maintains consistency,111

Isolation

Intuitively, the effect of a set of transactions should be the same as if they ran independently.  Formally, an interleaved execution of transactions is serializable if its effect is equivalent to a serial one.  Implies a user view where the system runs each user’s transaction stand-alone.  Of course, transactions in fact run with lots of concurrency, to use device parallelism – this will be covered later.  Transactions can use common data (shared data)  They can use the same data processing 112

Durability 

 

When a transaction commits, its results will survive failures (e.g. of the application, OS, DB system … even of the disk). Makes it possible for a transaction to be a legal contract. Implementation is usually via a log  DB system writes all transaction updates to a log file  to commit, it adds a record “commit(Ti)” to the log  when the commit record is on disk, the transaction is committed. 113

Transaction processing Can be automatic (controlled by the RDBMS) or programmatic (programmed using SQL or other supported programming languages, like PL/SQL)

114

Why Have Concurrent Processes?   

Better transaction throughput Improved response time Done via better utilization of resources: 

While one processes is doing a disk read, another can be using the CPU or reading another disk.

115

Typical situations requiring concurrency control 





Exclusive access to an external device or shared service (e.g., managing printer queues) Coordination of applications which process parallel data (e.g. parallel DB servers) Disabling or enabling execution of the client programs in a specific moment (typically for database administration - e.g. database backups, enforcing resource occupation, etc.)

116

Problems with Concurrency (in absence of locking) Lost Update problem - losing values due to intervention of write operation from other overlapping transactions  Temporary Update problem discarding previous changes made by overlapping transaction after rollback  Incorrect Summary problem overwriting of certain values used for calculation by write operations from other transactions 

117

Lost Update Problem Transaction A Start A

Value

T1

Read Value (6)

6

Start B

T2

Add 2 (6+2=8)

6

Read Value (6)

T3

Write Value (8) End A

8

Add 3 (6+3=9) Write Value (9) End B

Time T0

T4 T5

Transaction B

6

9 9



What should the final Order Value be?



Which Update has been lost? 118

Temporary Update Problem Time

Transaction A

Value

T0

Start A

6

T1

Read Value (6)

6

T2

Add 2 (8)

6

T3

8

T5

Write Value (8) Failure: Rollback! Write Value (6)

T6

End A

11

T4

T5  

8 6

11

Transaction B

Start B Read Value (8) Add 3 (8+3=11) Write Value (11) End B

What should the final Order Value be? Where is the temporary update? 119

Incorrect Summary Problem Time T0

 

Transaction A st Read 1 Value (6)

Values

Transaction B

6 3

T1

Add 2 (6+2=8)

6 3

T2

Write 1st Value (8)

8 3

T3

Read 2nd Value (3)

8 3

Read 1st Value (8)

T4

Add 2 (3+2 = 5)

8 3

Read 2nd Value (3)

T5

Write 2 Value should(5) the total

8 5

Total Sum = 11

nd

What should the total Order Value be? Which order was accumulated before update, and which after? 120

t1

t2

3.1 Database State and Changes

State D1

State D2

T

D1, D2

- Logically consistent states of the database data

TTransaction for changing the database t1, t2 - Absolute time before and after the transaction

121

Progress A transaction reaches its commit point when all operations accessing the database are completed and the result has been recorded in the log. It then writes a [commit, ] and terminates. BEGIN

END active

READ , WRITE

partially committed ROLLBACK

COMMIT committed

ROLLBACK

aborted

terminated

When a system failure occurs, search the log file for entries [start, ] and if there are no logged entries [commit, ] then undo all operations that have logged entries [write, , X, old_value, new_value] 122

Schedules • Schedule: Actions of transactions as seen by the DBMS T1 R(A) W(A)

T2

R(B) W(B) R(C) W(C) 123

Serializable Schedule 

A schedule whose effect on the DB “state” is the same as that of some serial schedule



All serial schedules are serializable 

But the reverse may not be true

124

Serializability Violations Transfer Rs.10,000 from A to B

T1 R(A) W(A)

Database is inconsistent!

R(B) W(B) commit

Add 6% interest to A&B

T2

R(A) W(A) R(B) W(B) commit

125

Cascading Aborts T1 R(A) W(A)

T2

R(A) W(A) abort

126

Recoverable Schedules Unrecoverable Schedule

T1 R(A) W(A)

T2

R(A) W(A) commit abort

Recoverable Schedule

T1 R(A) W(A)

T2

R(A) W(A) commit commit 127

Locking 





 

The concept of locking data items is one of the main techniques for controlling the concurrent execution of transactions. A lock is a variable associated with a data item in the database.  Generally there is a lock for each data item in the database. A lock describes the status of the data item with respect to possible operations that can be applied to that item  used for synchronising the access by concurrent transactions to the database items. A transaction locks an object before using it When an object is locked by another transaction,128

Locking Granularity 



A database item which can be locked could be  a database record  a field value of a database record  the whole database Trade-offs  coarse granularity  the larger the data item size, the lower the degree of concurrency  fine granularity  the smaller the data item size, the more locks to be managed and stored, and the more lock/unlock operations needed. 129

Locking: A Technique for Concurrency Control

•Locks are automatically obtained by DBMS. •Guarantees serializability! Compatibility matrix for lock types X and S

-S X

-√ √ √

S √ √

X √

S: Shared lock X: Exclusive lock -- No lock

130

Two- Phase Locking (2PL) Strict 2PL: – If T wants to read an object, first obtains an S lock. – If T wants to modify an object, first obtains X lock. – Hold all locks until end of transaction. – Guarantees serializability, and recoverable schedule, too! also avoids WW problems! 2PL: – Slight variant of strict 2PL – transactions can release locks before the end (commit or abort) But after releasing any lock it can acquire no new locks

– Guarantees serializability 131

Handling a Lock Request Lock Request (XID, OID, Mode) Mode==X

Mode==S

Empty Wait Queue?

Currently Locked? No

Yes

Yes

Currently X-locked? No

Put on Queue

Yes No

Grant Lock 132

133

Recovery 

Occurs in case of transaction failures.



Database (DB) is restored to the most recent consistent state just before the time of failure.



To do this, the DB system needs information about changes applied by various transactions. It is the system log. 134

Recovery: Motivation crash T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 •Atomicity: Undoing actions of transaction that do not commit •Durability: Making sure all actions of committed transactions survive system crashes •The Recovery Manager guarantees Atomicity & Durability. 135

Recovery Outline 

Restore to most recent “consistent” state just before time of failure 



Use data in the log file

Catastrophic Failure Restore database from backup  Replay transactions from log file 



Database becomes inconsistent (noncatastrophic errors) 

Undo or Redo last transactions until consistent state is restored

136

Logging 

Record REDO and UNDO information, for every update, in a log. – Sequential writes to log (put it on a separate disk). – Minimal info (diff) written to log, so multiple updates fit in a single log page.

137

Handling the Buffer Pool • When is buffer written back to disk?

• Steal/No-steal Can it be written before commit? (steal) Or does it have to wait till after commit? (no-steal) • Force/No-force Is it written “immediately” after commit? (force) Or can it remain in memory? (no-force) NoSteal Steal Force Trivial NoForce

Desired 138

Write- Ahead Logging (WAL) 



The Write- Ahead Logging Protocol: 

Must force the log record for an update before the corresponding data page gets to disk.



Must write all log records for a transaction before commit .

What goes into log: 

BFIM needed for UNDO type algorithms



AFIM needed for REDO type algorithms

139

 





Checkpoints in the System Log

Checkpoint record written in log when all updated DB buffers written out to disk Any committed transaction occurring before checkpoint in log can be considered permanent (won’t have to be redone after crash) Actions  suspend execution of all transactions  force-write all modified buffers to disk  write checkpoint entry in log and force write log  resume transactions 140 Fuzzy checkpointing

141

142

Related Documents

Rdbms
November 2019 19
Rdbms
July 2020 8
Rdbms
November 2019 13
Rdbms Day5
November 2019 6
Rdbms Concepts
June 2020 3
Rdbms Fundamentals
November 2019 15