Power
The Four Components to a Statistical Conclusion Sample size The number of units (e.g., people) accessible to study Effect size The salience of the program relative to the noise Alpha level The odds the observed result is due to chance Power The odds you’ll observe a treatment effect when it occurs
The Four Components to a Statistical Conclusion Sample size Amount of information Effect size Salience of program Alpha level Willingness to risk Power Ability to see effect that’s there
The Effect Size Is a ratio of...
The Effect Size Is a ratio of...
Signal Noise
The Effect Size Is a ratio of...
Signal Noise
Difference between groups Standard error of the difference
Given Values for Any Three, You Can Compute the Fourth. ● ● ● ●
n = f(effect size, a, power) effect size = f(n, a, power) a = f(n, effect size, power) power = f(n, effect size, a)
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude
Null true Alternative false In reality... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Accept null Reject alternative We say... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
Null true Alternative false In reality... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Accept null Reject alternative We say... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
Null true Alternative false In reality... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
1-α THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is none # of times out of 100 when there is no effect, we’ll say there is none
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude
Reject null Accept alternative We say... • • •
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
Null true Alternative false In reality... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude
Reject null Accept alternative We say... • • •
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
Null true Alternative false In reality... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
α TYPE I ERROR The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is none # of times out of 100 when there is no effect, we’ll say there is one
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude
Null false Alternative true In reality... • • •
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Accept null Reject alternative We say... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
Null false Alternative true • • •
In reality...
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Accept null Reject alternative We say... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
Null false Alternative true • • •
In reality...
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
β TYPE II ERROR The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is one # of times out of 100 when there is an effect, we’ll say there is none
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude
Reject null Accept alternative We say... • • •
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
Null false Alternative true • • •
In reality...
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude
Reject null Accept alternative We say... • • •
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
Null false Alternative true • • •
In reality...
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
1-β POWER The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is one # of times out of 100 when there is an effect, we’ll say there is one
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Accept null Reject alternative We say... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
Reject null Accept alternative We say... • • •
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
Null false Alternative true
Null true Alternative false In reality... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
• • •
In reality...
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
1-α
β
THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL
TYPE II ERROR
The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is none
The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is one
# of times out of 100 when there is no effect, we’ll say there is none
# of times out of 100 when there is an effect, we’ll say there is none
α
1-β
TYPE I ERROR The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is none
POWER The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is one
# of times out of 100 when there is no effect, we’ll say there is one
# of times out of 100 when there is an effect, we’ll say there is one
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Accept null Reject alternative We say... • • •
Accept alternative We say...
• •
• • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
• • •
In reality...
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
1-α
β
THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL
TYPE II ERROR
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
Reject null
•
Null false Alternative true
Null true Alternative false In reality...
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
α
1-β
TYPE I ERROR
POWER
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Accept null Reject alternative We say...
Null false Alternative true
Null true Alternative false In reality... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
• • •
In reality...
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
1-α
β
THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL
TYPE II ERROR
CORRECT • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
Reject null Accept alternative We say... • • •
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
α
1-β
TYPE I ERROR
POWER CORRECT
The Decision Matrix In reality What we conclude Accept null Reject alternative We say... • • •
Accept alternative We say...
• •
• • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
• • •
In reality...
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
1-α
β
THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL
TYPE II ERROR
The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is none
The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is one
α
1-β
TYPE I ERROR The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is none
POWER The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is one
If you try to increase power, you increase the chance of winding up in the bottom # of times out of 100 when # of times out of 100 when is noof effect, we’ll sayI error. there is an effect, we’ll say rowthere and Type there is none there is none
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
Reject null
•
Null false Alternative true
Null true Alternative false In reality...
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
# of times out of 100 when there is no effect, we’ll say there is one
# of times out of 100 when there is an effect, we’ll say there is one
If you try to decrease Type I The errors, In you reality increase the chance Whatof winding up we in the top row conclude and of Type II Accept null Reject alternative error. We say... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
Reject null Accept alternative We say... • • •
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
Decision Matrix Null false Alternative true
Null true Alternative false In reality... • • •
There is no real program effect There is no difference, gain Our theory is wrong
• • •
In reality...
There is a real program effect There is a difference, gain Our theory is correct
1-α
β
THE CONFIDENCE LEVEL
TYPE II ERROR
The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is none
The odds of saying there is no effect or gain when in fact there is one
# of times out of 100 when there is no effect, we’ll say there is none
# of times out of 100 when there is an effect, we’ll say there is none
α
1-β
TYPE I ERROR The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is none
POWER The odds of saying there is an effect or gain when in fact there is one
# of times out of 100 when there is no effect, we’ll say there is one
# of times out of 100 when there is an effect, we’ll say there is one