Plasma Nanotechnology: from Microelectronics and Discovery of Carbon Nanotubes to Self-Organized Nanodevices and Safe Nanotech of the Future Kostya (Ken) Ostrikov CEO Science Leader, Director, Plasma Nanoscience Centre Australia (PNCA), CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering, and Honorary Professor, University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA
% of Total Papers published
5 out 25 top cited in NANO!!! 20
Plasma* AND Fusion* Plasma* AND Astro* Plasma* AND Dust* Plasma* AND Nano* Plasma* AND Chemistry*
16 12 8 4
area we work in 0
0
5
10
15
Year (from 1990)
is a multidisciplinary subfield at the cutting edge of plasma physics, nanoscience, surface science, astrophysics, materials science and engineering, and structural chemistry, which aims to elucidate specific roles and purposes of the plasma environment in assembling nano-things in natural, laboratory and technological situations and find ways to bring this plasmabased assembly to the deterministic level.
Some examples of lab-based highly-controlled synthesis of nanoscale objects
35-50 nm
Grand challenge Architecture and hierarchically arrange complex functional nanoscale objects in “streets”, “suburbs”, and “cities” and then reconnect them at the expected density of integration!
Electronic
Photonic
Bio-
Incident light Ag Islands Amorphous material
insulator Si
Scientific approach: “Architecture” – Order – Make uniform – Connect
Extremely difficult to do for very small nanostructures (e.g., QDs) Poor ordering …
Unpredictable shapes…
Uncontrollable behaviour …
REASON: LARGE (>100 nm) NANOPARTICLES ARE TRAPPED IN ANY STATE THEY WERE CREATED
SMALL (<10 nm) NANOPARTICLES RETURN TO EQUILIBRIUM SHAPE *
* at least to the next available metastable state closer to equilibrium
Solution
Non-equilibrium Nanoarchitectronics: APPROACH Operating under far from equilibrium conditions [using the laws of kinetics] Reaching the normally „unreachable‟ less stable states [be quick!] Tailoring the barriers [keep the structure!]
Low temperature plasmas: a unique non-equilibrium system N Electrons Neutral Gas Ions
0.025 eV
• • • •
2 eV
Energy, W 0
Electrons not in thermal equilibrium with the ions or neutrals High Te dissociates gas Low TG and T+ protects substrates Negative charge on surfaces protects them from high 10 electron energy
MORE UNIQUE FEATURES Te >> Ti > Tn
Nn >> Ni ~ Ne
Higher complexity system – good for self-organization (more effective driving forces)
Electric fields Long-range Coulomb interactions Polarization interactions PLASMA – COMMON Isotropic vs anisotropic pressure INDUSTRIAL TOOL Non-equilibrium cooling/heating ) Surface stresses due to ion bombardment Charge, termination etc. – control of surface energy Virtually unlimited choice of BUs and WUs Unusual chemical reactivity – plasma etching So, what can the plasma do for nanotech?
FOR STARTERS: CNTs DISCOVERED IN A PLASMA
Unique vertical alignment of CNTs! Neutral route
Plasma route
http://www.nano-lab.com/nanotube-image.html
Z. Ren et al Science 1998: vol. 282. no. 5391, pp. 1105 - 1107 .
Plasma (nano)etching – common industrial process!
PPAP 4, 612 (2007)
Highly-unusual metastable nanomaterials and nanophases
S. Komatsu, JPD, v. 40, 23 Apr 2007
Controlled delivery and redistribution of building units Control of surface energetics, diffusion, desorption, etc.
Ie+Ii
Us
Ie+Ii=0
ffloat
NON-Equilibrium heating and stress
eU s 3 / 4 3 / 4 T , kb Substrate heating due to ion flux, φ [ML/s]
Effective substrate temperature in presence of an ion flux: T + δT
ENABLING A DETERMINISTIC APPROACH
I. SHAPING
Non-equilibrium plasma turns things upside down No plasma (no H-termination)
Si cube is least stable, “unwanted” Effective H-termination
Single crystal, cubic shape silicon nanocrystals produced in a non-equilibrium plasma [U. Kortshagen et al., JNN 9, 39 (2007)]
Si cube is most stable, “wanted” A. B.
Barnard, P. Zapol, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 4276 (2004)
T. Hawa, M. R. Zachariah, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 14796 (2008)
Tailoring Si nanocones and nanopyramids in Ar + H2 plasma (S. Y. Huang, S. Xu, I. Levchenko, K. Ostrikov, 2009)
Si (100)
Si (111)
PV – collaboration with PSAC NIE/NTU [S. Xu et al.] What does this mean for PV solar cells?
0.02 0.015 0.01
0.04
0.03 0.025 0.02
0.009
0.015 0.01
0.10
0.15
Voltage (V)
0.20
0.04
0.000 0.25
0 0.00
0.019
0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02
0.009
0.015 0.01 0.005
0.005
0.05
Voc= 453 mV
0.019
0.035
0.005 0 0.00
Voc= 347 mV
Current (A/cm 2)
Current (A/cm 2)
0.03 0.025
Pseudo Light IV curve w ithout the effect of Rs
Power Density (W/cm2)
Voc= 116 mV
Current (A/cm 2)
0.035
Pseudo Light IV curve w ithout the effect of Rs
0.009
Power Density (W/cm2)
0.04
Power Density (W/cm2)
Pseudo Light IV curve w ithout the effect of Rs
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.000 0.40
Voltage (V)
Ar : H2=1 : 3; Ar : H2 = 9 : 1; Pin =1.5 kW; Pin= 2.0 kW; T = 300K, T = 300 K; t =30 min; t=30 min; Vb=0. Vb= - 50V
0 0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.000 0.50
Voltage (V)
Ar : H2 = 1 : 3; Pin = 2.0 kW; T = 300 K; t=30min; Vb= - 50V
Tailoring iron oxide nanowires and nanobelts [U. Cvelbar, K. Ostrikov, Crystal Growth Design 8, 4347 (2008)]
Challenge: controlling nanostructure shapes Solution: control by electric conditions on the surface [APL 94, 211502 (2009)]
Tailoring microplasma nanofabrication: from nanostructures to nanoarchitectures [Mariotti & Ostrikov, J. Phys D 42, 092002 (2009)]
II. ARRANGING
Predicting nucleation sites
[Levchenko, Cvelbar, Ostrikov (June 2009), submitted to APL]
Self-organization of Ni/Si nanodots under plasma exposure [APL 93, 183102 (2008)]
Simultaneous Ni catalyst saturation [I. Levchenko and K. Ostrikov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 (2008)]
Arrows show larger relative ion flux
More uniform CNT arrays !
3D self-organization– not the case in neutral gas processes [Carbon 45, 2022 (2007)] !!!
Self-organization near thermodynamic equilibrium leads to relatively simple geometries whereas self-organization far from equilibrium leads to more complex geometries [Whitesides and Grzbowski, Science 295, 2418 (2002)]
No plasma
With plasma
S. Y. Huang, J. D. Long, S. Xu, K. Ostrikov (2008): self-ordering of SiC nanoislands (electric ordering factors)
III. CONNECTING
Self-Organized Carbon Connections Between Ag Nanoparticles via Atmospheric Microplasma Synthesis [CARBON (Letters) 47, 344 (2009)]
Also: Si NPs and realistic surface processes. Carbon, in press (2009) doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.031
IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 36, 866 (2008)
This will eventually lead to … nanoarchitectured self-assembled nanoscale systems
applications
Links to other academic and industrial areas Materials Surface Quantum science science information Re‟new‟wable energy Photonics Plasma Life Nanophysics sciences science NanoAstrophysics electronics Chemistry OptoMedicine electronics Sensors Advanced Integrated Plasma materials circuitry medicine
Nanodevices
Bio-implants Nanotools
Lasers Coatings Electrochem. Environmental Plasmonic batteries remediation structures Chemical Solar cells Drug/gene LEDs synthesis delivery Catalysis Biomarkers
Applications: some examples “Self-organised” Nanoelectronics
Multipurpose CNTs
Optoelectronics/Photonics
Ultra-nanoporous materials
GAS SENSORS BIOIMPLANTS
E-mail:
[email protected]
PV – collaboration with PSAC NIE/NTU [S. Xu et al.] Plasmonic arrays
TCO µc-Si
Si thin film solar cell
PV SOLAR CELLS
Photo-active layers
Plasma control of nanostructured phases in nc-Si for PV solar cells [Cryst Growth Design 9, 2863 (2009); Nanotechnology 20, 215606 (2009); J. Mater. Chem. (2009) DOI: 10.1039/b904227j]
nc-Si : control of nanocrystalline phases, growth rates, and optical bandgap [Cryst Growth Design 9, 2863 (2009); Nanotechnology 20, 215606 (2009); J. Mater. Chem. (2009) DOI: 10.1039/b904227j] 100oC
Very high growth rates
0 – 86% cryst phase + bandgap control
200oC Amorph phase
Cryst phase
300oC
Also: 1) no hydrogen dilution possible! 2) excellent transmittance in optical range Onset of nanocrystallinity + nanophase control
Challenges, grand or small, all lead to breakthrough
Transforming matter by controlled surface hydrogenation (“what amazing things can the plasma do!”) D. C. Elias et al., Science 323, 610 (2009)
Levchenko, Ostrikov, Xu, JPhysD 42, 125207 (2009)
Hydrogenation of graphene (inert and conducting) in Ar + H2 DC plasma leads to graphane (dielectric) Image: A. Savchenko, Science 323, 589 (2009)
Big challenges: 1) Epitaxial self-assembled graphene 2) Precise control of surface energetics 3) Switch-over between TD and kinetic modes
A plasma knife can cut the nanotubes to create GNRs Ar plasma (~10s)
Graphene Nanoribbons (GNRs): L. Jiao et al. Nature 458, 877 (2009) Big challenges: 1) understanding ion-CNT interactions 2) How to make it precise and “gentle”?
Superhydrophobic a-C/CNT composites via ion bombardment [Han, Tay, Shakerzadeh, Ostrikov, APL 94, 223106 (2009)]
CA ~ 150 – 170o
Energetic (~1 kV) ions are focused by the CNTs, push the Ni catalyst particle down the channel and then create a-C “caps”. Water droplets are suspended and do not fall down the inter-CNT gaps. Array parameters do matter!
Plasma exposure of CNTs can even convert them into diamond – caution and understanding needed!
E. Aydil et al, Uni Minnesota (Gordon Res. Conf. 2008)
Control of SWCNTs
Remote PECVD, 90% H2 + 10% CH4, 15 mbar, 400-650oC; 0.5 nm Al / 0.5-1 nm Fe / 10 nm Al 70% purity (30% a-C) Metallic / Semicond = 1:2
Challenges: chirality control; selective elimination of metallic or semicond. J. Robertson et al. APL 93, 163911 (2008) tubes
Example of solution: burning metallic SWCNTs
M. Keidar et al., Carbon 44, 1022 (2006); K. Ostrikov and A. B. Murphy, J. Phys. D 40, 2223 (2007)
But how to select any particular chirality?
Solution: grow thinner SWCNTs much faster than others!
NEUTRAL CVD
PECVD
E. Tam and K. Ostrikov (June 2009); see also APL 93, 261504 (2008)
PECVD
NEUTRAL CVD
PECVD
Towards epitaxial graphene
High-pressure Ar atmosphere
Si sublimates leaving exfoliated graphene behind K.V. Emtsev et al. Nature Mater. 8 (2009) 203. Images: P. Sutter Nature Mater. 8 (2009) 171.
Control of Si sublimation through polarization effects: the ionization theory approach [Phys Lett A 373, 2267 (2009)]
Si atoms tend to diffuse and evaporate faster than C. Electric field/Polarizability – additional way to control!
GRAND CHALLENGES 1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
JSAP/NEDO Roadmap:Plasma Process Technology Products, Application
Manufacturing technology
Development
Output
2010 Device dimension
35nm
2020 25nm
2030 10nm
2040
5nm
2.5nm
1nm
Compound Semiconductor Nano-scale Logic Device Molecular Device Atomic Device High Definition Flexible Display 3-Dimension Display Ubiquitous Display Projection in Brain Health Care Chip Drug-Delivery system Bio-Mechanics-fusion Bio-Self-assembly Self-repairing Genome Device Ultra Efficient Solar Cell Super Efficient Photoelectric/Thermoelectric conversion New Energy Source Environmental Detox Hi-Efficient Agricultural/Marine production Nano Detox Global Restoration
Hi-Efficient Manufac. Tool
1 Atom-Accurate Manufac. Tool
Self Assemble Manufac. Tool
Engineering makes Seeds(Principle) to Production Technology Hi Precision / Hi Productivity / Large Area / Stable Production Technology Development for Feedback Control Technology using Monitor and Simulation Navigation Assist Process Tuning Pin-Point Control Pin-Point Design Monitor- ,Simulator - Friendly Reactor Design
Top-down Process Principle of Surface Reaction 1 Atom/Molecule Control Control of Functional Unit Organic/Bio Material Monochroic Flux Vertical/Lateral Atomically-controlled Depo/Etch Bio Molecular Manipulation
Seeds
Research
Principle of Species Generation Control Nano, μ - m scale, Lo - Hi Pressure, Gas/Liquid/Solid(Surface), Phase mix
Bottom-Up Process Principle of Selective Reaction/Self-Assemble Clarify & Realize of No-defect / Ultra Hi-Speed reaction Ultimate Controlled Beam Process for Defect Self-healing Perfect No-Defect Hi-Speed SelfSynergic Reaction in Large area Common Basic Technology Assembled films / Materials Diagnostics Ultimate precise No Disturb. 3D Flash Diag. Nano struct./Elec.Charact. Diag. Prognostic Diag. Simulation
Ultimate correct
Multi Scaled Time/Space Flash (intuitive) Algorithm
DATABASE : Atom, Molecule Reaction / Surface Reaction / Mechanism Plasma Electronics Division, JSAP
Sub map for Plasma Process Technology
Process Simulation Products, Application
Seeds
Manufacturing technology
2020
2030
Interactive type software Z
2040
Learning・Adaptive control software
Diagnostics ・ Visualization support tool Linkage with experiments, experiment control (Validation of simulation) Rule mining (Estimation for law of physics & chemistry via simulation)
Molecule scale(Molecular dynamics) Mesoscopic scale (Fluid・ Stochastic method)
Multi scale (Space, Time) Simulation
Micro scale (Continuous model) Fundamentals
Research
Development
Output
2010
Approximation・Modeling Technique including first-principle simulation High speed algorithm Collection & compile of Fundamental data(Cross-section, Potential, transport co. ,…)
ピ
Sub map for Plasma Process Technology
Micro fabrication Atom, molecule process control
Plasma for Nano process 2010 Tr.Gate siza
Atom・Molec. Process + Self-assembled Reaction
2020
25nm
18
13
2030 9
6
4.2
CMOS Precise etching
2040 2.9
2.1
1.4
1.0
Miniaturization Model for process control
±3.0nm
<±1.0nm以下 Prediction・simulation (Lower limitation) Fundamental database
±2.0nm
Low damage
Tool monitoring (Crosssection, Reactivity,…)
675mmΦ
Large area 300mmΦ
450mmΦ
Tool control & Operation technol.
Effect for Equipment Availability (Productivity)
Run-to-Run Control
Large wafer
Real-time control
In-Situ Control
FDC/EES Virtual Metrology Fault Prediction
Fault Prediction Culture change Fault Detection & Classification
Very Edge control Real-time monitoring
Real Time Feed Back
EEC *Equipment Engineering Contribution
Plasma for MEMS fabrication
The Present
Wafer Quality (Yield)
プロセス特性
Real time prediction of fluctuation
MEMS
Max Aspect ration
50
Autonomous ajustment
プロセス特性 Revolutional Precise 150 Hi Integrationレシピ 250 500 Robot, Bio, Ecology Fusion w/Semi, Optics Sensor, Mirror, Switch
Ultra hi-speed, directional etching
Si /Quartz: ~300 / ~30 um/min
・Thru via, both sides, 3D
New field
・Ultra hi density Ne:~1016/cm3 Radical: ~1018/cm3 ・Thermal plasma, ATP
・Large area,
~500 / ~50 um/min
・Ultra flatness :~1nm
Magetic, Organic, Bio, Ecology ・Low density ・Low temp/energy, Low damage, ・UV/VUV control
Plasma Nanoarchitectronics – a way towards SAFE, CLEAN, and ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY nanotechnology Constantly raising concerns about nano-safety issues Plasma nanotech offers safe, clean, and green solutions: Vacuum processing – no human exposure No chemical vaste (all “burns”)
Surface supported nanoparticles – nothing to inhale Hazards “burn” yet no CO2 emission
CONCLUSIONS
Plasma – “nano-pioneer” (nano-etching, CNTs) Self-organized arrays/devices are vitally needed
Deterministic non-equilibrium nanoarchitectronics based on guided self-organization is the way to achieve these goals
Non-equilibrium low-temp plasma environments offer many exciting possibilities to enable determinism
Platform for future SAFE and GREEN nanotechnologies A lot of exciting work ahead to solve the Grand Challenges for the Science and Imagination!
More details:
[email protected]
Magnetic control factors of self-organization [Meletis and Jiang, JNN 6, 1-4 (2006)] nanocolumns
Co NPs DLC
Solar cells: low dimensional single junction Plasma
p-(n)-type Si p-type substrate
(a) Before
Si
p-type substrate
(b) Plasma on
The maximum open-circuit voltage Voc is 522 mV, and the corresponding fill factor is 80.8%.
Voc strongly depends on the r the shape of the structure.
Si
p-type Si substrate
(c) After
E
Solar cells: single junction
(a) Voc=116 mV; FF=39.1%
(b) Voc=287 mV; FF=76.7%
(c) Voc=347 mV; FF=77.4%
(d) Voc=453 mV; FF=82.1%
(e) Voc=480 mV; FF=79.2%
(b) Voc=522 mV; FF=80.8%
Collaboration with IHPC – plasmonic enhancement
Akimov, Koh, Ostrikov, Optics Express 17, 10195 (2009).
Size, density, and arrangement of metal NPs are VERY important!
Nuclear fusion device (DPF) for making ZnO nanoparticles 100% made of ions and featuring room-temp PL !!!
[a]
Malhotra, Roy, Srivastava, Kant, Ostrikov [submitted to J. Phys. D, May 2009]
OUTLINE:
1. PLASMA NANOSCIENCE - AREA WE WORK IN 2. GRAND CHALLENGE FOR NANOSCIENCE: INTRODUCING NON-EQUILIBRIUM NANOARCHITECTRONICS 3. WHY PLASMA AND WHAT CAN PLASMA/IONS/E-FIELDS DO? 4. IMPLEMENTATION: TAILOR – ARRANGE – CONNECT 5. MORE RESULTS AND EXAMPLES OF APPLICATIONS
6. SO, WHERE IS THE CUTTING EDGE AND WHERE WILL IT LEAD TO?
Our International Network: > 15 countries Rochester Uni Technol, USA Chartered Semiconductors MFG SJTU, China
Zhejiang, China
NUS, IHPC, IMRE, IME (Singapore)
NTU, NIE Singapore
Uni Sydney, AUS
Uni Sydney, AUS PNCA@
LHMTI, Belarus
Uni Michigan, USA
George Washington Uni, USA Fudan Uni, China
Ruhr-Uni, Germany, EU
Kharkiv National Uni + Natl Aerospace Uni, Ukraine Huazhong Uni, China
Josef Stefan Inst, Slovenia, EU Nagoya Uni, Japan Plasma Nanotech CoE Uni Delhi, India
Nanocrystalline Si for PV solar cells applications 28 24
500
20
400
16
300
12 4
100
0 2007
Cover image: J. Mater Chemistry (June 2009)
2008 Year
2009
2
8
200
Jsc (mA/cm )
Voc (mV)
600