Performance Assessment One of the assessments that we analyze at Chesapeake High School is the PSAT/NMSQT results. The PSAT is the preliminary test to the SAT. This test is designed to measure the skills students have learned throughout their education. It tests critical reading skills, math problem-solving skills and writing skills. At a school level it aides in making academic decisions regarding a student’s course of study. It also allows the school to assist in counseling each student on when to take the SAT. The PSAT can also be an indicator of success in Advanced Placement (AP) courses. Students are encouraged to take these AP courses for four reasons: Earn College Credit and Advanced Placement Stand Out in the College Admissions Process Gain Skills that Will Help with College Success Exposure to the Possibilities of College Chesapeake High tests all 9th and 10th graders and a group of 11th graders identified as possible National Merit Scholars. After reviewing the PSAT data below, respond to the following: PSAT Correlation Chart The second column of the table below identifies the section(s) of the PSAT/NMSQT that were used to predict performance for each course and the strength of the correlation between PSAT/NMSQT performance and AP performance for each AP Exam. Since this test is designed to measure the skills students have learned throughout their education, how could vertical teaming within feeder patterns help to increase the number of students identified as having AP potential in each content area? Note: In 2004, the Verbal section of the PSAT/NMSQT was renamed Critical Reading, which is designated as "CR" in the table below.
AP Exam
PSAT/NMSQT Section Used
PSAT/NMSQT Correlation
Biology
CR + M
.656
Calculus AB
Math
.530
Calculus BC
Math
.484
Computer Science A
Math
.511
English Language
CR + W
.732
English Literature
CR + W
.727
Environmental Science
CR + M
.632
Government & Politics: United States
CR + M + W
.622
Macroeconomics
CR + M
.566
Microeconomics
CR + M
.549
Psychology
CR + M + W
.624
Statistics
CR + M
.617
U.S. History
CR + M + W
.603
World History
CR + M
.584
2009 AP Potential Chart – Chesapeake HS A pool reflects the probability of students receiving an AP® Exam grade of 3, 4, or 5. For example, if you set your pool at 61, your roster includes all students whose probability of receiving an AP Exam grade of 3, 4, or 5 is anywhere between 61% and 100%.
What advantage would there be for increasing or decreasing the 61%? What supports would be necessary if the pool was decreased from 61%? This pool reflects the comparative standard from around the country. Define Pool
Subject Biology
2009 Potential AP Students 13
Calculus AB
8
Calculus BC
8
Computer Science 8 A English Language 22
Define Pool
Subject
2009 Potential AP Students
Biology
29
Calculus AB
69
Calculus BC
69
Computer Science 30 A English Language 33 English Literature 22 Environmental Science
29
Macroeconomics
18
Microeconomics
29
Psychology
108
Statistics
29
6
U.S. Government & Politics
30
U.S. Government & Politics
5
U.S. History
30
U.S. History
15
World History
124
World History
29
English Literature 12 Environmental Science
13
Macroeconomics
6
Microeconomics
13
Psychology
30
Statistics
The pool % has been increased in this example. The pool % has been lowered in this example.
Define Pool
Subject
2009 Potential AP Students
Biology
1
Calculus AB
1
Calculus BC
1
Computer Science 0 A English Language 1 English Literature 1 Environmental Science
0
Macroeconomics
0
Microeconomics
0
Psychology
1
Statistics
0
U.S. Government & Politics
0
U.S. History
0
World History
1
2009 HSA English10-Chesapeake High English Students Count as Values A Passed May2009 1 9 Not May2009 1 Passed Totals 2 0
B 5 3 1 7 7 0
C 4 1 3 9 8 0
English D E All Final Grades 13 0 126 39 1 7 52 1 7
113 239
2009 MSA Reading-Sussex Elementary Basic
All Students
Proficient
Advanced
%
#
%
#
%
#
18.9
27 143
65.7
94 143
15.4
22 143
AMO Gap
4.6
2009 MSA Reading-Deep Creek Middle Basic
All Students
Proficient
Advanced
%
#
%
#
%
#
21.5
168 783
47.1
369 783
31.4
246 783
AMO Gap
2.6
The PSAT Correlation Chart previously used identifies Critical Reading as an area that is evaluated to determine AP Potential for every course area except for Calculus and Computer Science. Using the Chesapeake HSA data provided and the DCMS and Sussex Reading MSA data, what correlation can be made between student success on the MSA at the elementary and middle school levels, the HSA and the potential of students to be successful in AP courses?