Num Sol Of Navier

  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Num Sol Of Navier as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,215
  • Pages: 13
Numerical Solution of the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations Ae243 Biofluid Mechanics Term Project 4 June 2004

Georgios Matheou

The Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations • Why Care? – Life can not exist without fluids. – All biological flows are incompressible, i.e. no bird or fish flies/swims faster than M=0.3. – Internal flows are mostly laminar (makes things easier).

• In spite of their simplicity the Navier-Stokes describe flows at very low Reynolds numbers (creeping flows) up to complicated turbulent flows at large Reynolds numbers. • The equations:

u  0

– Continuity

– Momentum



u   u  u  p     u  u T t



 2

The Role of Pressure •

Taking the divergence of the Navier-Stokes we get

ui u j 1 2 D 2      u    p     x j xi  Dt  •





The solution with initial and boundary condition     u  0 is Δ=0 if, and only if, the right hand side is zero everywhere. Thus the pressure satisfies the Poisson equation: ui u j 2  p   x j xi The satisfaction of this Poisson equation is a necessary and sufficient condition for a divergence free velocity field to remain divergence free. The role of pressure is to enforce continuity, it is more a mathematical variable than a physical one. This observation leads to a strategy of solving the Navier-Stokes equations that imposes continuity by inverting a Poisson equation for a pressure-like variable.

3

The Problem – Shear Driven Cavity •

• • •

Some insects (dragonfly) have wings with well defined cross-sectional corrugation (Kesel, 2000). Vortices develop in the valleys of the profile. The flow in the cavity is driven by shear. For a square cavity there is only one parameter that characterizes the flow, the Reynolds number:

Re 

U lid L



Flow visualization at Re=0.01. (Taneda, 1979)

4

Staggered Grid • Staggered Grid (Harlow and Welsh, 1965) – Pressure is defined at the cell centers – Velocities are normal to the cell faces

• Attractive mathematical and physical properties – Do not display spurious pressure oscillations – Low memory requirements – Computationally efficient – Conservation properties (mass, momentum, kinetic energy, vorticity)

5

Numerical Method – Exact Fractional Step Method (Chang, 2002) • •

Goal: satisfy discrete incompressibility and eliminate the pressure equation Incompressibility constraint:  u  nˆ dS   u Si  0 CV



Define volume fluxes as Ui=u Si and define the vector q that has the Ui’s in some ordering. Then the above equation in matrix form is: Dq  0, where :



faces

 1 0 0 1 1 D    1 1 1 0 0

We can construct a matrix C which is the null space of D, that is D C=0

 1 0 1 0   1 1 0 0    C   0 1 1 0    0 0 1  1    1 0 0 1  6

Numerical Method – Exact Fractional Step Method (Chang, 2002) (cont.) •

C is a discrete curl operator that allows us to define a discrete streamfunction s at the vertices of the mesh:

q  Cs



A discrete gradient operator G can be defined as the transpose of D:

G  DT •



If we have a scalar quantity (like pressure), the discretized vector of which is φ, then G is the discrete version of Then:

p

CTG  CT DT  (DC)T   0

which reproduces the continuous identity:

  p  0 7

Finite Volume Formulation •

x-momentum equation u 1  u u  ˆ  d V  u u  n d S  pn d S  n  i, j  t i, j   x i, j Re  x x y ny dSi, j



Evaluate all integrals with the second order accurate midpoint rule (uniform grid spacing in x and y): x y





dui , j dt



 



 y ui2 1 , j  ui2 1 , j  x ui , j  1 vi  1 , j 1  ui , j  1 vi  1 , j  y  pi , j  pi 1, j   2

2

In operator form:

2

2

dui , j

2

2

 u   1  u u   u     y    y       Re   x i  12 , j x i  12 , j  y i , j  1 y i , j  1  2 2    

1 (u ) Li , j ui , j 2 dt Re Changing variables from velocity u to volume fluxes U, normalizing in order to clear the denominator of the pressure gradient, the two momentum equations for the vector of fluxes q become: dq 1 M  G  Re Lq  r  b dt  H i(,uj)   i  1 pi , j 

8

Elimination of Pressure and Time Marching • Substituting q=Cs and premultipling the system by CT the pressure is eliminated and the momentum equations are reduced to a single scalar equation for s: CTMC

ds 1 T  Re C LCs  CT (r  b) dt

• Using explicit Adams-Bashforth 2 for the convection terms and implicit trapezoidal for the viscous we get the discrete system of equations: t  n1 t  n 1   3  CT  M  L Cs  CT  M  L Cs  t CT  r n  r n1  b  2 Re  2 Re  2   2 

9

Verification – Re=100 •Comparison of steady state solution with data from Ghia et al (1982). •Simulation at Re=100 with grid resolution of 100×100. •Ghia resolution is 128×128. •Computed main vortex center at x=0.6188 and y=0.7396 •Ghia prediction at x=0.6172 and y=0.7344

Velocity along the midlines. Lines are the current computation, circles are data from Ghia. Streamlines of steady state solution at Re=100 10

Re=1000 – Grid: 200² - Velocity Field

11

Vorticity – Re=1000

t=1.00

t=2.25

t=7.25

t=14.75 12

References • W. Chang, F. Giraldo, and B. Perot. Analysis of an exact fractional step method. J. Comput. Phys., 180:183-199, 2002. • J. H. Ferziger and M. Peric. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer, 2002. • U. Ghia, K. N. Ghia, and C. T. Shin. High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method. J. Comput. Phys., 8:387, 1982. • F. H. Harlow and J. E. Welch. Numerical calculations of time dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with a free surface. Phys. Fluids, 8(12):2182, 1965. • A. B. Kesel. Aerodynamic characteristics of dragonfly wing sections compared with technical aerofoils. J. Exp. Biol., 203:3125, 2000. • S. B. Pope. Turbulent flows. Cambridge, 2000. • S. Taneda. Visualization of separating flows. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 46:1935, 1979.

13

Related Documents

Num Sol Of Navier
December 2019 0
Calculo Navier
June 2020 0
Sol
May 2020 27
Sol
November 2019 38
Sol
April 2020 12
Sol
October 2019 37