Module 9

  • Uploaded by: PSkots
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Module 9 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 943
  • Pages: 35
Aircraft Performance

Module 9

Where are we? 1 : Introduction to aircraft performance, atmosphere 2 : Aerodynamics, air data measurements 3 : Weights / CG, engine performance, level flight 4 : Turning flight, flight envelope 5 : Climb and descent performance 6 : Cruise and endurance 7 : Payload-range, cost index 8 : Take-off performance 9 : Take-off performance 10 : Enroute and landing performance 11 : Wet and contaminated runways 12 : Impact of performance requirements on aircraft design

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

2

Take-off Performance (Part 2)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

3

Forces acting on the aircraft

L

T D θ horizontal

Ff = μ(W-L)

W



Take-off performance (2 of 2)

4

Forces acting on the aircraft (cont’d) Friction force = Ff = µ (W-L) 

Two cases : brakes off and brakes on •

Brakes off (acceleration segment) •

FR = µ

R

(W-L)

-

µ -

R

= aircraft rolling friction coefficient

Typically, µ

R

= 0.02 on a hard runway surface

-

Brakes on (braking segment) •

FB = µ

B

(W-L)

-

µ -

B

= aircraft braking friction coefficient

Typically, µ

B

= 0.4 - 0.5 on a hard runway surface

-

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

5

Forces acting on the aircraft (cont’d) Lift and Drag 

CD and CL are defined for the aircraft in taxi attitude (α = 0 ) •

Ground effect must considered •

increase in CL and reduction in CD relative to free-air data -

Effect of Ground Lift Dumpers (GLD) deployment must be considered during a rejected take-off •

CL is reduced and CD is increased when GLD are deployed -

These effects improve stopping performance

-

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

6

Forces acting on the aircraft (cont’d) 



• • •



Weight component along the runway longitudinal axis Θ is typically varying from -2 % (downhill) to + 2 % (uphill) Special certification requirements apply when |θ| > 2 %

Thrust

• •

Take-off thrust rating Reduced take-off thrust or a derate may be used to preserve engine life if the take-off is not performance limited

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

7

Calculation of distances (α = 0)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

8

Calculation of distances (α = 0) (Cont’d) 

Take-off speeds (V1, VR, VLOF , V2, …) must first be converted from airspeeds to ground speeds







VG = V - Vwind

headwinds are positive for field performance analysis (!)

FAR / JAR 25 require that take-off and landing performance be based on factored wind speeds





50 % of the reported headwind and on 150 % of the reported tailwind

Example: for a reported headwind of 10 kts, calculations are based on a headwind 5 kts)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

9

Calculation of distances (α = 0) (Cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

10

Calculation of distances (α = 0) (Cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

11

Calculation of distances (α = 0) (cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

12

Calculation of distances (α = 0) (cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

13

Calculation of distances (VR to 35 ft)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

14

Calculation of distances (VR to 35 ft) (Cont’d)

OEI

AEO tance s i d r fo used ) t o n ( lation u c l a c

Take-off performance (2 of - θ2)

15

Calculation of distances (VR to 35 ft) (Cont’d)

OEI

AEO

Take-off performance (2 of 2) - θ

16

T.O. – Take-off parameter

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

17

T.O. – Take-off parameter (cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

18

T.O. – Performance-limited take-off weight

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

19

T.O. – Brake energy considerations 



A very large amount of energy may be absorbed by the brakes during a rejected take-off

The energy absorbed by each braked wheel during a stop (BRKE) is calculated by integration of the braking force FB over distance increments ∆ s



BRKE = FB ∆ s / nbrakes

Where : BRKE = brake energy absorbed per braked wheel (ft-lb) nbrakes = number of braked wheels



If a simplified methodology is used (calculation of average acceleration at VRMS ), BRKE is evaluated with the same equation but FB is evaluated at VRMS

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

20

T.O. – Brake energy considerations (Cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

21

T.O. – Brake energy considerations (cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

22

T.O. – Tire speed limits

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

23

T.O. – Take-off WAT limits

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

24

T.O. – Take-off WAT limits (cont’d)

Requirement 25.121 ( a ) 25.121 ( b ) 25.121 ( c )

Name

Flap/Slat Ldg gear

First segment climb Take-off Second segment climbTake-off Final segment climb Retracted

down up up

Thrust

Speed Min. grad. Req'd

TO, OEI VLOFOEI TO, OEI V2 MCT, OEI VFTO

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

0% 2.40% 1.20%

25

T.O. – Take-off WAT limits (cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

26

T.O. – Take-off WAT limits (cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

27

T.O. – Obstacle clearance

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

28

T.O. – Obstacle clearance (cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

29

T.O. – Obstacle clearance (cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

30

T.O. – Obstacle clearance (cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

31

T.O. – Improved climb

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

32

T.O. – Improved climb (cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

33

T.O. – Runway weight chart

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

34

T.O. – Runway weight chart (Cont’d)

Take-off performance (2 of 2)

35

Related Documents

Module 9
May 2020 11
Module 9
December 2019 15
Wimmer Module 9 Activity
November 2019 15

More Documents from "John Fritz Singh"

Module 3
May 2020 23
Module 8
May 2020 25
Module 7
May 2020 23
Module 6
May 2020 21
Module 2
May 2020 23
Module 10
May 2020 15