MITOCHONDRIAL DNA VARIATION OF CULTURED AND WILD ASIAN SEABASS (Lates calcarifer) IN THAILAND Yusmansy a ID. h 50912419 Department of Aquatic Science, Faculty of Science, Burapha University
I.
Introduction
Statement and Significance of The Problem Objectives Contribution to Knowledge Scope of Study Hypothesis
II. Literature Review Biology of Asian Seabass Ecology and distribution Genetic Processes in Populations mtDNA as genetic marker for population genetic analyses Molecular techniques for mtDNA analysis
I. Introduction •Statement
and Significance of The Problem
•Objectives •Contribution to Knowledge •Scope of Study •Hypothesis
I. Introduction
Background
FAO, 2006
I. Introduction
Background
• Thailand is a major producer of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) fingerlings, mainly produced in hatcheries • Well managed breeding program is important to produce good quality fingerlings • Success of a breeding program highly depends on broodstock management maintaining genetic diversity
I. Introduction
Problem
Loss genetic diversity in hatcheries due to inapropriate hatchery practises, such as:
- Mating limited number of broodstock - Mass spawning that lead to unequal sex ratio and contribution of each families
I. Introduction
Consequences of the Problem Reduced genetic diversity may lead to undesirable consequences on traits reated to production, for instance:
- Resistance to the disease stress - Adaptive potential to the environmental stress
How to overcome the Problem Managing broodstock that able to maintain genetic diversity. Broodstock collection Design of mating scheme Rearing practice Introducing variation from Wild populations. Wild populations are potential source of genetic variation, because wild populations usually have larger population size (Ne) -> likely contain higher genetic variation
To implement both alternatives, genetic data
Molecular tools to evaluate
genetic data
Heterozygosity of nuclear DNA and genetic distance Allozyme Sequencing Microsatellite Haplotype and nucleotide diversity of mtDNA Genomic RFLP PCR -RFLP Direct sequencing
Molecular tools to evaluate
genetic data (cont.) Smaller genome size than nuclear DNA mtDNA is generally very sensitive to detect population structure due to lower Ne than nuclear DNA Nucleotide substitution rate higher than nuclear DNA Not subject to recombination
Objective of the Study 1
Estimate genetic variation within hatchery, and wild
populations of L. calcarifer using PCR-RFLP of the Dloop control region of mitochondrial DNA
2
Examine population differentiation among hatchery
and wild populations
Contribution to knowledge 1 The genetic data will be useful in managing existing genetic diversity in hatchery populations of L. calcarifer in Thailand
2 This data should be useful for breeders and government in order to develop a selective breeding program for L. calcarifer species
3
Data for wild populations will provide basic information to aid conservation efforts of
native genepool of L. calcarifer in Thailand
Scope of study
1 Analysis: mtDNA control region 2 Samples taken from 3 hatchery and 2 wild populations located around Gulf of Thailand, represent broodstock supplying fingerling in Thailand
3
Technique: Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) – Restriction Fragment Length
Polymorphisms (RFLP)
Hypothesis 1 Level of genetic variation within hatchery populations of L. calcarifer is lower than of wild populations.
2 Genetic differentiation among wild L. calcarifer populations is high, but the differences among hatchery populations are low
II. Literature Review •
Biology of Asian Seabass
•
Ecology and distribution
•
Genetic Processes in Populations
•
mtDNA as genetic marker for population genetic analyses
•
Molecular techniques for mtDNA analysis
•
Genetic Diversity of Asian seabass and fish species with similar life history
Literat Rure eview
Biology of Asian Seabass
Classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Actinopterygii Order: Perciformes Family: Centropomidae Genus: Lates Species: Lates calcarifer
Source: fishase.org
Literat Rure eview
Biology of Lates calcarifer Catadromous-demersal (Moore, 1982) Larvae and young juveniles live in estuaries, older juveniles inhabit the upper reaches of rivers (Moore & Reynolds, 1982) Vertical migration reaches maximum 70 Km, horizontal migration maximum 17 Km (Russel & Garrett, 1988)
Literat Rure eview
Biology of Lates calcarifer Growth Parameter:
Protandrous hermaphrodites
Individual is sexualy matured as male in the first time, then gonad structure develops into female in the following ages (Moore, 1979)
Literat Rure eview
Ecology & Distribution
Single annual reproductive period (Davis, 1985; Guiguen et al., 1994)
Adult -> Carnivorous; Juveniles -> Omnivorous (Sirimontaporn, 1988) Important food: Crustacean, decapoda, mysidacea, Isopoda (Cabral & Costa, 2001), and Amphipods (Laffaile et al., 2001)
Literat Rure eview
Ecology & Distribution Asian seabass distributed spread along Indo-West Pacific: eastern edge of the Persian Gulf to China, Taiwan and southern Japan, southward to southern Papua New Guinea (Larson, 1999), Indonesia and Australia (Marshall, 2005)
World geographic distribution of L. calcariifer (Retrieved from FIGIS-FAO, http://www.fao.ofg/figis/)
Literat Rure eview
Genetic Processes In Populations
Mutations
Primary source of genetic variation in populations
Two major types of mutations: Point (gene) mutations and Chromosomal mutations
Change could be due to base pair substitution, insertion or deletion Chromosomal mutation
Literat Rure eview
Genetic Processes In Populations
Genetic drift
Is change in allele frequency in a population in succesive generations due to random process
Magnitude of genetic drift in a population depend on deviation level from an ideal condition
In general, genetic drift occurs when the founder population size is small Mitochondrial DNA has lower population size (Ne) than nuclear DNA, therefore more susceptible to genetic drift effects
Literat Rure eview
Genetic Processes In Populations
Gene flow
Is any movement of alleles from one population to another through recombination of sexual reproduction
Gene flow will increase or maintain genetic variation in a population, but decrease distinctiveness among populations.
Gene flow in mtDNA can be indicated by haplotype share between genetically related populations
Literat Rure eview
Genetic Processes In Populations
Natural selection
Unequal probability of survived or reproduced alleles to the future generation causes genetic variation change
Major factor leads to the natural selection process in a populations the differential survival or reproduction of genotypes
Alleles associated with favorable heritable traits become more common, while unfavorable ones become less common.
Literat Rure eview
Mitochondrial DNA as genetic marker for Population genetic Analysis
• Uniparental inheritance • Relatively small effective population size than nucleus DNA • Higher mutation rate • Powerful for detecting patterns of genetic structure in natural systems
courses.washington.edu/fish340/Lab%20Pro ject.htm
Literat Rure eview
Molecular Techniques for Mitochondrial DNA Analysis Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLP) Detecting nucleotide variation based on specific restriction site recognition of : • Whole genomic DNA, or • Specific region, e.g. control region, cytochrome b
Direct Sequencing Determination of the order of nucleotide bases, i.e. Adenine(A), Guanine (G), Cytosine (C) and Thymine (T). Direct sequencing has higher sensitivity in detecting nucleotide
Bernatchez & Danzmann (1993) suggested congruence of the magnitude of variation and differentiation resulted from RFLP and sequencing analysis
Literat Rure eview
Genetic diversity of L. calcarifer And fish species with similar life history
Genetic variation within population • Genetic variation in wild population of L. calcarifer is relatively high
Literat Rure eview
Genetic diversity of L. calcarifer And fish species with similar life history
Genetic variation within population • Genetic variation in hatchery population is lower than wild populations
• In some cases, genetic variation within hatchery may higher than wild because of it consist of individual coming from genetically distinct sources
Literat Rure eview
Genetic diversity of L. calcarifer And fish species with similar life history
Genetic differentiation among populations • Genetic differentiation among wild population is much lower than within population, suggesting presence of population structure
Literat Rure eview
Genetic diversity of L. calcarifer And fish species with similar life history
Migration pattern • Indicated stepping stone model of migration dimensional linear structure along the river
one
• This migration pattern will preserve the genetic diversity rather among population
Picture reference: Neal, D. (2004) Introduction to population biology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge - UK
Literat Rure eview
Genetic data
Analysis
Genetic diversity within population Haplotype diversity Nucleotide diversity
Genetic differentiation among population Mean number of genetic differentiation between two randomly chosen haplotypes
Genetic differentiation also can be indicated by Φstatistics by using Analysis of Molecular Variation (AMOVA) developed by Excoffier, Smouse & Quattro (1992)
Literat Rure eview
Genetic data
Analysis
Genetic distance
Genetic distance can be estimated from 3 ways:
• From the proportion of nucleotide substitution • Pairwise FST values derived based on drift model • Average number of restriction site differences between populations (D)
Relationship among populations Relationship among population can be constructed using Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method based on pairwise genetic distance values.
Research methodology III. Research Methodology Samples collection DNA extraction
PCR amplification Enzyme digestion Data Analysis
Collecti
Research methodology
Sampl es
on
3 2 4
5
1
Collecti
Research methodology
Sampl es
Sampling Design
on
30-40 individuals per sample
Collecti
Research methodology
Sampl es
on
• Cut small amount caudal fin • Sample preserved in 95% Ethanol • Labeling
Digestio Cell
n
• Cut small amount 0,5 mm sample. • Insert to Lysis buffer + Proteinase K • Incubate overnight at 55oC
Extraction
Research methodology
DNA
Salting out method
NaCl saturated H2O
Amplification
Research methodology PCR
PCR-Reaction
• Primers – 2 pmole each LN20 (5’-ACC ACT AGC ACC CAA AGC TA-3’) HN20 (5’-GTG TTA TGC TTT AGT TAA GC-3’)
• • • • • •
PCR-Profile
Initial denaturing 94oC 1 min
1x PCR Buffer 2mM dNTPs, 0.4 mM MgCl2, Taq Polymerase, dH2O DNA template
35 Cycles 9 4 o 2 C 0oC 60s 60s
7 2oC 90s
Final extention 72oC 10 min
Digestion enzym e
Research methodology
7 Restriction enzymes will be used: • HindII, FauI, EcoRV, EcoRI, BstENI, Bse1I, EcoNI 10 µl RFLP-Reaction contains: • 1 µl - 1x Digestion Buffer • 2 µl - PCR product template • 0.1 µl – 2 u/ µl restriction enzyme • 6.9 µl dH2O Incubate overnight at 37oC (FauI); 37oC (HindII, EcoRI, EcoRV, EcoNI); and 65oC(Bse1I & BstENI)
Digestion enzym e
Research methodology
Scoring design for composite haplotype assignment
Composite haplotype is then rearranged to assigned the haplotype frequency
Digestion enzym e
Research methodology
Scoring for present/absence of the fragment position
The composite of present/absence (0/1 binary data format) is required for data analysis in Arlequin program, for example RA1 01100011 RA2 10001000 RA3 01100110
Analysis
Research methodology
data
Genetic diversity within populations haplotype diversity within and population, derived from formula where xi2 = frequency of sample of the ith haplotype; n = number of sample, l=number of nucleotide (Nei and Tajima, 1980)
Nucleotide diversity derived from formula proposed by Nei and Li (1990) where xi and xj = frequency of ith and jth haplotype; Πij = number of nucleotide differences per nucleotide sites between ith and jth haplotype.
Π = Σij xi xj Πij Haplotype and nucleotide diversity will be performed using Analysis of Molecular variation (AMOVA) in the Arlequin program
Analysis
Research methodology
data
Genetic differentiation among populations Genetic differentiation can be indicated by Φ-statistics developed by Excoffier, Smouse & Quattro (1992) by calculating ΦST, ΦSC, and ΦCT, as the correlation of random haplotypes among groups, among populations within a group, and among individuals within a population.
ΦST
ΦSC
ΦCT
Where , , and are the associated covariance component for groups, populations within a group, within populations, and total variation.
These calculations can be performed by AMOVA in the Arlequin program
Analysis
Research methodology
data
Genetic differentiation among populations Design for hierarchical Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA)
Analysis
Research methodology
data
Genetic differentiation among populations Design for hierarchical Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) in the Arlequin program
Analysis
Research methodology
data
Genetic distance
Genetic distance can be calculated based on average number of restriction site differences between populations (D) (Nei & Li, 1979). The difference between populations A and B ( AB) where k & k’ = the number of distinct haplotypes in populations A and B, respectively, xAi is the frequency of the i-th haplotype in population A, and δij is the number of restriction site differences between haplotype i and haplotypes j
Distance between population 1 and 2, and other OTU j can be calculated by where D1j and D2j are the distance between OTU 1 and OTU j; and OTU 2 OTU j, respectively.
Analysis
Research methodology
data
Population relationships will be constructed using Neighbor-Joining method based on Nei genetic distance and visualized by a consensus (bootstrap 1000 replicates) using PHYLIP program Consensed dendogram then will be visualized using TreeView Program
Thank You
Thank You